Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 8812-8819

  Daniel, Terry C ^a   Muhar, Andreas ^b   Arnberger, Arne ^b   Aznar, Olivier ^c   Boyd, James W ^d   Chan, Kai M A ^e   Costanza, Robert ^f   Elmqvist, Thomas ^g   Flint, Courtney G ^h   Gobster, Paul H ⁱ   Grêt Regamey, Adrienne ^j   Lave, Rebecca ^k   Muhar, Susanne ^b   Penker, Marianne ^b   Ribe, Robert G ^l   Schauppenlehner, Thomas ^b   Sikor, Thomas ^m   Soloviy, Ihor ⁿ   Spierenburg, Marja ^o   Taczanowska, Karolina ^b   Tam, Jordan ^e   Von Der Dunk, Andreas ^j   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^f PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

ⁱ NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^j ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^k INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ UKRAINIAN NATIONAL FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (Ukraine)

^o VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Cultural landscapes; Natural capital; Scenic beauty; Spiritual value; Tourism

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL SERVICE; CULTURAL VALUE; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EPISTEMOLOGY; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; LANDSCAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECREATION; RELIGION; REVIEW; TOURISM;

CULTURE; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOCIAL SCIENCES; SPIRITUALITY; TRAVEL;

EID: 84861909692     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109     Document Type: Review

References (139)

1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. A Framework for Assessment (Island Press, Washington, DC).
2. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1981) Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species (Random House, New York).
3. Daily G, ed (1997) Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington, DC).
4. Mooney HA, Ehrlich PR (1997) Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed Daily G (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 11-19.
5. Costanza R, et al. (2011) Valuing ecological systems and services. F1000 Biol Rep 3:14.
6. Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:67-98. (Pubitemid 350247525)
7. Daily GC, et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21-28.
8. Carpenter SR, et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305-1312.
9. Daily GC, et al. (2000) Ecology. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289:395-396.
10. Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616-626. (Pubitemid 46908771)
11. Costanza R, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
12. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393-408. (Pubitemid 34801001)
13. Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 139:235-246.
14. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643-653.
15. de Groot R, et al. (2010) Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, ed Kumar P (Earthscan, Oxford, UK), pp 9-40.
16. TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, ed Kumar P (Earthscan, Oxford, UK).
17. Costanza R (2008) Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 141:350-352.
18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, DC).
19. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecol 22:959-972. (Pubitemid 47125017)
20. Weber JL (2007) Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency. Ecol Econ 61:695-707.
21. Chan KMA, et al. (2011) Cultural services and non-use values. The Theory and Practice of Ecosystem Service Valuation in Conservation, eds Kareiva P, Daily G, Ricketts T, Tallis H, Polasky S (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 206-228.
22. US EPA (2009) Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services: A report of the EPA Science Advisory Board (US Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC).
23. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260-272.
24. Gobster PH (1999) An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal 18:54-64.
25. Nassauer JI (1995) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecol 10:229-237.
26. Daniel TC, Boster RS (1976) Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167. (Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO).
27. Daniel TC (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 54:267-281.
28. Hagerhall CM (2001) Consensus in landscape preference judgements. J Environ Psychol 21:83-92.
29. Stahl J, Sikor T, Dorondel S (2009) The institutionalization of property rights in Albanian and Romanian biodiversity conservation. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8:57-73.
30. Stamps AE (1999) Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature 14:155-175.
31. Buhyoff GJ, Wellman JD, Daniel TC (1982) Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas. Forest Science 28:827-838. (Pubitemid 13278698)
32. Silvennoinen H, Alho J, Kolehmainen O, Pukkala T (2001) Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level. Landsc Urban Plan 56:11-20. (Pubitemid 32812149)
33. Ribe RG (2005) Aesthetic perceptions of green-tree retention harvests in vista views. The interaction of cut level, retention pattern and harvest shape. Landsc Urban Plan 73:277-293.
34. Ribe RG, Armstrong ET, Gobster PH (2002) Scenic vistas and the changing policy landscape: Visualizing and testing the role of visual resources in ecosystem management. Landscape Journal 21:42-66.
35. Brown TC, Daniel TC (1986) Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. Forest Science 32:471-487. (Pubitemid 17241611)
36. Ribe RG (2009) In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. J Environ Manage 91:245-260.
37. Arnberger A, Eder R (2011) Exploring the heterogeneity of rural landscape preferences: A visual-based latent class approach. Landscape Research 36:19-40.
38. Bishop ID, Lange E (2005) Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning: Technology and Applications (Taylor & Francis, London).
39. Meitner MJ, et al. (2005) The multiple roles of environmental data visualization in evaluating alternative forest management strategies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:192-205. (Pubitemid 41139173)
40. BrownTC (1987) Production and cost of scenic beauty-Examples for a Ponderosa pine forest. Forest Science 33:394-410.
41. Thorn AJ, Daniel TC, Orland B, Brabyn N (1997) Managing forest aesthetics in production forests. New Zealand Forestry 42:21-29.
42. Benson ED, Hansen JL, Schwarz AL, Smersh GT (1998) Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 16:55-73. (Pubitemid 128404726)
43. Czepczynski M (2008) Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities: Representation of Powers and Needs (Ashgate, Aldershot-Burlington, VT).
44. UNESCO (2003) Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO, Paris).
45. Garibaldi A, Turner N (2004) Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9(3):1.
46. Verschuuren B (2006) An overview of cultural and spiritual values in ecosystem management and conservation strategies. International Conference on Endogenous Development and Bio-Cultural Diversity: The Interplay of Worldviews, Globalization and Locality, pp 299-325.
47. Stephenson J (2008) The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 84:127-139.
48. Bignal EM, McCracken DI (1996) Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. J Appl Ecol 33:413-424.
49. Pereira E, Queiroz C, Pereira H, Vicente L (2005) Ecosystem services and human well-being: A participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2):14.
50. Scaramellinia G, Varotto M (2008) Terraced Landscapes of the Alps: Atlas. 1. Alpter Project (Marsilio, Venice, Italy).
51. Krzywinski K, O'Connell M, Küster H (2009) Cultural Landscapes of Europe - Fields of Demeter - Haunts of Pan (Aschenbeck Media, Bremen, Germany).
52. Herzog F (1998) Streuobst: A traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agroforestry Systems 42:61-80.
53. Iwata Y, Fukamachi K, Morimoto Y (2011) Public perception of the cultural value of Satoyama landscape types in Japan. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 7:173-184.
54. Tempesta T, et al. (2010) The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: An integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Qual Prefer 21:827-836.
55. van Eetvelde V, Antrop M (2009) Indicators for assessing changing landscape character of cultural landscapes in Flanders (Belgium). Land Use Policy 26:901-910.
56. Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005) Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 70:111-125. (Pubitemid 39385052)
57. Kapfer M, Kantelhardt J, Osinski E (2003) Estimation of costs for maintaining landscape elements by the example of Southwest Germany. 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, August 16-22 2003, Durban, South Africa. Available at http://purl.umn.edu/25923. Accessed May 4, 2012.
58. Schüpbach B, Junge X, Briegel R, Lindemann-Matthies P, Walter T (2009) Ästhetische Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen durch die Bevölkerung (Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Ettenhausen, Germany).
59. Baylis K, Peplow S, Rausser G, Simon L (2008) Agrienvironmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecol Econ 65:753-764. (Pubitemid 351626535)
60. Takeuchi K (2010) Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: The Satoyama Initiative. Ecol Res 25:891-897.
61. Navrud S, Ready RC (2002) Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).
62. Butler CD, Oluoch-Kosura W (2006) Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecology and Society 11(1):30.
63. Gregory R, Slovic P (1997) A constructive approach to environmental valuation. Ecol Econ 21:175-181.
64. Gregory R, Trousdale W (2009) Compensating aboriginal cultural losses: An alternative approach to assessing environmental damages. J Environ Manage 90:2469-2479.
65. Sievänen T, Arnberger A, Dehez J, Jensen FS (2009) Monitoring of forest recreation demand. European Forest Recreation and Tourism. A Handbook, eds Bell S, Simpson M, Tyrväinen L, Sievänen T, Pröbstl U (Taylor and Francis, London), pp 105-133.
66. de Groot R, Ramakrishnan PS (2005) Cultural and Amenity Services. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 455-476.
67. Reed SE, Merenlender AM (2008) Quiet, nonconsumptive recreation reduces protected area effectiveness. Conservation Letters 1:146-154.
68. Liddle M (1997) Recreation Ecology. The Ecological Impact of Outdoor Recreation and Ecotourism (Chapman & Hall, London).
69. Weaver DB (2006) Sustainable Tourism: Theory and Practice (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK).
70. Krippendorf J, ed (1989) Für einen anderen Tourismus: Probleme, Perspektiven, Ratschläge (Fischer-Taschenbuch, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
71. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10:456.
72. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23:109-123. (Pubitemid 36703633)
73. Karmanov D, Hamel R (2008) Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landsc Urban Plan 86:115-125.
74. Elmqvist T, Maltby E (2010) Biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations, ed Kumar P (Earthscan, Oxford, UK), pp 41-111.
75. Henderson KA, Bialeschki MD (2005) Leisure and active lifestyles: Research reflections. Leisure Sciences 27:355-365. (Pubitemid 41490099)
76. Adamowicz WL, Naidoo R, Nelson E, Polasky S, Zhang J (2011) Nature-based tourism and recreation. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, eds Kareiva P, Daily G, Ricketts T, Tallis H, Polasky S (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
77. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390-394.
78. Naidoo R, Adamowicz WL (2005) Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. Environment and Development Economics 10:159-178. (Pubitemid 40518252)
79. Naidoo R, Stuart-Hill G, Weaver LC, Tagg J, Davis A (2011) Effect of diversity of large wildlife species on financial benefits to local communities in northwest Namibia. Environmental and Resource Economics 48:321-335.
80. Henderson KA, Presley J, Bialeschki MD (2004) Theory in recreation and leisure research: Reflections from the editors. Leisure Sciences 26:411-425. (Pubitemid 39393834)
81. Itami RM, Gimblett HR (2001) Intelligent recreation agents in a virtual GIS world. Complexity International 08:Paper ID: itami01. Available at http://www.complexity.org.au/ci/vol08/itami01/itami01.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2012.
82. Gimblett R, Daniel T, Cherry S, Meitner MJ (2001) The simulation and visualization of complex human-environment interactions. Landsc Urban Plan 54:63-78. (Pubitemid 32608260)
83. Jochem R, Marwijk RV, Pouwels R, Pitt DG (2008) MASOOR: Modeling the transaction of people and environment on dense trail networks in natural resource settings. Monitoring, Simulation and Management of Visitor Landscapes, eds Gimblett R, Skov-Petersen H (Univ of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp 269-293.
84. Taczanowska K, Arnberger A, Muhar A (2008) Exploring spatial behavior of individual visitors as a basis for agent-based simulation. Monitoring, Simulation, and Management of Visitor Landscapes, eds Gimblett R, Skov-Petersen H (Univ of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp 159-174.
85. O'Connor S, Campbell R, Cortez H, Knowles T (2009) Whale Watching Worldwide: Tourism Numbers, Expenditures and Expanding Economic Benefits, a Special Report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare Prepared by Economists at Large (International Fund for Animal Welfare, Yarmouth, MA).
86. Stynes DJ (2005) Economic significance of recreational uses of national parks and other public lands. Social Science Research Review 5:1-36.
87. Mayer M, Müller M, Woltering M, Arnegger J, Job H (2010) The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landsc Urban Plan 97:73-82.
88. Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values. Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. 80:64-75.
89. Lee Y, Dattilo J, Howard D (1994) The complex and dynamic nature of leisure experience. Journal of Leisure Research 26:195-211.
90. Reichhart T, Arnberger A (2010) Exploring the influence of speed, social, managerial and physical factors on shared trail preferences using a 3D computer animated choice experiment. Landsc Urban Plan 96:1-11.
91. Posey DA, ed (1999) Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity (Intermediate Technology, London).
92. Sponsel L (2001) Do anthropologists need religion, and vice versa? Adventures and dangers in Spiritual Ecology. New Directions in Anthropology and Environment: Intersections, ed Crumley CL (AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA).
93. Balmford A, et al. (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950-953. (Pubitemid 34856017)
94. de Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175-186.
95. Dudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Mansourian S (2005) Beyond Belief: Linking Faiths and Protected Areas to Support Biodiversity Conservation. A Research Report by WWF, Equilibrium and The Alliance of Religions and Conservation (WWF, Gland, Switzerland).
96. Wild R, McLeod C, IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Task Force on Cultural and Spiritual Values of Protected Areas and UNESCO Programme on Man and the Biosphere (2008) Sacred Natural Sites: Guidelines for Protected Area Managers (IUCN, UNESCO, Gland, Switzerland).
97. Schaaf T (1999) Environmental Conservation Based on Sacred Sites. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity (Intermediate Technology, London), p 341.
98. Bahuguna S (1992) People's Programme for Change. The INTACH Environmental Series 19 (INTACH, New Delhi).
99. Subash Chandran MD (2000) Shifting cultivation, sacred groves and conflicts in colonial forest policy in the Western Ghats. Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and Southeast Asia, eds Grove RH, Damodaran V, Sangwan S (Oxford Univ Press, New Delhi), pp 674-707.
100. Bhattacharya DK, et al. (2005) Cultural services. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Policy Responses. Findings of the Responses. Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ed Kanchan Chopra RL, Pushpam Kumar, Henk Simons (Island Press, Washington DC), Vol 3, pp 401-422.
101. Nolan ML (1992) Religious sites as tourism attractions in Europe. Annals of Tourism Research 19:68-78.
102. Dzingrai V, Bourdillon MFC (1997) Religious ritual and political control in Binga District, Zimbabwe. African Anthropology 4:4-26.
103. Spierenburg M (2004) Strangers, Spirits, and Land Reforms: Conflicts About Land in Dande, Northern Zimbabwe (Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands).
104. Moore DS (2005) Suffering for Territory: Race, Place, and Power in Zimbabwe (Duke Univ Press, Durham, NC).
105. Stiebel L, Gunner L, Sithole J (2000) The Land in Africa: Space, Culture, History Workshop. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 44:i-viii.
106. Luig U, von Oppen A (1997) Landscape in Africa; Process and vision. An introductory essay. The Making of African Landscapes, Paideuma, Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde, eds Luig U, von Oppen A (Steiner, Wiesbaden, Germany), Vol 43, pp 1- 45.
107. Coplan DB (1994) In the Time of Cannibals: The Word Music of South Africa's Basotho migrants (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
108. Cohen DW, Atiendo Odhiambo ES (1989) Siaya: The Historical Anthropology of an African Landscape (Heinemann Kenya, Nairobi).
109. Harmon D, Putney AD (2003) The Full Value of Parks: From Economics to the Intangible (Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Oxford).
110. Ranger TO (1999) Voices from the Rocks: Nature, Culture and History in the Matopos Hills of Zimbabwe (Indiana Univ Press, Bloomington, IN).
111. Hibbard K, et al. (2010) Developing an Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (IHOPE): Research Plan. IGBP Report No. 59 (IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm), p 40.
112. Wilson MA, Howarth RB (2002) Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol Econ 41:431-443. (Pubitemid 34801004)
113. Heal GM, et al. (2001) Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 20:333-364.
114. Pregernig M (2006) Transdisciplinarity viewed from afar: Science-policy assessments as forums for the creation of transdisciplinary knowledge. Science and Public Policy 33:445-455.
115. Pohl C (2005) Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures 37:1159-1178.
116. Ostrom E (2010) A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions 1:27-36.
117. Irwin A (2001) Sociology and the Environment (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).
118. Berkes F (2008) Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management (Routledge, New York), 2nd Ed.
119. Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: The role of social capital. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:253-278.
120. Cash DW, et al. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2):8.
121. Schläpfer F, Schmitt M, Roschewitz A (2008) Competitive politics, simplified heuristics, and preferences for public goods. Ecol Econ 65:574-589. (Pubitemid 351381344)
122. Bateman IJ, Day BH, Jones AP, Jude S (2009) Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. J Environ Econ Manage 58:106-118.
123. Boyd J, Krupnick A (2009) The definition and choice of environmental commodities for nonmarket valuation. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC), pp 9-35.
124. Costanza R, Voinov A (2004) Landscape Simulation Modeling: A Spatially Explicit, Dynamic Approach (Springer, New York).
125. Raymond CM, et al. (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301-1315.
126. Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ (2011) A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr 31:748-760.
127. Rodriguez JP, et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11:14.
128. Scheffer M, Brock W, Westley F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: An interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems (New York) 3:451-471.
129. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394-1404.
130. Rambonilaza M, Dachary-Bernard J (2007) Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? Landsc Urban Plan 83:318-326. (Pubitemid 350103613)
131. Grêt-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop ID, Schmid WA (2008) Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J Environ Manage 89:197-208.
132. Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC, eds (2003) A Primer on Non-Market Valuation (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
133. Dramstad WE, Sundli Tveit M, Fjellstad WJ, Fry GLA (2006) Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc Urban Plan 78:465-474. (Pubitemid 44692350)
134. Wissen Hayek U, Halatsch J, Kunze A, Schmitt G, Grêt-Regamey A (2010) Integrating natural resource indicators into procedural visualisation for sustainable urban green space design. Peer Reviewed Proceedings Digital Landscape Architecture 2010, eds Buhmann E, Pietsch M, Kretzler E (Wichmann, Offenbach, Germany), pp 361 369.
135. Howarth RB, Wilson MA (2006) A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: Aggregation by mutual consent. Land Econ 82:1-16. (Pubitemid 43329076)
136. Aldred J, Jacobs M (2000) Citizens and wetlands: Evaluating the Ely citizens' jury. Ecol Econ 34:217-232. (Pubitemid 30495891)
137. Brown TC, Peterson GL, Tonn BE (1995) The values jury to aid natural resource decisions. Land Econ 71:250-260.
138. Gregory R, McDaniels T, Fields D (2001) Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. J Policy Anal Manage 20:415-432.
139. Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manage 230:1-22.