Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 79-84

  Gemino, Andrew ^a   Wand, Yair ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

GRAMMAR CONSTRUCTS; ONTOLOGY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS MODELING TECHNIQUES; SYSTEMS ANALYSTS;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 4243086883     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/944217.944243     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Batra, D., Hoffer, J., and Bostrom, R. Comparing representations with relational and EER models. Commun. ACM 33, 2 (Feb. 1990), 126-139.
2. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., and Weber, R. Should optional properties be used in conceptual modeling? A theory and three empirical tests. Info. Syst. Res. 12, 4 (Dec. 2001), 384-405.
3. Brooks, F. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays of Software Engineering, Anniversary Edition. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.
4. Burton-Jones, A. and Meso, P. How good are these UML diagrams? An empirical test of the Wand and Weber Good Decomposition Model. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems 2002, L. Applegate, R. Galliers, and J. DeGross, Eds. (Barcelona, Spain, Dec. 15-18, 2002).
5. Gemino, A. Empirical Comparison of System Analysis Techniques, Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, June 1998.
6. Mayer, R. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001.
7. Mayer, R. Models for understanding. Rev. Edu. Res. 59, 1 (spring 1989), 43-64.
8. Oei, J., van Hemmen, L., Falkenberg, E., and Brinkkemper, S. The Meta Model Hierarchy: A Framework for Information Systems Concepts and Techniques. Tech. Rep. No. 92-17, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Katholieke Universiteir, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, July 1992, 1-30.
9. Standish Group International, Inc. Chaos 1994: Standish Group Report on Information System Development. Yarmouth, MA, 1995; see www.pm2go.com/ sample_research/chaos_l994_1.php.
10. Vessey, I. and Conger, S. Requirements specification: Learning object, process, and data methodologies. Commun. ACM 37, 5 (May 1994), 102-113.
11. Wand, Y. and Weber, R. Information systems and conceptual modeling: A research agenda. Info. Syst. Res. 13, 4 (Dec. 2002), 203-223.
12. Wand, Y. and Weber, R. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J. Info. Syst. 3 (1993), 217-237.