‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians

European Journal of Communication

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 653-667

  Larsson, Anders O ^a   Kalsnes, Bente ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Facebook; Internet related; political communication; social media; technology; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912064655     PISSN: 02673231     EISSN: 14603705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267323114531383     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barnett S.New media, old problems – New technology and the political process.European Journal of Communication. 1997;12 (2): 193-218
2. Bronstein J.Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages.Online Information Review. 2013;37 (2): 173-192
3. Carlson T.It’s a man’s world? – Male and female election campaigning on the Internet.Journal of Political Marketing. 2007;6 (1): 41-67
4. Carlson T,Strandberg K.Riding the Web 2.0 wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish National Elections.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2008;5 (2): 159-174
5. Chadwick AThe hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press; 2013:
6. Christensen C.@Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter.Popular Communication. 2013;11 (1): 30-46
7. Druckman JN,Kifer MJ,Parkin M.The technological development of congressional candidate web sites.Social Science Computer Review. 2007;25 (4): 425-442
8. Enjolras B,Karlsen R,Steen-Johnsen K, et alLiker, Liker Ikke. Oslo: Cappelen Damm; 2013:
9. Enli GS,Skogerbø E.Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics.Information, Communication & Society. 2013;16:757-774
10. Gibson R.Web campaigning from a global perspective.Asia-Pacific Review. 2004;11 (1): 95-126
11. Gibson RK,Lusoli W,Ward S.Nationalizing and normalizing the local? A comparative analysis of online candidate campaigning in Australia and Britain.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2008;4 (4): 15-30
12. Gustafsson N.The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation.New Media & Society. 2012;14 (7): 1111-1127
13. Hargittai E,Litt E.Becoming a tweep: How prior online experiences influence Twitter use.Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15 (5): 680-702
14. Hargittai E,Walejko G.The Participation Divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age.Information, Communication & Society. 2008;11 (2): 239-256
15. Haug AV.Local democracy online – Driven by crisis, legitimacy, resources, or communication gaps?.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2008;4 (2): 79-99
16. Hermans L,Vergeer M.Personalization in e-campaigning: A cross-national comparison of personalization strategies used on candidate websites of 17 countries in EP elections 2009.New Media & Society. 2012;15 (1): 72-92
17. Jackson NA,Lilleker DG.Just public relations or an attempt at interaction? British MPs in the press, on the web and ‘In Your Face’.European Journal of Communication. 2004;19 (4): 507-533
18. Jackson NA,Lilleker DG.Building an architecture of participation? Political parties and Web 2.0 in Britain.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2009;6 (3): 232-250
19. Jouet J,Vedel T,Comby JB.Political information and interpersonal conversations in a multimedia environment: A quantitative and qualitative examination of information practices in France.European Journal of Communication. 2011;26 (4): 361-375
20. Kahn KFThe Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press; 1996:
21. Norwegian parties and Web 2.0.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2009;6 (3): 251-266
22. Karlsen R.Obama’s online success and European Party Organizations: Adoption and adaptation of US online practices in the Norwegian Labor Party.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2012;10:158-170
23. LarssonAO (2011) ‘Extended infomercials’ or ‘Politics 2.0’? A study of Swedish political party web sites before, during and after the 2010 election. First Monday16(4). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3456/2858
24. Larsson AO.Bringing it all back home? Social media practices by Swedish municipalities.European Journal of Communication. 2013a;28 (6): 681-695
25. Larsson AO.‘Rejected Bits of Program Code’: Why notions of ‘Politics 2.0’ remain (mostly) unfulfilled.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2013b;10 (1): 72-85
26. Larsson AO.Tweeting the viewer – Use of Twitter in a talk show context.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2013c;57 (2): 135-152
27. Larsson AO,Moe H.Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign.New Media & Society. 2012;14 (5): 729-747
28. Larsson AO,Moe HTwitter and Society. Bruns ABurgess JWeller K, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2013:319-331.
29. Lewis SC,Zamith R,Hermida A.Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2013;57 (1): 34-52
30. Lilleker DG,Malagón C.Levels of interactivity in the 2007 French presidential candidates’ websites.European Journal of Communication. 2010;25 (1): 25-42
31. Lilleker DG,Koc-Michalska K,Schweitzer EJ, et al.Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning.European Journal of Communication. 2011;26 (3): 195-213
32. Lisi M.The professionalization of campaigns in recent democracies: The Portuguese case.European Journal of Communication. 2013;28:259-276
33. McMillan SJ.The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the world wide web.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000;77 (1): 80-98
34. Margolis M,Resnick DPolitics as Usual: The Cyberspace ‘revolution’. London: SAGE; 2000:
35. Margolis M,Resnick D,Wolfe JD, et al.Party competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain.Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics. 1999;4 (4): 24-47
36. Moe H,Larsson AO.Methodological and ethical challenges associated with large-scale analyses of online political communication.Nordicom Review. 2012;33 (1): 117-124
37. Nordicom-Sveriges Internetbarometer 2011 (MedieNotiser 2012). Gothenburg: Nordicom; 2012:
38. PascuCOsimoDUlbrichM. (2007) The potential disruptive impact of Internet 2 based technologies. First Monday12(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1630/1545
39. Polat RK.The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links.European Journal of Communication. 2005;20 (4): 435-459
40. Puopolo ST.The web and U.S. senatorial campaigns 2000.American Behavioral Scientist. 2001;44 (12): 2030-2047
41. Schweitzer EJ.Election campaigning online – German party websites in the 2002 National elections.European Journal of Communication. 2005;20 (3): 327-351
42. Schweitzer EJ.Innovation or normalization in E-campaigning? A longitudinal content and structural analysis of German party websites in the 2002 and 2005 National elections.European Journal of Communication. 2008;23 (4): 449-470
43. Schweitzer EJ.Europeanisation on the Internet? The role of German party websites in the 2004 European Parliamentary Elections.Observatorio. 2009;3 (3): 20-40
44. Schweitzer EJ.Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9.European Journal of Communication. 2011;26 (4): 310-327
45. Shane PMDemocracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet. New York: Routledge; 2004:
46. Strandberg K.Online campaigning: An opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates’ websites in the 2003 election campaign.New Media & Society. 2009;11 (5): 835-854
47. Strandberg K.A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections.New Media & Society. 2013;15:1329-1347
48. Strömbäck J.Political marketing and professionalized campaigning.Journal of Political Marketing. 2007;6 (2–3): 49-67
49. Tenscher J.First- and second-order campaigning: Evidence from Germany.European Journal of Communication. 2013;28 (3): 241-258
50. Tumasjan A,Sprenger TO,Sandner PG, et al.Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape.Social Science Computer Review. 2010;29 (4): 402-418
51. Vaccari C.Research note: Italian parties’ websites in the 2006 elections.European Journal of Communication. 2008a;23 (1): 69-77
52. Vaccari C.Surfing to the Elysee: The Internet in the 2007 French elections.French Politics. 2008b;6 (1): 1-22
53. Vaccari C,Nielsen RK.What drives politicians’ online popularity? An analysis of the 2010 U.S. Midterm Elections.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2012;10 (2): 208-222
54. Vergeer M.Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present.. and a peek into the future.New Media & Society. 2012;15 (1): 9-17
55. Vergeer M,Hermans L,Cunha C.Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis.New Media & Society. 2012;15 (1): 128-148
56. Williams CB,Gulati GJJ.Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008.New Media & Society. 2012;15 (1): 52-71
57. Wright S.Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation.New Media & Society. 2011;14 (2): 244-261