Tying process model quality to the modeling process: The impact of structuring, movement, and speed

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7481 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 33-48

  Claes, Jan ^a   Vanderfeesten, Irene ^b   Reijers, Hajo A ^b   Pinggera, Jakob ^c   Weidlich, Matthias ^d   Zugal, Stefan ^c   Fahland, Dirk ^b   Weber, Barbara ^c   Mendling, Jan ^e   Poels, Geert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^d TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^e VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

business process modeling; empirical research; modeling process; process model quality

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; MODELING BEHAVIOR; MODELING PROCESS; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING; STRUCTURED MODELING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84866375928     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Rittgen, P.: Quality and perceived usefulness of process models. In: Proc. SAC 2010, pp. 65-72. ACM (2010)
2. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models. LNBIP, vol. 6. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur. J. of Information Systems 15(1), 91-102 (2006)
4. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30-49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
5. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Information and Software Technology 52(2), 127-136 (2010)
6. Mendling, J., Sánchez-González, L., García, F., La Rosa, M.: Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models. Journal of Systems and Software 85(5), 1188-1197 (2012)
7. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 41(3), 449-462 (2011)
8. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: Investigating the process of process modeling with cheetah experimental platform. In: Proc. ER-POIS 2010, pp. 13-18 (2010)
9. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Recker, J.C.: Business Process Quality Management. In: Handbook on Business Process Management, vol. 1, pp. 167-185. Springer (2010)
10. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Proc. ICBIS 2006, pp. 1-12 (2006)
11. Vanderfeesten, I., Cardoso, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Quality metrics for business process models. In: BPM and Workflow Handbook, pp. 179-190 (2007)
12. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501-514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
13. Soffer, P., Kaner, M., Wand, Y.: Towards Understanding the Process of Process Modeling: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 357-369. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
14. Crapo, A.W., Waisel, L.B., Wallace, W.A., Willemain, T.R.: Visualization and the process of modeling: a cognitive-theoretic view. In: Proc. ACM SIGKDD 2000, pp. 218-226 (2000)
15. Morris, W.T.: On the art of modeling. Management Science 13(12), 707-717 (1967)
16. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weidlich, M., Fahland, D., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Tracing the Process of Process Modeling with Modeling Phase Diagrams. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 370-382. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
17. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: How the Structuring of Domain Knowledge Helps Casual Process Modelers. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 445-451. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
18. Breuker, D., Pfeiffer, D., Becker, J.: Reducing the variations in intra-and interorganizational business process modeling-an empirical evaluation. In: Proc. WI 2009, pp. 203-212 (2009)
19. Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2), 81-97 (1956)
20. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational 38(1), 63-71 (2003)
21. Demarco, T., Lister, T.: Programmer performance and the effects of the workplace. In: Proc. ICSE 1985, pp. 268-272 (1985)
22. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Sidorova, H., Verbeek, H.M.W., Voorhoeve, M., Wynn, M.T.: Soundness of workflow nets: classification, decidability, and analysis. Formal Aspects of Computing 23(3), 333-363 (2011)
23. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: The application of Petri nets to workflow management. Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers 8(1), 21-66 (1998)
24. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology 50(12), 1281-1294 (2008)
25. Wolf, K.: Generating Petri Net State Spaces. In: Kleijn, J., Yakovlev, A. (eds.) ICATPN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4546, pp. 29-42. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
26. Decker, G., Mendling, J.: Process instantiation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9), 777-792 (2009)
27. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) version 2.0 (2011)
28. McGill, R., Tukey, J., Larsen, W.A.: Variations of box plots. The American Statistician 32(1), 12-16 (1978)
29. Cegielski, C.: What makes a good programmer? Communications of the ACM 49(10), 73-75 (2006)
30. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
31. Laue, R., Mendling, J.: The Impact of Structuredness on Error Probability of Process Models. In: Kaschek, R., Kop, C., Steinberger, C., Fliedl, G. (eds.) UNISCON 2008. LNBIP, vol. 5, pp. 585-590. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
32. Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., Chen, L.: The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health 23, 151-169 (2002)