Influence factors of understanding business process models

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 7 LNBIP, Issue , 2008, Pages 142-153

  Mendling, Jan ^a   Strembeck, Mark ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LABELS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

BUSINESS ANALYSIS; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; INFLUENCE FACTORS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; ONLINE SURVEYS; PROCESS MODEL; QUALITY ASPECTS; QUALITY MEASURES; SECOND GROUP; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

PROCESS MONITORING;

EID: 70350057316     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Hoppenbrouwers, S.S., Proper, H.E., van der Weide, T.: A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, ́O. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol.3716, pp. 128-143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
2. Becker, J., Rosemann, M.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol.1806, pp. 30-49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
3. Moody, D.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowl. Eng. 55, 243-276 (2005)
4. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowl. Eng. 58, 358-380 (2006)
5. Mendling, J., Moser, M., Neumann, G., Verbeek, H., Dongen, B., Aalst, W.: Faulty EPCs in the SAP Reference Model. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol.4102, pp. 451-457. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
6. Mendling, J., Verbeek, H., Dongen, B., Aalst, W., Neumann, G.: Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPCs of the SAP Reference Model. In: Data & Knowl (accepted, 2007)
7. Simon, H.: Sciences of the Artificial., 3rd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
8. Mendling, J.: Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPC Business Process Models. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (2007)
9. Mendling, J., Reijers, H., Cardoso, J.:What makes process models understandable. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol.4714, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
10. Lindland, O., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11, 42-49 (1994)
11. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: A revised quality framework. Europ. J. of Inf. Systems 15, 91-102 (2006)
12. Moody, D., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., Sølvberg, A.: Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Testing of a Quality Framework. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol.2503, pp. 380-396. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
13. ISO: Information technology - software product evaluation - quality characteristics and guide lines for their use. ISO/IEC IS 9126 (1991)
14. Güceglioglu, A.S., Demirörs, O.: Using software quality characteristics to measure business process quality. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol.3649, pp. 374-379. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. Commun. ACM 46, 79-84 (2003)
16. Green, T., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A 'cognitive dimensions' framework. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 7, 131-174 (1996)
17. Lee, G., Yoon, J.M.: An empirical study on the complexity metrics of petri nets. Microelectronics and Reliability 32, 323-329 (1992)
18. Nissen, M.: Redesigning reengineering through measurement-driven inference. MIS Quarterly 22, 509-534 (1998)
19. Morasca, S.: Measuring attributes of concurrent software speci.cations in petri nets. In: METRICS 1999, pp. 100-110 (1999)
20. Reijers, H., Vanderfeesten, I.: Cohesion and coupling metrics for workflow process design. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol.3080, pp. 290-305. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (Pubitemid 39742130)
21. Cardoso, J.: Evaluating WorkfLows and Web Process Complexity. In: Workflow Handbook 2005, pp. 284-290 (2005)
22. Balasubramanian, S., Gupta, M.: Structural metrics for goal based business process design and evaluation. Business Process Management Journal 11, 680-694 (2005)
23. Canfora, G., Garćia, F., Piattini, M., Ruiz, F., Visaggio, C.: A family of experiments to validate metrics for software process models. Journal of Systems and Software 77, 113-129 (2005)
24. Aguilar, E.R., Ruiz, F., Garćia, F., Piattini, M.: Towards a Suite of Metrics for Business Process Models in BPMN. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Filipe, J., Constantopoulos, P., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2006, Proceedings (III), pp. 440-443 (2006)
25. Laue, R., Gruhn, V.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Abramowicz, W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) BIS 2006, Proceedings. LNI, vol.85, pp. 1-12 (2006)
26. Cardoso, J.: Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation. In: IEEE SCC 2006, Proceedings, pp. 167-173 (2006)
27. Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P.: A Study of the Evolution of the Representational Capabilities of Process Modeling Grammars. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol.4001, pp. 447-461. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
28. Agarwal, R., Sinha, A.: Object-oriented modeling with UML: A study of developers perceptions. Communications of the ACM 46, 248-256 (2003)
29. Sarshar, K., Loos, P.: Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol.3649, pp. 434-439. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
30. Lange, C., Chaudron, M.: An experimental investigation. In: Osterweil, L., Rombach, H., Soffa, M. (eds.) ICSE 2006, Proceedings., pp. 401-411 (2006)
31. Mendling, J., Aalst, W.: Towards EPC Semantics based on State and Context. In: Nüttgens, M., Rump, F.J., Mendling, J. (eds.) EPK 2006, Proc., pp. 25-48 (2006)
32. Mendling, J., Aalst, W.: Formalization and Verification of EPCs with OR-Joins Based on State and Context. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol.4495, pp. 439-453. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
33. Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S.: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. (2000)
34. Nagelkerke, N.: A note on a general definition of the coe.cient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691-692 (1991)