Quality in business process modeling

Quality in Business Process Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-249

  Krogstie, John ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; PROCESS ENGINEERING; REVIEWS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; POST-GRADUATE LEVELS; PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE; PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; RETURN ON INVESTMENTS; SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 85008925708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42512-2     Document Type: Book

References (398)

1. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: Analysis and design of business processes using BPMN. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2010)
2. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: BPMN 2.0 for modeling business processes. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2015)
3. Ader, M., Lu, G., Pons, P., Monguio, J., Lopez, L., De Michelis, G., Grasso, M.A., Vlondakis, G.: WOOrks, an object-oriented work flow system for offices. Technical report, ITHACA technical report (1994)
4. Alter, S.: A workaround design system for anticipating, designing, and/or preventing workarounds. In: Proceedings of EMMSAD 2015, Stockholm, Sweden (2015)
5. Ambriola, V., Conradi, R., Fuggetta, A.: Assessing process-centered software engineering environments. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 6(3), 283-328 (1997)
6. Anderl, R., Raßler, J.: PML an object-oriented process modelling language. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 277, pp. 145-156. Computer-Aided Innovation (CAI), Gaetano Cascini, Boston, Springer (2008)
7. Andersen Consulting Process Excellence Handbook. http://www.scribd.com/doc/31730974/Process-Excellence-Handbook#scribd. Last Accessed 8 Jan 2016 (1997)
8. Argyris, C., Schön, D.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (1978)
9. Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, Cambrige (1962)
10. Benson, et al.: Mathematical structure for reasoning about emergent organizations. In: CSCW2000 Workshop: Beyond Workflow Management: Supporting Dynamic Organizational Processes, Philadelphia, USA (2000)
11. Bernstein, A.: How Can Cooperative Work Tools Support Dynamic Group Processes? Bridging the Specificity Frontier, ACM CSCW Conference, Philadelphia, USA (2000)
12. Bogia, D.P.: Supporting flexible, extensible task descriptions in and among tasks. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (1995)
13. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language: User Guide Second Edition. Addison-Wesley (2005)
14. Bråten, S.: Model monopoly and communications: systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociol. J. Scand. Social. Assoc. 16(2), 98-107 (1973)
15. Button, G.: What’s wrong with speach act theory. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work. 3(1), 39-42 (1995)
16. Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model: towards a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9-36 (1976)
17. Conner, D.: Managing at the Speed of Change. Random House, New York (1992)
18. Conradi, R., Jaccheri, M.L.: Process modelling languages. In: Software Process: Principles, Methodology and Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1500. Springer, Berlin (1998)
19. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process modeling. Commun. ACM. 35(9), 75-90 (1992)
20. Davis, A.M.: A comparison of techniques for the specification of external system behaviour. Communications of the ACM,. 31(9), 1098-1115 (1988)
21. De Michelis, G., Grasso, M.A.: Situating conversations within the language/action perspective: the Milan conversation model. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1994 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’94), pp. 89-100. Chapel Hill, NC, 22-26 Oct (1994)
22. Derniame, J.C. (ed.): Software Process: Principles, Methodology and Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1500. Springer, New York (1998)
23. Dignum, F., Weigand, H.: Modelling communication between cooperative systems. In: Iivari, J., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’95), Jyväskylä, Finland, 12-16 June 1995, pp. 140-153. Springer, Berlin (1995)
24. Dourish, P.: Re-spaceing place: "place" and "space" ten years on proceedings of ACM conference. In: Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’06, Banff, Canada, pp. 299-308. ACM, New York (2006)
25. Dourish, P., Holmes, J., MacLean, A., Marqvardsen, P., Zbyslaw, A.: Freeflow: Mediating between representation and action in workflow systems. In: ACM CSCW Conference, Boston, USA, (1996)
26. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2013)
27. EU: Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment, Malmø, Sweden 5th Ministerial eGovernment conference (2009)
28. Evéquoz, F., Sterren, C.: Waiting for the miracle: comparative analysis of twelve business process management systems regarding the support of BPMN 2.00 Palette and Export Technical report IIG-TR 2011-.03 (2011)
29. Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B.E., Oei, J.L.H., Rolland, C., Stamper, R.K., Assche, F.J.M.V., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., Voss, K.: A Framework of information system concepts-The FRISCO Report, IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO (1996)
30. Fickas, S.: Design issues in a rule-based system. J. Syst. Softw. 10(2), 113-123 (1989)
31. Findler, N.V. (ed.): Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computer. Academic, New York (1979)
32. Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M.: Enterprise modeling. AI Mag. 19(3), 109-121 (2000)
33. Gane, C., Sarson, T.: Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)
34. Gao, S., Krogstie, J.: Capturing process knowledge for multi-channel information systems: a case study. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 3(1), 78-98 (2012)
35. Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: An accounting object infrastructure for knowledge-based enterprise models. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14, 89-94 (1999)
36. Genesereth, M.R., Ketchpel, S.T.: Software agents. Commun. ACM. 37(7), 48-53 (1994)
37. Gilbreth, F.B., Gilbreth, L.M.: Process Charts. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1921)
38. Glance, N.S., Pagani, D.S., Pareschi, R.: Generalized process structure grammars (GPSG) for flexible representation of work. In: ACM CSCW Conference, Boston, USA (1996)
39. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: An overview of declarative process modeling principles and languages. Commun. Syst. Inf. World. Netw. 6, 51-58 (2009)
40. Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapting UML activity diagrams for mobile work process modelling: experimental comparison of two notation alternatives. In: Proceedings of PoEM 2010. Springer, Berlin (2010)
41. Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Capturing location in process models: comparing small adaptations of mainstream notation. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 3(3), 24-45 (2012)
42. Gordijn, J., Yu, E., van der Raadt, B.: e-service design using i* and e3 value. IEEE Softw. 23(3), 23-33 (2006)
43. Green, P., Rosemann, M.: Integrated process modeling: an ontological evaluation. Inf. Syst. 25(3), 73-87 (2000)
44. Hagelstein, J., Rifaut, A.: A comparison of semantic models for collections. Technical Report, Philips Research Lab, Brussels, Belgium (1987)
45. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York (1993)
46. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N.: How to build collaborative advantage. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(1), 22-30 (2004)
47. Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-placeing space: the roles of space and place in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’96, Boston, MA, pp. 67-76. ACM, New York (1996)
48. Hauge, Ø., Ayala, C., Conradi, R.: Adoption of open source software in software-intensive industry-a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(11), 1133-1154 (2010)
49. Havey, M.: Essential Business Process Modelling. O’Reilly, Cambridge (2005)
50. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., Wesenberg, H.: Ensuring quality of large scale industrial process collections: Experiences from a case study. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 11-25. Springer, Berlin (2014)
51. Hommes, B.-J., van Reijswoud, V.: The quality of business process modelling techniques. In: Conference on Information Systems Concepts (ISCO). Leiden, Kluwer (1999)
52. Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Krogstie, J.: BPM-in-the-large-towards a higher level of abstraction in business process management. Paper presented at GISP under WCC, Brisbane, Australia (2010)
53. Hruby, P.: Model-Driven Design Using Business Patterns. Springer, New York (2006)
54. Hull, R., King, R.: Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 19(3), 201-260 (1987)
55. IDEF0: http://www.idef.com/IDEF0.htm. Last Accessed 1 July 2015
56. Iden, J.: Business Process Management. The RIS Methodology. Bergen, IPAAS (2009)
57. Iden, J., Tessem, B., Paivarinta, T.: Problems in the interplay of IS development and IT operations: an alignment analysis. In: Pooley, R., Coady, J., Schneider, C., Linger, H., Barry, C., Lang, M. (eds.) Information Systems Development. Springer, New York (2013)
58. Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), New and Emerging Research Track-Companion (2009)
59. Kappel, G., Rausch-Schott, S., Retschitzegger, W.: Coordination in workflow management systems: a rule-based approach. In: Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications, pp. 99-119. Springer, Berlin (1998)
60. Kavakli, E., Loucopoulos, P.: Goal modeling in requirements engineering: analysis and critique of current methods in information modeling methods and methodologies. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005)
61. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). Wirtschaftsinformatik 89 (1992)
62. Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Domain-Specific Modelling: Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)
63. Kolata, G.: A Sea Change in Treating Heart Attacks. New York Times, June 19 (2015). http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/health/saving-heart-attack-victims-stat.html?_r=0
64. Krogstie, J.: A semiotic approach to quality in requirements specifications. Paper presented at the IFIP 8.1. Working Conference on Organizational Semiotics (2001)
65. Krogstie, J.: Integrated goal, data and process modeling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering from Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI, Hershey (2008)
66. Krogstie, J.: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, London (2012a)
67. Krogstie, J.: Modeling of digital ecosystems: challenges and opportunities. IFIP Adv. Inf. Comm. Technol. 380, 137-145 (2012b)
68. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Utilizing deontic operators in information systems specifications. Requir.Eng. J. 1, 210-237 (1996)
69. Krogstie, J., Carlsen, S.: An integrated modelling approach for process support. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-30), Maui, Hawaii (1997)
70. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.: Interactive models for supporting networked organisations. Paper presented at the 16th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2004), Riga, Latvia, 9-11 June (2004)
71. Krogstie, J., Nossum, A.: A semiotic approach for guiding the visualizing of time and space in enterprise models. In: Proceedings ICISO 2014, Shanghai, China (2014)
72. Krogstie, J., McBrien, P., Owens, R., Seltveit, A.H.: Information systems development using a combination of process and rule based approaches. Paper presented at the third international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE’91), Trondheim, Norway (1991)
73. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Harmonising business processes of collaborative networked organisations using process modelling. In: PROVE’04. Toulouse, France (2004)
74. Lei, Y., Singh, M.P.: A comparison of workflow metamodels. In: ER Workshop on Behavioral Modeling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1565 (1997)
75. Leppänen, M.: An ontological framework and a methodical skeleton for method engineering: a contextual approach. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä (2005)
76. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2008)
77. Loos, P., Allweyer, T.: Process Orientation and Object-Orientation-An approach for Integrating UML with Event-Driven Process Chains (EPC). University of Saarland, Germany (1998)
78. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Governatori, G.: On managing business processes variants. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(7), 642-664 (2009)
79. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554-578 (1982)
80. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The action workflow approach to work flow management technology. In: Proceedings of CSCW’92, Toronto (1992)
81. Morris, C.: Foundations of the theory of signs. In: International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, London (1938)
82. Nossum, A., Krogstie, J.: Integrated quality of models and quality of maps. Paper presented at the EMMSAD (2009)
83. OMG: BPMN v1.1 specification. Technical report, OMG. http://www.omg.org/, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.1/. Accessed Jan 2008
84. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN 2.0). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0(2011)
85. Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G.: Facet modeling: an approach to flexible and integrated conceptual modeling. Inf. Syst. 22(5), 291-323 (1997)
86. Ould, M.A.: Business Processes-Modeling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement. Wiley, Beverly Hills (1995)
87. Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: Capability maturity model for software (Version 1.1). Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024 ESC-TR-93-177 (1993)
88. Peckham, J., Maryanski, F.: Semantic data models. ACM Comput. Surv. 20(3), 153-190 (1988)
89. Petri, C.A.: Kommunikation mit automaten (In German). Schriften des Rheinisch-Westfalischen Institut für Instrumentelle Mathematik an der Universität Bonn, (2) (1962)
90. Potter, W.D., Trueblood, R.P.: Traditional, semantic and hyper-semantic approaches to data modeling. IEEE Comput. 21(6), 53-63 (1988)
91. Pierce, C.S.: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1931-1935)
92. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework. In: IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS2004), Prato, Italy, pp. 658-672, 1-3 July 2004
93. Recker, J.: Green, greener, BPM? BPTrends 5(7), 1-8 (2011)
94. Reijers, H.A., Mansar, S.: Best practice in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. OMEGA 33, 283-306 (2005)
95. Rosemann, M., Recker, J.: Systemic ideation: a playbook for creating innovative ideas more consciously 3600. Bus. Transform. J. 13, 34-45 (2015)
96. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as a Strategy. Harvard Business School Press (2006)
97. Scheer, A.W.: ARIS, Business Process Framework, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)
98. Schonenberg, H.B., Weber, B., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2008)
99. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)
100. Searle, J.R.: Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)
101. Searle, J.R., Vanderveken, D.: Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
102. Shoham, Y.: Agent oriented programming: an overview of the framework and summary of recent research. In: Masuch, M., Polos, L. (eds.) Knowledge Representation and Reasoning under Uncertainty: Logic at Work, pp. 123-129. Springer, Berlin (1994)
103. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012)
104. Singh, B., Rein, G.L.: Role interaction nets (RINs); a process description formalism. Technical Report CT-083-92, MCC, Austin (1992)
105. Stabell, C.B., Fjeldstad, Ø.D.: Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 19, 413-437 (1998)
106. Stachowiak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, Wien (1973)
107. Stamper, R.: Semantics. In: Boland Jr., T.J., Hirschheim, R.A. (eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, pp. 43-78. Wiley, Englewood Cliffs (1987)
108. Störle, H.: Describing process patterns with UML. In: EWSPT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2077. Springer, Berlin (2001)
109. Suchman, L.: Do categories have politics? Comput. Support. Cooper. Work. 2(3), 177-190 (1994)
110. Swenson, K.D., Maxwell, R.J., Matsymoto, T., Saghari, B., Irwin, I.: A business process environment supporting collaborative planning. J. Collab. Comput. 1(1), 15-34 (1994)
111. Tomlinson, C., Scheevel, M.: Concurrent programming. In: Kim, W., Lochovsky, F.H. (eds.) Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases and Applications. Addison-Wesley, New York (1989)
112. Twining, W., Miers, D.: How to Do Things with Rules. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London (1982)
113. UN/CEFACT: Modeling Methodology (UMM) User guide. Project report. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/cefact/umm/UMM_userguide-nutshell.pdf (2007)
114. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 245-275 (2005)
115. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M.: DecSerFlow: towards a truly declarative service flow language. Web Serv. Form. Method. 4814, 1-23 (2006)
116. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative work flows: balancing between flexibility and support. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 23(2), 99-113 (2009)
117. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process Mining manifesto. Business Process Management Workshops 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 99. Springer, Berlin (2011)
118. Vanderhaeghen, D., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Organizational and technological options for business process management from the perspective of web 2.0-results of a design oriented research approach with particular consideration of self-organization and collective intelligence. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2, 15-28 (2010)
119. Veenstra, A.F., Aagesen, G., Janssen, M., Krogstie, J.: Infrastructures for public service delivery: complexities of governance and architecture in service infrastructure development. e-Serv.J. (2012)
120. Von Brocke, J., Rosemann, M.: Handbook on Business Process Management, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2015)
121. Wegner, P.: Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Comm. ACM 40(5) (1997)
122. Weick, K.: Sensemaking in Organisations. Sage, London (1995)
123. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, New York (2007)
124. WfMC Workflow Handbook 2001: Workflow Management Coalition, Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, Florida, USA (2000)
125. White, S.A.: Introduction to BPMN. IBM Cooperation (2004)
126. Wieringa, R.: Three roles of conceptual models in information systems design and use. In: Falkenberg, E., Lindgren, P. (eds.) Information Systems Concepts: An In-Depth Analysis, pp. 31-51. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)
127. Willoch, B.E.: Business Process Reengineering -En praktisk innføring og veiledning. Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad og Bjorke AS, Bergen (1994)
128. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)
129. Young, J.W., Kent, H.K.: Abstract formulation of data processing problems. J. Ind. Eng. 471-479(1958)
130. Andersen Consulting Process Excellence Handbook (1997). http://www.scribd.com/doc/31730974/Process-Excellence-Handbook#scribd
131. Arkilic, I.G., Reijers, H.A., Goverde, R.R.H.M.J.: How good is an as-is model really? In: Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. Springer, Berlin, pp. 89-100(2013)
132. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Berlin (2006)
133. Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A.: Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(3) (2009)
134. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Schütte, R.: Guidelines of Modelling (GoM). Wirtschaftsinformatik 37 (5), 435-445 (in German) (1995)
135. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling in Business Process Management Volume 1806 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 30-49 (2002)
136. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M.: Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2003)
137. Berger, P., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin, London (1966)
138. Cardoso, J., et al.: A discourse on complexity of process models. In Business Process Management Workshops. Springer, Berlin (2006)
139. Claes, J., et al.: Tying process model quality to the modeling process: the impact of structuring, movement, and speed. In Business Process Management Conference, pp. 33-48 (2012)
140. Davis, R.: Business Process Modelling with Aris: A Practical Guide. Springer, Berlin (2001)
141. Davis, A.M., Overmeyer, S., Jordan, K., Caruso, J., Dandashi, F., Dinh, A., Kincaid, G., Ledeboer, G., Reynolds, P., Sitaram, P., Ta, A., Theofanos, M.: Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification. In: Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, pp. 141-152 (1993)
142. Denning, P.J.: What is software quality? Commun. ACM. 35(1), 13-15 (1992)
143. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281-1294 (2008)
144. Dumas, M., et al.: Understanding business process models: the costs and benefits of structuredness. In Ralyté, J., et al. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp. 31-46 (2012)
145. Dumas, M, La Rosa, M, Mendling, J, Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2013)
146. Effinger, P., Jogsch, N., Seiz, S.: On a study of layout aesthetics for business process models using BPMN. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M., Weske, M. (eds.) Business Process Modeling Notation.Springer, Berlin, pp. 31-45 (2010)
147. Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B.E., Oei, J.L.H., Rolland, C., Stamper, R.K., Assche, F.J.M.V., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., Voss, K.: A Framework of information system concepts-The FRISCO Report, IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO (1996)
148. Figl, K., Laue, R.: Cognitive complexity in business process modeling. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 452-466 (2011)
149. Fortnow, L.: CACM viewpoint: time for computer science to grow up. Commun. ACM. 52(8), 33-35 (2011)
150. Frank, U.: Evaluation of reference models. In Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis IGI. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)
151. Gane, C., Sarson, T.: Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)
152. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: 2 Approaches for business process model complexity metrics. In: Abramowicz, Mayr, H.C. (eds.) Technologies for Business Information Systems. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 13-24 (2007a)
153. Gruhn, V., Laue. R.: Good and bad excuses for unstructured business process models. In 12th European conference on pattern languages of programs (EuroPLoP 2007). UVK-Universitaetsverlag, Konstanz (2007b)
154. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Detecting common errors in event-driven process chains by label analysis. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. 6(1), 3-15 (2011)
155. Hella, L., Krogstie, J.: A structured evaluation to assess the reusability of models of user profiles. In: Proceeding of EMMSAD-Conference on Evaluating Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Hammamet, Tunis (2010)
156. ISO 9000: Quality management systems-fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland (2005)
157. Kano, N.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Japanese Soc. Qual. Control. 14(2), 39-48 (1984)
158. Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: resolving the vicious circle. Data Knowl. Eng. 56(1), 23-40 (2006)
159. Koehler, J., Vanhatalo, J.: Process anti-patterns: how to avoid the common traps of business process modeling. In: Tech. Rep. Report RZ-3678. IBM Zurich Reseach Lab (2007)
160. Krogstie, J.: Supporting a decentralized organization using WWW: the ISDO’95 conference Invited talk at the IFIP 8.1. Conference on Information Systems Development for Decentralized Organizations. Trondheim, Norway (1995)
161. Krogstie, J.: Using quality function deployment in software requirements specification. Paper presented at the Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ’99), Heidelberg, Germany, June 14-15 (1999)
162. Krogstie, J.: A semiotic approach to quality in requirements specification. In: Proceedings of IFIP 8.1. Working Conference on Organizational Semiotics, Montreal, Canada, 23-25 July (2001)
163. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML using a generic quality framework. In: Liliana F. (ed.) UML and the Unified Process, pp. 1-22. IRM Press, USA (2003)
164. Krogstie, J.: Integrated Goal, Data and Process modeling: From TEMPORA to Model-Generated Work-Places. In Paul Johannesson & Eva Søderstrøm (Eds.), Information Systems Engineering From Data Analysis to Process Networks (pp. 43-65): IGI. (2008)
165. Krogstie, J.: Model-based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, Berlin (2012a)
166. Krogstie, J.: Quality of Business Process Models. Proceedings PoEM’2012, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 134, 76-90. (2012b)
167. Krogstie, J.: Quality of conceptual data models. In: Proceedings 14th ICISO, Stockholm Sweden, April (2013a)
168. Krogstie, J.: A Semiotic framework for data quality. In: Proceedings EMMSAD 2013, Valencia, Spain, June (2013b)
169. Krogstie, J.: Capturing Enterprise Data Integration Challenges Using a Semiotic Data Quality Framework Business & Information Systems Engineering February 2015, Vol. 57, Issue 1, pp. 27-36 (2015)
170. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.D.: Quality of interactive models. In: First International Workshop on Conceptual Modelling Quality (IWCMQ’02). 11 Oct 2002. Tampere, Finland. Springer, Berlin (2002)
171. Krogstie, B.R., Krogstie, J., Maiden, N., Lockerbie, J., Wessel, D., Knipfer, K.: Collaborative Modelling of Reflection to Inform the Development and Evaluation of Work-Based Learning Technologies Proceedings of i-KNOW 2012. ACM Press, New York (2012)
172. Larsson L., Segerberg R.: An Approach for Quality Assurance in Enterprise Modelling, MSc thesis. Stockholm University, Sweden (2004)
173. Lassen, K.B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Complexity metrics for Workflow nets. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(3), 610-626 (2009)
174. Laue, R., Mendling, J.: The impact of structuredness on error probability of process models. In: Kaschek, R., et al. (eds.) Information Systems and E-Business Technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp. 585-590 (2008)
175. Laue, R., Mendling, J.: Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models. IseB. 8(3), 287-307 (2010)
176. Lin, Y., Strasunskas, D., Hakkarainen, S., Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Semantic annotation framework to manage semantic heterogeneity of process models. Paper presented at the CAiSE’2006, Luxembourg (2006)
177. Lindgren, P. (ed): A framework for information systems concepts. Interrim report FRISCO (1990)
178. Lindland, O.I.: A Prototyping Approach to Validation of Conceptual Models in Information Systems Engineering. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, IDT, NTH (1993)
179. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42-49 (1994)
180. Mendling, J.: Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPC Business Process Models, in Institute of Information Systems and New Media. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (WU Wien), Austria (2007)
181. Mendling, J., Neumann. G.: Error metrics for business process models. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (2007)
182. Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Towards systematic usage of labels and icons in business process models. In: Halpin, T., Proper, H.A., Krogstie, J. (eds.) 13th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series, Montpellier. See http://ceur-ws.org/France (2008)
183. Mendling, J., Reijers., H.A.: The impact of activity labeling styles on process model quality. In European Symposium on Analysis, Design, Use and Societal Impact of Information Systems. Marburg, Germany (2008)
184. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Influence factors of understanding business process models. In Abramowicz, W.F.D. (eds.) Business Information Systems. Springer, Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 142-153 (2008)
185. Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Cardoso, J.: What makes process models understandable? In: G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M., (eds.) Business Process Management, Alonso. Springer, Berlin, pp. 48-63 (2007a)
186. Mendling, J., Neumann, G., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Understanding the occurrence of errors in process models based on metrics. In: Meersman, R.T.Z., (ed.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, pp. 113-130 (2007b)
187. Mendling, J., et al.: Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model. Data Knowl. Eng. 64(1), 312-329 (2008)
188. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 467-482 (2010a)
189. Mendling, J., Recker, J., Reijers, H.A.: On the usage of labels and icons in business process modeling. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 1(2), 40-58 (2010b)
190. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(2), 127-136 (2010c)
191. Mendling, J., et al.: Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models. J. Syst.Softw. 85(5), 1188-1197 (2012)
192. Moody, D.L.: Metrics for evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER '98), Singapore, November 16-19. Elsevier Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1998)
193. Moody, D.L.: The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2003, Naples, 16-21 June (2003)
194. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach (ER’94), pp. 94-111. Manchester, England (1994)
195. Moody, D.L., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., Sølvberg, A.: Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Testing of a Quality Framework. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y.(eds.) Proceedings ER 2002, LNCS 2503, pp. 214-231 (2002)
196. Moreno-Montes de Oca, I., Snoeck, M.: Pragmatic Guidelines for Business Process Modeling. Technical report KU Leuven (2014)
197. Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Softw.Qual. J. 20(1), (2011)
198. Nossum, A., Krogstie, J.: Integrated Quality of Models and Quality of Maps. Proceedings EMMSAD. Springer, Berlin (2009)
199. Pohl, K.: The Three dimensions of requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of CAiSE’93, Springer, LNCS 685 (1993)
200. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework. In: IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS 2004), Prato, Italy, 1-3, pp. 658-672 (2004)
201. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework: Development and comparative analysis. J. Inf. Technol. 20(2), 88-102 (2005)
202. Recker, J., Mendling, J.: On the translation between BPMN and BPEL: conceptualmismatch between processmodeling languages. In: Latour, T., Petit, M.(eds.) Proceedings of theCAiSEWorkshops at the 18th Conference onAdvanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006), Luxembourg, Luxembourg, pp. 521-532. Presses Universitaries de Namur, Belgique (2006)
203. Reggio, G., et al.: On business process modelling with the UML: a discipline and three styles. Dipartimento di Informatica e Scienze dell’Informazione (DISI). University of Genova, Italy (2011a)
204. Reggio, G., Leotta, M., Ricca, F.: Precise is better than light-a document analysis study about quality of business process models. In First International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (2011b)
205. Reijers, H., Mendling, J.: Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects. In Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 20-35 (2008)
206. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R.M.: On the usefulness of subprocesses. In Business Process Models. BPM center report, Eindhoven, p. 32 (2010)
207. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. IEEE Transac. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A. 41(3), 449-462 (2011)
208. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R.M.: Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension. Inf. Syst. 36(5), 881-897 (2011a)
209. Reijers, H.A., et al.: Syntax highlighting in business process models. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 339-349 (2011b)
210. Reijers, H., Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Business Process quality management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin (2015)
211. Rolón, E., et al.: An exploratory experiment to validate measures for business process models. In: International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. Ouarzazate, Morocco (2007)
212. Rolón, E., et al.: Prediction models for BPMN usability and maintainability. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (2009a)
213. Rolón, E., et al.: Analysis and validation of control-flow complexity measures with bpmn process models. In: Halpin, T., et al. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Springer, Berlin, pp. 58-70 (2009b)
214. Rosemann, M., Recker, J.: Systemic Ideation: A playbook for creating innovative ideas more consciously. 360° Bus. Transform. J. 13 Jul (2015)
215. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)
216. Sánchez-González, L., et al.: Quality assessment of business process models based on thresholds. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P., (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, p. 78-95. (2010)
217. Sánchez-González, L., et al.: Towards thresholds of control flow complexity measures for BPMN models. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM (2011a)
218. Sánchez-González, L., et al.: Improving quality of business process models. In: Maciaszek, L.A., Zhang, K., (eds.) Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE 2011. Springer: Beijing, pp. 130-144. 8 (2011b)
219. Sánchez-González, L., et al.: Quality indicators for business process models from a gateway complexity perspective. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(11), 1159-1174 (2012)
220. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wiβotzki, M.: Enterprise Modelling-Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)
221. Schrepfer, M., et al.: The impact of secondary notation on process model understanding. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Working Conference. Stockholm, Sweden (2009)
222. Sedera, W., Rosemann, M., Doebeli, G.: A process modelling success model: insights from a case study. 11th European Conference on Information Systems, Naples, Italy (2003)
223. Sharp, A., McDermott, P.: Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Application Development, Artech House (2001)
224. Silver, B. Ten tips for effective process modeling. BPMS watch, (2008)
225. Silver, B., BPMN: Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos (2012)
226. Snoeck, M., Moreno-Montes de Oca, I., Haegemans, T., Schedeman, B., Hoste, T.: Testing a Selection of BPMN Tools for Their Support of Modelling Guidelines. Proceedings PoEM (2015)
227. Tsichritzis, D., Klug, A.: The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS framework. Inf. Syst. 3, 173-191 (1978)
228. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Work flow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases. 14(3), 5-51 (2003)
229. Vanderfeesten, I., et al.: On a quest for good process models: the cross-connectivity metric. In: Bellahsene, Z., Leonard, M., (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 480-494.(2008)
230. Vanhatalo, J., Volzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and more focused control-flow analysis for business process models through sese decomposition. In 5th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vienna, Austria (2007)
231. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J. Inform. Syst. 3(4), 217-237 (1993)
232. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling-a research agenda. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(4), 363-376 (2002)
233. Weber, B., et al.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 62(5), 467-486 (2011)
234. Willoch, B.E.: Business Process Reengineering-En praktisk innføring og veiledning. Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad og Bjorke AS, Bergen (1994)
235. Alsam, A.: Contrast enhancing colour to grey. In: SCIA '09 Proceedings of the 16th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Oslo (2009)
236. Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., Tollis, I.G.: Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Technical report, Brown University (1994)
237. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin, Madison (1983)
238. Bråten, S.: Model monopoly and communications: systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociol. J. Scand. Social. Assoc. 16(2), 98-107 (1973)
239. Brown, R.A.: Conceptual modelling in 3D virtual worlds for process communication. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2010), Brisbane (2010)
240. Conesa, J., Olive, A., Caballé, S.: Semantic web personalization and context awareness information science reference. In: Refactoring and Its Application to Ontologies, pp. 107-136 (2011)
241. Conklin, J.: Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley, New York (2005)
242. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.J.: gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Trans.Inf. Syst. 6(4), 303-331 (1988)
243. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36, 498-516 (2010)
244. Fowler, M., Beck, K.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1999)
245. Francalanci, C., Pernici, B.: View integration: a survey of current developments. Technical Report 93-053, Politecnico de Milano, Milan (1993)
246. Gane, C., Sarson, T.: Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)
247. Gjersvik, R.: The construction of information systems in organizations. Unpublished PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim (1993)
248. Gjersvik, R., Krogstie, J., Følstad, A.: Participatory development of enterprise process models. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modelling Methods and Methodologies.Idea Group Publishers, Hershey (2004)
249. Gulla, J.A.: A general explanation component for conceptual modeling in CASE environments. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 14(3), 297-329 (1996)
250. Hahn, U., Jarke, M., Rose, T.: Group work in software projects: integrated conceptual models and collaboration tools. In: Gibbs, S., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A. (eds.) Multi-user Interfaces and Applications: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.4 Conference on Multi-user Interfaces and Applications, pp. 83-102. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)
251. Hawryszkiewycz, I.: Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)
252. Hella, L., Krogstie, J.: A structured evaluation to assess the reusability of models of user profiles. In: Proceeding of EMMSAD-Conference on Evaluating Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Hammamet, Tunis (2010)
253. Hewett, J., Durham, T.: CASE: The Next Steps. Technical report, OVUM (1989)
254. Krogstie, J.: A semiotic approach to quality in requirements specification. In: Proceedings of IFIP 8.1. Working Conference on Organizational Semiotics, Montreal, Canada, (2001)
255. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML using a generic quality framework. In: Favre, L. (ed.) UML and the Unified Process, pp. 1-22. IRM Press (2003)
256. Krogstie, J.: Integrated goal, data and process modeling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering From Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI (2008)
257. Krogstie, J.: Model-based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, Berlin (2012a)
258. Krogstie, J.: Quality of business process models. In: Proceedings of PoEM’2012, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 134, pp. 76-90 (2012b)
259. Krogstie, J.: Quality of conceptual data models. In: Proceedings of 14th ICISO, Stockholm Sweden, (2013a)
260. Krogstie, J.: A semiotic framework for data quality. In: Proceedings of EMMSAD 2013, Valencia, Spain (2013b)
261. Krogstie, J.: Capturing Enterprise Data Integration Challenges Using a Semiotic Data Quality Framework Business and Information Systems Engineering Feb 2015, vol. 57, issue 1, pp. 27-36(2015)
262. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.D.: Quality of interactive models. In: First International Workshop on Conceptual Modelling Quality (IWCMQ’02), 11 Oct 2002, Tampere, Finland. Springer, Berlin (2002)
263. Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Information Systems Engineering: Conceptual Modeling in a Quality Perspective. Kompendiumforlaget, Trondheim (2003)
264. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Increasing the value of process modelling. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems ICEIS 2006, Cyprus (2006)
265. Kuntz, J.C., Christiansen, T.R., Cohen, G.P., Jin, Y., Levitt, R.E.: The virtual design team: a computational simulation model of project organizations. Commun. ACM 41(11) (1998)
266. Langefors, B.: Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems, 1st edn. Studentliteratur, Auerbach (1973)
267. Leite, J.C.S.P., Freeman, P.A.: Requirements validation through viewpoint resolution. IEEE Trans.Softw. Eng. 17(12), 1253-1269 (1991)
268. Lin, Y., Strasunskas, D., Hakkarainen, S., Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Semantic annotation framework to manage semantic heterogeneity of process models. Paper presented at the CAiSE’2006, Luxembourg (2006)
269. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42-49 (1994)
270. Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Towards systematic usage of labels and icons in business process models. In: Halpin, T., Proper, H.A., Krogstie, J. (eds.) 13th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series, Montpellier. See http://ceur-ws.org/France (2008)
271. zur Mühlen, M., Recker, J.C.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Proceedings CAiSE’08. Springer-Verlag, Montpellier, France (2008)
272. Nossum, A., Krogstie, J.: Integrated quality of models and quality of maps. In: Proceedings of EMMSAD 2009. Springer, Berlin (2009)
273. Orlikowski, J.W., Gash, D.C.: Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 174-207 (1994)
274. Petre, M.: Why looking isn’t always seeing. Readership skills and graphical programming.Commun. ACM. 38(6), 33-44 (1995)
275. Pohl, K.: The three dimensions of requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of CAiSE’93, Springer, LNCS 685 (1993)
276. Rittel, H.: On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the first and second generations. Bedriftsøkonomen 34(8) (1972)
277. Rittgen, P.: Business process model similarity as a proxy for group consensus. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 12-24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
278. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wiβotzki, M.: Enterprise Modelling-Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)
279. Seltveit, A.H.: An abstraction-based rule approach to large-scale information systems development. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’93), Paris, France, 8-11 June 1993, pp. 328-351. Springer, Berlin (1993)
280. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1963)
281. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M.S., Jacobs. S.M.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading (2009)
282. Silver, B.: BPMN: Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012)
283. Tamassia, R., Di Battista, G., Batini, C.: Automatic graph drawing and readability of diagrams.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 61-79 (1988)
284. van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Chichester (2009)
285. Wangler, B., Wohed, R., Ohlund, S.-E.: Business modelling and rule capture in a CASE environment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on the Next Generation of CASE Tools, Twente (1993)
286. Ware, C.: Information Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2000)
287. Wesenberg, H.: Enterprise modeling in an agile world PoEM 2011. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Oslo, Norway (2011)
288. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: Analysis and design of business processes using BPMN. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2010)
289. Bråten, S.: Model monopoly and communications: systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociol. J. Scand. Social. Assoc. 16(2), 98-107 (1973)
290. Christensen, L.C., Johansen, B.W., Midjo, N., Onarheim, J., Syvertsen, T., Totland, T.: Enterprise modeling-practices and perspectives. Comput. Eng., 1071-1084 (1995)
291. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., Wesenberg, H.: Ensuring quality of large scale industrial process collections: Experiences from a case study. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 11-25. Springer, Berlin (2014)
292. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., Wesenberg, H.: Understanding model quality concerns when using process models in an industrial company. In Proceedings from EMMSAD 2015. Springer, Berlin (2015a)
293. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., Wesenberg, H.: The Influence of Syntactic Quality of Enterprise Process Models on Model Comprehension. CAiSE Forum, Stockholm CEUR (2015b)
294. Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Krogstie, J.: Business process management in the large. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 3(6), 385-388 (2011)
295. Krogstie, J.: Integrated goal, data and process modeling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering from Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI, Hershey (2008)
296. Krogstie, J.: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, London (2012)
297. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M. Harmonising business processes of collaborative networked organisations using process modelling. In: PROVE’04. Toulouse, France (2004)
298. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Process modeling value framework. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Filipe, J., Constantopoulos, P., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Selected Papers from 8th International Conference, ICEIS 2006, vol. LNBIP 3, pp. 309-321. Springer, Paphos, Cyprus (2008)
299. Krogstie, J., de Flon Arnesen, S.: Assessing enterprise modeling languages using a generic quality framework. Inf. Model. Methods Methodol. 1537-9299, 63-79 (2005)
300. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2008)
301. Malinova, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: A Meta-Model for Process Map Design. In: CAiSE Forum 2014, June 16-20, Thessaloniki, Greece (2014)
302. Ould, M.A.: Business Processes-Modeling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement. Wiley, Beverly Hills (1995)
303. Rossi, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Complexity metrics for system development methods and techniques.Inf. Syst. 21(2), 209-227 (1994)
304. Sedera, W., Rosemann, M., Doebeli, G.: A process modelling success model: insights from a case study. In: 11th European Conference on Information Systems, Naples, Italy (2003)
305. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos (2012)
306. Solum, P.E., Østerud, M.: Integreret CASE-verktøy. Kartlegging av teknologien og problemer i forhold til tradisjonell systemutvikling. Master Thesis NTNU, Trondheim Norway (1989)
307. Totland, T.: Enterprise modeling as a means to support human sense-making and communication in organizations. PhD Thesis, NTNU Trondheim, Norway (1997)
308. Wesenberg, H.: Enterprise modeling in an agile world PoEM 2011. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Oslo, Norway, 2-3 Nov 2011
309. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: Analysis and design of business processes using BPMN. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2010)
310. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: BPMN 2.0 for modeling business processes. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2015)
311. Böhmann, T., Burr, W., Herrmann, T., Krcmar, H.: Implementing International Services a Tailorable Method for Market Assessment, Modularization, and Process Transfer. GABL, Wiesbaden (2011)
312. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language: User Guide, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Boston (2005)
313. Bråten, S.: Model monopoly and communications: systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociol. J. Scand. Soc. Assoc. 16(2), 98-107 (1973)
314. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modelling in practice? Data. Knowl. Eng. 58, 358-380 (2006)
315. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Formal semantics and analysis of BPMN process models. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane (2007)
316. Emery, M., Purser, R.E.: The Search Conference. A Powerful Method for Planning Organizational Change and Community Action. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1996)
317. Evéquoz, F., Sterren, C.: Waiting for the Miracle: Comparative Analysis of Twelve Business Process Management Systems Regarding the Support of BPMN 2.00 Palette and Export. Technical Report IIG-TR 2011.03 (2011)
318. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. Commun. ACM 46, 79-84 (2003)
319. Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010, LNCS 6563, pp. 377-396. Springer, Berlin (2011)
320. Gjersvik, R., Krogstie, J., Følstad, A.: Participatory development of enterprise process models. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modelling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group Publishers, Hershey (2004)
321. Herrmann, T.: SeeMe in a Nutshell. The Semi-Structured Socio-Technical Modeling Method (2006)
322. Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Domain-Specific Modelling: Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)
323. Krogstie, J.: On the distinction between functional development and functional maintenance. J. Soft. Maintenance 7, 383-403 (1995)
324. Krogstie, J.: Integrated goal, data and process modeling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering from Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI, Hershey (2008)
325. Krogstie, J.: Model-based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, Berlin (2012)
326. Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Software maintenance in Norway: a survey investigation. In: Muller, H., Georges, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM’94), pp. 304-313. IEEE Computer Society Press, Victoria (1994)
327. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.: Interactive models for supporting networked organisations. Paper presented at the 16th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2004), Riga, Latvia, 9-11 June (2004)
328. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.: Using a model quality framework for requirements specification of an enterprise modeling languages. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research, vol. 4. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005)
329. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.D.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur. J. Inform Syst. 15(1), 91-102 (2006a)
330. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Process modeling value framework. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Filipe, J., Constantopoulos, P., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Selected papers from 8th International Conference, ICEIS 2006, vol. LNBIP 3, pp. 309-321. Springer, Paphos (2008)
331. Krogstie, B., et al.: Computer support for reflective learning in the workplace: a model. In: International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2012, ACM: Rome (2012)
332. Krogstie, B.R., Schmidt, A.P., Kunzmann, C., Krogstie, J., Mora, S.: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations Proceedings ARTEL 2013 (2013)
333. Kump, B., et al.: The Role of Reflection in Maturing Organizational Know-How. In: 1st European Workshop ARNets11, in Conjunction with EC-TEL 2011. Palermo, Italy (2011)
334. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2008)
335. Lin, Y., Strasunskas, D., Hakkarainen, S., Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Semantic annotation framework to manage semantic heterogeneity of process models. Paper presented at the CAiSE’2006, Luxembourg (2006)
336. Moody, D.L.: The "Physics" of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35, 756-779 (2009)
337. Nguyen, L., Swatman, P.A.: Managing the Requirements Engineering Process Proceedings REFSQ 2001. Interlaken, Switzerland (2001)
338. Nysetvold, A.G., Krogstie, J.: Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research Series, vol. 5, pp. 79-93. Idea Group, Hershey (2006)
339. OMG: BPMN v2 Specification. Technical report, OMG. (http://www.omg.org/), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/, Jan (2011)
340. Ouyang, C., et al.: Workflow management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
341. Persson, A., Stirna, J.: Towards defining a competence profile for the enterprise modelling practitioner the practice of enterprise modelling. In: PoEM 2010, Delft, 2010. Springer, Berlin (2010)
342. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weidlich, M., Fahland, D., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Tracing the process of process modeling with modeling phase diagrams. In Proceedings ER-BPM’11, pp. 370-382 (2012)
343. Recker, J.: BPMN Modeling-Who, Where, How and Why. BPTrends (2008)
344. Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do process modelling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia (2005)
345. Recker. J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: How good is BPMN really? Insights from theory and practice. In: 14th European Conference on Information System (ECIS 2006), pp. 1-12, Gothenburg, Sweden (2006)
346. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology-versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling language: a comparison. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20, 774-799 (2007)
347. Reijers, H., Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Business process quality management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin (2015)
348. Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P.: A study of the evolution of the representational capabilities of process modeling grammars. Adv. Inf. Syst. Eng.-CAiSE 4001:447-461 (2006)
349. Rossi, M., Cocco, M., Kristensen, K., Parrotta, S., Terzi, S., Krogstie, J., Ahlers, D.: LEAN Virtual Obeya in Book from the LinkedDesign Project. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)
350. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow control-flow patterns: a revised view. BPM Center Report BPM-06-22, BPMcenter. org, pp. 6-22 (2006)
351. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wiβotzki, M.: Enterprise Modelling-Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)
352. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012)
353. Sindre, G., Krogstie, J.: Process heuristics to achieve requirements specification of feasible quality. In: Pohl, K., Peters, P. (eds.) Second International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ’95), pp. 92-103. Jyvälskylä, Finland (1995)
354. Snoeck, M., Moreno-Montes de Oca, I., Haegemans, T., Schedeman, B., Hoste, T.: Testing a selection of BPMN tools for their support of modelling guidelines. In: Proceedings PoEM (2015)
355. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 245-275 (2005)
356. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B, Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14, 5-5 (2003)
357. van der Aalst, W., et al.: Process Mining Manifesto, Business Process Management Workshops 2011, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 99, Springer, Berlin (2011)
358. Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An analytical evaluation of BPMN using a semiotic quality framework. In: Proceedings of EMMSAD’2005, pp. 533-544 (2005)
359. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J. Inform. Syst. 3(4), 217-237 (1993)
360. Wesenberg, H.: Enterprise modeling in an agile world. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Oslo, Norway (2011)
361. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Pattern-based analysis of BPMN-an extensive evaluation of the control-flow, the data and the resource perspectives (revised version). BPM Center Report BPM-06-17, BPMcenter.org (2005)
362. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling. In: Business Process Management-BPM 2006, Vienna, Austria. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4102, pp. 161-176 (2006)
363. zur Mühlen, M., Ho, D.T.: Service process innovation: a case study of BPMN in practice. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual (2008)
364. zur Mühlen, M., Recker, J.C.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Proceedings CAiSE’08. Springer-Verlag, Montpellier, France (2008)
365. Andersson, A., Krogstie, J.: Implementation and first evaluation of a molecular modeling language. In: Proceedings EMMSAD 2015 LNBIP 214. Springer, Berlin (2015)
366. Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Web semantics: science. Serv. Agents World Wide Web. 5(2), 58-71 (2007)
367. Asif, M., Krogstie, J.: Externalization of user model in mobile services. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. (iJIM). 8(1), 4-9 (2014)
368. Biczok, G., Martinez, S.D., Jelle, T., Krogstie, J.: Navigating Mazemap: indoor human mobility, spatio-logicalties and future potential. PERMODY IEEE (2014)
369. Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Comm. Soc. 15(5), 662-679 (2012)
370. Chen, M., Mao, S., Liu, Y.: Big data: a survey. Mobile Netw. Appl. 2014(19), 171-209 (2012)
371. Conti, M., et al.: Looking ahead in pervasive computing: challenges and opportunities in the era of cyber-physical convergence. In: Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2-21, Feb 2012
372. D’Andria, F., Field, D., Kopaneli, A., Kousiouris, G., Garcia-Perez, D., Pernici, B., Plebani, P.: Data Movement in the Internet of Things Domain Service Oriented and Cloud Computing, vol. 9306, pp. 243-252. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2015)
373. Embury, S.M., Missier, P., Sampaio, S., Greenwood, R.M., Preece, A.D.: Incorporating domain-specific information quality constraints into database queries. J. Data Inf. Qual. (JDIQ). 1(2), 11 (2009)
374. Fossland, S., Krogstie, J.: Modeling as-is, ought-to-be and to-be-experiences from a case study in the health sector. In: Proceedings PoEM 2015, Valencia, Spain (2015)
375. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., Wesenberg, H.: Ensuring quality of large scale industrial process collections: Experiences from a case study. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 11-25. Springer, Berlin (2014)
376. Krogstie, J.: Integrated goal, data and process modeling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering from Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI, Hershey (2008)
377. Krogstie, J.: Modeling of digital ecosystems: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceeding PRO-VE 2012. Springer, Berlin (2012)
378. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating data quality for integration of data sources. In: Proceedings PoEM 2013, pp. 39-53, Riga, Latvia (2013)
379. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Utilizing deontic operators in information systems specifications. Requir. Eng. J. 1, 210-237 (1996)
380. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.: Interactive models for supporting networked organisations. Paper presented at the 16th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2004), Riga, Latvia, 9-11 June 2004
381. Krogstie, J., Gao, S.: A semiotic approach to investigate quality issues of open big data ecosystems. In: Proceedings ICISO (2015)
382. Krogstie, J., McBrien, P., Owens, R., Seltveit, A.H.: Information systems development using a combination of process and rule based approaches. Paper presented at the third international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE’91), Trondheim, Norway (1991)
383. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Process modeling value framework. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Filipe, J., Constantopoulos, P., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Selected Papers from 8th International Conference, ICEIS 2006. LNBIP, vol. 3, pp. 309-321. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
384. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2008)
385. Lindland, O.I., Krogstie, J.: Validating conceptual models by transformational prototyping. In: 5th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’93). Springer, Paris (1993)
386. Loucopoulos, P., McBrien, P., Schumacker, F., Theodoulidis, B., Kopanas, V., Wangler, B.: Integrating database technology, rule-based systems and temporal reasoning for effective information systems: the TEMPORA paradigm. J. Inf. Syst. 1, 129-152 (1991)
387. Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J.: Is Traditional Conceptual Modeling Becoming Obsolete? Conceptual Modeling, vol. 8217, pp. 61-73. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2013)
388. Maggi, F.M., Slaats, T., Reijers, H.A.: The Automated Discovery of Hybrid Processes Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2014)
389. Malinova, M., Mendling, J.: Why is BPMN not appropriate for process maps? In: Proceedings ICIS 2015 Forth Worth (2015)
390. Martin, N., Poulovassillis, A., Wang, J.: A methodology and architecture embedding quality assessment in data integration. ACM J. Data Inf. Qual. 4(4), 17 (2012)
391. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wiβotzki, M.: Enterprise Modelling-Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)
392. Shekhar, S., Xiong, H.: Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Berlin (2008)
393. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P, Adams, M., Russel, N.: Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and its Support Environment. Springer, Berlin (2010)
394. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Soft. Eng. 37 (2013)
395. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer (2016)
396. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Business Process Management Workshops 2011, vol. 99. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer, Berlin (2011)
397. Wad, C.: QoS: Quality Driven Data Abstraction for Large Databases. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2008)
398. Ware, C.: Information Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann (2000)