Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: Successes and gaps

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 5851-5855

  Leach, Andrew R ^b   Shoichet, Brian K ^c   Peishoff, Catherine E ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; DOCKING TECHNOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LIGAND INTERACTION; REVIEW; SCORING TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BINDING SITES; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33749245117     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm060999m     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorth, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 935-949.
2. Mohan, V.; Gibbs, A. C.; Cummings, M. D.; Jaeger, E. P.; DesJarlais, R. L. Docking: Success and challenges. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 323-333.
3. Krovat, E. M.; Steindl, T.; Langer, T. Recent advances in docking and scoring. Curr. Computer-Aided Drug Des. 2005, 1, 93-102.
4. Pham, T. A.; Jain, A. J. Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5856-5868.
5. Boda, K.; Johnson, A. P. Molecular complexity analysis of de novo designed ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5869-5879.
6. Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5880-5884.
7. Moitessier, N.; Therrien, E.; Hanessian, S. A method for induced-fit docking, scoring, and ranking of flexible ligands. Application to peptide and pseudopeptidic β-secretase (BACE 1) inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5885-5894.
8. Muegge, I. PMF scoring revisited. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5895-5902.
9. Yang, C.-Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, S. M-Score: A knowledge-based potential scoring function accounting for protein atom mobility. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5903-5911.
10. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A.-M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5931.
11. Kontoyianni, M.; McClellan, L. M.; Sokol, G. S. Evaluation of docking performance: Comparative data on docking algorithms. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 558-565.
12. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC, a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 177-182.
13. Cummings, M. D.; DesJarlais, R. L.; Gibbs, A. C.; Mohan, V.; Jaeger, E. P. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 962-976.
14. van Gunsteren, W. F.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: Methodology, applications, and perspectives in chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 992-1023.
15. Simonson, T.; Carlsson, J.; Case, D. A. Proton binding to proteins: pK(a) calculations with explicit and implicit solvent models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4167-4180.
16. Pearlman, D. A. Evaluating the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7796-7807.
17. Deng, Y.; Roux, B. Calculation of standard binding free energies: Aromatic molecules in the T4 lysozyme L99A mutant. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 1255-1273.
18. Chang, C. E.; Gilson, M. K. Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13156-13164.
19. Bohm, H.-J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
20. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: 1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
21. Smith, R.; Hubbard, R. E.; Gschwend, D. A.; Leach, A. R.; Good, A. C. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (3). New methods and old problems in scoring function design. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2003, 22, 41-53.
22. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1999, 34, 17-28.
23. Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W. M.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R. Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6504-6515.
24. Cerutti, D. S.; Jain, T.; McCammon, J. A. CIRSE: a solvation energy estimator compatible with flexible protein docking and design applications. Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 1579-1596.
25. Kalyanaraman, C.; Bernacki, K.; Jacobson, M. P. Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 2059-2071.
26. Ferrara, P.; Gohlke, H.; Price, D. J.; Klebe, G.; Brooks, C. L., 3rd. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3032-3047.
27. Wei, B. Q.; Baase, W. A.; Weaver, L. H.; Matthews, B. W.; Shoichet, B. K. A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 322, 339-355.
28. Lenin, V. I. What Is To Be Done? Lenin: Collected Works, 4th ed. (English); Progress Publishers: Moscow, 1973; Vol. V, pp 375-376, 451-453, 464-467.
29. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980. Also, see www.pdbbind.org.
30. Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Gilson, M. K. The Binding database: overview and user's guide. Biopolym. Nucleic Acid Sci. 2002, 61, 127-141. Also, see www.bindingdb.org/bind/index.jsp.
31. Hu, L.; Benson, M. L.; Smith, R. D.; Lerner, M. G.; Carlson, H. A. Binding MOAD (mother of all databases). Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2005, 60, 333-340. Also, see www.BindingMOAD.org.
32. Nissink, J. W. M.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction. Proteins 2002, 49, 457-471. Also, see www.c-cdc.cam.ac.uk/products/ life_sciences/validate/astex/.
33. McGovern, S. L.; Caselli, E.; Grigorieff, N.; Shoichet, B. K. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1712-1722.
34. Shoichet, B. K. Screening in a spirit haunted world. Drug Discovery Today. 2006, 607-615.
35. A workshop report is available at http://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/ Reports/DockingWorkshop082505.htm.
36. A workshop report is available at http://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/ Reports/DockingMeeting022406.htm.
37. A workshop report will be posted at http://www.boulder.nist.gov/ div838/.
38. Meeting minutes are available at http://www.nigms.nih.gov/About/Council/ Minutes/May18-19_2006.htm.