Efficient and rapid generation of large genomic variants in rats and mice using CRISMERE

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Birling, Marie Christine ^a   Schaeffer, Laurence ^a   André, Philippe ^a   Lindner, Loic ^a   Maréchal, Damien ^a   Ayadi, Abdel ^a   Sorg, Tania ^a   Pavlovic, Guillaume ^a   Hérault, Yann ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a INSTITUT CLINIQUE DE LA SOURIS   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE GÉNÉTIQUE ET DE BIOLOGIE MOLÉCULAIRE ET CELLULAIRE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d INSERM   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; GENE EDITING; GENE REARRANGEMENT; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; RAT; TIME FACTOR; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GENE EDITING; GENE REARRANGEMENT; MICE; RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85014746979     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep43331     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Dierssen, M., Herault, Y., Estivill, X. Aneuploidy: from a physiological mechanism of variance to Down syndrome. Physiol Rev 89, 887-920 (2009).
2. Choong, X. Y., Tosh, J. L., Pulford, L. J., Fisher, E. M. Dissecting Alzheimer disease in Down syndrome using mouse models. Front Behav Neurosci 9, 268 (2015).
3. Lana-Elola, E., et al. Genetic dissection of Down syndrome-associated congenital heart defects using a new mouse mapping panel. Elife 5 (2016).
4. Brault, V., et al. Opposite phenotypes of muscle strength and locomotor function in mouse models of partial trisomy and monosomy 21 for the proximal Hspa13-App region. PLoS Genet 11, e1005062 (2015).
5. Jiang, X., et al. Genetic dissection of the Down syndrome critical region. Hum Mol Genet (2015).
6. Olson, L. E., Richtsmeier, J. T., Leszl, J., Reeves, R. H. A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 306, 687-690 (2004).
7. Brudno, M., et al. Automated whole-genome multiple alignment of rat, mouse, human. Genome Res 14, 685-692 (2004).
8. Zhao, S., et al. Human, mouse, rat genome large-scale rearrangements: stability versus speciation. Genome Res 14, 1851-1860 (2004).
9. Mullins, L. J., Mullins, J. J. Insights from the rat genome sequence. Genome Biol 5, 221 (2004).
10. Nigam, R., et al. Rat Genome Database: a unique resource for rat, human, mouse quantitative trait locus data. Physiol Genomics 45, 809-816 (2013).
11. Zhang, L., et al. Human chromosome 21 orthologous region on mouse chromosome 17 is a major determinant of Down syndromerelated developmental cognitive deficits. Hum Mol Genet 23, 578-589 (2014).
12. Brault, V., Pereira, P., Duchon, A., Herault, Y. Modeling chromosomes in mouse to explore the function of genes, genomic disorders, chromosomal organization. PLoS Genet 2, e86 (2006).
13. Brault, V., Besson, V., Magnol, L., Duchon, A., Herault, Y. Cre/loxP-mediated chromosome engineering of the mouse genome. Handb Exp Pharmacol 178, 29-48 (2007).
14. Herault, Y., Rassoulzadegan, M., Cuzin, F., Duboule, D. Engineering chromosomes in mice through targeted meiotic recombination (TAMERE). Nat Genet 20, 381-384 (1998).
15. Ramirez-Solis, R., Liu, P., Bradley, A. Chromosome engineering in mice. Nature 378, 720-724 (1995).
16. Zheng, B., Mills, A. A., Bradley, A. A system for rapid generation of coat color-tagged knockouts and defined chromosomal rearrangements in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 2354-2360 (1999).
17. Adams, D. J., et al. Mutagenic insertion and chromosome engineering resource (MICER). Nat Genet 36, 867-871 (2004).
18. Ruf, S., et al. Large-scale analysis of the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome with a transposon-associated sensor. Nature Genetics 43, 379-386 (2011).
19. Spitz, F., Herkenne, C., Morris, M. A., Duboule, D. Inversion-induced disruption of the Hoxd cluster leads to the partition of regulatory landscapes. Nat Genet 37, 889-893 (2005).
20. Li, J., et al. Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9. J Mol Cell Biol 7, 284-298 (2015).
21. Wang, L., et al. Large genomic fragment deletion and functional gene cassette knock-in via Cas9 protein mediated genome editing in one-cell rodent embryos. Scientific Reports 5, 17517 (2015).
22. Zhang, L., et al. Large genomic fragment deletions and insertions in mouse using CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS One 10, e0120396 (2015).
23. Kraft, K., et al. Deletions, Inversions, Duplications: Engineering of Structural Variants using CRISPR/Cas in Mice. Cell Rep 10, 833-339 (2015).
24. Boroviak, K., Doe, B., Banerjee, R., Yang, F., Bradley, A. Chromosome engineering in zygotes with CRISPR/Cas9. Genesis 54, 78-85 (2016).
25. Lopes Pereira, P., et al. A new mouse model for the trisomy of the Abcg1-U2af1 region reveals the complexity of the combinatorial genetic code of down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 18, 4756-4769 (2009).
26. Yu, T., et al. Effects of individual segmental trisomies of human chromosome 21 syntenic regions on hippocampal long-term potentiation and cognitive behaviors in mice. Brain Research 1366, 162-171 (2010).
27. Watanabe, M., et al. Mice deficient in cystathionine beta-synthase: animal models for mild and severe homocyst(e)inemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 1585-1589 (1995).
28. De la Torre, R., et al. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, a DYRK1A inhibitor, rescues cognitive deficits in Down syndrome mouse models and in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res 58, 278-288 (2014).
29. Luco, S. M., et al. Case report of novel DYRK1A mutations in 2 individuals with syndromic intellectual disability and a review of the literature. BMC Med Genet 17, 15 (2016).
30. Bronicki, L. M., et al. Ten new cases further delineate the syndromic intellectual disability phenotype caused by mutations in DYRK1A. Eur J Hum Genet 23, 1482-1487 (2015).
31. van Bon, B. W., et al. Disruptive de novo mutations of DYRK1A lead to a syndromic form of autism and ID. Mol Psychiatry 21, 26-32 (2016).
32. Møller, R. S., et al. Truncation of the Down syndrome candidate gene DYRK1A in two unrelated patients with microcephaly. Am J Hum Genet 82, 1165-1170 (2008).
33. Guedj, F., et al. DYRK1A: a master regulatory protein controlling brain growth. Neurobiol Dis 46, 190-203 (2012).
34. Altafaj, X., et al. Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 10, 1915-1923 (2001).
35. Fotaki, V., et al. Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Mol Cell Biol 22, 6636-6647 (2002).
36. Benavides-Piccione, R., et al. Alterations in the phenotype of neocortical pyramidal cells in the Dyrk1A+/? mouse. Neurobiol Dis 20, 115-122 (2005).
37. Fotaki, V., Martinez De Lagran, M., Estivill, X., Arbones, M., Dierssen, M. Haploinsufficiency of Dyrk1A in mice leads to specific alterations in the development and regulation of motor activity. Behav Neurosci 118, 815-821 (2004).
38. Arque, G., et al. Impaired spatial learning strategies and novel object recognition in mice haploinsufficient for the dual specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase-1A (Dyrk1A). PLoS One 3, e2575 (2008).
39. Li, Z., et al. Duplication of the entire 22. 9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 16, 1359-1366 (2007).
40. Deng, T., et al. HMGN1 modulates nucleosome occupancy and DNase I hypersensitivity at the CpG island promoters of embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 33, 3377-3389 (2013).
41. Lane, A. A., et al. Triplication of a 21q22 region contributes to B cell transformation through HMGN1 overexpression and loss of histone H3 Lys27 trimethylation. Nat Genet 46, 618-623 (2014).
42. Malliri, A., et al. Mice deficient in the Rac activator Tiam1 are resistant to Ras-induced skin tumours. Nature 417, 867-871 (2002).
43. Growney, J. D., et al. Loss of Runx1 perturbs adult hematopoiesis and is associated with a myeloproliferative phenotype. Blood 106, 494-504 (2005).
44. Wu, S., Ying, G., Wu, Q., Capecchi, M. R. Toward simpler and faster genome-wide mutagenesis in mice. Nat Genet 39, 922-930 (2007).
45. Lee, H. J., Kweon, J., Kim, E., Kim, S., Kim, J. S. Targeted chromosomal duplications and inversions in the human genome using zinc finger nucleases. Genome Res 22, 539-548 (2012).
46. Gupta, A., et al. Targeted chromosomal deletions and inversions in zebrafish. Genome Res 23, 1008-1017 (2013).
47. Pan, D., Zhang, L. Tandemly arrayed genes in vertebrate genomes. Comp Funct Genomics, 545269 (2008).
48. Duchon, A., Besson, V., Pereira, P. L., Magnol, L., Herault, Y. Inducing segmental aneuploid mosaicism in the mouse through targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination. Genetics 180, 51-59 (2008).
49. Herault, Y., et al. Controlled somatic and germline copy number variation in the mouse model. Curr Genomics 11, 470-480 (2010).
50. Tai, D. J., et al. Engineering microdeletions and microduplications by targeting segmental duplications with CRISPR. Nat Neurosci 17 517-522 (2016).