Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework

Advanced Topics in Database Research

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 79-93

  Nysetvold, Anna Gunhild ^a   Krogstie, John ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049125964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-935-9.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Carlsen, S. (1997). Conceptual modeling and composition of flexible workflow models. Unpublished PhD thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
2. EXTERNAL (1999). EXTERNAL - Extended enterprise resources, networks and learning, EU Project, IST-1999-10091, new methods of work and electronic commerce, dynamic networked organizations. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://research.dnv.com/external/default.htm
3. Fowler, M. (2004). UML distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995, June). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 14(2).
5. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
6. Krogstie, J. (1999, June 14-15). Using quality function deployment in software requirements specification. In A. L. Opdahl, K. Pohl, & E. Dubois (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ'99) (pp. 171-185). Heidelberg, Germany.
7. Krogstie, J. (2001). Using a semiotic framework to evaluate UML for the development of models of high quality. In K. Siau & T. Halpin (Eds.), Unified modeling language: Systems analysis, design, and development issues (pp. 89-106). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
8. Krogstie, J., & Arnesen, S. (2004). Assessing enterprise modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In J. Krogstie, K. Siau, & T. Halpin (Eds.), Information modeling methods and methodologies (pp. 63-79). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
9. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O. I., & Sindre, G. (1995, March 28-30). Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In E. D. Falkenberg, W. Hesse, & A. Olive (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Concepts (ISCO3); Towards a consolidation of views, Marburg, Germany (pp. 216-231). London: Chapman & Hall.
10. Krogstie, J., & Sølvberg, A. (2003). Information systems engineering: Conceptual modeling in a quality perspective. Trondheim, Norway: Kompendiumforlaget.
11. Nysetvold, A. G. (2004, November). Prosessorientert IT-arkitektu., Project thesis (in Norwegian), IDI, NTNU.
12. Østbø, M. (2000, June 20). Anvendelse av UML til dokumentering av generiske systemer. Unpublished master's thesis (in Norwegian). Høgskolen i Stavanger, Norway.
13. van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Kiepuszewski, B., & Barros, A. P. (2003). Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 5-52.
14. Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (1993). On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Journal of Information Systems 3(4), 217-237.
15. White, S. A. (2004). Introduction to BPMN. White Plains, NY: IBM Corporation.