Structural insights into the functional cycle of the ATPase module of the 26S proteasome

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1305-1310

  Wehmer, Marc ^a   Rudack, Till ^b   Beck, Florian ^a   Aufderheide, Antje ^a   Pfeifer, Günter ^a   Plitzko, Jürgen M ^a   Förster, Friedrich ^a,c   Schulten, Klaus ^b   Baumeister, Wolfgang ^a   Sakata, Eri ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

26S proteasome; AAA+ ATpase; Cryo electron microscopy; Integrative modeling; Single particle analysis

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; FUNGAL ENZYME; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; NUCLEOTIDE;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME STRUCTURE; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN MOTIF; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CHEMISTRY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEOTIDES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 85011681247     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1621129114     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hershko A, Ciechanover A, Varshavsky A (2000) Basic Medical Research Award. The ubiquitin system. Nat Med 6(10):1073-1081.
2. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W (1999) The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 68:1015-1068.
3. Finley D (2009) Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 78:477-513.
4. Peters JM, Cejka Z, Harris JR, Kleinschmidt JA, Baumeister W(1993) Structural features of the 26 S proteasome complex. J Mol Biol 234(4):932-937.
5. Pühler G, et al. (1992) Subunit stoichiometry and three-dimensional arrangement in proteasomes from Thermoplasma acidophilum. EMBO J 11(4):1607-1616.
6. Seemüller E, et al. (1995) Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: A threonine protease. Science 268(5210):579-582.
7. Groll M, et al. (1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386(6624):463-471.
8. Baumeister W, Walz J, Zühl F, Seemüller E (1998) The proteasome: Paradigm of a selfcompartmentalizing protease. Cell 92(3):367-380.
9. Smith DM, et al. (2007) Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol Cell 27(5):731-744.
10. Sadre-Bazzaz K, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Formosa T, Hill CP (2010) Structure of a Blm10 complex reveals common mechanisms for proteasome binding and gate opening. Mol Cell 37(5):728-735.
11. Yu Y, et al. (2010) Interactions of PAN's C-Termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J 29(3):692-702.
12. Shi Y, et al. (2016) Rpn1 provides adjacent receptor sites for substrate binding and deubiquitination by the proteasome. Science 351(6275):aad9421.
13. Husnjak K, et al. (2008) Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453(7194):481-488.
14. Deveraux Q, Ustrell V, Pickart C, Rechsteiner M (1994) A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J Biol Chem 269(10):7059-7061.
15. Verma R, et al. (2002) Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298(5593):611-615.
16. Yao T, Cohen RE (2002) A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419(6905):403-407.
17. Lander GC, et al. (2012) Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482(7384):186-191.
18. Lasker K, et al. (2012) Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(5):1380-1387.
19. Sauer RT, Baker TA (2011) AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 80:587-612.
20. Nyquist K, Martin A (2014) Marching to the beat of the ring: Polypeptide translocation by AAA+ proteases. Trends Biochem Sci 39(2):53-60.
21. Unverdorben P, et al. (2014) Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(15):5544-5549.
22. Schweitzer A, et al. (2016) Structure of the human 26S proteasome at a resolution of 3.9 Å. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(28):7816-7821.
23. Luan B, et al. (2016) Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(10):2642-2647.
24. Huang X, Luan B, Wu J, Shi Y (2016) An atomic structure of the human 26S proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23(9):778-785.
25. Chen S, et al. (2016) Structural basis for dynamic regulation of the human 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(46):12991-12996.
26. Beck F, et al. (2012) Near-Atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(37):14870-14875.
27. Trabuco LG, Villa E, Schreiner E, Harrison CB, Schulten K (2009) Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: A practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Methods 49(2):174-180.
28. Chen X, Lee BH, Finley D, Walters KJ (2010) Structure of proteasome ubiquitin receptor hRpn13 and its activation by the scaffolding protein hRpn2. Mol Cell 38(3):404-415.
29. Sledz P, et al. (2013) Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(18):7264-7269.
30. Aufderheide A, et al. (2015) Structural characterization of the interaction of Ubp6 with the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(28):8626-8631.
31. Huber EM, et al. (2016) A unified mechanism for proteolysis and autocatalytic activation in the 20S proteasom. Nat Commun 7:10900.
32. Förster A, Masters EI, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Hill CP (2005) The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol Cell 18(5):589-599.
33. Wendler P, Ciniawsky S, Kock M, Kube S (2012) Structure and function of the AAA+ nucleotide binding pocket. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823(1):2-14.
34. Glynn SE, Martin A, Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2009) Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139(4):744-756.
35. Itsathitphaisarn O, Wing RA, Eliason WK, Wang J, Steitz TA (2012) The hexameric helicase DnaB adopts a nonplanar conformation during translocation. Cell 151(2):267-277.
36. Matyskiela ME, Lander GC, Martin A (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(7):781-788.
37. Liu S, Chistol G, Bustamante C (2014) Mechanical operation and intersubunit coordination of ring-shaped molecular motors: Insights from single-molecule studies. Biophys J 106(9):1844-1858.
38. Whitby FG, et al. (2000) Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 408(6808):115-120.
39. Sen M, et al. (2013) The ClpXP protease unfolds substrates using a constant rate of pulling but different gears. Cell 155(3):636-646.
40. Martin A, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2008) Diverse pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine mediate unassisted and adaptor-dependent recognition of ssrA-Tagged substrates. Mol Cell 29(4):441-450.
41. Nickell S, et al. (2005) TOM software toolbox: Acquisition and analysis for electron tomography. J Struct Biol 149(3):227-234.
42. Scheres SH (2012) RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 180(3):519-530.
43. Goh BC, et al. (2016) Computational methodologies for real-space structural refinement of large macromolecular complexes. Annu Rev Biophys 45:253-278.
44. Ribeiro JV, et al. (2016) QwikMD-integrative molecular dynamics toolkit for novices and experts. Sci Rep 6:26536.
45. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33-38.
46. Phillips JC, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781-1802.
47. Cox J, et al. (2014) Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(9):2513-2526.
48. Bartolommei G, Moncelli MR, Tadini-Buoninsegni F (2013) A method to measure hydrolytic activity of adenosinetriphosphatases (ATPases). PLoS One 8(3):e58615.
49. Korinek A, Beck F, Baumeister W, Nickell S, Plitzko JM (2011) Computer controlled cryo-electron microscopy-TOM2 a software package for high-Throughput applications. J Struct Biol 175(3):394-405.
50. Grant T, Grigorieff N (2015) Automatic estimation and correction of anisotropic magnification distortion in electron microscopes. J Struct Biol 192(2):204-208.
51. Li X, et al. (2013) Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable nearatomic- resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat Methods 10(6):584-590.
52. Mindell JA, Grigorieff N (2003) Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 142(3):334-347.
53. Pettersen EF, et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605-1612.
54. Bohn S, et al. (2010) Structure of the 26S proteasome from Schizosaccharomyces pombe at subnanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(49):20992-20997.
55. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234(3):779-815.
56. He J, et al. (2012) The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric α-helical rings. Structure 20(3):513-521.
57. Mackerell AD Jr, Feig M, Brooks CL 3rd (2004) Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 25(11):1400-1415.
58. Stone JE, McGreevy R, Isralewitz B, Schulten K (2014) GPU-Accelerated analysis and visualization of large structures solved by molecular dynamics flexible fitting. Faraday Discuss 169:265-283.
59. Greber BJ, et al. (2014) The complete structure of the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Nature 515(7526):283-286.
60. Adams PD, et al. (2002) PHENIX: Building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58(Pt 11):1948-1954.
61. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66(Pt 4):486-501.