Recent themes in social networking service research

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Liu, John S ^a   Ho, Mei Hsiu Ching ^a   Lu, Louis Y Y ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG ABUSE; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; GENDER BIAS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MOTIVATION; NARCISSISM; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POLITICS; PRIVACY; PUBLISHING; SELF DISCLOSURE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; HUMAN RELATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 85010366237     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170293     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Duggan M. Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Pew Research Center, August, 2015.
2. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007; 13(1):210-30.
3. Berger K, Klier J, Klier M, Probst F. A review of information systems research on online social networks. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2014; 35(1):8.
4. Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT. A review of facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012; 7(3):203-20. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904 PMID: 26168459
5. Caers R, De Feyter T, De Couck M, Stough T, Vigna C, Du Bois C. Facebook: A literature review. New Media & Society. 2013; 15(6):982-1002.
6. Cheong M, Lee V. Dissecting twitter: A review on current microblogging research and lessons from related fields: Springer; 2010.
7. Błachnio A, Przepiórka A, Rudnicka P. Psychological determinants of using facebook: A research review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2013; 29(11):775-87.
8. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Online social networking and addiction-a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2011; 8(9):3528-52. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8093528 PMID: 22016701
9. Hugl U. Reviewing person's value of privacy of online social networking. Internet Research. 2011; 21(4):384-407.
10. Manca S, Ranieri M. Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2013; 29(6):487-504.
11. Aydin S. A review of research on facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2012; 60(6):1093-106.
12. Finfgeld-Connett D. Twitter and health science research. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2015; 37(10):1269-83. doi: 10.1177/0193945914565056 PMID: 25542190
13. Girvan M, Newman ME. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002; 99(12):7821-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122653799 PMID: 12060727
14. Newman ME, Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E. 2004; 69(2):026113.
15. Malliaros FD, Vazirgiannis M. Clustering and community detection in directed networks: A survey. Physics Reports. 2013; 533(4):95-142.
16. Leicht EA, Newman ME. Community structure in directed networks. Physical review letters. 2008; 100(11):118703. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.118703 PMID: 18517839
17. Nicosia V, Mangioni G, Carchiolo V, Malgeri M. Extending the definition of modularity to directed graphs with overlapping communities. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 2009; 2009(03):P03024.
18. Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S. Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities. Physical Review E. 2009; 80(1):016118.
19. Duan D, Li Y, Jin Y, Lu Z. Community mining on dynamic weighted directed graphs. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Complex Networks Meet Information & Knowledge Management: ACM; 2009. p. 11-8.
20. Yang T, Chi Y, Zhu S, Gong Y, Jin R. Directed network community detection: A popularity and productivity link model. SDM: SIAM; 2010. p. 742-53.
21. Kim Y, Son S-W, Jeong H. Finding communities in directed networks. Physical Review E. 2010; 81(1):016103.
22. Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT. Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008; 105(4):1118-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706851105 PMID: 18216267
23. Chen P, Redner S. Community structure of the physical review citation network. Journal of Informetrics. 2010; 4(3):278-90.
24. Barbieri N, Bonchi F, Manco G. Cascade-based community detection. Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining: ACM; 2013. p. 33-42.
25. Speidel L, Takaguchi T, Masuda N. Community detection in directed acyclic graphs. The European Physical Journal B. 2015; 88(8):1-10.
26. Liu JS, Lu LY, Lu W-M. Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 2016; 58:33-45.
27. Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, Matsushima K. Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation. 2008; 28(11):758-75.
28. Newman ME. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006; 103(23):8577-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103 PMID: 16723398
29. Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems. 2006; 1695(5):1-9.
30. Heidemann J, Klier M, Probst F. Online social networks: A survey of a global phenomenon. Computer Networks. 2012; 56(18):3866-78.
31. Ravasan AZ, Rouhani S, Asgary S. A review for the online social networks literature (2005-2011). European Journal of Business and Management. 2014; 6(4):22-37.
32. Probst F, Grosswiele D-KL, Pfleger D-KR. Who will lead and who will follow: Identifying influential users in online social networks. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2013; 5(3):179-93.
33. Hanson CL, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, West JH, Barnes MD, Hansen B. Tweaking and tweeting: Exploring twitter for nonmedical use of a psychostimulant drug (adderall) among college students. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15(4):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2503 PMID: 23594933
34. Hanson CL, Cannon B, Burton S, Giraud-Carrier C. An exploration of social circles and prescription drug abuse through twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15(9):e189. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2741 PMID: 24014109
35. Katsuki T, Mackey TK, Cuomo R. Establishing a link between prescription drug abuse and illicit online pharmacies: Analysis of twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17(12).
36. Thompson L, Rivara FP, Whitehill JM. Prevalence of marijuana-related traffic on twitter, 2012-2013: A content analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2015; 18(6):311-9.
37. Zhang N, Campo S, Janz KF, Eckler P, Yang J, Snetselaar LG, et al. Electronic word of mouth on twitter about physical activity in the united states: Exploratory infodemiology study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15(11):e261. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2870 PMID: 24257325
38. Prochaska JJ, Pechmann C, Kim R, Leonhardt JM. Twitter = quitter? An analysis of twitter quit smoking social networks. Tobacco Control. 2012; 21(4):447-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042507 PMID: 21730101
39. Myslín M, Zhu S-H, Chapman W, Conway M. Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15(8):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2534 PMID: 23989137
40. Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery SL. A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on twitter. Tobacco Control. 2014; 23(SUPPL. 3):iii26-iii30.
41. Chu K-H, Unger JB, Allem J-P, Pattarroyo M, Soto D, Cruz TB, et al. Diffusion of messages from an electronic cigarette brand to potential users through twitter. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10(12):e0145387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145387 PMID: 26684746
42. Kim AE, Hopper T, Simpson S, Nonnemaker J, Lieberman AJ, Hansen H, et al. Using twitter data to gain insights into e-cigarette marketing and locations of use: An infoveillance study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17(11).
43. Cole-Lewis H, Pugatch J, Sanders A, Varghese A, Posada S, Yun C, et al. Social listening: A content analysis of e-cigarette discussions on twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17(10).
44. Burton SH, Tanner KW, Giraud-Carrier CG, West JH, Barnes MD. "Right time, right place" health communication on twitter: Value and accuracy of location information. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2012; 14(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2121 PMID: 23154246
45. Du L, Kamenova K, Caulfield T. The gene patent controversy on twitter: A case study of twitter users' responses to the cheo lawsuit against long qt gene patents. BMC Medical Ethics. 2015; 16(1):1.
46. Jansen BJ, Zhang M, Sobel K, Chowdury A. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009; 60(11):2169-88.
47. Golbeck J, Grimes JM, Rogers A. Twitter use by the us congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(8):1612-21.
48. Small TA. What the hashtag? A content analysis of canadian politics on twitter. Information, Communication & Society. 2011; 14(6):872-95.
49. Graham T, Broersma M, Hazelhoff K, van't Haar G. Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of twitter during the 2010 uk general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society. 2013; 16(5):692-716.
50. Larsson AO, Ihlen Ø. Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on twitter during the 2013 norwegian elections. European Journal of Communication. 2015:0267323115595525.
51. Enli GS, Skogerb Ø E. Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society. 2013; 16(5):757-74.
52. Larsson AO, Kalsnes B. 'Of course we are on facebook': Use and non-use of social media among swedish and norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication. 2014:0267323114531383.
53. Larsson AO, Moe H. Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 swedish election campaign. New Media & Society. 2012; 14(5):729-47.
54. Ausserhofer J, Maireder A. National politics on twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society. 2013; 16(3):291-314.
55. Sobaci MZ, Karkin N. The use of twitter by mayors in turkey: Tweets for better public services? Government Information Quarterly. 2013; 30(4):417-25.
56. Hsu C-l, Park HW. Mapping online social networks of korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly. 2012; 29(2):169-81.
57. Grant WJ, Moon B, Busby Grant J. Digital dialogue? Australian politicians' use of the social network tool twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science. 2010; 45(4):579-604.
58. Miller NW, Ko RS. Studying political microblogging: Parliamentary candidates on twitter during the february 2012 election in kuwait. International Journal of Communication. 2015; 9:21.
59. Xu WW, Sang Y, Blasiola S, Park HW. Predicting opinion leaders in twitter activism networks the case of the wisconsin recall election. American Behavioral Scientist. 2014:0002764214527091.
60. Pang B, Lee L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Rrends in Information Retrieval. 2008; 2(1-2):1-135.
61. Ghiassi M, Skinner J, Zimbra D. Twitter brand sentiment analysis: A hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network. Expert Systems wih Applications. 2013; 40(16):6266-82.
62. Sashittal HC, Hodis M, Sriramachandramurthy R. Entifying your brand among twitter-using millennials. Business Horizons. 2015; 58(3):325-33.
63. Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G. Sentiment in twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(2):406-18.
64. Zubiaga A, Spina D, Martínez R, Fresno V. Real-time classification of twitter trends. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015; 66(3):462-73.
65. Naaman M, Becker H, Gravano L. Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(5):902-18.
66. Wilkinson D, Thelwall M. Trending twitter topics in english: An international comparison. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012; 63(8):1631-46.
67. Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior. 2011; 27(2):705-13.
68. Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2011; 16(4):511-27.
69. Marshall TC. Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012; 15(10):521-6.
70. Marshall TC, Bejanyan K, Di Castro G, Lee RA. Attachment styles as predictors of facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships. 2013; 20(1):1-22.
71. Fox J, Warber KM. Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014; 17(1):3-7.
72. Elphinston RA, Noller P. Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2011; 14(11):631-5.
73. Chaulk K, Jones T. Online obsessive relational intrusion: Further concerns about facebook. Journal of Family Violence. 2011; 26(4):245-54.
74. Clayton RB, Nagurney A, Smith JR. Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013; 16(10):717-20.
75. Clayton RB. The third wheel: The impact of twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014; 17(7):425-30.
76. Waters RD, Burnett E, Lamm A, Lucas J. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using facebook. Public Relations Review. 2009; 35(2):102-6.
77. Xifra J, Grau F. Nanoblogging pr: The discourse on public relations in twitter. Public Relations Review. 2010; 36(2):171-4.
78. Lovejoy K, Waters RD, Saxton GD. Engaging stakeholders through twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review. 2012; 38(2):313-8.
79. Muralidharan S, Rasmussen L, Patterson D, Shin J-H. Hope for haiti: An analysis of facebook and twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Review. 2011; 37(2):175-7.
80. Kim D, Chun H, Kwak Y, Nam Y. The employment of dialogic principles in website, facebook, and twitter platforms of environmental nonprofit organizations. Social Science Computer Review. 2014:0894439314525752.
81. Svensson PG, Mahoney TQ, Hambrick ME. Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits a study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2015; 44(6):1086-106.
82. Saffer AJ, Sommerfeldt EJ, Taylor M. The effects of organizational twitter interactivity on organization-public relationships. Public Relations Review. 2013; 39(3):213-5.
83. Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How twitter, facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(2):361-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361 PMID: 19275991
84. Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: A qualitative evaluation of communication with facebook. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2011; 26(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3 PMID: 20945113
85. Weitzman ER, Cole E, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Social but safe? Quality and safety of diabetes-related online social networks. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011; 18(3):292-7. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.009712 PMID: 21262920
86. De la Torre-Díez I, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Antón-Rodríguez M. A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on facebook and twitter. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012; 18(6):404-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0227 PMID: 22650380
87. Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin M-C, Jadad AR. Seeking support on facebook: A content analysis of breast cancer groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(1):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1560 PMID: 21371990
88. Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Mccrory P. Isupport: Do social networking sites have a role to play in concussion awareness? Disability and Rehabilitation. 2010; 32(22):1877-83. doi: 10.3109/09638281003734409 PMID: 20367328
89. Timian A, Rupcic S, Kachnowski S, Luisi P. Do patients "like" good care? Measuring hospital quality viafacebook. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2013:1062860612474839.
90. Glover M, Khalilzadeh O, Choy G, Prabhakar AM, Pandharipande PV, Gazelle GS. Hospital evaluations by social media: A comparative analysis of facebook ratings among performance outliers. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015; 30(10):1440-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3236-3 PMID: 25749881
91. Gittelman S, Lange V, Crawford CAG, Okoro CA, Lieb E, Dhingra SS, et al. A new source of data for public health surveillance: Facebook likes. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17(4).
92. Arceneaux N, Weiss AS. Seems stupid until you try it: Press coverage of twitter, 2006-9. New Media & Society. 2010.
93. Bruns A. Journalists. and twitter: How australian news organisations adapt to a new medium. Media International Australia. 2012; 144(1):97-107.
94. Lasorsa DL, Lewis SC, Holton AE. Normalizing twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies. 2012; 13(1):19-36.
95. Lasorsa D. Transparency and other journalistic norms on twitter: The role of gender. Journalism Studies. 2012; 13(3):402-17.
96. Hermida A, Lewis SC, Zamith R. Sourcing the arab spring: A case study of andy carvin's sources on twitter during the tunisian and egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2014; 19(3):479-99.
97. Artwick CG. News sourcing and gender on twitter. Journalism. 2014; 15(8):1111-27.
98. Greer CF, Ferguson DA. Using twitter for promotion and branding: A content analysis of local television twitter sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2011; 55(2):198-214.
99. Herrera-Damas S, Hermida A. Tweeting but not talking: The missing element in talk radio's institutional use of twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2014; 58(4):481-500.
100. Veenstra AS, Iyer N, Park CS, Alajmi F. Twitter as "a journalistic substitute"? Examining# wiunion tweeters' behavior and self-perception. Journalism 2014:1464884914521580.
101. Harlow S, Harp D. Collective action on the web: A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the united states and latin america. Information, Communication & Society. 2012; 15(2):196-216.
102. Theocharis Y, Lowe W, van Deth JW, García-Albacete G. Using twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the occupy wall street, indignados, and aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society. 2015; 18(2):202-20.
103. Litt DM, Stock ML. Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: The roles of social norms and social networking sites. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2011; 25(4):708. doi: 10.1037/a0024226 PMID: 21644803
104. Moreno MA, D'Angelo J, Kacvinsky LE, Kerr B, Zhang C, Eickhoff J. Emergence and predictors of alcohol reference displays on facebook during the first year of college. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 30:87-94.
105. Moreno MA, Cox ED, Young HN, Haaland W. Underage college students' alcohol displays on facebook and real-time alcohol behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015; 56(6):646-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.020 PMID: 26003580
106. Tonks A, Lyons AC, Goodwin I. Researching online visual displays on social networking sites: Methodologies and meanings. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2015; 12(3):326-39.
107. Moreno MA, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Brito TE, Christakis DA. Display of health risk behaviors on myspace by adolescents: Prevalence and associations. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2009; 163(1):27-34.
108. Moreno MA, VanderStoep A, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Kurth A, Christakis DA. Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: A randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent medicine. 2009; 163(1):35-41.
109. Moreno MA, Briner LR, Williams A, Brockman L, Walker L, Christakis DA. A content analysis of displayed alcohol references on a social networking web site. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2010; 47(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.001 PMID: 20638009
110. Moreno MA, Briner LR, Williams A, Walker L, Christakis DA. Real use or "real cool": Adolescents speak out about displayed alcohol references on social networking websites. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2009; 45(4):420-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.015 PMID: 19766949
111. Moreno MA, Swanson MJ, Royer H, Roberts LJ. Sexpectations: Male college students' views about displayed sexual references on females' social networking web sites. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2011; 24(2):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.10.004 PMID: 21190872
112. Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B. Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis: ACM; 2007. p. 56-65.
113. Romero DM, Kleinberg JM. The directed closure process in hybrid social-information networks, with an analysis of link formation on twitter. ICWSM 2010.
114. Catanese SA, De Meo P, Ferrara E, Fiumara G, Provetti A. Crawling facebook for social network analysis purposes. Proceedings of the international conference on web intelligence, mining and semantics: ACM; 2011. p. 52.
115. Catanese S, De Meo P, Ferrara E, Fiumara G, Provetti A. Extraction and analysis of facebook friendship relations. Computational social networks: Springer; 2012. p. 291-324.
116. De Meo P, Ferrara E, Fiumara G. Finding similar users in facebook. Social Networking and Community Behavior Modeling Qualitative and Quantitative Measurement, IGI Global. 2011:304-23.
117. Ferrara E. Community structure discovery in facebook. International Journal of Social Network Mining. 2012; 1(1):67-90.
118. De Meo P, Ferrara E, Fiumara G, Provetti A. On facebook, most ties are weak. Communications of the ACM. 2014; 57(11):78-84.
119. Ferrara E. A large-scale community structure analysis in facebook. EPJ Data Science. 2012; 1(1):1.
120. Gilbert E, Bakhshi S, Chang S, Terveen L. I need to try this?: A statistical overview of pinterest. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM; 2013. p. 2427-36.
121. Lee E, Lee J-A, Moon JH, Sung Y. Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2015; 18(9):552-6.
122. Internet development status in china. China Internet Network Information Center, January, 2016.
123. Hartzel KS, Marley KA, Spangler WE. Online social network adoption: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2016; 56(2):87-96.