Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science

Information Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Huizing, Ard ^a   Cavanagh, Mary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856769712     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2008). On the practise of practice: in-tensions and ex-tensions in the ongoing reconfiguration of practice. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.). Handbook of new and emerging approaches to management & organization (pp. 112-131). London: Sage.
2. Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
3. Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S. & Pitsis, T. (2009). Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40(2), 145-159.
4. Black, A. (1997). Understanding community librarianship: the public library in post-modern Britain. London: Avebury.
5. Blackler, F. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 864-884.
6. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Bonifacio, M., Camussone, P. & Zini, C. (2004). Managing the KM trade-off: knowledge centralization versus distribution. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(3), 162-175.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
10. Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213.
12. Budd, J. M. (2001). Knowledge and knowing in library and information science: a philosophical framework. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
13. Buschman, J. & Leckie, G. (2007). The library as place: history, community and culture. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
14. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Case, D.O. (2002). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science.
16. Certeau, M. de (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17. Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: how organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, M. & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12(2), 147-167.
19. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S. & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265-283.
20. Coulter, J. (2001). Human practices and the observability of the 'macro-social'. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 29-41). London: Routledge.
21. Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
22. Czarniawska, B. (2002). A tale of three cities, or the globalization of city management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773-791.
24. Czarniawska, B. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.
25. Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: Free Press.
26. Egan, M.E. & Shera J.H. (1952). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly 22(2), 125-137.
27. Engestro{double acute}m, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.) (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fisher, K.E., Erdelez, S. & Mckechnie, L. (Eds.) (2005). Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
29. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon.
30. Foucault, M. (1983). Afterword: the subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.) (pp. 208-226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York, NY: Seabury.
32. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Gherardi, S. (1999). Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery? Organization Studies, 20(1), 101-124.
34. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: the circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329-348.
35. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: the texture of workplace learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
36. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. & Strati, A. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14(3), 315-329.
37. Gherardi, S. (2009a). Introduction: the critical power of the 'practice lens'. Management Learning, 40(2), 115-128.
38. Gherardi, S. (2009b), Practice? It's a matter of taste. Management Learning, 40(5), 535-550.
39. Gherardi, S. (2010). Telemedicine: a practice-based approach to technology, Human Relations, 63(4), 501-524.
40. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
41. Gorman, M. (2000). Our enduring values: librarianship in the 21st century. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
42. Huizing, A. (2007a). Objectivist by default: why information management needs a new foundation. In A. Huizing & E.J. de Vries (Eds.), Information management: setting the scene (pp. 73-90). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
43. Huizing, A. (2007b). The value of a rose: rising above objectivism and subjectivism. In A. Huizing & E.J. de Vries (Eds.), Information management: setting the scene (pp. 91-110). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
44. Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations: vols. 1 and 2. London: Routledge.
45. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: an activity-based view. London: Sage.
46. Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1-30.
48. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175-188). London: Routledge.
50. Knorr-Cetina, K. & Bruegger, U. (2001). Transparency regimes and management by content in global organizations: the case of institutional currency trading. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 180-194
51. Knorr-Cetina, K. & Bruegger, U. (2002). Global microstructures: the virtual societies of financial markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 905-950.
52. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
56. Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393.
60. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
61. Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.) (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Leckie, G., Given, L. & Buschman, J. (Eds.). (2010). Critical theory for library and information science: exploring the social from across the discipline. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
63. Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
65. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracies: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation
66. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
67. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self & society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (ed. C.W. Morris). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68. Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D. & Yanow, D. (2009). Re-turn to practice: an introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309-1327.
69. Nardi, B. (1996). (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Nardi, B. & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (2003). Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
72. Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391-1418.
73. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
75. Orlikowki, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.
76. Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, TheAcademy of Management Annals, 2(1): 433-474.
77. Orlikowski, W.J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125-141.
78. Orr, J.E. (2006). Ten years of talking about machines. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1805-1820.
79. Ortner, S.B. (1994). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. In N.B. Dirks, G. Eley & S.B. Ortner (Eds.), Culture/power/history: a reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 372-411). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80. Osburn, C.B. (2009). The social transcript: uncovering library philosophy. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
81. Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
82. Pels, D., Hetherington, K. & Vandenberghe, F. (2002). The status of the object: performances, mediations, and techniques. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1), 1-21.
83. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
84. Pickering, A. (2001). Practice and posthumanism: social theory and a history of agency. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. (pp. 163-174). London: Routledge.
85. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
86. Preda, A. (1999). The turn to things: arguments for a sociological theory of things. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(2), 347-366.
87. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
88. Rouse, J. (2001). Two concepts of practice. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp.189-198). London: Routledge.
89. Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behavior and information practice: reviewing the 'umbrella concepts' of information-seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109-132.
90. Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: a social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
91. Schatzki, T.R. (1996). Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. & von Savigny, E. (Eds). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
93. Schatzki, T.R. (2001a). Introduction: practice theory. In T.R. Schatzki K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
94. Schatzki, T.R. (2001b). Practice mind-ed orders. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. (pp. 42-55). London: Routledge.
95. Schatzki, T.R. (2005). Peripheral visions: the sites of organizations, Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484.
96. Schatzki, T.R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873.
97. Schultze, U. & Orlikowski, W.J. (2004). A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: the use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 87-106.
98. Shera, J.H. (1972). The foundations of education for librarianship. New York, NY: Becker and Hayes.
99. Stern, D.G. (2003). The practical turn. In S. Turner & P. Roth (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to philosophy of social sciences (pp. 185-206). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
100. Star, S.L. (Ed.). (1995). The cultures of computing. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
101. Suchman, L. (2005). Affiliative objects. Organization, 12(3), 379-399.
102. Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56-73). London: Routledge.
103. Tolbert, P.S. & Zucker, L.G. (1996). Institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), The handbook of organization studies (pp. 175-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
104. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Tuomela, R. (2002). The philosophy of social practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects: things we think with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
107. Wenger, (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Whetten, D. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 219-234.
109. Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735.
110. Wittgenstein, L. (1973). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.