Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 398-403

  García Aguado, Roberto ^a   Viñoles, Juan ^b   Brimacombe, Joseph ^c   Vivó, Miguel ^a   López Estudillo, Rosario ^b   Ayala, Guillermo ^d  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR PESET   (Spain)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MOUTH INJURY; OCCULT BLOOD; PHARYNX; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT INJURY; SORE THROAT; TIME; TUBE;

EID: 33646344716     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022507     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-4.
2. Brimacombe J. ProSeal LMA for ventilation and airway protection. In: Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and Practice. London: WB Saunders; 2005, 505-38.
3. Garcia-Aguado R, Vivo M, Dura R, et al. New method for inserting the Proseal laryngeal mask using an aspiration catheter in a case of difficult airway. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2004; 51: 58-9.
4. Drolet P, Girard M. An aid to correct positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 718-9.
5. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Awake fibreoptic-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 719.
6. Howarth A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 624-7.
7. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, Asai T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1167-70.
8. LMA ProSeal™ Instruction Manual, 1st ed. San Diego: LMA North America Inc; 2000.
9. Brimacombe J. Placement phase. In: Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and Practice. London: WB Saunders; 2005, 265-80.
10. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.
11. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 127-9.
12. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A, Mitchell S. Assessing ProSeal laryngeal mask positioning: the suprasternal notch test (reply). Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1375.
13. Parker MR, Day CJ. Visible and occult blood contamination of laryngeal mask airways and tracheal tubes used in adult anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 388-90.
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-9.
15. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Vosoba Judd D. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9.
16. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 770-6.
17. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 534-9.
18. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Stability of the ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions. A randomised crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 65-9.
19. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the Proseal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 262-6.
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-95.
21. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, et al. The ProSeal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 824-5.
22. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Brimacombe L. The laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ as a temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 737-40.
23. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puehringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1351-3.
24. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics: part 5, statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 1054-9.
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A. Gastric insufflation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1614-5.
26. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32: 681-4.