Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): Better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 55, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 6582-6594

  Mysinger, Michael M ^a   Carchia, Michael ^a   Irwin, John J ^a   Shoichet, Brian K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; INTERNET; MOLECULAR DOCKING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUALITY CONTROL;

BENCHMARKING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 84864264343     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: 15204804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm300687e     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 935-949
2. Kolb, P.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Irwin, J. J.; Fung, J. J.; Kobilka, B. K.; Shoichet, B. K. Structure-based discovery of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor ligands Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 6843-6848
3. Mysinger, M. M.; Weiss, D. R.; Ziarek, J. J.; Gravel, S.; Doak, A. K.; Karpiak, J.; Heveker, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Volkman, B. F. Structure-based ligand discovery for the protein-protein interface of chemokine receptor CXCR4 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109, 5517-5522
4. Gruneberg, S.; Stubbs, M. T.; Klebe, G. Successful virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3588-3602
5. Jain, A. N.; Nicholls, A. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 133-139
6. Babaoglu, K.; Simeonov, A.; Irwin, J. J.; Nelson, M. E.; Feng, B.; Thomas, C. J.; Cancian, L.; Costi, M. P.; Maltby, D. A.; Jadhav, A.; Inglese, J.; Austin, C. P.; Shoichet, B. K. Comprehensive mechanistic analysis of hits from high-throughput and docking screens against beta-lactamase J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2502-2511
7. Ferreira, R. S.; Simeonov, A.; Jadhav, A.; Eidam, O.; Mott, B. T.; Keiser, M. J.; McKerrow, J. H.; Maloney, D. J.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. Complementarity between a docking and a high-throughput screen in discovering new cruzain inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4891-4905
8. Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 2644-2676
9. Enyedy, I. J.; Egan, W. J. Can we use docking and scoring for hit-to-lead optimization? J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 161-168
10. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042
11. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767
12. Pham, T. A.; Jain, A. N. Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5856-5868
13. Kellenberger, E.; Rodrigo, J.; Muller, P.; Rognan, D. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy Proteins 2004, 57, 225-242
14. Ferrara, P.; Gohlke, H.; Price, D. J.; Klebe, G.; Brooks, C. L., III. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3032-3047
15. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6789-6801
16. Christofferson, A. J.; Huang, N. How to benchmark methods for structure-based virtual screening of large compound libraries. In Computational Drug Discovery and Design (Methods in Molecular Biology); 2011/12/21 ed.; Baron, R., Ed.; Springer Protocols: New York, 2012; Vol. 819, Chapter 13, pp 187-195.
17. Verdonk, M. L.; Berdini, V.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Mooij, W. T.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, R. D.; Watson, P. Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 793-806
18. Kuntz, I. D.; Chen, K.; Sharp, K. A.; Kollman, P. A. The maximal affinity of ligands Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 9997-10002
19. Fan, H.; Irwin, J. J.; Webb, B. M.; Klebe, G.; Shoichet, B. K.; Sali, A. Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 2512-2527
20. Repasky, M. P.; Murphy, R. B.; Banks, J. L.; Greenwood, J. R.; Tubert-Brohman, I.; Bhat, S.; Friesner, R. A. Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-012-9575-9
21. Brozell, S. R.; Mukherjee, S.; Balius, T. E.; Roe, D. R.; Case, D. A.; Rizzo, R. C. Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-012-9565-y
22. Neves, M. A.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-012-9547-0
23. Spitzer, R.; Jain, A. N. Surflex-Dock: docking benchmarks and real-world application J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-011-9533-y
24. Schneider, N.; Hindle, S.; Lange, G.; Klein, R.; Albrecht, J.; Briem, H.; Beyer, K.; Claussen, H.; Gastreich, M.; Lemmen, C.; Rarey, M. Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 10.1007/s10822-011-9531-0
25. Liebeschuetz, J. W.; Cole, J. C.; Korb, O. Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-012-9551-4
26. Novikov, F. N.; Stroylov, V. S.; Zeifman, A. A.; Stroganov, O. V.; Kulkov, V.; Chilov, G. G. Lead Finder docking and virtual screening evaluation with Astex and DUD test sets J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 10.1007/s10822-012-9549-y
27. Good, A. C.; Oprea, T. I. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection? J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 169-178
28. Mackey, M. D.; Melville, J. L. Better than random? The chemotype enrichment problem J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1154-1162
29. Hawkins, P. C.; Warren, G. L.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 179-190
30. Irwin, J. J. Community benchmarks for virtual screening J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 193-199
31. Mysinger, M. M.; Shoichet, B. K. Rapid context-dependent ligand desolvation in molecular docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1561-1573
32. Vogel, S. M.; Bauer, M. R.; Boeckler, F. M. DEKOIS: demanding evaluation kits for objective in silico screening-a versatile tool for benchmarking docking programs and scoring functions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2650-2665
33. Wallach, I.; Lilien, R. Virtual decoy sets for molecular docking benchmarks J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 196-202
34. Gatica, E. A.; Cavasotto, C. N. Ligand and decoy sets for docking to G protein-coupled receptors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 1-6
35. Cereto-Massague, A.; Guasch, L.; Valls, C.; Mulero, M.; Pujadas, G.; Garcia-Vallve, S. DecoyFinder: an easy-to-use python GUI application for building target-specific decoy sets Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1661-1662
36. Rohrer, S. G.; Baumann, K. Maximum unbiased validation (MUV) data sets for virtual screening based on PubChem bioactivity data J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 169-184
37. Ripphausen, P.; Wassermann, A. M.; Bajorath, J. REPROVIS-DB: a benchmark system for ligand-based virtual screening derived from reproducible prospective applications J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2467-2473
38. Gaulton, A.; Bellis, L. J.; Bento, A. P.; Chambers, J.; Davies, M.; Hersey, A.; Light, Y.; McGlinchey, S.; Michalovich, D.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Overington, J. P. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1100-1107
39. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887-2893
40. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242
41. Apweiler, R.; Bairoch, A.; Wu, C. H.; Barker, W. C.; Boeckmann, B.; Ferro, S.; Gasteiger, E.; Huang, H.; Lopez, R.; Magrane, M.; Martin, M. J.; Natale, D. A.; O'Donovan, C.; Redaschi, N.; Yeh, L. S. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D115-D119
42. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K.; Mysinger, M. M.; Huang, N.; Colizzi, F.; Wassam, P.; Cao, Y. Automated docking screens: a feasibility study J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5712-5720
43. Powers, R. A.; Morandi, F.; Shoichet, B. K. Structure-based discovery of a novel, noncovalent inhibitor of AmpC beta-lactamase Structure 2002, 10, 1013-1023
44. Carlsson, J.; Yoo, L.; Gao, Z. G.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K.; Jacobson, K. A. Structure-based discovery of A2A adenosine receptor ligands J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3748-3755
45. Carlsson, J.; Coleman, R. G.; Setola, V.; Irwin, J. J.; Fan, H.; Schlessinger, A.; Sali, A.; Roth, B. L.; Shoichet, B. K. Ligand discovery from a dopamine D3 receptor homology model and crystal structure Natre Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 769-778
46. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 177-182
47. Velankar, S.; McNeil, P.; Mittard-Runte, V.; Suarez, A.; Barrell, D.; Apweiler, R.; Henrick, K. E-MSD: an integrated data resource for bioinformatics Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D262-265
48. Hawkins, P. C.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 74-82
49. Teotico, D. G.; Babaoglu, K.; Rocklin, G. J.; Ferreira, R. S.; Giannetti, A. M.; Shoichet, B. K. Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC beta-lactamase Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 7455-7460
50. Tondi, D.; Morandi, F.; Bonnet, R.; Costi, M. P.; Shoichet, B. K. Structure-based optimization of a non-beta-lactam lead results in inhibitors that do not up-regulate beta-lactamase expression in cell culture J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4632-4639
51. Graves, A. P.; Brenk, R.; Shoichet, B. K. Decoys for docking J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3714-3728
52. Hawkins, P. C.; Skillman, A. G.; Warren, G. L.; Ellingson, B. A.; Stahl, M. T. Conformer generation with OMEGA: algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the Protein Data Bank and Cambridge Structural Database J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 572-584
53. Jain, A. N. Bias, reporting, and sharing: computational evaluations of docking methods J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 201-212