Rationality Through Reasoning

Rationality Through Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-302

  Broome, John ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016386089     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118609088     Document Type: Book

References (189)

1. Adler, Jonathan, Belief ' s Own Ethics, MIT Press, 2002.
2. Alston, William P., ' The deontological conception of epistemic justifi cation ', Philosophical Perspectives, 2 (1988), pp. 257-99.
3. Anscombe, Elizabeth, Intention, Blackwell, 1957.
4. Arpaly, Nomy, Unprincipled Virtue, Oxford University Press, 2003.
5. Arpaly, Nomy and Timothy Schroeder, ' Deliberation and acting for reasons ', Philosophical Review, 12 1 (2012), pp. 209-39.
6. Audi, Robert, The Architecture of Reason, Oxford University Press, 2001.
7. Audi, Robert, ' Dispositional beliefs and dispositions to believe ', Noûs, 28 (1994), pp. 419-34.
8. Audi, Robert, Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision, Routledge, 2006.
9. Audi, Robert, The Structure of Justifi cation, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
10. Bennett, Jonathan, ' Why is belief involuntary? ', Analysis, 50 (1990), pp. 87-107.
11. Binkley, Robert, ' A theory of practical reason ', Philosophical Review, 74 (1965), pp. 42 3-4 8.
12. Blackburn, Simon, Ruling Passions, Oxford University Press, 1998.
13. Blackburn, Simon, Spreading the Word, Oxford University Press, 1984.
14. Boghossian, Paul, ' Blind reasoning ', in his Content and Justifi cation, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 266-87.
15. Boghossian, Paul, ' What is inference? ', Philosophical Studies, 2012, DOI 10.1007/ s11098-012-9903-x.
16. Bovens, Luc, and Stephan Hartmann, Bayesian Epistemology, Oxford University Press, 2003.
17. Brandom, Robert, Making It Explicit, Harvard University Press, 1994.
18. Bratman, Michael, ' Cognitivism about practical reason ', in his Faces of Intention, Cam- bridge University Press, 1999, pp. 250-64.
19. Bratman, Michael, ' Intention, belief, and instrumental rationality ', in Reasons for Action, edited by David Sobel and Steven Wall, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 1 3-36.
20. Bratman, Michael, ' Intention, belief, practical, theoretical ', in Spheres of Reason, edited by Simon Robertson, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 29-61.
21. Bratman, Michael, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, 1987.
22. Broadie, Alexander, ' The practical syllogism ', Analysis, 29 (1968), pp. 26-8.
23. Broome, John, ' Are intentions reasons? And how should we cope with incommensurable values? ', in Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by Christopher Morris and Arthur Ripstein, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 98-120.
24. Broome, John, ' Comments on Allan Gibbard ' s Tanner Lectures ', in Reconciling Our Aims: In Search of Bases for Ethics, by Allan Gibbard, edited by Barry Stroud, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 102-19.
25. Broome, John, ' Comments on Boghossian ', Philosophical Studies, 2012, DOI 10.1007/ s11098-012-9894-7.
26. Broome, John, ' Normative requirements ', Ratio, 12 (1999), pp. 398-419. Reprinted in Normativity, edited by Jonathan Dancy, Blackwell, 2000, pp. 78-99.
27. Broome, John, ' Practical reasoning ', in Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality, edited by José Bermúdez and Alan Millar, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 85-11 1.
28. Broome, John, ' Practical reasoning and inference ', in Thinking About Reasons: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Dancy, edited by David Bakhurst, Brad Hooker and Margaret Little, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 286-309.
29. Broome, John, ' Reasoning with preferences? ', in Preferences and Well-Being, edited by Serena Olsaretti, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 183-208.
30. Broome, John, ' Reasons ', in Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by R. Jay Wallace, Michael Smith, Samuel Scheffl er and Philip Pettit, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 28-55.
31. Broome, John, ' Replies to Southwood, Kearns and Star, and Cullity ', Ethics, 119 (2008), pp. 96-108.
32. Broome, John, ' Requirements ', in Homage à Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, edited by Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, Björn Petersson, Jonas Josefs- son and Dan Egonsson, 2007, www.fi l.lu.se/hommageawlodek.
33. Broome, John, ' The unity of reasoning? ', in Spheres of Reason, edited by Simon Robertson, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 62-92.
34. Broome, John, Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time, Blackwell, 1991.
35. Broome, John, Weighing Lives, Oxford University Press, 2004.
36. Broome, John, ' Williams on ought ', in Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams, edited by Ulrike Heuer and Gerald Lang, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 247-65.
37. Brunet, Josée, ' Le double aspect du raisonnement pratique ', Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 10 1 (2003), pp. 479-500.
38. Burge, Tyler, ' Reason and the fi rst person ', in Knowing Our Own Minds, edited by Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith and Cynthia MacDonald, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 243-70.
39. Bykvist, Krister, ' Objective versus subjective moral oughts ', in Logic, Ethics, and All That Jazz: Essays in Honour of Jordan Howard Sobel, edited by L.-G. Johansson, R. Sliwinski and J. Osterberg, Uppsala Philosophical Studies 57, 2009, pp. 39-65.
40. Carroll, Lewis, ' What the tortoise said to Achilles ', Mind, 4 (1895), pp. 278-80.
41. Carruthers, Peter, ' Phenomenal concepts and higher-order experiences ', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68 (2004), pp. 316-35.
42. Castañeda, Hector-Neri, ' On the logic of attributions of self-knowledge to others ', Journal of Philosophy, 65 (1968), pp. 439-56.
43. Castañeda, Hector-Neri, ' Practical thinking, reasons for doing, and intentional action: the thinking of doing and the doing of thinking ', Philosophical Perspectives, 4 (1990), pp. 273-308.
44. Chisholm, Roderick, ' The ethics of requirement ', American Philosophical Quarterly, 1 (1964), pp. 147-53.
45. Chisholm, Roderick, ' Practical reasoning and the logic of requirement ', in Practical Reason, edited by S. Körner, Blackwell, 1974, pp. 2-13. Reprinted in Practical Reasoning, edited by Joseph Raz, Oxford University Press, 1978, pp. 118-27.
46. Chrisman, Matthew, ' On the meaning of "ought" ', in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7, edited by Russ Schafer-Landau, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 304-32.
47. Cullity, Garrett, ' Decisions, reasons, and rationality ', Ethics, 119 (2008), pp. 57-95.
48. Dancy, Jonathan, ' Enticing reasons ', in Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philoso- phy of Joseph Raz, edited by R. Jay Wallace, Michael Smith, Samuel Scheffl er and Philip Pettit, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 91-118.
49. Dancy, Jonathan, Ethics Without Principles, Oxford University Press, 2004.
50. Dancy, Jonathan, ' The logical conscience ', Analysis, 37 (1977), pp. 81-4.
51. Dancy, Jonathan, ' Reasons and rationality ', in Spheres of Reason, edited by Simon Robertson, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 93-112.
52. Danielsson, Sven, ' What shall we do with deontic logic? ', Theoria, 66 (2000), pp. 97-114.
53. Dreier, James, ' Humean doubts about categorical imperatives ', in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, edited by Elijah Millgram, MIT Press, 2001, pp. 27-48.
54. Enoch, David, ' Agency, schmagency: why normativity won ' t come from what is constitutive of action ', Philosophical Review, 115 (2006), pp. 169-98.
55. Enoch, David, ' Reason-giving and the law ', in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Volume 1, edited by Leslie Green and Brian Leiter, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1-38.
56. Farrell, Daniel M., ' Intention, reason, and action ', American Philosophical Quarterly, 26 (1989). pp. 283-95.
57. Feldman, Richard, ' Voluntary belief and epistemic evaluation ', in Knowledge, Truth, and Duty, edited by M. Steup, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 77-92.
58. Fine, Kit, ' Essence and modality ', Philosophical Perspectives, 8 (1994), pp. 1-16.
59. Fink, Julian, ' A constitutive account of "rationality requires" ', forthcoming.
60. Foot, Philippa, Natural Goodness, Oxford University Press, 2001.
61. Forrester, James William, Being Good and Being Logical: Philosophical Groundwork for a New Deontic Logic, M. E. Sharpe, 1996.
62. Fowler, H. W., The King ' s English, Second edition, Oxford University Press, 1908.
63. Frege, Gottlob, ' Begriffsschrift: a formalized language of pure thought modelled upon the language of arithmetic ', in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black, Blackwell, 1970, pp. 1-20.
64. Geach, Peter, ' Ascriptivism ', Philosophical Review, 69 (1960), pp. 221-5.
65. Geach, Peter, ' Assertion ', Philosophical Review, 74 (1965), pp. 449-65.
66. Geach, Peter, ' Whatever happened to deontic logic? ', Philosophia, 11 (1982), pp. 1-12.
67. Goble, Lou, ' Normative confl icts and the logic of "ought "', Noûs, 43 (2009), pp. 450-89.
68. Gibbard, Allan, Thinking How to Live, Harvard University Press, 2003.
69. Gibbard, Allan, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment, Oxford University Press, 1990.
70. Greenspan, Patricia, ' Conditional oughts and hypothetical imperatives ', Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1975), pp. 259-76 ,.
71. Grice, Paul, Aspects of Reason, Oxford University Press, 2001.
72. Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals, Oxford University Press, 1952.
73. Hare, R. M., Practical Inferences, Macmillan, 1971.
74. Harman, Gilbert, Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, MIT Press, 1986.
75. Harman, Gilbert, Review of The Signifi cance of Sense: Meaning, Modality and Morality by Roger Wertheimer, Philosophical Review, 82 (1973), pp. 235-9.
76. Hearne, James, ' Deductivism and practical reason ', Philosophical Studies, 45 (1984), pp. 205-8.
77. Hieronymi, Pamela, ' Controlling attitudes ', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87 (2006), pp. 45-74.
78. Horty, John F., Agency and Deontic Logic, Oxford University Press, 2001.
79. Horty, John F., ' Reasoning with moral conflicts ', Noûs, 37 (2003), pp. 557-605.
80. Horty, John F., and Nuel Belnap, ' The deliberative stit: a study of action, omission, ability, and obligation ', Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24 (1995), pp. 583-644.
81. Humberstone, Lloyd, ' Two kinds of agent-relativity ', Philosophical Quarterly, 41 (1991), pp. 144-66.
82. Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, Oxford University Press, 1978.
83. Hurley, Susan, Natural Reasons, Oxford University Press, 1989.
84. Hursthouse, Rosalind, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford University Press, 1999.
85. Hussain, Nadeem, ' The requirements of rationality ', forthcoming.
86. Jackson, Frank, ' Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection ', Ethics, 101 (1991), pp. 461-82.
87. Jackson, Frank, and Philip Pettit, ' Moral functionalism and moral motivation', Philosophical Quarterly, 45 (1995), pp. 20-40.
88. Jeffrey, Richard, The Logic of Decision, Second Edition, University of Chicago Press, 1983.
89. Johnston, Mark, ' Dispositional theories of value ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 63 (1989), pp. 139-74.
90. Joyce, Richard, The Myth of Morality, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
91. Kahneman, Daniel, ' A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality ', American Psychologist, 58 (2003), pp. 697-720.
92. Kamm, Francis, ' The doctrine of triple effect and why a rational agent need not intend the means to his ends ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 74 (2000), pp. 21-39.
93. Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, translated by H. J. Paton under the title The Moral Law, Hutchinson, 1948.
94. Kavka, Gregory, ' The toxin puzzle ', Analysis, 43 (1983), pp. 33-6.
95. Kearns, Stephen, and Daniel Star, ' Reasons: explanation or evidence? ', Ethics, 119 (2008), pp. 31-56.
96. Kiesewetter, Benjamin, ' Instrumental normativity ', forthcoming.
97. Kolodny, Niko, ' How does coherence matter? ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107 (2007), pp. 229-63.
98. Kolodny, Niko, ' Instrumental reasons ', in The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by Daniel Star, Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
99. Kolodny, Niko, ' The myth of practical consistency ', European Journal of Philosophy, 16 (2008), pp. 366-402.
100. Kolodny, Niko, ' Why be disposed to be coherent? ', Ethics, 118 (2008), pp. 437-63.
101. Kolodny, Niko, ' Why be rational? ', Mind, 114 (2005), pp. 509-63.
102. Korsgaard, Christine, ' The activity of reason ', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 83 (2009), pp. 23-43.
103. Korsgaard, Christine, ' The normativity of instrumental reason ', in Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 215-54.
104. Korsgaard, Christine, Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford University Press, 2009.
105. Korsgaard, Christine, The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
106. Kratzer, Angelika, Morals and Conditionals, Oxford University Press, 2012.
107. Kripke, Saul, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Blackwell, 1982.
108. Krogh, Christen, and Henning Herrestad, ' Getting personal: some notes on the relationship between personal and impersonal obligation ', in Deontic Logic, Agency, and Normative Systems, edited by Mark Brown and José Carmo, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 134-53.
109. Langton, Rae, ' Intention as faith ', in Agency and Action, edited by John Hyman and Helen Steward, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 243-58.
110. Lavin, Douglas, ' Practical reason and the possibility of error ', Ethics, 114 (2004), pp. 424-57.
111. Lewis, David, ' Causal explanation ', in his Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 214-40.
112. Lewis, David, ' Semantic analyses for dyadic deontic logic ', in Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, edited by S. Stendlund, Reidel, 1974, pp. 1-14.
113. Mackie, J. L., Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin, 1977.
114. McNamara, Paul, ' Agential obligation as non-agential personal obligation plus agency ', Journal of Applied Logic, 2 (2004), pp. 117-52.
115. McNamara, Paul, ' Deontic logic ', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
116. Moore, G. E., Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, 1903.
117. Morauta, James, Evaluating Intentions, DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford, 2006.
118. Nagel, Thomas, The Possibility of Altruism, Oxford University Press, 1970.
119. Parfit, Derek, On What Matters, Oxford University Press, 2012.
120. Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, 1984.
121. Paul, Sarah, ' How we know what we ' re doing ', Philosopher ' s Imprint', 99 (2009), pp. 1-24.
122. Persson, Ingmar, ' A consequentialist distinction between what we ought to do and ought to try ', Utilitas, pp. 348-55.
123. Pettit, Philip, The Common Mind: an Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics, Oxford University Press, 1993.
124. Pettit, Philip, ' Rationality, reasoning and group agency ', Dialectica, 51 (2007), pp. 495-519.
125. Piller, Christian, ' Normative practical reasoning ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 75 (2001), pp. 195-216.
126. Price, A. W, Contextuality in Practical Reason, Oxford University Press, 2008.
127. Prichard, H. A., ' Does moral philosophy rest on a mistake? ', Mind, 21 (1912), pp. 21-37, reprinted in his Moral Writings, edited by Jim MacAdam, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 7-20.
128. Priest, Graham, Koji Tanaka and Zach Weber, ' Paraconsistent logic ', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
129. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1972.
130. Raz, Joseph, Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action, Oxford University Press, 1999.
131. Raz, Joseph, ' The myth of instrumental rationality ', Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1 (2005).
132. Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms, edition published by Oxford University Press, 1999. (Originally published in 1975.).
133. Reisner, Andrew, Conflicts of Normativity, DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 2004.
134. Reisner, Andrew, ' Unifying the Requirements of Rationality ', Philosophical Explorations, 12 (2009), pp. 243-60.
135. Rosenthal, David, ' Thinking that one thinks ', in his Consciousness and Mind, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 46-70.
136. Ross, Alf, ' Imperatives and logic ', Theoria, 7 (1941), pp. 53-71.
137. Ross, Jacob, ' How to be a cognitivist about practical reason ', Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 4, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 243-82.
138. Ross, Jacob, ' The irreducibility of personal obligation ', Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39 (2010), pp. 307-2 3.
139. Ross, Jacob, ' Rationality, normativity, and commitment ', in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford University Press, 2012.
140. Salmon, Nathan, ' Being of two minds: belief with doubt ', Noûs, 29 (1995), pp. 1-20.
141. Scanlon, T. M., ' Reasons: a puzzling duality? ', in Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by R. Jay Wallace, Michael Smith, Samuel Scheffl er and Philip Pettit, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 23 1-46.
142. Scanlon, T. M., ' Structural irrationality ', in Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, edited by Geoffrey Brennan, Robert Goodin, Frank Jackson and Michael Smith, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 84-103.
143. Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press, 1998.
144. Scheffler, Samuel, Human Morality, Oxford University Press, 1992.
145. Schroeder, Mark, ' The scope of instrumental reason ', Philosophical Perspectives, 18 (2004), pp. 337-64.
146. Schroeter, Laura and François Schroeter, ' Reasons as right-makers ', Philosophical Explorations, 12 (2009), pp. 279-96.
147. Searle, John, Rationality in Action, MIT Press, 2001.
148. Sellars, Wilfred, ' Language as thought and as communication ', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 29 (1969), pp. 506-27.
149. Setiya, Kieran, ' Cognitivism about instrumental reason ', Ethics, 117 (2007), pp. 649-73.
150. Setiya, Kieran, ' Knowledge of intention ', in Essays on Anscombe ' s Intention, edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby and Frederick Stoutland, Harvard University Press, 2011.
151. Setiya, Kieran, ' Practical knowledge ', Ethics, 118 (2008), pp. 388-409.
152. Shackel, Nicholas, ' Two kinds of normativity ', forthcoming.
153. Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics, Seventh edition, Macmillan, 1907.
154. Skorupski, John, The Domain of Reasons, Oxford University Press, 2010.
155. Smith, Michael, Ethics and the A Priori, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
156. Smith, Michael, ' Humean rationality ', in The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, edited by Alfred R. Mele and Piers Rawling, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 75-92.
157. Smith, Michael, ' Internal reasons ', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1995), pp. 109-31.
158. Smith, Michael, The Moral Problem, Blackwell, 1994.
159. Smith, Nicholas, ' Frege ' s judgement stroke and the conception of logic as the study of infer- ence not consequence ', Philosophy Compass, 4 (2009), pp. 639-65.
160. Southwood, Nicholas, ' Vindicating the normativity of rationality ', Ethics, 119 (2008), pp. 9-30.
161. Tännsjö, Torbjörn, From Reasons to Norms: On the Basic Question in Ethics, Springer, 2010.
162. Tenenbaum, Sergio, ' Minimalism about intention: a modest defence ', forthcoming.
163. Thomson, Judith Jarvis, The Realm of Rights, Harvard University Press, 1990.
164. Van Fraassen, Bas C, ' Values and the heart ' s command ', Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), pp. 5-19.
165. Velleman, David, ' Deciding how to decide ', in Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 29-52.
166. Velleman, David, The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford University Press, 2000.
167. Vineberg, Susan, ' Dutch Book Arguments ', in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
168. Von Wright, G. H., ' A note on deontic logic and derived obligation ', Mind, 65 (1956), pp. 507-9.
169. Vranas, Peter, ' New foundations for imperative logic I: logical connectives, consistency, and quantifiers ', Noûs, 42 (2008), pp. 529-72.
170. Wallace, R. Jay, ' How to argue about practical reason ', Mind, 99 (1990), pp. 355-85.
171. Wallace, R. Jay, ' Normativity, commitment, and instrumental reason ', Philosophers' Imprint, 1 (200 1). jK.
172. Way, Jonathan, ' The symmetry of rational requirements ', Philosophical Studies, 155 (2011), pp. 227-39.
173. Wedgwood, Ralph, ' Internalism explained ', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65 (2002), pp. 349-69.
174. Wedgwood, Ralph, ' The meaning of "ought" ', in Oxford Studies in Methaethics, Volume 1, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 127-60.
175. Wedgwood, Ralph, The Nature of Normativity, Oxford University Press, 2007.
176. Wedgwood, Ralph, ' The normative force of reasoning ', Noûs, 40 (2006), pp. 660-86.
177. Williams, Bernard, ' Deciding to believe ', in his Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-1972, Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 136-51.
178. Williams, Bernard, ' Ethical consistency ', in his Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-1972, Cambridge University Press, 1973 pp. 166-86.
179. Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana, 1985.
180. Williams, Bernard, ' Internal and external reasons ', in his Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 101-13.
181. Williams, Bernard, ' Ought and moral obligation ', in his Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 114-23.
182. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, 1968.
183. Woods, Michael, ' Reasons for action and desires ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 46 (1972), pp. 189-201.
184. Wright, Crispin, ' Comment on Paul Boghossian: "The nature of inference" ', Philosophical Studies, 2012, DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-9892-9.
185. Yalcin, Seth, ' Bayesian expressivism ', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 112 (2012), pp. 123-60.
186. Žarnic, Berislav, ' A logical typology of normative systems ', Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy, 2 (2010), pp. 30-40.
187. Zimmerman, Michael, ' Is moral obligation objective or subjective? ', Utilitas, 18 (2006), pp. 329-61.
188. Zimmerman, Michael, Living With Uncertainty: the Moral Signifi cance of Ignorance, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
189. Zimmerman, Michael, Reconsidering the Moral Signifi cance of Ignorance, Hägerström Lectures, 201 1.