The influence of syntactic quality of enterprise process models on model comprehension

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1367, Issue , 2015, Pages 89-96

  Heggset, Merethe ^a   Krogstie, John ^a   Wesenberg, Harald ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b STATOIL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ENTERPRISE MODELS; FURTHER WORKS; OIL COMPANIES; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELLING; QUALITY SYSTEMS; USAGE STATISTICS; USER FEEDBACK;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84937468701     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Heggset, M., Krogstie, J. and Wesenberg, H. Ensuring quality of large scale industrial process col-lections: Experiences from a case study. In The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pages 11-25. Springer, (2014).
2. Houy, Constantin, Fettke, Peter, Loos, Peter, van der Aalst, Wil M. P., & Krogstie, John. (2011a). Business Process Management in the Large. Business & Information Systems Engineering(6).
3. Krogstie, J.: Model-based development and evolution of information systems: A quality approach, Springer, London (2012).
4. Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Process modeling value framework. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Filipe, J., Constantopoulos, P., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Selected papers from 8th International Conference, ICEIS 2006, pp. 309-321. Springer, Paphos (2008).
5. Moody DL, Sindre G, Brasethvik T, Sølvberg A (2002) Evaluating the quality of process models: Empirical analysis of a quality framework, In Proc. 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'2002), Tampere, Finland, 7-11 Oct.
6. Moody, D.L.: Theorethical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Cur-rent state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55 243-276 (2005).
7. Nelson, H.J, Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M. A conceptual modeling quality framework. Soft-ware Quality Journal 20:201-228 (2012).
8. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework: Development and comparative analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 20 (2), 88-102 (2005).
9. Silver, B. BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012).
10. Statoil: TR0002 Enterprise Structure and Standard Notation. version 1 (2009).
11. Statoil: TR0002 Enterprise Structure and Standard Notation. version 3 (2013).
12. Statoil: Statoilboken http://www.statoil.com/no/About/TheStatoilBook/Downloads/Statoil-Boken.pdf (2014).
13. Wesenberg, H. Enterprise Modeling in an Agile World PoEM 2011, Proceedings of the 4th confer-ence on Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Oslo, Norway, November 2-3 (2011).