Organs-on-Chips as Bridges for Predictive Toxicology

Applied In Vitro Toxicology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 97-102

  Hutson, M Shane ^a   Alexander, Peter G ^a,b   Allwardt, Vanessa ^a   Aronoff, David M ^a,c,d   Bruner Tran, Kaylon L ^a,c   Cliffel, David E ^a   Davidson, Jeffrey M ^a,d,e   Gough, Albert ^a,f   Markov, Dmitry A ^a,d,g   McCawley, Lisa J ^a,d,g   McKenzie, Jennifer R ^a   McLean, John A ^a   Osteen, Kevin G ^a,c,d,e   Pensabene, Virginia ^a,g   Samson, Philip C ^a   Senutovitch, Nina K ^a,f,h   Sherrod, Stacy D ^a   Shotwell, Matthew S ^a   Taylor, D Lansing ^a,f,h   Tetz, Lauren M ^a,c   Tuan, Rocky S ^a,b   Vernetti, Lawrence A ^a,f   Wikswo, John P ^a,d,g   more..

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; CELL CULTURE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENT BIOSENSOR; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; ORGANS ON CHIPS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 85017140815     PISSN: 23321512     EISSN: 23321539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/aivt.2016.0003     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. National Research Council. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century, A Vision and a Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
2. Dix DJ, Houck KA, Martin MT, et al. The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol Sci 2007:95;5-12.
3. Kavlock R. The future of toxicity testing-The NRC vision and the EPA's ToxCast program national center for computational toxicology. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2009:31;237.
4. Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, et al. In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: The ToxCast Project. Environ Health Perspect 2010: 118;485-492.
5. Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Reif DM, et al. Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening. Environ Health Perspect 2011:119;1596-1603.
6. Martin MT, Dix DJ, Judson RS, et al. Impact of environmental chemicals on key transcription regulators and correlation to toxicity end points within EPA's ToxCast Program. Chem Res Toxicol 2010:23;578-590.
7. Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Reif DM, et al. Predictive model of rat reproductive toxicity from ToxCast high throughput screening. Biol Reprod 2011:85;327-339.
8. Sipes NS, Martin MT, Reif DM, et al. Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast highthroughput screening data. Toxicol Sci 2011:124;109-127.
9. Thomas RS, Black MB, Li LL, et al. A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using highthroughput in vitro screening. Toxicol Sci 2012:128;398-417.
10. Ghaemmaghami AM, Hancock MJ, Harrington H, et al. Biomimetic tissues on a chip for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2012:17;173-181.
11. Huh D, Torisawa YS, Hamilton GA, et al. Microengineered physiological biomimicry: Organs-on-chips. Lab Chip 2012:12;2156-2164.
12. van der Meer AD, van den Berg A. Organs-on-chips: Breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012:4;461-470.
13. Wikswo JP. The relevance and potential roles of microphysiological systems in biology and medicine. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2014:239;1061-1072.
14. Wikswo JP, Porter AP. Biology coming full circle: Joining the whole and the parts. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2015: 240;3-7.
15. Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, et al. Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2010:29;730-741.
16. Senutovitch N, Vernetti L, Boltz R, et al. Fluorescent protein biosensors applied to microphysiological systems. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2015:240;795-808.
17. Wikswo JP, Block III FE, Cliffel DE, et al. Engineering challenges for instrumenting and controlling integrated organ-on-a-chip systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013: 60;682-690.
18. Eklund SE, Snider RM, Wikswo J, et al. Multianalyte microphysiometry as a tool in metabolomics and systems biology. J Electroanal Chem 2006:587;333-339.
19. Eklund SE, Thompson RG, Snider RM, et al. Metabolic discrimination of select list agents by monitoring cellular responses in a multianalyte microphysiometer. Sensors 2009:9;2117-2133.
20. Kimmel DW, Dole WP, Cliffel DE. Application of multianalyte microphysiometry to characterize macrophage metabolic responses to oxidized LDL and effects of an apoA-1 mimetic. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013:431;181-185.
21. Kimmel DW, Meschievitz ME, Hiatt LA, et al. Multianalyte microphysiometry of macrophage responses to phorbol myristate acetate, lipopolysaccharide, and lipoarabinomannan. Electroanalysis 2013:25;1706-1712.
22. Kimmel DW, Rogers LM, Aronoff DM, et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulation of macrophage innate immunity. Chem Res Toxicol 2016:29;19-25.
23. Snider RM, McKenzie JR, Kraft L, et al. The effects of cholera toxin on cellular energy metabolism. Toxins (Basel) 2010:2;632-648.
24. Venmar KT, Kimmel DW, Cliffel DE, et al. IL4 receptor alpha mediates enhanced glucose and glutamine metabolism to support breast cancer growth. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015:1853;1219-1228.
25. van Meerloo J, Kaspers GJ, Cloos J. Cell sensitivity assays: The MTT assay. Methods Mol Biol 2011:731;237-245.
26. Wilson AP. Cytotoxicity and viability assays. In: Animal Cell Culture: A Practical Approach, Vol 1. JR Masters (ed); pp. 175-220. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
27. Kimmel DW, LeBlanc G, MeschievitzME, et al. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Anal Chem 2012:84;685-707.
28. McKenzie JR, Cognata AC, Davis AN, et al. Real-time monitoring of cellular bioenergetics with a multianalyte screen-printed electrode. Anal Chem 2015:87;7857-7864.
29. Eklund SE, Cliffel DE, Kozlov E, et al. Modification of the CytosensorTM microphysiometer to simultaneously measure extracellular acidification and oxygen consumption rates. Anal Chim Acta 2003:496;93-101.
30. Eklund SE, Taylor D, Kozlov E, et al. A microphysiometer for simultaneous measurement of changes in extracellular glucose, lactate, oxygen, and acidification rate. Anal Chem 2004:76;519-527.
31. Velkovsky M, Snider R, Cliffel DE, et al. Modeling the measurements of cellular fluxes in microbioreactor devices using thin enzyme electrodes. J Math Chem 2011:49;251-275.
32. Enders JR, Marasco CC, Wikswo JP, et al. A dual-column solid phase extraction strategy for online collection and preparation of continuously flowing effluent streams for mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2012:84;8467-8474.
33. Marasco CC, Enders JR, Seale KT, et al. Real-time cellular exometabolome analysis with a microfluidic-mass spectrometry platform. PLoS One 2013:10;Article e0117685.
34. Marasco CC, Goodwin CR, Winder DG, et al. Systems-level view of cocaine addiction: The interconnection of the immune and nervous systems. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2014:239;1433-1442.
35. May JC, Goodwin CR, McLean JA. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry strategies for untargeted systems, synthetic, and chemical biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015:31;117-121.
36. May JC, McLean JA. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry: Timedispersive instrumentation. Anal Chem 2015:87;1422-1436.
37. Enders JR, Goodwin CR, Marasco CC, et al. Advanced structural mass spectrometry for systems biology: Pulling the needles from haystacks. Spectrosc Supp Curr Trends Mass Spectrom 2011:July;18-23.
38. Enders JR, Marasco CC, Wikswo JP, et al. A dual-column solid phase extraction strategy for online collection and preparation of continuously flowing effluent streams for mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2012:84;8467-8474.
39. Hines KM, Enders JR, McLean JA. Multidimensional separations by ion mobility-mass spectrometry. In: Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry (online; DOI: 10. 1002/9780470027318. A9313). RA Myers, D Muddiman (eds). New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
40. Kliman M, May JC, McLean JA. Lipid analysis and lipidomics by structurally selective ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2011:1811;935-945.
41. Li S, Park Y, Duraisingham S, et al. Predicting network activity from high throughput metabolomics. Plos Comput Biol 2013:9;e1003123.
42. Goodwin CR, Covington BC, Derewacz DK, et al. Structuring microbial metabolic responses to multiplexed stimuli via self-organizing metabolomics maps. Chem Biol 2015: 22;661-670.
43. Hines KM, Ballard BR, Marshall DR, et al. Structural mass spectrometry of tissue extracts to distinguish cancerous and non-cancerous breast diseases. Mol Biosyst 2014:10;2827-2837.
44. Goodwin CR, Fenn LS, Derewacz DK, et al. Structural mass spectrometry: Rapid methods for separation and analysis of peptide natural products. J Nat Prod 2012:75;48-53.
45. Goodwin CR, Sherrod SD, Marasco CC, et al. Phenotypic mapping of metabolic profiles using self-organizing maps of high-dimensional mass spectrometry data. Anal Chem 2014:86;6563-6571.
46. Hines KM, Ashfaq S, Davidson JM, et al. Biomolecular signatures of diabetic wound healing by structural mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2013:85;3651-3659.
47. Marasco CC, Enders JR, Seale KT, et al. Real-time cellular exometabolome analysis with a microfluidic-mass spectrometry platform. PLoS One 2015:10;e0117685.
48. Matusch A, Fenn LS, Depboylu C, et al. Combined elemental and biomolecular mass spectrometry imaging for probing the inventory of tissue at a micrometer scale. Anal Chem 2012:84;3170-3178.
49. Brown JA, Sherrod SD, Goodwin CR, et al. Metabolic consequences of interleukin-6 challenge in developing neurons and astroglia. J Neuroinflamm 2014:11;Article 183.
50. Kumar KK, Goodwin CR, Uhouse MA, et al. Untargeted metabolic profiling identifies interactions between Huntington's disease and neuronal manganese status. Metallomics 2015:7;363-370.
51. Shi M, Majumdar D, Gao Y, et al. Glia co-culture with neurons in microfluidic platforms promotes the formation and stabilization of synaptic contacts. Lab Chip 2013:13; 3008-3021.
52. Sherrod SD, McLean JA. Systems-wide high-dimensional data acquisition and informatics using structural mass spectrometry strategies. Clin Chem 2016:62;77-83.
53. Wu MH, Huang SB, Lee GB. Microfluidic cell culture systems for drug research. Lab Chip 2010:10;939-956.
54. Vernetti LA, Senutovitch N, Boltz R, et al. A human liver microphysiology platform for investigating physiology, drug safety, and disease models. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2016:241;101-114.