Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: The case of argumentation

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 213-240

  Németh, Nóra ^a   Kormos, Judit ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990323712     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136216880100500303     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Dörnyei, Z. 1998: Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32: 232-262.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. 1993: Learning the rules of academic talk: a longitudinal study of pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 279-304.
3. Blum-Kulka, S. and Ohlstain, E. 1986: Too many words: length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 8: 47-61.
4. Bygate, M. 1996a: Effects of task repetition: appraising the developing language of learners. In Willis, D. and Willis, J., editors, Challenge: change in language teaching. London: Heinemann, 136-146.
5. Bygate, M. 1996b: Effects of task repetition on language structure and control. Paper presented at AAAL Conference, March 1996, Chicago, IL.
6. Bygate, M. 1999: Words and phrases in argumentation and narrative tasks: do tasks activate different nerve endings? Paper presented at TESOL Convention, March 1999, New York, NY.
7. Connor, U. 1990: Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English 24: 67-87.
8. Connor, U. and Lauer, J. 1985: Understanding persuasive essay writing: linguistic/rhetorical approach. Text 5: 309-326.
9. Connor, U. and Lauer, J. 1988: Cross-cultural variation in persuasive student writing. In Purves, A. C., editor, Writing across languages and cultures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 138-159.
10. Csölle, A. and Károly, K. 1999: Patterns in FL spoken argumentative text structure. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Dörnyei, Z. and Katona, L. 1992: Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing 9: 187-206.
12. Dörnyei, Z. and Kormos, J. 1998: Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: a psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 349-385.
13. Dörnyei, Z. and Kormos, J. 2000: The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research 4: 275-300.
14. Dörnyei, Z. and Thurrell, S. 1992: Conversation and dialogues in action. New York: Prentice Hall.
15. Duff, P. 1986: Another look at interlanguage talk: taking task to task. In Day, R., editor, Talking to learn. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
16. Ellis, R. 1992: Learning to communicate in the classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 1-23.
17. Enkvist, N. E. 1985: Text linguistics and written composition. Text 5: 284-302.
18. Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. 1989: Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G., editors, Cross-cultural pragmatics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 221-247.
19. Foster, P. and Skehan P. 1996: The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 293-323.
20. Glendinning, E. and Mantell, H. 1983: Write ideas: an intermediate course in writing skills. London: Longman.
21. Hoey, M. P. 1983: On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.
22. House, J. 1996: Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 225-252.
23. House, J. and Kasper, G. 1987: Interlanguage pragmatics: requesting in a foreign language. In Lorscher, W. and Schulze, R., editors, Perspectives on language performance: Festschrift for Werner Hullen. Tübingen: Narr, 1250-1288.
24. Kasper, G. and Schmidt, R. 1997: Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149-169.
25. Klein-Braley, C. 1985: A close-up on the C-test: a study in the construct validation of authentic tests. Language Testing 2: 76-104.
26. Klein-Braley, C. and Raatz, U. 1984: A survey on research on the C-test. Language Testing 1: 134-146.
27. Kopperschmidt. J. 1985: An analysis of argumentation. In van Dijk, T. A., editor, Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3. London: Academic Press, 159-169.
28. Maeshiba, N., Yoshinaga, N., Kasper, G. and Ross, S. 1996: Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing. In Gass, S. and Neu, J., editors, Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155-187.
29. Ohlstain, E. and Blum-Kulka, S. 1985: Degree of approximation: nonnative reactions to native speech behaviour. In Gass, S. M. and Madden, C., editors, Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 303-325.
30. Pica, T., Kanagy, R. and Falodun, J. 1993: Choosing and using communication tasks for language instruction. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S. M., editors, Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 10-34.
31. Robinson, P. 1995: Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning 45: 99-140.
32. Robinson, P., Ting, C. C. and Urwin, J. J. 1996: Investigating second language task complexity. RELC Journal 26: 62-79.
33. Schiffrin, D. 1985: Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in talk. In van Dijk, T. A., editor, Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3. London: Academic Press, 35-46.
34. Skehan, P. 1998a: Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 268-286.
35. Skehan, P. 1998b: A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. 1996: Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Paper presented at the AAAL conference, Chicago, IL.
37. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. 1997: The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research 1: 185-211.
38. Takahashi, T. and Beebe, L. 1987: The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal 8: 131-151.
39. Tirkonnen-Condit, S. 1985: Argumentative text structure and translation. Jyvaskykla: University of Jyvaskala.
40. Toulmin, S. 1958: The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. and Janik, A. 1979: An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
42. Trosborg, A. 1987: Apology strategies in natives/non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 147-167.
43. Varghese, S. A. and Abraham, S. A. 1998: Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 287-306.
44. van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R. 1984: Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrechts-Holland: Foris.
45. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. 1997: Argumentation. In van Dijk, T. A., editor, Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage, 208-229.
46. Wildner-Bassett, M. 1984: Improving pragmatic aspects of learner interlanguage. Tübingen: Narr.
47. Wildner-Bassett, M. 1994: Intercultural pragmatics and proficiency: ‘polite’ noises for cultural appropriateness. International Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 3-17.