A prospective randomised clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques for the insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway in adults-index finger insertion technique versus 90° rotation technique;Yetişkinlerde proseal laringeal maske havayolunun takılmasında kullanılan iki yöntemin karş ılaştırılması için yapılan prospektif randomize bir klinik çalışma-işaret parmağı kullanarak takma tekniği ve 90° rotasyonla takma tekniği

Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisi

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 98-102

  Dhulkhed, Pavan V ^a,b   Khyadi, Sunil V ^c   Jamale, Parbati B ^a   Dhulkhed, Vithal K ^a  

^a KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c BLDE UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

90 rotation technique; Airway management; Laryngeal masks; LMA insertion techniques; ProSeal LMA

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018484546     PISSN: 13040871     EISSN: 1305614X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.70298     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’--a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-4. [CrossRef]
2. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the proseal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 262-6. [CrossRef]
3. Nakayama S, Osaka Y, Yamashita M. The rotational technique with a partially inflated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 4169. [CrossRef]
4. Koay CK, Yoong CS, Kok P. A randomized trial comparing two laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29: 613-5.
5. Soh CR, Ng ASB. Laryngeal mask airway insertion in paediatric anesthesia: comparison between the reverse and standard techniques. Anaesth Intense Care 2001; 29: 515-9.
6. Khan RM (ed). Supraglottic airway devices. In: Airway Management – Made Easy. A manual for Clinical Practitioners and Examinees. Paras Medical Publishers, Hyderabad, 2005; 12: 82-95.
7. Brimacombe JR. In: Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia - Principles and Practice (2nd Edn), Saunders, Philadelphia 2005.
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. In: The Upper Airway and Anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin N Am Dec 2002; 20: 871-91. [CrossRef]
9. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 527-33. [CrossRef]
10. Brimacombe J, Berry A. Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway-A prospective study of four techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 89-92.
11. Watanabe K, Nakayama S, Yamashita M. The rotational technique with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway does not improve the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 598-9. [CrossRef]
12. Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7. [CrossRef]
13. Matta BF, Marsh DS, Nevin M. Laryngeal mask airway: more successful method of insertion. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 132-5. [CrossRef]
14. Wakeling HG, Butler PJ, Baxter PJ. The laryngeal mask airway: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Anaesth Analg 1997; 85: 687-90. [CrossRef]
15. Sharma B, Sahai C, Bhattacharya A, Kumra VP, Sood J. Proseal Laryngeal mask airway: A study of 100 consecutive cases of laproscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2003; 47: 467-72.
16. Haghighi M, Mohammadzadeh A, Naderi B, Seddighinejad A, Movahedi H. Comparing two methods of LMA insertion; classic versus simplified (airway). MEJ Anesth 2010; 20: 509-14.
17. Brimacombe J, Berry A. Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Aprospective study of four techniques. Anaesth Intense Care 1993; 21: 89-92.
18. Saraswat N, Kumar A, Mishra A, Gupta A, Saurabh G, Srivastava U. The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2011; 55: 129-34. [CrossRef]
19. Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, Oh AY, Park HP, Yun MJ, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 211-5. [CrossRef]
20. Brodrik PM, Webster NR, Nunn JF. The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing. Anesthesia 1989; 44: 238-41.
21. Kumar D, Khan M, Ishaq M. Rotational vs. Standard Smooth Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Adults. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012; 22: 275-9.
22. Yun M, Hwang J, Oh A, Han M, Kim H, Na H, et al. Comparison of two insertion techniques of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90° rotation in pediatric patients. Critical Care 2010; 14(Suppl 1): 215. [CrossRef]
23. Yun M, Hwang J, Sang-Heon Park, Sung-Hee Han, HeePyoung Park, et al. The 90° rotation technique improves the ease of insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in children. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 379-83. [CrossRef]