Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 358-371

  Kenter, Jasper O ^a   Bryce, Rosalind ^b   Christie, Michael ^c   Cooper, Nigel ^d,m   Hockley, Neal ^e   Irvine, Katherine N ^f   Fazey, Ioan ^g   O'Brien, Liz ^h   Orchard Webb, Johanne ⁱ   Ravenscroft, Neil ⁱ   Raymond, Christopher M ^j   Reed, Mark S ^k   Tett, Paul ^a   Watson, Verity ^l  

^a SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS   (United Kingdom)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^h FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^j SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^k NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^m The Diocese of Ely ^*  (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Deliberative monetary valuation; Ethics; Integrated valuation; Shared values; Transcendental values

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007189487     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. 1980, Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Alvarez Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens' juries with choice modelling. Land Econ., 82, 2006, 465.
3. Alvarez Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Barberán, R., Lázaro, A., Choice modeling at the market stall: individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation. Ecol. Econ. 60 (2007), 743–751, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.009.
4. Arrow, K., A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J. Political Econ. 58 (1950), 328–346.
5. Bardi, A., Goodwin, R., The Dual Route to Value Change: Individual Processes and Cultural Moderators. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 42 (2011), 271–287, 10.1177/0022022110396916.
6. Bryce, R., Irvine, K., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015 in this issue.
7. Buijs, A., Lawrence, L., Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. For. Policy Econ. 33 (2013), 104–111.
8. Bunse, L., Rendon, O., Luque, S., What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 88–97, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.004.
9. Burningham, K., Environmental values as discursive resources. Guerrier, Y., et al. (eds.) Values and the Environment, 1995, Wiley, Chichester.
10. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., Woodside, U., Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
11. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J., Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 8–18.
12. Chan, K.M.A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G.W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 (2016), 1462–1465, 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
13. Christiano, T., Democracy. Zalta, E.N., (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), 2015.
14. Church, A., Fish, R., Haines-Young, R., Mourato, S., Tratalos, J., Stapleton, L., Willis, C., Coates, P., Gibbons, S., Leyshon, C., Potschin, M., Ravenscroft, N., Sanchis-Guarner, R., Winter, M., Kenter, J.O., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work package report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
15. Cleary, S., Mooney, G., McIntyre, D., Claims on health care: a decision-making framework for equity, with application to treatment for HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Health Policy Plann 26 (2011), 464–470, 10.1093/heapol/czq081.
16. Cooper, N., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Steen, H., Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services'. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014 in this issue.
17. Cromton, T., 2010. Common Cause: the Case for Working with Our Cultural Values. WWF-UK, Godalming.
18. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J., der Dunk, von, A., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (2012), 8812–8819.
19. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I.A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K.M., Figueroa, V.E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G.M., Martín-López, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Pérez, E.S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R.J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z.A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, S.T., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, L.A., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A.M.M., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W.A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J.P., Mikissa, J.B., Moller, H., Mooney, H.A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A.A., Pataki, G., Roué, M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y., Zlatanova, D., The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 1–16, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
20. Dietsch, A.M., Teel, T.L., Manfredo, M.J., Social values and biodiversity conservation in a dynamic world. Conserv. Biol., 2016, 10.1111/cobi.12742.
21. Dietz, T., Stern, P.C., Dan, A., How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: an experiment. Land Econ. 85 (2009), 329–347.
22. Economic and Social Research Council, Risky choices, soft disasters: environmental decision-making under uncertainty. Global Environmental Change Programme. ESRC. 2000, Swindon and University of Sussex, Brighton.
23. Edwards, D., Collins, T., Goto, R., An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.018 in this issue.
24. Everard, M., Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., The ripple effect: institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.001 in this issue.
25. Farber, S.C., Costanza, R., Wilson, M.A., Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 41 (2002), 375–392, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5.
26. Fish, R., Burgess, J., Chilvers, J., Footitt, A., Haines-Young, R., Russel, D., Turner, K., Winter, D.M., 2011a. Participatory and Deliberative Techniques to Embed an Ecosystems Approach Into Decision-making: Full Technical Report. DEFRA, London.
27. Fish, R., Burgess, J., Church, A., Turner, K., 2011b. Shared Values for the Contributions Ecosystem Services Make to Human Well-being, in: UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
28. Fish, R., Church, A., Winter, M., Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 in this issue.
29. Fish, R., Church, A., Willis, C., Winter, M., Tratalos, J.W., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK Nature Improvement Initiative. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.017 in this issue.
30. Gastil, J., By Popular Demand. Revitalising Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections. CA, 2000, University of California Press, Berkeley.
31. Griffin, J., Nickerson, D., Wozniak, A., Racial differences in inequality aversion: evidence from real world respondents in the ultimatum game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 84, 2012, 600–617, 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.09.010.
32. Habermas, J., The theory of communicative action: reason and the rationalization of society (Volume 1). 1984, Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
33. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., The ecosystem approach as a framework for understanding knowledge utilisation. Environ. Plann C. 32 (2014), 301–319, 10.1068/c1329j.
34. Hicks, C.C., Cinner, J.E., Stoeckl, N., McClanahan, T.R., Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. Conserv. Biol. 29 (2015), 1471–1480, 10.1111/cobi.12550.
35. Hines, J., Hungerford, H., Tomera, A., Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Educ. 18:2 (1986/7), 1–8.
36. Hockley, N., Cost-benefit analysis: a decision-support tool or a venue for contesting ecosystem knowledge?. Environ. Plann C. 32 (2014), 283–300.
37. Howarth, R.B., Wilson, M.A., A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregationaggregation by mutual consent. Land Econ. 82 (2006), 1–16, 10.3368/le.82.1.1.
38. Hungerford, H., Volk, T., Changing learner behavior through environmental education. J. Environ. Educ. 21:3 (1990), 8–21.
39. Independent Panel on Forestry (2011) Final Report. (www.defra.gov.uk/forestrypanel).
40. Irvine, K., O'Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O., Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001 in this issue.
41. Ives, C.D., Kendal, D., The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 144 (2014), 67–72, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013.
42. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: a study in the headline method. J. Risk Uncertain. 9 (1994), 5–37, 10.1007/BF01073401.
43. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D., Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J. Risk Uncertain. 19 (1999), 203–235.
44. Kenter, J.O., Deliberative monetary valuation. Spash, C.L., (eds.) Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society, 2017, Routledge, Abingdon.
45. Kenter, J.O., Deliberative and Non-Monetary Valuation. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, Abingdon.
46. Kenter, J.O., Shared, plural and Cultural Values. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.010 in this issue.
47. Kenter, J.O., Integrating Deliberative Choice Experiments, Systems Modelling and Participatory Mapping to Assess Shared Values of Ecosystem Services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010 in this issue.
48. Kenter, J.O., Hyde, T., Christie, M., Fazey, I., The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Change 21 (2011), 505–521, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001.
49. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Everard, M., N, I.K., O'brien, E.A., Molloy, C., Bryce, R., Brady, E., Christie, M., Church, A., Collins, T., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Edwards, D., Evely, A., Fazey, I., Goto, R., Hockley, N., Jobstvogt, N., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Shared, Plural and Cultural Values: A Handbook for Decision-Makers. 2014, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 10.13140/RG.2.1.4683.5281.
50. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, L., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. 2014, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 10.13140/RG.2.1.1275.6565.
51. Kenter, J.O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.
52. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Fazey, I., The Deliberative Value Formation model. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015 in this issue.
53. Kenter, J.O., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Irvine, K., Christie, M., Bryce, R., The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006 in this issue.
54. Kiely, R., Neo-liberal globalization meets global resistance: the significance of ‘anti-globalization’ protest. Dasgupta, S., (eds.) The Changing Face of Globalisation, 2004, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, 264–297.
55. Lienhoop, N., Hanley, N., Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine?. Ecol. Econ. 60 (2006), 299–307.
56. Lienhoop, N., MacMillan, D., Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 24 (2007), 289–295.
57. Lo, A.Y., Analysis and democracy: the antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 29 (2011), 958–974.
58. Lo, A.Y., Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecol. Econ. 87 (2013), 84–94, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.014.
59. Lo, A.Y., Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. J. Econ. Surv. 27 (2013), 768–789, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00718.x.
60. Manfredo, M.J., Teel, T.L., Dietsch, A.M., Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 30 (2016), 287–296, 10.1111/cobi.12619.
61. Manfredo, M., Teel, T., Gavin, M., Fulton, D., 2014. Considerations in Representing Human Individuals in Social-Ecological Models, in: Understanding Society and Natural Resources. pp. 137–158.
62. Milcu, A.I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., Cultural ecosystem services: aa literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc., 18, 2013, 44.
63. Mooney, G., Jan, S., Wiseman, V., Staking a claim for claims: a case study of resource allocation in Australian aboriginal health care. Soc. Sci. Med. 54 (2002), 1657–1667, 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00333-1.
64. Norton, B., Costanza, R., Bishop, R.C., The evolution of preferences. Ecol. Econ. 24 (1998), 193–211, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00143-2.
65. O'Hara, S.U., Stagl, S., Endogenous preferences and sustainable development. J. Socio-Econ. 31 (2002), 511–527, 10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00134-8.
66. O'Neill, J., Cost-benefit analysis, rationality and the plurality of values. Ecologist 26 (1996), 98–103.
67. O'Neill, J., Markets, Deliberation and Environment, 2007, Routledge, Abingdon.
68. O'Neill, J., Holland, A., Light, A., Environmental Values, 2008, Routledge, Abingdon.
69. Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Church, A., Deliberative democratic monetary valuation to implement the ecosystems approach. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005 in this issue.
70. Parks, S., Gowdy, J., What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst. Serv. 3 (2013), e1–e10, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.002.
71. Pieraccini, M., Re-thinking participation in environmental decision-making: epistemologies of marine conservation in South-East England. J. Environ. Law 27 (2015), 45–67.
72. Pieraccini, M., Democratic legitimacy and new commons: examples from English protected areas. Int. J. Commons 9 2 (2015), 552–572.
73. Pleasant, M.M., Gray, S.A., Lepczyk, C., Fernandes, A., Hunter, N., Ford, D., Managing cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2014, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.006.
74. Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Cumming, G., Dapling, T., Lawes, E., Richardson, P., Forming shared values in conservation management: an interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.016 in this issue.
75. Raymond, C.M., Brown, G., Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions. J. Environ. Manag. 92:10 (2011), 2513–2523.
76. Raymond, C., Kenter, J.O., Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018 in this issue.
77. Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N.J., Alexander, K.A., Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 145–156, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033.
78. Reed, M., Evely, A.C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I.R.A., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., What is social learning?. Ecol. Soc., 15, 2010 (online).
79. Rivera-Ferre, M.G., Pereira, L., Karpouzoglou, T., A vision for transdisciplinarity in future earth: Perspectives from young researchers. Journal of Agriculture. Food Syst. Commun. Devel. 3 (2013), 249–260, 10.5304/jafscd.2013.034.028.
80. Ryan, A.M., Spash, C.L., Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. J. Econ. Psychol. 32 (2011), 674–687, 10.1016/j.joep.2011.07.004.
81. Sagoff, M., Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecol. Econ. 24 (1998), 213–230.
82. Satterfield, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., Chan, K.M., Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 117 (2013), 103–114, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033.
83. Scholte, S.S.K., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol. Econ. 114 (2015), 67–78, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007.
84. Schwartz, S.H., Universals in the Content and Structure of Values - Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25 (1992), 1–65.
85. Schwartz, S.H., Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?. J. Soc. Issues 50 (1994), 19–45.
86. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W., Toward a universal psychological structure of human-values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53 (1987), 550–562.
87. Sia, A., Hungerford, H., Tomera, A., Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior. J. Environ. Educ. 17:2 (1985/86), 31–40.
88. Spash, C.L., Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rightsrights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Econ. 82 (2006), 602–622, 10.3368/le.82.4.602.
89. Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Econ. 84 (2008), 469–488.
90. Steg, L., Vlek, C., Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (2009), 309–317, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
91. Stern, P.C., New environmental theories: towardtoward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56 (2000), 407–424, 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
92. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T.D., Guagnano, G.A., A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: thethe case of environmentalism. Res. Hum. Ecol. 6 (1999), 81–97.
93. Szabó, Z., Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: improving the validity of biodiversity valuation. Ecol. Econ., 2011, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.025.
94. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
95. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on phase: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
96. Urama, K.C., Hodge, I., Participatory environmental education and willingness to pay for river basin management: empirical evidence from Nigeria. Land Econ. 82 (2006), 542–561.
97. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2207–2215.
98. Young, I.M., Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. Benhabib, S., (eds.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 1996, Princeton University Press, 120–136.
99. Zografos, C., Howarth, R.B., Deliberative ecological economics for sustainability governance. Sustainability 2010 (2010), 3399–3417.