Trending Twitter topics in english: An international comparison

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1631-1646

  Wilkinson, David ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cross cultural aspects; international aspects; news media; topics; Twitter

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ASPECTS; INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS; NEWS MEDIA; TOPICS; TWITTER;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84864397513     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22713     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abel, F., Gao, Q., Houben, G.-J., &, Tao, K., (2011). Analyzing user modeling on Twitter for personalized news recommendations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6787/2011, 1-12.
2. Ahlers, D., (2006). News consumption and the new electronic media. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics, 11 (1), 29-52. (Pubitemid 43120109)
3. Alessandrini, A.C., (2001). "My heart's Indian for all that": Bollywood film between home and diaspora. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10 (3), 315-340.
4. Alexa. (2011). Top sites. Retrieved from.
5. Alonso, O., Carson, C., Gerster, D., Ji, X., &, Nabar, S.U., (2010). Detecting uninteresting content in text streams. In Proceedings of the SIGIR 2010 Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Search Evaluation (CSE 2010) (pp. 39-42). New York, NY: ACM Press.
6. Becker, H., Naaman, M., &, Gravano, L., (2011a). Beyond trending topics: Real-world event identification on Twitter. In, N. Nicolov, &, J.G. Shanahan, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press. Retrieved from
7. Becker, H., Naaman, M., &, Gravano, L., (2011b). Selecting quality Twitter content for events. In, N. Nicolov, &, J.G. Shanahan, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press. Retrieved from)
8. Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., &, Livingston, S., (2007). When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Berger, G., (2009). How the Internet impacts on international news: Exploring paradoxes of the most global medium in a time of 'hyperlocalism '. International Communication Gazette, 71 (5), 355-371.
10. Besova, A.A., &, Cooley, S.C., (2009). Foreign news and public opinion: Attribute agenda-setting theory revisited. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 30 (2), 219-242.
11. Bhattacharya, N., (2004). A 'basement' cinephilia. Indian diaspora women watch Bollywood. South Asian Popular Culture, 2 (2), 161-183.
12. Bielby, D.B., &, Harrington, C.L., (2008). Global TV: Exporting television and culture in the world market. New York, NY: New York University Press.
13. Blake, K.D., Viswanath, K., Blendon, R.J., &, Vallone, D., (2008). The role of reported tobacco-specific media exposure on adult attitudes towards proposed policies to limit the portrayal of smoking in movies. Pediatrics, 121 (1), e108-e117.
14. Bruns, A., (in press). How long is a tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication & Society.
15. Cataldi, M., Caro, L.D., &, Schifanella, C., (2010). Emerging topic detection on Twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining table of contents (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: ACM Press.
16. Chang, T.-K., Shoemaker, P.J., &, Brendlinger, N., (1987). Determinants of international news coverage in the U.S. media. Communication Research, 14 (4), 396-414.
17. Chang, T.-K., (1998). All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25 (5), 528-566.
18. Chen, G.M., (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2), 755-762.
19. Chomsky, N., (2000). A new generation draws the line: Kosovo, East Timor and the standards of the West. New York, NY: Verso Books.
20. Cohen, B., (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
21. Cohen, J., (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37-46.
22. Crystal, D., (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Dann, S., (2010). Twitter content classification. First Monday, 15 (12). Retrieved from
24. Der Doran, J., (2009). Virtuous war: Mapping the military-industrial- media-entertainment network. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Ding, Y., (2011). Community detection: Topological vs. topical. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4), 498-514.
26. Dotan, A., &, Zaphiris, P., (2010). A cross-cultural analysis of Flickr users from Peru, Israel, Iran, Taiwan and the UK. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 6 (3), 284-302.
27. Entman, R.M., (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41 (4), 6-27.
28. Entman, R.M., (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51-58.
29. Entman, R.M., (1994). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Eysenbach, G., (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (4), e123.
31. Farhi, P., (2009). The Twitter explosion American Journalism Review, 31 (3). Retrieved from
32. Fleiss, J.L., (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
33. Fujisaka, T., Lee, R., &, Sumiya, K., (2010). Detection of unusually crowded places through micro-blogging sites. In 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA 2010) (pp. 467-472). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
34. Genc, Y., Sakamoto, Y., &, Nickerson, J.V., (2011). Discovering context: Classifying tweets through a semantic transform based on Wikipedia. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6780/2011, 484-492.
35. Golan, G.J., (2006). Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7 (2), 323-333.
36. Golan, G.J., (2008). Where in the world is Africa ? International Communication Gazette, 70 (1), 41-57.
37. Golder, S.A., &, Macy, M.W., (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science, 333 (6051), 1878-1881
38. Groshek, J., (2008). Homogenous agendas, disparate frames: CNN and CNN International coverage online. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52 (1), 52-68.
39. Hale, S.A., (2012). Net increase? Cross-lingual linking in the blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (2), 135-151.
40. Heaivilin, N., Gerbert, B., Page, J.E., &, Gibbs, J.L., (2011). Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. Journal of Dental Research, 90 (9), 1047-1051
41. Herman, E.S., &, Chomsky, N., (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
42. Hermida, A., (2010). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. M/C Journal, 13 (2). Retrieved from
43. Hernandez, B.A., (2011). Facebook reveals 2011's most-popular status trends. Mashable.com. Retrieved from
44. Heverin, T., &, Zach, L., (2012). Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (1), 34-47.
45. Honeycutt, C., &, Herring, S.C., (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
46. Huang, H., (2010). Frame-rich, frame-poor: An investigation of the contingent effects of media frame diversity and individual differences on audience frame diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22 (1), 47-73.
47. Huang, J., Thornton, K.M., &, Efthimiadis, E.N., (2010). Conversational tagging in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 173-178). New York, NY: ACM Press.
48. Hughes, A.L., &, Palen, L., (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6 (3-4), 248-260.
49. Iyengar, S., Peters, M.D., &, Kinder, D.R., (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the "not-so-minimal" consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 76 (4), 848-858.
50. Jackoway, A., Samet, H., &, Sankaranarayanan, J., (2011). Identification of live news events using Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks (LBSN'11) (pp. 25-32). New York, NY: ACM Press.
51. Jansen, B.J., Sobel, K., &, Cook, G., (2011). Classifying ecommerce information sharing behaviour by youths on social networking sites. Journal of Information Science, 37 (2), 120-136.
52. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., &, Chowdury, A., (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60 (11), 2169-2188.
53. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., &, Tseng, B., (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (pp. 56-65). New York, NY: ACM Press. (Pubitemid 351665610)
54. Kalb, M., (1994). A view from the press. In, W.L. Bennett, &, D.L. Paletz, (Eds.), Taken by storm: Media, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War (pp. 3-6). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Kissau, K., &, Hunger, U., (2008). Political online-participation of migrants in Germany. German Policy Studies, 4 (4), 5-31.
56. Kolmer, C., &, Semetko, H.A., (2010). International television news. Journalism Studies, 11 (5), 700-717.
57. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., &, Moon, S., (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web (pp. 591-600). New York, NY: ACM Press.
58. Kwak, N., Poor, N., &, Skoric, M.M., (2006). Honey, I shrunk the world! The relation between Internet use and international engagement. Mass Communication and Society, 9 (2), 189-213.
59. Larson, J.F., (1982). International affairs coverage on US evening network news, 1972-1979. In, W. Adams, (Ed.), Television's coverage of international affairs. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60. Lerman, K., &, Ghosh, R., (2010). Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICSWM 2010) (pp. 90-97). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
61. Lin, W.-Y., Lo, V.-h., &, Wang, T.-L., (2011). Bias in television foreign news in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Communication 4 (3), 293-310.
62. Livingston, S.G., (1992). The politics of international agenda-setting: Reagan and North-South relations. International Studies Quarterly, 36 (3), 313-330.
63. Loomis, K.D., (2009). A comparison of broadcast world news web pages: Al Jazeera English, BBC, CBS, and CNN. Electronic News, 3 (3), 143-160.
64. Mathioudakis, M., &, Koudas, N., (2010). TwitterMonitor: Trend detection over the Twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '10) (pp. 1155-1157). New York, NY: ACM Press.
65. Matthes, J., (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86 (2), 349-367.
66. McCombs, M.E., &, Bell, T., (1996). The agenda setting role of mass communication. In, M. Salwen, &, D. Stacks, (eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. McCombs, M.E., &, Shaw, D.L., (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2), 176.
68. Naaman, M., Becker, H., &, Gravano, L., (2011). Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on Twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (5), 902-918.
69. Naaman, M., Boase, J., &, Lai, C.-H., (2010). Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. In, K.I. Quinn, C. Gutwin, &, J.C. Tang, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY: ACM Press.
70. Nakasaki, H., Kawaba, M., Utsuro, T., &, Fukuhara, T., (2009). Mining cross-lingual/cross-cultural differences in concerns and opinions in blogs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5459/2009, 213-224.
71. Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., &, Alhadi, A.C., (2011). Bad news travel fast: A content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter. WebSci 2011. Retrieved from
72. Neuendorf, K., (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London, England: Sage.
73. Pak, A., &, Paroubek, P., (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010). Malta: European Language Resources Association. Retrieved from)
74. Phelan, O., McCarthy, K., &, Smyth, B., (2009). Using twitter to recommend real-time topical news. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '09) (pp. 385-388). New York, NY: ACM Press.
75. Riegert, K., (2011). Pondering the future for foreign news on national television. International Journal of Communication, 5. Retrieved from
76. Romero, D.M., Meeder, B., &, Kleinberg, J., (2011). Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web (WWW '11) (pp. 695-704). New York, NY: ACM.
77. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., &, Matsuo, Y., (2010). Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 851-860). New York, NY: ACM Press.
78. Signorini, A., Segre, A.M., &, Polgreen, P.M., (2011). The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 6 (5), e19467.
79. Subašić, I., &, Berendt, B., (2011). Peddling or creating ? Investigating the role of Twitter in news reporting. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6611/2011, 207-213.
80. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., &, Wellman, B., (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks, 34 (1), 73-81
81. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., &, Paltoglou, G., (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (2), 406-418.
82. Thelwall, M., &, Prabowo, R., (2007). Identifying and characterizing public science-related concerns from RSS feeds. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58 (3), 379-390. (Pubitemid 46383525)
83. Thelwall, M., Wouters, P., &, Fry, J., (2008). Information-centered research for large-scale analysis of new information sources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (9), 1523-1527.
84. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., &, Welpe, I.M., (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 178-185). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
85. Twitter. (2011). Hot topics. Retrieved from
86. Wang, A.H., (2010). Don't follow me: Spam detection in Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT). Retrieved from)
87. Wanta, W., Golan, G.J., &, Lee, C., (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81 (2), 364-377. (Pubitemid 39196736)
88. Westman, S., &, Freund, L., (2010). Information interaction in 140 characters or less: Genres on twitter. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (IIiX'10) (pp. 323-327). New York, NY: ACM Press.
89. Wigand, F.D.L., (2010). Twitter in government: Building relationships one Tweet at a time. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Technology (pp. 563-567). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
90. Winsten, J.A., (2000). The Harvard Alcohol Project: Promoting the "designated driver." In, M. Suman, &, G. Rossman, Advocacy groups and the entertainment industry (pp. 3-8). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
91. Wu, H.D., (2000). Systemic determinants of international news coverage: a comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50 (2), 110-130.
92. Zaller, J., &, Chiu, D., (1996). Government's little helper: US press coverage of foreign policy crises 1945-1991, Political Communication, 13 (4), 385-405. (Pubitemid 126175469)
93. Zhang, M., Jansen, B. J., &, Chowdhury, A., (2011). Influence of business engagement in online word-of-mouth communication on Twitter: A path analysis. Electronic Markets: The International Journal on Networked Business, 21 (3), 161-175.
94. Zhao, D., &, Rosson, M.B., (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '09) (pp. 243-252). New York, NY: ACM Press.
95. Zhao, W.X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E., -P., Yan, H., &, Li, X., (2011). Comparing Twitter and traditional media using topic models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6611/2011, 338-349.