Comparison of three insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized clinical trial

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 510-514

  Nalini, Kadirehally ^a   Shivakumar, Shivanna ^a   Archana, Shivashankar ^a   Sandhya Rani, Doddagavanahalli ^a   Mohan, Chadalavada ^a  

^a M S RAMAIAH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Insertion technique; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway; success rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PHARYNGOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; SORE THROAT;

EID: 85000741793     PISSN: 09709185     EISSN: 22312730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.194774     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Khan RM, Maroof M. Airway management made easy. 2nd ed. Paras; Hyderabad, India; 2007. p. 122-7.
2. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-A laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:650-4.
3. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000;91:1017-20.
4. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:739-60.
5. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:286-7.
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93:104-9.
7. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000;85:262-6.
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Pühringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1351-3.
9. Brimacombe J, Irving S, Keller C. Ease of placement of LMA Proseal with a gastric tube inserted. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1817.
10. Drolet P, Girard M. An aid to correct positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:718-9.
11. García-Aguado R, Viñoles J, Brimacombe J, Vivó M, López-Estudillo R, Ayala G. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:398-403.
12. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kihara S. Gum elastic bougieguided placement of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:528-9.
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Awake fibreoptic-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2002;57:719.
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004;100:25-9.
15. Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009;110:905-7.
16. Koay CK, Yoong CS, Kok P. A randomized trial comparing two laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001;29:613-5.
17. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:527-33.
18. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Stadlbauer KH, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1253-6.
19. Kuppusamy A, Azhar N. Comparison of bougie-guided insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway with digital technique in adults. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:35-9.
20. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Barragan L, Keller C. Bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway has higher first attempt success rate than the digital technique in children. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:238-41.
21. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, King JA, Roux P, Bennett P, et al. The proseal laryngeal mask: Results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:534-9.
22. Tan SM, Sim YY, Koay CK. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection in male and female patients in an Asian population. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33:239-42.