Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research

Information Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Moring, Camilla ^a   Lloyd, Annemaree ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910635614     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, T. D. (2007). Settings, arenas and boundary objects: socio-material framings of information practices. Information Research, 12(4), 1-16
2. Bonner, A. & Lloyd A. (2011). What information counts in the moment of practice: information practices of renal nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(6), 1213-1221
3. Bourdieu, P. (1976). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
4. Cox, A. M. (2012a). An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 176-188
5. Cox, A. M. (2012b). Information in social practice: a practice approach to understanding information activities in personal photography. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 61-72
6. Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-world. A commentary on Heideggers being and time, division one. Cambridge MA: MIT Press
7. Eckerdal, J. R. (2011).Young women choosing contraceptives: stories about information literacy practices related to evaluation and use of information sources. Dansk Biblioteksforskning [Danish Library Research], 7(2/3), 17-31
8. Feldmann, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorising practice and practising theory.organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253
9. Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: the critical power of the `practice lens'. Management Learning, 40(2), 115-129
10. Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study: problems and methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
11. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan
12. Halkier, B. & Jensen, I. (2011). Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 101-123
13. Hara, N. (2009). Communities of practice: fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the work place. Berlin: Springer.
14. Huizing, A. & Cavanagh, M. (2011). Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science. Information Research, 16(4), 1-19
15. Lave, J. (2008). Epilogue: situated learning and changing practice. Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (Eds.). Community, economic creativity and organization (283-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press
16. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Limberg, L.; Sundin, O. & Talja, S. (2012). Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. Human IT, 11(2), 93-130
18. Lipponen, L. (2010). Information literacy as situated and distributed activity. Lloyd, A. & Talja. S. (Eds.). Practising information literacy. Bringing theories of learning, practice and literacy together (51-64). Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies
19. Lloyd, A. (2005). No man (or woman) is an island: information literacy, affordances and communities of practice. Australian Library Journal, 54(3), 230-237
20. Lloyd, A. (2009). Informing practice: information experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation, 65(3), 396-419
21. Lloyd, A. (2010). Framing information literacy as information practice: site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245-258
22. Lloyd, A. (2011). Between a rock and a hard place: what counts as information literacy in the workplace and how is it conceptualized?Library Trends, 60(2), 277-296
23. Lloyd, A. (2012). Information literacy as a socially enacted practice: sensitising themes for an emerging perspective of people-in-practice. Journal of Documentation, 68(6), 772-783
24. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul
25. Moring, C. (2011). Newcomer information practices: negotiations on information seeking in and across communities of practice. Human IT, 11(2), 1-20
26. Pilerot, O. & Limberg, L. (2011). Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: a study of design scholars´ information practices. Journal of Documentation, 67(2), 312-333
27. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a social theory of practices: a development in culturalist theorising. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263
28. Rose, G. (2010). Doing family photography. Farnham: Ashgate
29. Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behaviour and information practice: reviewing the 'umbrella concepts' of information-seeking studies. The Library Quarterly,77(2), 109-132
30. Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: a social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press
31. Schatzki, T. R. (2000). The social bearing of nature. Inquiry, 43(1), 21-38
32. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: practice theory. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). The practice turn in contemporary theory (1-14). London: Routledge
33. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: a philosophical account of the constitution of everyday life. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
34. Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: on performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Maryland: Lexington Books
35. Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In Higgs. J. et al. (Eds). Practice-based education: perspectives and strategies (13-26). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
36. Talja, S. (2006). The domain analytic approach to scholars information practices. Fisher, K.E., Erdelez, S. & McKechnie, L. (Eds.). Theories of information behaviour (123-127). Medford, NJ: Information Today
37. Talja, S. & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. Spink, A. & Cole, C. (eds.). New directions in human information behavior (113-134). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer
38. Talja, S. & Lloyd, A. (2010). Integrating theories of learning, literacies and information practice. Lloyd, A. and Talja. S. (Eds.). Practising information literacy. Bringing theories of learning, practice and literacy together (viiii-xx). Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies
39. Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R. & Talja, S. (2005). Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. Library Quarterly, 75(3), 329–345
40. Veinot, T. C. (2007). ‘The eyes of the power company’: workplace information practices of a vault inspector. The Library Quarterly, 77(2), 157-179
41. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
42. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. Blackmore, C. (Ed.).Social learning systems and communities of practices (179-198). London: Springer
43. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: MacMillian