The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals

Organization Science

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1337-1357

  Mazmanian, Melissa ^a   Orlikowski, Wanda J ^b   Yates, JoAnne ^b  

^a 5226 Donald Bren Hall   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Autonomy paradox; Communication practices; Escalating engagement; Information technologies; Mobile email

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885131530     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0806     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Abbott A (1981) Status and status strain in the professions. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(4):819-835.
2. Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
3. Alvesson M (2001) Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations 54(7):863-886.
4. Alvesson M, Robertson M (2006) The best and the brightest: The construction, significance and effects of elite identities in consulting firms. Organization 13(2):195-224.
5. Alvesson M, Willmott H (2002) Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. J. Management Stud. 39(5):619-644.
6. Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL, Thomas R (2008) Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization 15(1):5-28.
7. Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19(2):202-220.
8. Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH (1993) Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):88-115.
9. Attewell P (1987) The deskilling controversy. Work Occupations 14(3):323-346.
10. Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in selfmanaging teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38:408-437.
11. Barker JR (1999) The Discipline of Teamwork: Participation and Concertive Control (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
12. Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78-108.
13. Barley SR (1988) Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. Torbert P, Barley S, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 6 (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 33-80.
14. Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363-399.
15. Barley SR, Kunda G (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
16. Barley SR, Meyerson DE, Grodal S (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22(4):887-906.
17. Bechky B (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720-752.
18. Beck U (1994) The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, eds. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 1-55.
19. Bergami M, Bagozzi RP (2000) Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(4):555-577.
20. Blau JR (1984) Architects and Firms: A Sociological Perspective on Architectural Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
21. Braverman H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, New York).
22. Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
23. Burke PJ, Reitzes DC (1991) An identity theory approach to commitment. Soc. Psych. Quart. 54(3):239-251.
24. Burris BH (1998) Computerization of the workplace. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:141-157.
25. Carlile P (2006) Artifacts and knowledge negotiation across domains. Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 101-118.
26. Carmeli A (2005) Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organ. Stud. 26(3):443-464.
27. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, London).
28. Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW, Heian JB, Samuel S (1998) The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):293-327.
29. Dale K (2005) Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization 12(5):649-678.
30. Deetz S (1997) Discursive formations, strategized subordination and self-surveillance. McKinley AS, Starkey KP, eds. Foucault, Management and Organization Theory (Sage, London), 151-172.
31. Elsbach K (2006) Perceptual biases and misinterprtation of artifacts. Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 61-80.
32. Engel GV (1970) Professional autonomy and bureaucratic organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 15(1):12-21.
33. Ezzamel M, Willmott H (1998) Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):358-396.
34. Fraser JA (2001) White Collar Sweat-Shop: The Deterioration of Work and Its Rewards in Corporate America (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).
35. Freidson E (1983) The Theory of the Professions: State of the Art (Macmillan, London).
36. Freidson E (1984) The changing nature of professional control. Annual Rev. Sociol. 10:1-20.
37. Freidson E (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
38. Gant D, Kiesler S (2001) Blurring the boundaries: Cell phones, mobility and the line between work and personal life. Brown B, Green N, Harper R, eds. Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age (Springer, New York), 121-131.
39. Garson B (1988) The Electronic Sweatshop: How Computers Are Transforming the Office of the Future into the Factory of the Past (Penguin Books, New York).
40. Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (University of California Press, Berkeley).
41. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).
42. Giddens A (1994) Living in a post-traditional society. Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, eds. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 56-109.
43. Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):499-517.
44. Golden AG, Geisler C (2007) Work-Life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations 60(3):519-551.
45. Goode WJ (1960) The profession: Reports and opinion: Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology and medicine. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(6):902-914.
46. Green N (2001) Who's watching whom? Monitoring and accountability in mobile relations. Brown B, Green N, Harper R, eds. Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age (Springer, New York), 32-44.
47. Green N (2002) On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. Inform. Soc. 18(4):281-292.
48. Haas M, R (2010) The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Acad. Management J. 53(5):989-1008.
49. Hackman JR (1976) Group influences on individuals. Dunnette M, ed. Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 1455-1526.
50. Hackman JR (1983) Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (McGraw-Hill, New York).
51. Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250-279.
52. Hall RH (1968) Professionalization and bureaucratization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(1):92-104.
53. Hansson RO, Hogan R, Johnson JA, Schroeder D (1983) Disentangling type A behavior: The roles of ambition, insensitivity, and anxiety. J. Res. Personality 17(2):186-197.
54. Haug MR, Sussman MB (1969) Professional autonomy and the revolt of the client. Soc. Problems 17(2):153-161.
55. Hislop D, Axtell C (2011) Mobile phones during work and non-work time: A case study of mobile, non-managerial workers. Inform. Organ. 21(1):41-56.
56. Hogan R, Nicholson RA (1988) The meaning of personality test scores. Amer. Psychologist 43(8):621-626.
57. Hughes EC (1963) The professions. Daedalus 92(4):655-668.
58. Janz BD, Colquitt JA, Noe RA (1997) Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development and contextual support variables. Personnel Psych. 50(4):877-904.
59. Jermier JM (1998) Introduction: Critical perspectives on organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):235-256.
60. Kalleberg A (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).
61. Kraft P (1979) The industrialization of computer programming: From programming to software production. Zimbalist A, ed. Case Studies in the Labour Process (Monthly Review Press, New York), 1-17.
62. Kunda G (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).
63. Langfred CW (2000) The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 21(5):563-585.
64. Langfred CW (2004) Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. 47(3):385-399.
65. Langfred CW (2005) Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. J. Management 31(4):513-529.
66. Langfred CW (2007) The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. 50(4):885-900.
67. Larson MS (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley).
68. Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What's under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1-51.
69. MacCormick JS, Dery K, Kolb DG (2012) Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organ. Dynamics 41(3):194-201.
70. Martin J, Knopoff K, Beckman C (1998) An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at the body shop. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):429-469.
71. Mazmanian M (2012) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print July 30.
72. Meiksins PF, Watson JM (1989) Professional autonomy and organizational constraint: The case of engineers. Sociol. Quart. 30(4):561-585.
73. Middleton CA (2007) Illusions of balance and control in an alwayson environment: A case study of BlackBerry users. Continuum: J. Media Cultural Stud. 21(2):165-178.
74. Middleton CA, Cukier W (2006) Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(3):252-260.
75. Murray WC, Rostis A (2007) "Who's running the machine?" A theoretical exploration of work stress and burnout of technologically tethered workers. J. Employment Rights 12(3):249-263.
76. Nelson RL (1985) Ideology, practice, and professional autonomy: Social values and client relationships in the large law firm. Stanford Law Rev. 37(2):503-551.
77. Noble D (1977) America By Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (Alfred Knopf, New York).
78. Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433-474.
79. Perlow LA (1998) Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):328-357.
80. Prasad P (1993) Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1400-1429.
81. Prasopoulou E, Pouloud A, Panteli N (2006) Enacting new temporal boundaries: The role of mobile phones. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(3):277-284.
82. Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. (2006) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
83. Reith G (2004) Consumption and its discontents: Addiction, identity, and the problems of freedom. British J. Sociol. 55(2):283-300.
84. Robertson M, Scarbrough H, Swan J (2003) Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects. Organ. Stud. 24(6):831-857.
85. Sandberg J, Pinnington AH (2009) Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. J. Management Stud. 46(7):1138-1170.
86. Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership (Jossey- Bass, San Francisco).
87. Scott WR (1982) Managing professional work: Three models of control for health organizations. Health Services Res. 17(3):213-240.
88. Scott WR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Soc. 37(5):427-442.
89. Scott WR, Meyer JW (1991) The organization of societal sectors. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 108-140.
90. Sewell G (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):397-428.
91. Sewell G, Barker JR (2006) Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934-961.
92. Sharma A (1997) Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Acad. Management Rev. 22(3):758-798.
93. Spector PE (1986) Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39(11):1005-1016.
94. Stewart GL, Barrick MR (2000) Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. 43(2):135-148.
95. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
96. Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155-174.
97. Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145-180.
98. Wajcman J, Rose E (2011) Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organ. Stud. 32(7):941-961.
99. Wallace JE (1995) Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonprofessional organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):228-255.
100. Williams RB Jr, Haney TL, Lee KL, Kong Y-H, Blumenthal JA, Whalen RE (1980) Type A behavior, hostility, and coronary atherosclerosis. Psychosomatic Medicine 42(6):539-549.
101. Willmott H (1993) Strength is ignorance, slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. J. Management Stud. 30(4):515-552.