The impact of structuredness on error probability of process models

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 5, Issue , 2008, Pages 585-590

  Laue, Ralf ^a   Mendling, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; ERROR PROBABILITIES; EVENT DRIVEN PROCESS CHAIN; PROCESS MODELING; QUALITY PROBLEMS; RECENT RESEARCHES; REFERENCE MODELING;

ERRORS;

EID: 84994745713     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: 18651356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78942-0_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Europ. J. of Inf. Systems 15, 91-102 (2006)
2. Mendling, J., Verbeek, H., Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W., Neumann, G.: Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPCs of the SAP Reference Model. Data & Knowledge Engineering (accepted for publication, 2007)
3. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: What business process modelers can learn from programmers. Science of Computer Programming 65, 4-13 (2007)
4. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and more focused control-flow analysis for business process models through sese decomposition. In: Kramer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
5. Mendling, J.: Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPC Business Process Models. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (2007)
6. Mendling, J., Neumann, G., van der Aalst, W.: Understanding the occurrence of errors in process models based on metrics. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 113-130. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
7. Oulsnam, G.: Unravelling unstructured programs. Comp. J. 25, 379-387 (1982)
8. Ammarguellat, Z.: A control-flow normalization algorithm and its complexity. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 18, 237-251 (1992)
9. Ouyang, C, Dumas, M., Breutel, S., ter Hofstede, A.: Translating standard process models to BPEL. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 417-432. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. van der Aalst, W., Lassen, K.: Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: Theory and implementation. Inf. & Softw. Techn. (In Press, 2006)
11. Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.: Formalization and Verification of EPCs with OR-Joins Based on State and Context. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 439-453. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
12. Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S.: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2000)
13. van der Aalst, W.M.: Formalization and verification of Event-Driven Process Chains. Information & Software Technology 41, 639-650 (1999)
14. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Good and bad excuses for unstructured business process models. In: EuroPLoP 2007, Proceedings (to appear)