Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions

Accounts of Chemical Research

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 302-309

  Liu, Zhihai ^a   Su, Minyi ^a   Han, Li ^a   Liu, Jie ^a   Yang, Qifan ^a   Li, Yan ^a   Wang, Renxiao ^a,b  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (China)

^b MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Macao)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

CHEMISTRY; DRUG DESIGN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN DATABASE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 85013653033     PISSN: 00014842     EISSN: 15204898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00491     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Talele, T. T. et al. Successful Applications of Computer-Aided Drug Discovery: Moving Drugs from Concept to the Clinic Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 127-141 10.2174/156802610790232251
2. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373 10.1002/wcms.18
3. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 935-949 10.1038/nrd1549
4. Leach, A. R.; Shoichet, B. K.; Peishoff, C. E. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5851-5855 10.1021/jm060999m
5. Huang, S.-Y.; Grinter, S. Z.; Zou, X. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 12899-12908 10.1039/c0cp00151a
6. Schneider, G.; Fechner, U. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2005, 4, 649-663 10.1038/nrd1799
7. Liu, J.; Wang, R. Classification of Current Scoring Functions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 55, 475-482 10.1021/ci500731a
8. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26 10.1023/A:1016357811882
9. Englebienne, P.; Moitessier, N. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1568-1580 10.1021/ci8004308
10. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2287-2303 10.1021/jm0203783
11. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Fang, X.; Wang, S. An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2114-2125 10.1021/ci049733j
12. Roche, O.; Kiyama, R.; Brooks, C. L. III. Ligand-Protein DataBase: Linking Protein-Ligand Complex Structures to Binding Data J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3592-3598 10.1021/jm000467k
13. Puvanendrampillai, D.; Mitchell, J. B. O. Protein Ligand Database (PLD): additional understanding of the nature and specificity of protein-ligand complexes Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1856-1857 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg243
14. Block, P.; Sotriffer, C. A.; Dramburg, I.; Klebe, G. AffinDB: a freely accessible database of affinities for protein-ligand complexes from the PDB Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D522-D526 10.1093/nar/gkj039
15. Sotriffer, C. A.; Sanschagrin, P.; Matter, H.; Klebe, G. SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2008, 73, 395-419 10.1002/prot.22058
16. Berman, H. M.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 980 10.1038/nsb1203-980
17. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind Database: Collection of Binding Affinities for Protein-Ligand Complexes with Known Three-Dimensional Structures J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980 10.1021/jm030580l
18. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C.-Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind Database: Methodologies and Updates J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4111-4119 10.1021/jm048957q
19. Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Han, L.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Nie, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R. PDB-wide Collection of Binding Data: Current Status of the PDBbind Database Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 405-412 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626
20. Inhester, T.; Rarey, M. Protein-ligand interaction databases: advanced tools to mine activity data and interactions on a structural level WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 562-575 10.1002/wcms.1192
21. Cheng, T.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1079-1093 10.1021/ci9000053
22. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Cheng, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Evaluation of the Performance of Four Molecular Docking Programs on a Diverse Set of Protein-Ligand Complexes J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 2109-2125 10.1002/jcc.21498
23. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Han, L.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, R. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: I. Compilation of the Test Set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 1700-1716 10.1021/ci500080q
24. Li, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: II. Evaluation Methods and General Results J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 1717-1736 10.1021/ci500081m
25. Liu, Z. G.; Wang, G. T.; Li, Z. T.; Wang, R. Geometrical Preferences of the Hydrogen Bonds on Protein-Ligand Binding Interface Derived from Statistical Surveys and Quantum Mechanics Calculations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 1959-1973 10.1021/ct800267x
26. Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Wang, R. A Statistical Survey on the Binding Constants of Covalently Bound Protein-Ligand Complexes Mol. Inf. 2010, 29, 87-96 10.1002/minf.200900003
27. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Test MM-PB/SA on True Conformational Ensembles of Protein-Ligand Complexes J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1682-1692 10.1021/ci100036a
28. Cheng, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. A Knowledge-guided Strategy for Improving the Accuracy of Scoring Functions in Binding Affinity Prediction BMC Bioinf. 2010, 11, 193-208 10.1186/1471-2105-11-193
29. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Han, L.; Li, C.; Wang, R. Mining the Characteristic Interaction Patterns on Protein-Protein Binding Interfaces J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 2437-2447 10.1021/ci400241s
30. Liu, Z. H.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y. C.; Nie, W.; Han, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, R. Cross-Mapping of Protein-Ligand Binding Data between ChEMBL and PDBbind Mol. Inf. 2015, 34, 568-576 10.1002/minf.201500010
31. Ahmed, A.; Smith, R. D.; Clark, J. J.; Dunbar, J. B.; Carlson, H. A. Recent improvements to Binding MOAD: a resource for protein-ligand binding affinities and structures Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D465-D469 10.1093/nar/gku1088
32. Moitessier, N.; Englebienne, P.; Lee, D.; Lawandi, J.; Corbeil, C. R. Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, S7-S26 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515
33. Waszkowycz, B.; Clark, D. E.; Gancia, E. Outstanding challenges in protein-ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011, 1, 229-259 10.1002/wcms.18
34. Ain, Q. U.; Aleksandrova, A.; Roessler, F. D.; Ballester, P. J. Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015, 5, 405-424 10.1002/wcms.1225
35. Yan, Z.; Wang, J. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of ligand binding with the inclusion of solvation effect Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2015, 83, 1632-1642 10.1002/prot.24848
36. Mysinger, M. M.; Carchia, M.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6582-6594 10.1021/jm300687e
37. Carlson, H. A. Lessons Learned over Four Benchmark Exercises from the Community Structure-Activity Resource J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 951-954 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00182
38. Kalliokoski, T.; Kramer, C.; Vulpetti, A. Quality issues with public domain chemogenomics data Mol. Inf. 2013, 32, 898-905 10.1002/minf.201300051