The PDBbind database: Methodologies and updates

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 4111-4119

  Wang, Renxiao ^a   Fang, Xueliang ^a   Lu, Yipin ^a   Yang, Chao Yie ^a   Wang, Shaomeng ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DATA BASE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENOMICS; IC 50; LIGAND BINDING; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; INTERNET; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 20444422149     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm048957q     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kuntz, I. D. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science, 1992, 257, 1078-1082.
2. Verlinde, C. L. M. J.; Hol, W. G. J. Structure-based drug design: Progress, results, and challenges. Structure 1994, 2, 577-587.
3. Gane, P. J.; Dean, P. M. Recent advances in structure-based rational drug design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 401-404.
4. Hardy, L. W.; Malikayil, A. The impact of structure-guided drug design on clinical agents. Curr. Drug Discov. 2003, Dec, 15-20.
5. Böhm, H. J.; Stahl, M. The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applications. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D.S., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Inc.: New York, 2002; Vol. 18, pp 41-88.
6. Böhm, H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
7. Jain, A. N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440.
8. Head, R. D.; Smythe, M. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Waller, C. L.; Green, S. M.; Marshall, G. R. VALIDATE: A new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3959-3969.
9. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
10. Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Eldridge, M. D. Empirical scoring functions. II. The testing of an empirical scoring function for the prediction of ligand-receptor binding affinities and the use of Bayesian regression to improve the quality of the model. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 503-519.
11. Böhm, H. J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de nova design or 3D database search programs. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 309-323.
12. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Lai, L. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4, 379-394.
13. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
14. Muegge, I. A knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: Probing the reference state. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 20, 99-114.
15. Muegge, I. Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 418-425.
16. Mitchell, J. B. O.; Laskowski, R. A.; Alex, A.; Thornton, J. M. BLEEP: Potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions. I. Generating potential. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 1165-1176.
17. Mitchell, J. B. O.; Laskowski, R. A.; Alex, A.; Forster, M. J.; Thornton, J. M. BLEEP: Potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions. II. Calculation of binding energies and comparison with experimental data. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 1177-1185.
18. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
19. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Predicting binding modes, binding affinities and "hot spots" for protein-ligand complexes using a knowledge-based scoring function. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 20, 115-144.
20. Ishchenko, A. V.; Shakhnovich, E. I. Small molecule growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2770-2780.
21. Cozzini, P.; Fornabaio, M.; Marabotti, A.; Abraham, D. J.; Kellogg, G. E.; Mozzarelli, A. Simple, Intuitive Calculations of Free Energy of Binding for Protein-Ligand Complexes. 1. Models without Explicit Constrained Water. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2469-2483.
22. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26.
23. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, I. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/.
24. Zhang, J. W.; Aizawa, M.; Amari, S.; Iwasawa, Y.; Nakano T.; Nakata, K. Development of KiBank, a database supporting structure-based drug design. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2004, 28, 401-407. http://kibank.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/.
25. Roth, B. L.; Kroeze, W. K.; Patel, S.; Lopez, E. The multiplicity of serotonin receptors: Uselessly diverse molecules or an embarrassment of riches? Neuroscientist 2000, 6, 252-262. http://kidb.cwru.edu/.
26. Roche, O.; Kiyama, R.; & Brooks, C. L. III. Ligand-Protein DataBase: Linking Protein-Ligand Complex Structures to Binding Data. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3592-3598. http://lpdb.scripps.edu/.
27. Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Gilson, M. K. Binding DB: A web-accessible molecular recognition database. J. Combi. Chem. High-T. Scr. 2001, 4, 719-725. http://www.bindingdb.org/.
28. Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Liu, M.; & Gilson, M. K. The Binding Database: Data Management and Interface Design. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 130-139.
29. Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Gilson, M. K. The Binding Database: Overview and User's Guide. Biopolymers Nucleic Acid Sci. 2002, 61, 127-141.
30. Puvanendrampillai, D. and Mitchell, J. B. O. Protein Ligand Database (PLD): Additional understanding of the nature and specificity of protein-ligand complexes. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1856-1857. http://www-mitchell.ch.cam.ac.uk/ pld/.
31. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind Database: Collection of Binding Affinities for Protein-Ligand Complexes with Known Three-Dimensional Structures. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980.
32. Csizmadia, F. JChem: Java Applets and Modules Supporting Chemical Database Handling from Web Browsers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 323-324.
33. Hendlich, M.; Bergner, A.; Gunther, J.; Klebe G. Relibase: Design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326, 607-620. http://relibase.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/.
34. Chalk, A. J.; Worth, C. L.; Overington, J. P.; Chan, A. W. E. PDBLIG: Classification of Small Molecular Protein Binding in the Protein Data Bank. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3807-3816.
35. Hu, L.; Benson, M. L.; Smith, R. D.; Lerner, M. G.; Carlson, H. A. Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases). Proteins: Struct. Fund. Bioinf. In press.
36. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Fang, X.; Wang, S. An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2114-2125.