PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 757-774

  Enli, Gunn Sara ^a   Skogerbø, Eli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

election campaigns; Facebook; Norway; social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878800628     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aardal, B. (2011) Det politiske landskap.En studie av stortingsvalget 2009, CappelenDamm, Oslo.
2. Aardal, B., Krogstad, A. and Narud, H. M. 2004. I valgkampens hete: strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhet, Oslo: Universitetsforl.
3. Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. L. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K. & Wollebæk, D. (2012) Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: transcending participatory divides? New Media & Society. Published online 26 November 2012, pp 1-19.
5. Enjolras, B., Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K. and Wollebæk, D. 2013. Liker - liker ikke: sosiale medier, samfunnsengasjement og offentlighet, Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
6. Enli, G. S. and Thumin, N. 2012. Socializing and self-representation online: exploring Facebook. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 6: 87 - 105.
7. Følstad, A., Lüders, M. & Johannessen, R. M. (2011) Engasjement på Mitt Arbeiderparti, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
8. Grant, W. J., Moon, B. and Grant, J. B. 2010. Digital dialogue? Australian politicians' use of the social network tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45: 579 - 604. (doi:10.1080/10361146.2010.517176)
9. Gulati, G. and Williams, C. 2010. Congressional candidates' use of YouTube in 2008: its frequency and rationale. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7: 93 - 109. (doi:10.1080/19331681003748958)
10. Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: Polity.
11. Habermas, J. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
12. Heidar, K. and Saglie, J. 2003. Predestined parties?: organizational change in Norwegian political parties. Party Politics, 9: 219 - 239.
13. Hjarvard, S. 2008. The mediatization of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 30: 105 - 134.
14. Johansen, G. S. 2011. Valg 2009: den siste TV-valgkampen?: en studie av norske politikeres bruk av sosiale medier, Oslo: G.S. Johansen.
15. Karlsen, R. (2010a) 'Candidates and social media in party centred campaigns. Empirical evidence from the 2009 Norwegian campaign', paper presented at the workshop 'Elections, Campaigning and Citizens Online' Oxford Internet Institute, 15-16 September.
16. Karlsen, R. 2010b. Fear of the political consultant. Party Politics, 16: 193 - 214. (doi:10.1177/1354068809341055)
17. Karlsen, R. 2011a. A platform for individualized campaigning? Social media and parliamentary candidates in the 2009 Norwegian election campaign. Policy and the Internet, 3: 1 - 25. (doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1137)
18. Karlsen, R. 2011b. Still broadcasting the campaign: on the internet and the fragmentation of political communication with evidence from Norwegian electoral politics. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8: 146 - 162. (doi:10.1080/19331681.2011.536419)
19. Karlsen, R. and Skogerbø, E. forthcoming. 'Candidate campaigning in parliamentary systems individualized vs. localized campaigning'. Party Politics, Accepted for publication
20. Larsson, A. O. and Moe, H. 2012. Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14: 729 - 747. (doi:10.1177/1461444811422894)
21. Lilleker, D. G. N. A. J. 2010. Towards a more participatory style of election campaigning: the impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 general election. Policy and Internet, 2: 67 - 96. (doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1064)
22. Mjøs, O., Enli, G., Moe, H. and Syvertsen, T. forthcoming. The Nordic Welfare State Media, Michigan University Press.
23. Narud, H. M. and Valen, H. 2007. Demokrati og ansvar: politisk representasjon i et flerpartisystem, Oslo: Damm.
24. Nielsen, R. K. 2011. Mundane internet tools, mobilizing practices, and the coproduction of citizenship in political campaigns. New Media & Society, 13: 755 - 771. (doi:10.1177/1461444810380863)
25. Postman, N. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, London: Heinemann.
26. Sennett, R. 1976. The Fall of Public Man, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, New York: Penguin.
28. Skogerbø, E. 2011. " Everybody reads the newspaper': local newspapers in the digital age ". In Local and Regional Media - Democracy and Civil Society Shaping Processes, Edited by: Biernacka-Ligie{ogonek}za, I. and Koćwin, L. 357 - 373. Nowa Ruda - Wrocław: Wydawnictwo MARIA.
29. Strömbäck, J. 2008. Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press-Politics, 13: 228 - 246. (doi:10.1177/1940161208319097)
30. Strömbäck, J. and Aalberg, T. 2008. Election news coverage in democratic corporatist countries: a comparative study of Sweden and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31: 91 - 106. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00197.x)
31. Strömbäck, J. and Dimitrova, D. V. 2006. Political and media systems matter. A comparison of election news coverage in Sweden and the United States. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11: 131 - 147. (doi:10.1177/1081180X06293549)
32. Sunstein, C. R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Thompson, J. B. 1995. The Media and Modernity. A Social Theory of the Media, Cambridge: Polity Press.
34. van Zoonen, L. 1998. A day at the zoo: political communication, pigs and popular culture. Media Culture & Society, 20: 183 - 200. (doi:10.1177/016344398020002002)
35. van Zoonen, L. 2005. Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
36. van Zoonen, L. and Holtz-Bacha, C. 2000. Personalisation in Dutch and German politics: the case of talk show. Javnost - The Public, 7: 45 - 56.
37. van Zoonen, L., Muller, F., Alinejad, D., Dekker, M., Duits, L., Vis, P. V. and Wittenberg, W. 2007. Dr. Phil meets the candidates: how family life and personal experience produce political discussions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24: 322 - 338. (doi:10.1080/07393180701560849)