The third wheel: The impact of twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 425-430

  Clayton, Russell B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DIVORCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL MEDIA; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; DIVORCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL MEDIA; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904012877     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0570     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. boyd d, Ellison BN. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 13
2. Choi JH. (2008) Living in cyworld: Contextualising cy-Ties in South Korea. In Bruns A, Jacobs J, eds. Uses of blogs. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 173-186
3. Clayton R, Nagurney A, Smith J. Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16: 717-720
4. Ellison BN, Steinfield C, Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook' 'friends'': Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12: Article 1
5. Lampe C, Ellison BN, Steinfield C. Social capital, selfesteem, and use of online social network sites. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008; 29: 434-445
6. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Individual Differences Research Group 2008; 8: 27-33
7. Fox J, Warber K. Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults' perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Journal of Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16: 3-7
8. About Twitter. https: //twitter.com/about (accessed Jun. 20, 2013
9. 2010 Best social networking site reviews and comparisons. http: //social-networking-websites-review.toptenreviews.com (accessed Dec. 28, 2013
10. Statistics Brain. Twitter statistics. www.statisticbrain.com/ twitter-statistics/ (accessed Jun. 20, 2013
11. Sarno D. On Twitter, mindcasting is the new lifecasting. Los Angeles Times, Mar. 11, 2009. http: //latimesblogs.latimes .com/technology/2009/03/on- Twitter-mind.html (accessed Jan. 12, 2014
12. Thompson C. Brave new world of digital intimacy. The New York Times, Sep. 5, 2008. www.nytimes.com/2008/ 09/07/magazine/07awareness-T.html?-r = 1&pagewanted = all (accessed Dec. 29, 2013
13. Chen G. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27: 755-762
14. Johnson P, Yang S-U. Uses and gratifications of Twitter: An examination of user motives and satisfaction of Twitter use. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication in Boston, MA
15. Clayton R, Osborne R, Miller B, et al. Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29: 687-693
16. Joinson AN. (2008) ''Looking at, '' ''looking up'' or ''keeping up with'' people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 5-10, 2008), CHI'08. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1027-1036
17. Tong ST. Facebook use during relationship termination: Uncertainty reduction and surveillance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16: 788-793
18. Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2011; 16: 511-527
19. Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27: 705-713
20. Kerkhof P, Finkenauer C, Muusses, LD. Relational consequences of compulsive internet use: A longitudinal study among newlyweds. Human Communication Research 2011; 37: 147-173
21. Papp LM, Danielewicz J, Cayemberg C. 'áre we Facebook official?'' Implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15: 85-90
22. Lyndon A, Bonds-Raacke J, Cratty AD. College students' Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2011; 14: 711-716
23. Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S. More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the greeneyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12: 441-444
24. Marshall T. Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15: 521-526
25. Rubin AM. (2009) Uses and gratifications: An evolving perspective on media effects. In Nabi RL, Oliver MB, eds. The SAGE handbook of media processes and effect. Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 147-159
26. Hayes AF. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press
27. Buck S. (2013) When Facebook official isn't enough. Mashable.com. http: //mashable.com/2013/08/04/social-mediacouples/ (accessed Jan. 10, 2014
28. For Life Media Inc. (2013) 2Life App description. www.2life.io (accessed Sep. 28, 2013.