Comparison of two insertion techniques of proseal™ laryngeal mask airway: Standard versus 90-degree rotation

Anesthesiology

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 905-907

  Hwang, Jung Won ^a   Park, Hee Pyoung ^a   Lim, Young Jin ^a   Do, Sang Hwan ^a   Lee, Sang Chul ^a   Jeon, Young Tae ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPOPHARYNX; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349185468     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5d40     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C: The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2000; 93:104-9
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puhringer F: Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:1351-3
3. Keller C, Brimacombe J: Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:262-6
4. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, Garcia de Lucas E, Capdevilla X, Brimacombe N: A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2002; 96:289-95
5. Drolet P, Girard M: An aid to correct positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48:718-9
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C: Awake íbreoptic-guided insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:719
7. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kihara S: Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49:528-9
8. Garcia-Aguado R, Vinoles J, Brimacombe J, Vivo M, Lopez-Estudillo R, Ayala G: Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53:398-403
9. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV: Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2004; 100:25-9
10. LMATM Airway Instruction Manual. San Diego, LMA North America, 2005 11. Soh CR, Ng AS: Laryngeal mask airway insertion in paediatric anaesthesia: Comparison between the reverse and standard techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29:515-9
11. Nakayama S, Osaka Y, Yamashita M: The rotational technique with a partially inłated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12:416-9
12. Brimacombe J, Berry A: Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway-A prospective study of four techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21:89-92
13. Watanabe K, Nakayama S, Yamashita M: The rotational technique with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway does not improve the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16:598-9
14. Grady DM, McHardy F, Wong J, Jin F, Tong D, Chung F: Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients: Does size matter? ANESTHESIOLOGY 2001; 94:760-6