Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 776-788

  Allen, David ^a   Karanasios, Stan ^b   Slavova, Mira ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Ghana)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY THEORY; INFORMATION BEHAVIOR; RESEARCH ACTIVITIES; RESEARCH GROUPS; UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS;

ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS; SEMANTICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 79952383893     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21441     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Allen, D., (2000). Information strategy formation in UK higher education institutions. Doctoral dissertation, Sheffield University Sheffield.
2. Allen, D., &, Ellis, D., (1997). Beyond paradigm closure in information systems research: Theoretical possibilities for pluralism in Galliers. In, R. Galliers, C. Murphy, H. Hansen, R. O'Callghan, S. Carlsson, &, C. Loebbecke, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 760-776). Cork, Ireland: Cork Publishing Company.
3. Allen, D.K., &, Ellis, D., (1999). The paradigm debate in IS research. In, L.K. Brooks, &, C. Kimble, (Eds.), Proceedings of the UK Academy of Information Systems Annual Conference (pp. 83-97). York, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill.
4. Allen, D.K., &, Wilson, T.D., (2004). Action, interaction and the role of ambiguity in the introduction of mobile information systems in a UK police force. In, E. Lawrence, B. Pernici, &, J. Krogstie, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Mobile Information Systems: IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems (Vol. I, pp. 15-37). New York: Springer.
5. Backhurst, D., (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Education Review, 61 (2), 197-210.
6. Barki, H., Titah, R., &, Boffo, C., (2007). Information system use-related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Information Systems Research, 18 (2), 173-192.
7. Benoët, G., (2001). Critical theory as a foundation for pragmatic information systems design. Information Research, 6 (2). Retrieved from
8. Berryman, J.M., (2006). What defines 'enough' information? How policy workers make judgements and decisions during information seeking: Preliminary results from an exploratory study. Information Research, 11 (4). Retrieved from
9. Bertelsen, O.W., &, Bødker, S., (2003). Activity theory. In, J.M. Caroll, (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Towards an interdisciplinary science (pp. 291-324). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Bertelsen, O.W., Bødker, S., &, John, M.C., (2003). Activity theory. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks (pp. 291-324). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Bødker, S., (1991). Through the interface. A human activity approach to user interface design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Burnett, G., &, Jaeger, P.T., (2008). Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: the ramifications of the information behavior of social groups in public policy and the public sphere. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 13 (2). Retrieved from
13. Burton-West, T., vondracek, R., Erdelez, S., Hendry, D.G., Hirsh, S., &, Marchionini, G., (2005, October). Lost in translation? Applying information behavior research to information systems design (Vol. 42). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Charlotte, North Carolina.
14. Case, D.O., (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
15. Case, D.O., (2006). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40 (1), 293-327.
16. Courtright, C., (2007). Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 273-306.
17. Cronin, B., (2008). The sociological turn in information science. Journal of Information Science, 34 (4), 465-475.
18. Cronin, B., &, Meho, L.I., (2008). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (4), 551-564. (Pubitemid 351310577)
19. Davydov, V.V., (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 39-52). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dervin, B., (1997). Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast (pp. 13-38). Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Seeking in Context. Tampere, Finland: Taylor Graham Publishing.
21. Dervin, B., (2003). Human studies and user studies: A call for methodological inter-disciplinarity. Information Research, 9 (1), Paper 166.
22. Dervin, B., &, Nilan, M., (1986). Information needs and uses. In, M. Williams, (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 21, pp. 3-33). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
23. Dourish, P., (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (1), 19-30.
24. Ellis, D., Allen, D.K., &, Wilson, T.D., (1999). Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50 (12), 1095-1107. (Pubitemid 30510998)
25. Engeström, Y., (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
26. Engeström, Y., (1999). Activity theory and transformation. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 1-38). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
27. Engeström, Y., (2000). Activity theory and the social construction of knowledge: A story of four umpires. Organization, 7 (2), 301-310.
28. Engeström, Y., (2008). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting with Computers, 20 (2), 256-259. (Pubitemid 351253769)
29. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., &, Vähäaho, T., (1999a). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In, S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, U.J. Jensen, & International Society for Activity Theory and Cultural Research Congress (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (p. 381). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
30. Engeström, Y., &, Miettinen, R., (1999). Introduction. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
31. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., &, Punamäki-Gitai, R.-L., (1999b). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
32. Fidel, R., &, Pejtersen, A.M., (2004). From information behavior research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work Analysis framework. Information Research, 10 (1), Paper 210.
33. Grant, J., Brutscher, P.-B., Kirk, S., Butler, L., &, Wooding, S., (2009). Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international practice Prepared for the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Cambridge, UK: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from
34. Han, P., &, Jones, M., (1994). The dialectics of information systems: Judge Institute of Management. Research paper 1994/4, Cambridge University, United Kingdom.
35. Ingwersen, P., &, Järvelin, K., (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
36. Järvelin, K., &, Ingwersen, P., (2004). Information seeking research needs extension towards tasks and technology Information Research, 10 (1), paper 212.
37. Järvelin, K., &, Wilson, T.D., (2003). On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research. Information Research, 9 (1). Retrieved from
38. Johnson, J.D., (2009). An impressionistic mapping of information behavior with special attention to contexts, rationality and ignorance. Information Processing & Management, 45 (5). doi10.1016/j.ipm.2009.04.005
39. Johnstone, D., Bonner, M., &, Tate, M., (2004). Bringing human information behavior into information systems research: An application of systems modelling. Information Research, 9 (4), Paper 191.
40. Kaptelinin, V., (1996). Computer-aided activity: functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In, B.A. Nardi, (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
41. Kaptelinin, V., &, Nardi, B., (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Karanasios, S., Allen, D., &, Vardaxoglou, G., (2009). In innovation in UK law enforcement: The emergence of mobile data. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco. Retrieved from
43. Keshavarz, H., (2008). Human information behavior and design, development and evaluation of information retrieval systems. Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42 (4), 391-401.
44. Korpela, M., Soriyan, H.A., &, Olufokunbi, K.C., (2000). Activity analysis as a method for information systems development: General experiments from Nigeria and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 191-210.
45. Kuhlthau, C.C., (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
46. Kuutti, K., (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In, B.A. Nardi, (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Kuutti, K., (1999). Activity theory, transformation of work, and information systems design. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 360-376). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
48. Leiman, M., (1999). The concept of sign in the work of Vygotsky, Winnicott, and Bakhtin: Further integration of object relations theory and activity theory. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 419-434). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
49. Lektorsky, V.A., (1999). Activity theory in a new era. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 65-69). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
50. Leonardi, P.M., &, Barley, S.R., (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18 (3), 159-176.
51. Leont'ev, A.N., (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52. Makri, S., Blandord, A., &, Cox, L.A., (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behavior of academic lawyers: From Ellis's model to design. Information Processing & Management, 44 (2), 613-634. (Pubitemid 351288471)
53. Miettinen, R., (2006). Epistemology of transformative material activity: John Dewey's pragmatism and cultural-historical activity theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 36 (4), 389-408. (Pubitemid 44952290)
54. Nardi, B.A., (1996a). Activity theory and human computer interaction. In, B.A. Nardi, (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
55. Nardi, B.A., (1996b). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Nardi, B.A., (1996c). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In, B.A. Nardi, (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57. Pettigrew, K.E., Fidel, R., &, Bruce, H., (2001). Conceptual Frameworks in Information Behavior. In, M.E. Williams, (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 43 -78). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
58. Ponomarenko, V.A., (2004). The significance of theoretical concepts in activity theory for applied research in aviation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5 (4), 297-312.
59. Rogers, Y., (2008). 57 varieties of activity theory. Interacting With Computers, 20 (2), 247-250. (Pubitemid 351253770)
60. Rouse, W.B., &, Rouse, S.H., (1984). Human information seeking and design of information systems. Information Processing & Management, 20 (1-2), 129-138.
61. Savolainen, R., (2006). Time as a context of information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 28 (1), 110-127. (Pubitemid 43355976)
62. Savolainen, R., (2007). Information beviour and information practice: Reviewing the "umbrella concepts" of information-seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77 (2), 109-132.
63. Savolainen, R., (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31 (1), 38-45.
64. Sawyer, S., &, Huang, H.Y., (2007). Conceptualizing information, technology, and people: Comparing information science and information systems literatures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (10), 1436-1447. (Pubitemid 47196187)
65. Schatzki, T.R., (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
66. Schatzki, T.R., (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26 (3), 465-484.
67. Spasser, M.A., (1999). Informing information science: The case for activity theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50 (12), 1136-1138. (Pubitemid 30511005)
68. Spasser, M.A., (2002). Realist activity theory for digital library evaluation: Conceptual framework and case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 81-110. (Pubitemid 34585841)
69. Strauss, A.L., (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
70. Talja, S., Keso, H., &, Pietilainen, T., (1999). The production of 'context' in information seeking research: A metatheoretical view. Information Processing & Management, 35 (6), 751-763. (Pubitemid 30509550)
71. Talja, S., Tuominen, K., &, Savolainen, R., (2005). "Isms" in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61 (1), 79-101. (Pubitemid 40687656)
72. Tolman, C.W., (1999). Society versus context in individual development: Does theory make a difference ? In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 70-86). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
73. Toulmin, S., (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, &, R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai, (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 53-64). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
74. Uden, L., (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1 (1), 81-102.
75. Uden, L., Valderas, P., &, Pastor, O., (2008). An activity-theory-based model to analyse Web application requirements. Information Research, 13 (2). Retrieved from
76. Vakkari, P., (2008). Trends and approaches in information behavior research. Information Research, 13 (4).
77. Van House, N.A., (2004). Science and technology studies and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 3-86.
78. Vardaxoglou, Slavova, M., Allen, D., &, Wilson, T., (2008). Perceptions and adoption of technological innovation in UK public safety organisations: The case of introducing location services in the police. Paper presented at the EGPA Conference, Rotterdam.
79. von Thaden, T.L., (2007). Building a foundation to study distributed information behavior. Information Research, 12 (3), Paper 312. Retrieved from
80. Webber, S., (2003). Information science in 2003: A critique. Journal of Information Science, 29 (4), 311-330.
81. Widén-Wulff, G., &, Davenport, E., (2007). Activity systems, information sharing and the development of organizational knowledge in two Finnish firms: An exploratory study using activity theory. Information Research, 12 (3).
82. Wilson, T.D., (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3 (2), 49-56.
83. Wilson, T.D., (2006). A re-examination of information seeking behavior in the context of activity theory. Information Research, 11 (4), Paper 260. Retrieved from
84. Wilson, T., (2008a). The information user: past, present and future. Journal of Information Science, 34 (4), 457-464.
85. Wilson, T.D., (2008b). Activity theory and information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 119-161.
86. Xu, Y., (2007). The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior, part I: An activity theory perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (7), 958-970. (Pubitemid 46826213)
87. Xu, Y., &, Liu, C., (2007). The dynamics of interactive information retrieval, part II: An empirical study from the activity theory perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (7), 987-988.