Evaluating data quality for integration of data sources

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 165 LNBIP, Issue , 2013, Pages 39-53

  Krogstie, John ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Data integration; Data quality; Product modelling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

COLLABORATIVE WORK; DATA QUALITY; DATA-SOURCES; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; PLM SYSTEMS; PRODUCT MODELLING; PRODUCT MODELS; QUALITY OF DATA;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 85006001856     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41641-5_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aasland, K., Blankenburg, D.: An analysis of the uses and properties of the Obeya. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ICE-Conference, Munich (2012)
2. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer (2006)
3. Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A.: Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(3) (2009)
4. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language: User Guide, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2005)
5. Francalanci, C., Pernici, B.: View integration: A survey of current developments. Technical Report 93-053, Politecnico de Milano, Milan, Italy (1993)
6. Grudin, J.: Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37(1), 92-105 (1994)
7. Hermans, F.F.J.: Analyzing and Visualizing Spreadsheets. PhD thesis, Software Engineering Research Group, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (2012)
8. Høydalsvik, G.M., Sindre, G.: On the purpose of object-oriented analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA 1993), pp. 240-255. ACM Press (1993)
9. Jiang, L., Barone, D., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Measuring and Comparing Effectiveness of Data Quality Techniques. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 171-185. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
10. Krogstie, J.: Using Quality Function Deployment in Software Requirements Specification. Paper presented at the Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ 1999), Heidelberg, Germany, June 14-15 (1999)
11. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework. In: Favre, L. (ed.) UML and the Unified Process, pp. 1-22. IRM Press (2003)
12. Krogstie, J.: Integrated Goal, Data and Process Modeling: From TEMPORA to ModelGenerated Work-Places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering From Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI (2008)
13. Krogstie, J.: Model-based development and evolution of information systems: A quality approach. Springer, London (2012)
14. Krogstie, J.: Quality of Business Process Models. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 76-90. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
15. Krogstie, J.: Quality of Conceptual Data Models. In: Proceedings 14th ICISO, Stockholm Sweden (2013)
16. Krogstie, J.: A Semiotic Framework for Data Quality. In: Nurcan, S., Proper, H.A., Soffer, P., Krogstie, J., Schmidt, R., Halpin, T., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2013 and EMMSAD 2013. LNBIP, vol. 147, pp. 395-410. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
17. Krogstie, J., Arnesen, S.: Assessing Enterprise Modeling Languages using a Generic Quality Framework. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group Publishing (2004)
18. La Rocca, G.: Knowledge based engineering: Between AI and CAD. Review of a language based technology to support engineering design. Advanced Engineering Informatics 26(2), 159-179 (2012)
19. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer (2008)
20. Manyika, J., Sprague, K., Yee, L.: Using technology to improve workforce collaboration. What Matters. McKinsey Digital (October 2009)
21. Moody, D.L.: Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211-225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
22. Moody, D.L.: Theorethical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55, 243-276 (2005)
23. Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Software Quality Journal (2011)
24. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A Semiotic Information Quality Framework. In: IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS 2004), Prato, Italy, July 1-3, pp. 658-672 (2004)
25. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework: Development and comparative analysis. Journal of Information Technology 20(2), 88-102 (2005)
26. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology-versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling language: A comparison. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20, 774-799 (2007)