Structural basis for dynamic regulation of the human 26S proteasome

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 46, 2016, Pages 12991-12996

  Chen, Shuobing ^a,b   Wu, Jiayi ^a   Lu, Ying ^c   Ma, Yong Bei ^b   Lee, Byung Hoon ^c   Yu, Zhou ^d   Ouyang, Qi ^a   Finley, Daniel J ^c   Kirschner, Marc W ^c   Mao, Youdong ^a,b,c,e  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

AAA ATPase; Cyroelectron microscopy; Ubiquitin proteasome system

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HOLOENZYME; PROTEASOME; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HEK293 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 84995618106     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614614113     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Finley D, Chen X, Walters KJ (2016) Gates, channels, and switches: Elements of the proteasome machine. Trends Biochem Sci 41(1):77-93.
2. Tomko RJ, Jr, Hochstrasser M (2013) Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 82:415-445.
3. Kish-Trier E, Hill CP (2013) Structural biology of the proteasome. Annu Rev Biophys 42: 29-49.
4. Finley D (2009) Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 78:477-513.
5. Harshbarger W, Miller C, Diedrich C, Sacchettini J (2015) Crystal structure of the human 20S proteasome in complex with carfilzomib. Structure 23(2):418-424.
6. Huber EM, Groll M (2012) Inhibitors for the immuno- and constitutive proteasome: Current and future trends in drug development. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51(35): 8708-8720.
7. Beck F, et al. (2012) Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(37):14870-14875.
8. Lasker K, et al. (2012) Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(5):1380-1387.
9. Lander GC, et al. (2012) Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482(7384):186-191.
10. da Fonseca PC, He J, Morris EP (2012) Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol Cell 46(1):54-66.
11. Löwe J, et al. (1995) Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 Å resolution. Science 268(5210):533-539.
12. Groll M, et al. (1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution. Nature 386(6624):463-471.
13. Unno M, et al. (2002) The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 Å resolution. Structure 10(5):609-618.
14. Pathare GR, et al. (2012) The proteasomal subunit Rpn6 is a molecular clamp holding the core and regulatory subcomplexes together. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(1):149-154.
15. Pathare GR, et al. (2014) Crystal structure of the proteasomal deubiquitylation module Rpn8-Rpn11. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(8):2984-2989.
16. Riedinger C, et al. (2010) Structure of Rpn10 and its interactions with polyubiquitin chains and the proteasome subunit Rpn12. J Biol Chem 285(44):33992-34003.
17. Wang Q, Young P, Walters KJ (2005) Structure of S5a bound to monoubiquitin provides a model for polyubiquitin recognition. J Mol Biol 348(3):727-739.
18. Worden EJ, Padovani C, Martin A (2014) Structure of the Rpn11-Rpn8 dimer reveals mechanisms of substrate deubiquitination during proteasomal degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21(3):220-227.
19. Zhang N, et al. (2009) Structure of the S5a:K48-linked diubiquitin complex and its interactions with Rpn13. Mol Cell 35(3):280-290.
20. Dambacher CM, Worden EJ, Herzik MA, Martin A, Lander GC (2016) Atomic structure of the 26S proteasome lid reveals the mechanism of deubiquitinase inhibition. eLife 5:e13027.
21. Boehringer J, et al. (2012) Structural and functional characterization of Rpn12 identifies residues required for Rpn10 proteasome incorporation. Biochem J 448(1):55-65.
22. He J, et al. (2012) The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric α-helical rings. Structure 20(3):513-521.
23. Zhang F, et al. (2009) Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol Cell 34(4):473-484.
24. Zhang F, et al. (2009) Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol Cell 34(4):485-496.
25. Luan B, et al. (2016) Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(10):2642-2647.
26. Matyskiela ME, Lander GC, Martin A (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(7):781-788.
27. Śledź P, et al. (2013) Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(18):7264-7269.
28. Unverdorben P, et al. (2014) Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(15):5544-5549.
29. Estrin E, Lopez-Blanco JR, Chacón P, Martin A (2013) Formation of an intricate helical bundle dictates the assembly of the 26S proteasome lid. Structure 21(9):1624-1635.
30. Wang X, et al. (2007) Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. Biochemistry 46(11):3553-3565.
31. Scheres SH, et al. (2007) Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization. Nat Methods 4(1):27-29.
32. Scheres SH (2012) A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J Mol Biol 415(2):406-418.
33. Whitby FG, et al. (2000) Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 408(6808):115-120.
34. Sauer RT, Baker TA (2011) AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 80:587-612.
35. Ogura T, Wilkinson AJ (2001) AAA+ superfamily ATPases: Common structure-diverse function. Genes Cells 6(7):575-597.
36. Beckwith R, Estrin E, Worden EJ, Martin A (2013) Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(10):1164-1172.
37. Glynn SE, Martin A, Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2009) Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139(4):744-756.
38. Iosefson O, Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2015) Coordinated gripping of substrate by subunits of a AAA+ proteolytic machine. Nat Chem Biol 11(3):201-206.
39. Zhang X, Wigley DB (2008) The 'glutamate switch' provides a link between ATPase activity and ligand binding in AAA+ proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(11):1223-1227.
40. Tian G, et al. (2011) An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18(11):1259-1267.
41. Stadtmueller BM, et al. (2010) Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J Biol Chem 285(1):13-17.
42. Kim YC, DeMartino GN (2011) C termini of proteasomal ATPases play nonequivalent roles in cellular assembly of mammalian 26 S proteasome. J Biol Chem 286(30): 26652-26666.
43. Lee SH, Moon JH, Yoon SK, Yoon JB (2012) Stable incorporation of ATPase subunits into 19 S regulatory particle of human proteasome requires nucleotide binding and C-terminal tails. J Biol Chem 287(12):9269-9279.
44. Groll M, et al. (2000) A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol 7(11):1062-1067.
45. Erales J, Hoyt MA, Troll F, Coffino P (2012) Functional asymmetries of proteasome translocase pore. J Biol Chem 287(22):18535-18543.
46. Peth A, Kukushkin N, Bossé M, Goldberg AL (2013) Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasomal ATPases by binding to Usp14 or Uch37 homologs. J Biol Chem 288(11):7781-7790.
47. Schweitzer A, et al. (2016) Structure of the human 26S proteasome at a resolution of 3.9 Å. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(28):7816-7821.
48. Huang X, Luan B, Wu J, Shi Y (2016) An atomic structure of the human 26S proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23(9):778-785.
49. Wu J, et al. (2016) Unsupervised single-particle deep classification via statistical manifold learning. arXiv:1604.04539.
50. Smart OS, Neduvelil JG, Wang X, Wallace BA, Sansom MS (1996) HOLE: A program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J Mol Graph 14(6):354-360, 376.