The interplay between information practices and information context: The case of mobile knowledge workers

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1073-1089

  Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein ^a   Thomson, Leslie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

GLOBAL ECONOMICS; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; INFORMATION CONTEXTS; INFORMATION PRACTICES; KNOWLEDGE WORK; KNOWLEDGE WORKERS; KNOWLEDGE WORKFORCES; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; WORKER;

EID: 85016044869     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23773     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Aguinis, H., & Lawal, S.O. (2013). eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science–practice gap. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 6–17.
2. Allen, B. (1997). Information needs: A person-in-situation approach. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context (pp. 111–122). London, UK: Taylor Graham Publishing.
3. Allen, D., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 776–788.
4. Altman, E.J., Nagle, F., & Tushman, M. (2013). Innovating Without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero. In M. Hitt, C. Shalley, & J. Zhou (Eds.), Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 353–275). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bardram, J.E., & Bossen, C. (2005). Mobility work: The spatial dimension of collaboration at a hospital. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 14, 131–160.
6. Barley, S.R., & Kunda, G. (2006). Contracting: A new form of professional practice. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 45–66.
7. Barreau, D.K. (1995). Context as a factor in personal information management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 327–339.
8. Bierig, R., & Göker, A. (2006). Time, location and interest: An empirical and user-centred study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Interaction in Context. ACM, New York.
9. Blatt, K., & Gallagher, J. (2013). Mobile workforce: The rise of the mobilocracy. In P. Bruck & M. Rao (Eds.), Global mobile: Applications and innovations for the Worldwide mobile ecosystem. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
11. Brodkin, J. (2013). How mobile technology created a workforce that never stops working. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/08/how-mobile-technology-created-a-that-never-stops-working/
12. Buckland, M.K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 42, 351–360.
13. Büscher, M. (2013). Nomadic work: Romance and reality. A response to Barbara Czarniawska's ‘Nomadic Work as Life-Story Plot’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 16.
14. Byström, K., & Lloyd, A. (2012). Practice theory and work task performance: How are they related and how can they contribute to a study of information practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–5.
15. Chen, L., & Nath, R. (2008). A socio-technical perspective of mobile work. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 7, 41–60.
16. Ciborra, C. (2002). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ciolfi, L., & de Carvalho, A.F.P. (2014). Work practices, nomadicity and the mediational role of technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 119–136.
18. Cool, C., & Spink, A. (2002). Issues of context in information retrieval (IR): An introduction to the special issue. Information Processing & Management, 38, 605–611.
19. Costas, J. (2013). Problematizing mobility: A metaphor of stickiness, non-places and the kinetic elite. Organization Studies, 34, 1467–1485.
20. Courtright, C. (2007). Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 273–306.
21. Cousins, K.C., & Robey, D. (2005). Human agency in a wireless world: Patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments. Information and Organization, 15, 151–180.
22. Cox, A.M. (2012). An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science. Journal of Information Science, 38, 176–188.
23. Cox, A.M. (2013a). Information in social practice: A practice approach to understanding information activities in personal photography. Journal of Information Science, 39, 61–72.
24. Cox, A.M. (2013b). Practice Theory. In T.D. Wilson (Ed.), Theory in information behaviour research. Sheffield, UK: Eiconics Ltd.
25. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11, 773–791.
26. Czarniawska, B. (2014). Nomadic work as life-story plot. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 205–221.
27. D'Mello, M., & Sahay, S. (2007). “I am kind of a nomad where I have to go places and places”… understanding mobility, place and identity in global software work from India. Information and Organization, 17, 162–192.
28. Dal Fiore, F., Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., & Singer, M.E. (2014). “Nomads at last”? a set of perspectives on how mobile technology may affect travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 97–106.
29. Davenport, E., & Cronin, B. (1998). Texts at work: Some thoughts on “jus† for you” service in the context of domain expertise. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39, 264–274.
30. Davenport, T. (2013). Thinking for a living: How to get better performances and results from knowledge workers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
31. Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32. Davis, G. (2002). Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work. Communications of the ACM, 45, 67–73.
33. de Carvalho, A.F., Ciolfi, L., & Gray, B. (2011). The making of nomadic work: Understanding the mediational role of ICTs. In M. Cruz-Cunha & F. Moreira (Eds.), Handbook of research on mobility and computing: Evolving technologies and ubiquitous impacts (pp. 381–396). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
34. Dey, A., Kortuem, G., Morse, D., & Schmidt, A. (2001). Special issue on situated interaction and context-aware computing. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(1), 1–3.
35. Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
36. Egyedi, T.M., Mehos, D.C., & Vree, W.G. (2009). New perspectives on inverse infrastructures. Paper presented at the Infrastructure Systems and Services: Developing 21st Century Infrastructure Networks, (INFRA), 2009 Second International Conference on.
37. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
38. Erickson, I., & Jarrahi, M.H. (2016). Infrastructuring and the challenge of dynamic seams in mobile knowledge work. Paper presented at the CSCW '16, San Fransisco, CA.
39. Erickson, I., Jarrahi, M.H., Thomson, L., & Sawyer, S. (2014). More than nomads: Mobility, knowledge work, and infrastructure. Paper presented at the European Group for Organizational Studies Colloquium, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
40. Feldman, M.S., & Orlikowski, W.J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22, 1240–1253.
41. Fulton, C. (2005). Hotdesking: A potential link in the e worker's information chain. In J. Krogstie, K. Kautz, & D. Allen (Eds.), Mobile information systems II (pp. 163–170). Berling, Germany: IFIP- Springer.
42. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
43. Gherardi, S. (2013). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
44. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
45. Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
46. Goker, A., Myrhaug, H., & Bierig, R. (2009). Context and information retrieval. In A. Goker & J. Davies (Eds.), Information retrieval: Searching in the 21st century (pp. 131–157).
47. Grinter, R.E., & Eldridge, M.A. (2001). y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? Paper presented at the ECSCW 2001, Bonn, Germany.
48. Harmer, B.M., & Pauleen, D.J. (2012). Attitude, aptitude, ability and autonomy: The emergence of ‘offroaders’, a special class of nomadic worker. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 439–451.
49. Hogan, T.P., & Palmer, C.L. (2005). “Information work” and chronic illness: Interpreting results from a nationwide survey of people living with HIV/AIDS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Charlotte, NC.
50. Huizing, A., & Cavanagh, M. (2011). Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science. Information Research Journal, 16, 497.
51. Huotari, M.L., & Wilson, T.D. (2001). Determining organizational information needs: The critical success factors approach. Information Research, 6, 6–3.
52. IBM. (2005). The mobile working experience, A European perspective. Retrieved from http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/imc/pdf/g510-4029-mobile-working-experience.pdf
53. Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91, 66–73.
54. Johnson, J.D. (2003). On contexts of information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 39, 735–760.
55. Jones, W., Capra, R., Diekema, A., Teevan, J., Pérez-Quiñones, M., Dinneen, J., & Hemminger, B. (2015). 'For telling' the present: Using the Delphi method to understand personal information management practices. Paper presented at the CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
56. Julien, H., Pecoskie, J.J., & Reed, K. (2011). Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 19–24.
57. Kakihara, M., & Sørensen, C. (2001). Expanding the 'mobility' concept. ACM SIGGroup Bulletin, 22, 33–37.
58. Kar, S. (2012). Mobile Workers Present New Security Challenges for the Cloud. Retrieved from http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/04/02/mobile-workers-present-new-security-challenges-for-the-cloud/
59. Kari, J., & Savolainen, R. (2007). Relationships between information seeking and context: A qualitative study of internet searching and the goals of personal development. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 47–69.
60. Koehne, B., Shih, P.C., & Olson, J.S. (2012). Remote and alone: Coping with being the remote member on the team. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York.
61. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Lagunas, K. (2012). BYOD or Bust: Survey Results Report. Retrieved from http://blog.softwareadvice.com/articles/hr/byod-or-bust-survey-results-report-103212/
63. Lai, E. (2012). Average Mobile Worker Carries 3.5 Devices. Here's the Downside. ÜberTech. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/article/average-mobile-worker-carries-3-5-devices-heres-the-downside/.
64. Lamming, M., Eldridge, M., Flynn, M., Jones, C., & Pendlebury, D. (2000). Satchel: Providing access to any document, any time, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7, 322–352.
65. Liegl, M. (2014). Nomadicity and the care of place—on the aesthetic and affective organization of space in freelance creative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 163–183.
66. Lloyd, A. (2003). Information literacy the meta-competency of the knowledge economy? An exploratory paper. Journal of Librarianship and information Science, 35, 87–92.
67. Lloyd, A. (2005). Information literacy different contexts, different concepts, different truths? Journal of Librarianship and information Science, 37, 82–88.
68. Lloyd, A. (2009). Informing practice: Information experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation, 65, 396–419.
69. Lloyd, A. (2010a). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66, 245–258.
70. Lloyd, A. (2010b). Information literacy landscapes: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford: Chandos.
71. Lloyd, A. (2014). Following the red thread of information in information literacy research: Recovering local knowledge through interview to the double. Library & Information Science Research, 36, 99–105.
72. Lloyd, A., & Williamson, K. (2008). Towards an understanding of information literacy in context implications for research. Journal of Librarianship and information Science, 40, 3–12.
73. Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski W. J., & Yates J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization science, 24(5), 1337–1357.
74. Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. McKenzie, P.J. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59, 19–40.
76. McKenzie, P.J. (2009). Informing choice: The organization of institutional interaction in clinical midwifery care. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 163–173.
77. Mervyn, K., & Allen, D.K. (2012). Sociospatial context and information behavior: Social exclusion and the influence of mobile information technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1125–1141.
78. Middleton, C. (2008). Do mobile technologies enable work-life balance? Dual perspectives on BlackBerry usage for supplemental work. In D. Hislop (Ed.), Mobility and technology in the workplace (pp. 209–224). London: Routledge.
79. Moring, C.E., & Lloyd, A. (2013). Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research. Information Research, 18(3). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC35.html#.V2ysohUrJhF
80. Morse, D.R., Armstrong, S., & Dey, A.K. (2000). The what, who, where, when, why and how of context-awareness. Paper presented at the CHI'00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands.
81. Myrhaug, H.I., & Göker, A. (2003). AmbieSense-interactive information channels in the surroundings of the mobile user. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece
82. Nicolini, D. (2009). Articulating practice through the interview to the double. Management Learning, 40, 195–212.
83. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. New York: ME Sharpe.
84. Olson, J.S., & Olson, G.M. (2014). How to make distance work work. interactions, 21, 28–35.
85. Olsson, M. (2005). Meaning and authority: The social construction of an 'author' among information behaviour researchers. Information Research, Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper219.html
86. Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization science, 13, 249–273.
87. Orlikowski, W.J., & Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433–474.
88. Østerlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21, 91–107.
89. PearnKandola. (2007). A Study: Understanding and Managing the Mobile Workforce. Cisco Systems. Retrieved from http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/eKits/MobileWorkforce_071807.pdf.
90. Perry, M. (2007). Enabling nomadic work: Developing the concept of ‘mobilisation work’. Paper presented at the ECSCW 2007 Workshop: Beyond Mobility: Studying Nomadic Work Limerick, Ireland.
91. Perry, M., & Brodie, J. (2006). Virtually connected, practically mobile. In E. Andriessen & M. Vartiainen (Eds.), Mobile virtual work – A new paradigm (pp. 97–128). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
92. Perry, M., O'hara, K., Sellen, A., Brown, B., & Harper, R. (2001). Dealing with mobility: Understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 8, 323–347.
93. Pilerot, O., & Limberg, L. (2011). Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: A study of design scholars' information practices. Journal of Documentation, 67, 312–333.
94. Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorising media and practice. In B. Bräuchler & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
95. Rainie, H., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
96. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263.
97. Reuters. (2012). Ricoh tackles the challenge of mobile worker productivity. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/06/idUS131742+06-Sep-2012+PRN20120906.
98. Rivera, G., & Cox, A. (2014). An evaluation of the practice based approach to understanding the adoption and use of information systems. Journal of Documentation, 70, 878–901.
99. Rossitto, C., Bogdan, C., & Severinson-Eklundh, K. (2014). Understanding constellations of technologies in use in a collaborative nomadic setting. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 137–161.
100. Rossitto, C., & Eklundh, K.S. (2007). Managing work at several places: A case of project work in a nomadic group of students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Invent! Explore! ACM, New York.
101. Savolainen, R. (2006). Time as a context of information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 28, 110–127.
102. Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behavior and information practice: Reviewing the “umbrella concepts” of information-seeking Studies. The Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109–132.
103. Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
104. Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 38–45.
105. Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
107. Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26, 465–484.
108. Schilit, B., Adams, N., & Want, R. (1994). Context-aware computing applications. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Los Alamitos, CA.
109. Schmidt, A., Beigl, M., & Gellersen, H.W. (1999). There is more to context than location. Computers & Graphics, 23, 893–901.
110. Schmidt, K., & Simonee, C. (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5, 155–200.
111. Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3–42.
112. Schultze, U., & Boland, R.J. (2000). Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 193–212.
113. Sørensen, C. (2011). Enterprise mobility: Tiny technology with global impact on work (Technology, work, and globalization). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
114. Sørensen, C. (2014). Enterprise mobility. Tiny technology with global impact on work. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
115. Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441.
116. Stebbins, R.A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (Vol. 48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
117. Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29, 163–178.
118. Su, N., & Mark, G. (2008). Designing for nomadic work. Paper presented at the Seventh ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Cape Town, South Africa.
119. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
120. Sundin, O., & Francke, H. (2009). Search of credibility: Pupils' information practices in learning environments. Information Research, 14, 6.
121. Tabak, E. (2014). Jumping between context and users: A difficulty in tracing information practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 2223–2232.
122. Talja, S. (1997). Constituting “information” and “user” as research objects: A theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context, 67–80. London: Taylor Graham.
123. Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2005). Information sharing. In A. Spink & C. Cole (Eds.), New directions in human information behavior (pp. 113–134). Berlin: Springer.
124. Talja, S., Keso, H., & Pietiläinen, T. (1999). The production of ‘context’ in information seeking research: A metatheoretical view. Information Processing & Management, 35, 751–763.
125. Talja, S., & McKenzie, P.J. (2007). Editors' introduction: Special issue on discursive approaches to information seeking in Context1. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 77, 97–108.
126. Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R., & Talja, S. (2005). Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice1. The Library Quarterly, 75(3), 329–345.
127. Urry, J. (2013). Mobile lives and materialities. In F.-X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 263). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
128. Veinot, T. (2007). “The eyes of the power company”: Workplace information practices of a vault inspector1. Library Quarterly, 77, 157–179.
129. Vertesi, J. (2014). Seamful spaces: Heterogeneous infrastructures in interaction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39, 264–284.
130. Widén, G., Steinerová, J., & Voisey, P. (2014). Conceptual modelling of workplace information practices: A literature review. Information Research, 19(4). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic08.html#.V2yv1hUrJhE