The role of social values in the management of ecological systems

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 144, Issue , 2014, Pages 67-72

  Ives, Christopher D ^a   Kendal, Dave ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assigned values; Conservation; Ecosystems; Management; Social values; Value orientations

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS;

ASSIGNED VALUE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION; ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENTS; ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATIONS; MULTIPLE PATHWAYS; NATURAL HERITAGES; SOCIAL VALUES; VALUE ORIENTATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

CULTURAL INFLUENCE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; MANAGER; NATURAL SCIENCE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SOCIAL BELIEF; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; CONFLICT; ECONOMICS;

ATTITUDE; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84902094714     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Arponen A., Heikkinen R.K., Thomas C.D., Moilanen A. The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: representation, species weighting, and benefit functions. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:2009-2014.
3. Bengston D., Webb T., Fan D. Shifting forest value orientations in the United States, 1980-2001: a computer content analysis. Environ. Values 2004, 13:373-392.
4. Bengston D.N. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1994, 7:515-533.
5. Bottrill M.C., Joseph L.N., Carwardine J., Bode M., Cook C., Game E.T., Grantham H., Kark S., Linke S., McDonald-Madden E., Pressey R.L., Walker S., Wilson K.A., Possingham H.P. Is conservation triage just smart decision making?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:649-654.
6. Brechin S., Wilshusen P., Fortwangler C., West P. Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2002, 15:41-64.
7. Brooks T. Conservation planning and priorities. Conservation Biology for All 2010, 199-219. Oxford University Press, Oxford. N.S. Sodhi, P.R. Ehrlich (Eds.).
8. Brown G. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA J. 2012, 25:7-18.
9. Brown G., Reed P. Values compatibility analysis: using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) for decision support in national forest management. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy 2012, 5:317-332.
10. Brown T. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 1984, 60:231-246.
11. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18.
12. Costanza R., D'Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., others The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
13. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ. Behav. 2007, 40:330-354.
14. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30:335-372.
15. Dunlap R., Van Leire K. The new environmental paradigm. J.Environ. Educ. 1978, 9:10-19.
16. Endter-Wada J., Blahna D., Krannich R., Brunson M. Aframework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8:891-904.
17. Farber S.C., Costanza R., Wilson M.A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:375-392.
18. Ford R.M., Williams K.J.H., Bishop I.D., Webb T. Avalue basis for the social acceptability of clearfelling in Tasmania, Australia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 90:196-206.
19. Ford R.M., Williams K.J.H., Smith E.L., Bishop I.D. Beauty, belief, and trust: toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Environ. Behav. 2012.
20. Fulton D.C., Manfredo M.J., Lipscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 1996, 1:24-47.
21. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739-755.
22. Graham S., Barnett J., Fincher R., Hurlimann A., Mortreux C., Waters E. The social values at risk from sea-level rise. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 41:45-52.
23. Heberlein T.A. Navigating environmental attitudes. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26:583-585.
24. Ives C.D., Kendal D. Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:80-90.
25. Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 59:1-11.
26. Keeney R. Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1996, 2217:4-5.
27. Kempton W., Boster J., Hartley J. Environmental Values in American Culture 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Knight A., Cowling R., Rouget M., Balmford A., Lombard A.T., Campbell B.M. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research - implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:610-617.
29. Knight A.T., Sarkar S., Smith R.J., Strange N., Wilson K.A. Engage the hodgepodge: management factors are essential when prioritizing areas for restoration and conservation action. Divers. Distrib. 2011, 17:1234-1238.
30. Lockwood M. Humans valuing nature: synthesising insights from philosophy, psychology and economics. Environ. Values 1999, 8:381-401.
31. Lockwood M. Integration of natural area values: conceptual foundations and methodological approaches. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 12:8-19.
32. López-Mosquera N., Sánchez M. Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J.Environ. Manage. 2012, 113:251-262.
33. Lowe P., Whitman G., Phillipson J. Ecology and the social sciences. J.Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:297-305.
34. Mascia M.B., Brosius J.P., Dobson T.A., Forbes B.C., Horowitz L., McKean M.A., Turner N.J. Conservation and the social sciences. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:649-650.
35. McIntyre N., Moore J., Yuan M. Aplace-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2008, 37-41.
36. McNie E. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:17-38.
37. Norton B.G., Noonan D. Ecology and valuation: big changes needed. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:664-675.
38. Ojala M., Lidskog R. What lies beneath the surface? A case study of citizens' moral reasoning with regard to biodiversity. Environ. Values 2011, 20:217-237.
39. Plumwood V. Environmental Culture: the Ecological Crisis of Reason 2002, Routledge.
40. Raymond C., Brown G. Amethod for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. J.Environ. Plan. Manage. 2006, 49:797-812.
41. Raymond C.M., Brown G., Robinson G.M. The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models. J.Environ. Psychol. 2011, 31:323-335.
42. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
43. Ritchie E.G., Bradshaw C.J., Dickman C.R., Hobbs R., Johnson C.N., Johnston E.L., Laurance W.F., Lindenmayer D., McCarthy M.A., Nimmo D.G., Possingham H.H., Pressey R.L., Watson D.M., Woinarski J. Continental-scale governance and the hastening of loss of Australia's biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:1133-1135.
44. Robertson D.P., Hull R.B. Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15:970-979.
45. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values 1973, Free Press, New York.
46. Rolston H. Value in nature and the nature of value. R.Inst. Philos. Suppl. 1994, 36:13-30.
47. Rolston H., Coufal J. Aforest ethic and multivalue forest management. J.For. 1991, 89:35-40.
48. Sandbrook C., Adams W.M., Büscher B., Vira B. Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 00:1-4.
49. Schultz P.W. The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J.Environ. Psychol. 2001, 21:327-339.
50. Schultz P.W. Conservation means behavior. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:1080-1083.
51. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, 1-65. Academic, Orlando, Florida. M. Zanna (Ed.).
52. Sellars R. Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History 1997, Yale University Press, New Haven.
53. Seymour E., Curtis A., Pannell D. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management. Australas. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 17:142-153.
54. Seymour E., Curtis A., Pannell D.J., Roberts A., Allan C. Same river, different values and why it matters. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2011, 12:207-213.
55. Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J.Environ. Psychol. 2005, 25:415-425.
56. Steg L., van den Berg A., de Groot J.I.M. Environmental Psychology: An Introduction 2013, BPS Blackwell, Chichester.
57. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J.Environ. Psychol. 2009, 29:309-317.
58. Stephenson J. The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 84:127-139.
59. Stern P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J.Soc. Issues 2000, 56:407-424.
60. Stern P.C., Dietz T. The value basis of environmental concern. J.Soc. Issues 1994, 50:65-84.
61. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Kalof L. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 1993, 25:322-348.
62. Stern P.C., Kalof L., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J.Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 25:1611-1636.
63. Sutherland W.J., Pullin A.S., Dolman P.M., Knight T.M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:305-308.
64. Thompson S.C.G., Barton M.A. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes towards the environment. J.Environ. Psychol. 1994, 149-157.
65. Tyrväinen L., Mäkinen K., Schipperijn J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79:5-19.
66. Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H., Kolehmainen O. Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban For. Urban Green. 2003, 1:135-149.
67. Vaske J.J., Absher J.D., Bright A.D. Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2007, 14:223-232.
68. Whitehead A.L., Kujala H., Ives C.D., Gordon A., Lentini P.E., Wintle B.A., Nicholson E., Raymond C.M. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2014.
69. Winter C. The intrinsic, instrumental and spiritual values of natural area visitors and the general public: a comparative study. J.Sustain. Tour. 2007, 15:599-614.
70. Winter C., Lockwood M. The natural area value scale. Australas. J. Environ. Manage. 2003.
71. Xu Z., Bengston D.N. Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982-1993. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1997, 10:43-59.
72. Zube E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1987, 1:37-45.