The PDBbind database: Collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2977-2980

  Wang, Renxiao ^a   Fang, Xueliang ^a   Lu, Yipin ^a   Wang, Shaomeng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN; LIGAND;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; GENOMICS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEPTOR BINDING; SCREENING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; INTERNET; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 2542530042     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm030580l     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Böhm, H. J.; Stahl, M. The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applications. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D. B., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Inc.: New York, 2002; pp 41-88.
2. Böhm, H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
3. Jain, A. N. Scoring non-covalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440.
4. Head, R. D.; Smythe, M. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Waller, C. L.; Green, S. M., Marshall, G. R. VALIDATE: A new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3959-3969.
5. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
6. Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Eldridge, M. D. Empirical scoring functions. II. The testing of an empirical scoring function for the prediction of ligand-receptor binding affinities and the use of Bayesian regression to improve the quality of the model. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 503-519.
7. Böhm, H. J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 309-323.
8. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Lai, L. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4, 379-394.
9. Cozzini, P.; Fornabaio, M.; Marabotti, A.; Abraham, D. J.; Kellogg, G. E.; Mozzarelti, A. Simple, Intuitive Calculations of Free Energy of Binding for Protein-Ligand Complexes. 1. Models without Explicit Constrained Water. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2469-2483.
10. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26.
11. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
12. Muegge, I. A knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: Probing the reference state. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 20, 99-114.
13. Muegge, I. Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 418-425.
14. Mitchell, J. B. O.; Laskowski, R. A.; Alex, A.; Thornton, J. M. BLEEP: potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions. I. Generating potential. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 1165-1176.
15. Mitchell, J. B. O.; Laskowski, R. A.; Alex, A.; Forster, M. J.; Thornton, J. M. BLEEP: potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions. II. Calculation of binding energies and comparison with experimental data. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 1177-1185.
16. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
17. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Predicting binding modes, binding affinities and "hot spots" for protein-ligand complexes using a knowledge-based scoring function. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 20, 115-144.
18. Ishchenko, A. V.; Shakhnovich, E. I. Small molecule growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2770-2780.
19. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, I. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242 (http:// www.rcsb.org/pdb/).
20. Kenakin, T. Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction, 3rd ed. ; Lippincott-Raven Press: New York, 1997.
21. SYBYL (software), version 6.8; Tripos Inc.: St. Louis, MO; http:// www.tripos.com/.
22. Hendlich, M.; Bergner, A.; Gunther, J.; Klebe, G. Relibase: Design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326, 607-620 (http://relibase.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/).
23. Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Liu, M.; Gilson, M. K. The Binding Database: Data Management and Interface Design. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 130-139 (http://www.bindingdb.org/).
24. Roche, O.; Kiyama, R.; Brooks, C. L., III. Ligand-Protein DataBase: Linking Protein-Ligand Complex Structures to Binding Data. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3592-3598 (http:// lpdb.scripps.edu/).
25. Puvanendrampillai, D.; Mitchell, J. B. O. Protein Ligand Database (PLD): additional understanding of the nature and specificity of protein-ligand complexes. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1856-1857 (http://www-mitchell.ch.cam.ac.uk/pld/index.html).
26. Personal communications with Dr. Heather A. Carlson at the College of Pharmacy, the University of Michigan.