An enhancement deep feature fusion method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 119, Issue , 2017, Pages 200-220

  Shao, Haidong ^a   Jiang, Hongkai ^a   Wang, Fuan ^a   Zhao, Huiwei ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Deep feature fusion; Fault diagnosis; Feature enhancement; Locality preserving projection; Rotating machinery

Indexed keywords

FAILURE ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MACHINERY; ROTATING MACHINERY;

FEATURE ENHANCEMENT; FEATURE FUSION; FEATURE FUSION METHOD; FEATURE LEARNING; INTELLIGENT DIAGNOSIS; LOCALITY PRESERVING PROJECTIONS; MACHINERY FAULT DIAGNOSIS; VIBRATION DATA;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 85008219650     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. [1] Jiang, H.K., Li, C.L., Li, H.X., An improved EEMD with multiwavelet packet for rotating machinery multi-fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 36 (2013), 225–239.
2. [2] Jin, X., Zhao, M., Chow, T.W.S., Motor bearing fault diagnosis using trace ratio linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61 (2014), 2441–2451.
3. [3] Jia, F., Lei, Y.G., Lin, J., Zhou, X., Lu, N., Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 72-73 (2016), 303–315.
4. [4] Lei, Y.G., He, Z.J., Zi, Y.Y., EEMD method and WNN for fault diagnosis of locomotive roller bearings. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 7334–7341.
5. [5] Liu, H.H., Han, M.H., A fault diagnosis method based on local mean decomposition and multi-scale entropy for roller bearings. Mech. Mach. Theory 75 (2014), 67–78.
6. [6] Muruganatham, B., Sanjith, M.A., Krishnakumar, B., Roller element bearing fault diagnosis using singular spectrum analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 35 (2013), 150–166.
7. [7] Yu, Y., Yu, D.J., Cheng, J.S., A roller bearing fault diagnosis method based on EMD energy entropy and ANN. J. Sound Vib. 294 (2006), 269–277.
8. [8] Zhang, X.L., Wang, B.J., Chen, X.F., Intelligent fault diagnosis of roller bearings with multivariable ensemble-based incremental support vector machine. Knowl.-Based Syst. 89 (2015), 56–85.
9. [9] Hussein, A., Irina, T., A fault diagnosis methodology for rolling element bearings based on advanced signal pretreatment and autoregressive modelling. J. Sound Vib. 369 (2016), 246–265.
10. [10] Li, Y.B., Xu, M.Q., Zhao, H.Y., Huang, W.H., Hierarchical fuzzy entropy and improved support vector machine based binary tree approach for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Mech. Mach. Theory 98 (2016), 114–132.
11. [11] Liu, R.N., Yang, B.Y., Zhang, X.L., Wang, S.B., Chen, X.F., Time-frequency atoms-driven support vector machine method for bearings incipient fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 75 (2016), 345–370.
12. [12] Xia, X., Zhou, J.Z., Xiao, J., A novel identification method of Volterra series in rotor-bearing system for fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66-67 (2016), 557–567.
13. [13] Lu, N., Xiao, Z.H., Malik, O.P, Feature extraction using adaptive multiwavelets and synthetic detection index for rotor fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 52-53 (2015), 393–415.
14. [14] Chen, C.S., Chen, J.S., Rotor fault diagnosis system based on sGA-based individual neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 10822–10830.
15. [15] Keskes, H., Braham, A., Lachiri, Z., Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 97 (2013), 151–157.
16. [16] Mustafa, M.O., Varagnolo, D., Nikolakopoulos, G., Detecting broken rotor bars in induction motors with model-based support vector classifiers. Control Eng. Pract. 52 (2016), 15–23.
17. [17] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.E., Review: deep learning. Nature 521 (2015), 436–444.
18. [18] Shao, H.D., Jiang, H.K., Zhang, X., Niu, M.G., Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using an optimization deep belief network. Meas. Sci. Technol., 26, 2015, 115002.
19. [19] Tamilselvan, P., Wang, P.F., Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 115 (2013), 124–135.
20. [20] Tran, V.T., AlThobiani, F., Ball, A., An approach to fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valves using Teager–Kaiser energy operator and deep belief networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), 4113–4122.
21. [21] Janssens, O., Slavkovikj, V., Vervisch, B., Stockman, K., Loccufier, M., Verstockt, S., Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery. J. Sound Vib. 377 (2016), 331–345.
22. [22] Chen, Z.Q., Li, C., Sanchez, R.V., Gearbox fault identification and classification with convolutional neural networks. Shock Vib. 2 (2015), 1–10.
23. [23] Sun, W.J., Shao, S.Y, Zhao, R., Yan, R.Q., Zhang, X.W., Chen, X.F., A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification. Measurement 89 (2016), 171–178.
24. [24] Leng, J.W., Jiang, P.Y., A deep learning approach for relationship extraction from interaction context in social manufacturing paradigm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 100 (2016), 188–199.
25. [25] Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A., stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 (2010), 3371–3408.
26. [26] Schulza, H., Chob, K., Raikob, T., Behnkea, S., Two-layer contractive encodings for learning stable nonlinear features. Neural Netw. 64 (2015), 4–11.
27. [27] Xiong, P., Wang, H.R., Liu, M., Zhou, S.P., Hou, Z.G., Liu, X.L., ECG signal enhancement based on improved denoising auto-encoder. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 52 (2016), 194–202.
28. [28] Zabalza, J., Ren, J.C, Zheng, J.B, Zhao, H.M, Qing, C.M, Novel segmented stacked autoencoder for effective dimensionality reduction and feature extraction in hyperspectral imaging. Neurocomputing 185 (2016), 1–10.
29. [29] Ding, X.X., He, Q.B., Luo, N.W., A fusion feature and its improvement based on locality preserving projections for rolling element bearing fault classification. J. Sound Vib. 335 (2015), 367–383.
30. [30] Yu, J.B., Bearing performance degradation assessment using locality preserving projections and Gaussian mixture models. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25 (2011), 2573–2588.
31. [31] Fan, Q., Gao, D.Q., Wang, Z., Multiple empirical kernel learning with locality preserving constraint. Knowl.-Based Syst. 105 (2016), 107–118.
32. [32] Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Learning, Representation, A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35 (2013), 1798–1828.
33. [33] Erhan, D., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Manzagol, P.A., Vincent, P., Bengio, S., Why does unsupervised pre-training help deep learning?. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 (2010), 625–660.
34. [34] Rosa, E.D.L, Yu, W., Randomized algorithms for nonlinear system identification with deep learning modification. Inf. Sci. 364–365 (2016), 197–212.
35. [35] Kim, S., Choi, Y., Lee, M., Deep learning with support vector data description. Neurocomputing 165 (2015), 111–117.
36. [36] Sun, J.H., Xiao, Z.W., Xie, Y.X., Automatic multi-fault recognition in TFDS based on convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing 222 (2017), 127–136.
37. [37] http://csegroups.case.edu/bearingdatacenter/pages/welcome-case-western-reserve-university-bearing-data-center-website, 2003.
38. [38] http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/, 2007.
39. [39] Wulandhari, L.A., Wibowo, A., Desa, M.I., Condition diagnosis of multiple bearings using adaptive operator probabilities in genetic algorithms and back propagation neural networks. Neural Comput. Appl. 26 (2015), 57–65.
40. [40] Qiu, H., Lee, J., Lin, J., Yu, G., Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on rolling element bearing prognostics. J. Sound Vib. 289 (2006), 1066–1090.
41. [41] Demsar, J., Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 (2006), 1–30.
42. [42] Garcia, S., Herrera, F., An extension on statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets for all pairwise comparisons. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9 (2008), 2677–2694.