The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: Integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 270-290

  Kenter, Jasper O ^a,b   Jobstvogt, Niels ^b   Watson, Verity ^b   Irvine, Katherine N ^c   Christie, Michael ^d   Bryce, Ros ^b,e  

^a SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^d ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Deliberative monetary valuation; Fair price; Integrated valuation; Interpretive methods; Transcendental values

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007560540     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Aanesen, M., Armstrong, C., Czajkowski, M., Falk-Petersen, J., Hanley, N., Navrud, S., Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: preserving cold-water coral in Norway. Ecol. Econ. 112 (2015), 53–67, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.007.
2. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (1991), 179–211, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
3. Ajzen, I., From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., (eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, 1985, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
4. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. 1980, Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Armstrong, M., Brown, A., Hargreaves, J., Hyder, K., Pilgrim-Morrison, S., Munday, M., Proctor, S., Roberts, A., Williamson, K., Sea Angling 2012 – A Survey of Recreational Sea Angling Activity and Economic Value in England. 2013, Defra, London.
6. Beaumont, N., Townsend, M., Mangi, S., Austen, M.C., Marine Biodiversity – An Economic Valuation. 2008, Defra, London.
7. Brouwer, R., Constructed preference stability: a test–retest. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 1, 2012, 70–84, 10.1080/21606544.2011.644922.
8. Bryce, R., Irvine, K., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv 21 (2016), 258–269, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015.
9. Bunse, L., Rendon, O., Luque, S., What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 88–97, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.004.
10. Burson, A., Crocker, J., Mischkowski, D., Two types of value-affirmation implications for self-control following social exclusion. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3 (2012), 510–516.
11. Cameron, T.A., Huppert, D.D., OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 17 (1989), 230–246.
12. Chambers, R., 2002. Participatory Workshops. Earthscan.
13. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., Woodside, U., Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
14. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J., Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 8–18.
15. Chan, K.M.A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G.W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016), 1462–1465, 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
16. Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., Kenter, J.O., An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecol. Econ. 83 (2012), 69–80.
17. Church, A., Burgess, J., Ravenscroft, N., Bird, W., Blackstock, K., Brady, E., Crang, M., Fish, R., Gruffudd, P., Mourato, S., Pretty, J., Tolia-Kelly, D., Turner, K., Winter, M., 2011. Cultural Services. In: UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
18. Church, A., Fish, R., Haines-Young, R., Mourato, S., Tratalos, J., Stapleton, L., Willis, C., Coates, P., Gibbons, S., Leyshon, C., Potschin, M., Ravenscroft, N., Sanchis-Guarner, R., Winter, M., Kenter, J.O., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 5: Cultural Ecosystem Services and Indicators. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
19. Coates, P., Brady, E., Church, A., Cowell, B., Daniels, S., DeSilvey, C., Fish, R., Holyoak, V., Horrell, D., Mackey, S., Pite, R., Stibbe, A., Waters, R., UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow On Arts & Humanities Perspectives on Cultural Ecosystem Services. 2014, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
20. Cooper, N., Brady, E., Attlee, A., Bryce, R., Steen, H., Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 218–229, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014.
21. Costello, A., Osborne, J., Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess., 2005, 1–9.
22. Cruz, I., Stahel, A., Max-Neef, M., Towards a systemic development approach: building on the Human-Scale Development paradigm. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2021–2030, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.004.
23. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J., der Dunk, von, A., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (2012), 8812–8819.
24. Dallimer, M., Irvine, K.N., Skinner, A.M.J., Davies, Z.G., Rouquette, J.R., Maltby, L.L., Warren, P.H., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62 (2012), 47–55, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9.
25. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., Shwom, R., Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30 (2005), 335–372, 10.1146/Annurev.Energy.30.050504.144444.
26. Drew Associates, Research into the Economic Contribution of Sea Angling, Defra. 2004, Defra, London.
27. Edwards, D., Collins, T., Goto, R., An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 319–328, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.018.
28. Everard, M., Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., The ripple effect: institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosyst. Serv 21 (2016), 230–240, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.00110.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.001.
29. Fielding, K., McDonald, R., Louis, W., Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. J. Environ. Psychol. 28 (2008), 318–326, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003.
30. Fielding, K., Queensland, A., Terry, D., Masser, B., Hogg, M., California, U., Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. Br. J. Social. Psychol. 47 (2008), 23–48, 10.1348/014466607X206792.
31. Fish, R., Burgess, J., Church, A., Turner, K., 2011. Shared Values for the Contributions Ecosystem Services Make to Human Well-being. In: UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
32. Fish, R., A., Church, M., Winter, Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv 21 (2016), 208–217, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002.
33. Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J., Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3 (2007), 390–394, 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149.
34. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (2011), 613–628, 10.1177/0309133311421708.
35. Hattam, C., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Börger, T., Burdon, D., Hadjimichael, M., Delaney, A., Atkins, J.P., Garrard, S., Austen, M.C., Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: mixed methods or mixed messages?. Ecol. Econ. 120 (2015), 126–138, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011.
36. Hawcroft, L.J., Milfont, T.L., The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 30 (2010), 143–158, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003.
37. Hogan, C., Practical Facilitation. 2003, Kogan Page Publishers, London.
38. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeslow, S., Applied Logistic Regression, 2000, Wiley, New York.
39. Ingold, T., The Perception of the Environment. 2000, Psychology Press.
40. Irvine, K., O'Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O., Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 184–193, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001.
41. Irvine, K.N., Warber, S.L., Devine-Wright, P., Gaston, K.J., Understanding urban green space as a health resource: a qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in sheffield, UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10 (2013), 417–442.
42. Irvine, K.N., Fuller, R.A., Devine-Wright, P., Tratalos, J., Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. Jenks, M., Jones, C., (eds.) Dimensions of the Sustainable City, 2010, Springer, Amsterdam, 1–23.
43. Ives, C.D., Kendal, D., The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 144 (2014), 67–72, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013.
44. Jobstvogt, N., Hanley, N., Hynes, S., Kenter, J., Witte, U., Twenty thousand sterling under the sea: estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity. Ecol. Econ. 97 (2014), 10–19, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.019.
45. Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Kenter, J.O., Looking below the surface: the cultural ecosystem service values of UK marine protected areas (MPAs). Ecosyst. Serv. 10 (2014), 97–110, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.006.
46. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 22 (1992), 57–70, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S.
47. Kaiser, F., Hubner, G., Bogner, F., Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35 (2005), 2150–2170, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x.
48. Kenter, J.O., 2016a. Deliberative and Non-Monetary Valuation. In: Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, Routledge, Abingdon.
49. Kenter, J.O., Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 175–183, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.010.
50. Kenter, J.O., Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 291–307, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010.
51. Kenter, J.O., 2017. Deliberative Monetary Valuation. In: Spash, C.L. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society. Routledge, Abingdon (in press).
52. Kenter, J.O., Hyde, T., Christie, M., Fazey, I., The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Change 21 (2011), 505–521, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001.
53. Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Davies, A., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Ranger, S., Solandt, J.L., Duncan, C., Christie, M., Crump, H., Irvine, K.N., Pinard, M., Reed, M.S., 2013. The Value of Potential Marine Protected Areas in the UK to Divers and Sea Anglers. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Interim Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
54. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Everard, M., Irvine, K.N., O'brien, E.A., Molloy, C., Bryce, R., Brady, E., Christie, M., Church, A., Collins, T., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Edwards, D., Evely, A., Fazey, I., Goto, R., Hockley, N., Jobstvogt, N., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On Shared, Plural and Cultural Values: A Handbook for Decision-Makers. 2014, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 10.13140/RG.2.1.4683.5281.
55. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, L., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., 2014b. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1275.6565.
56. Kenter, J.O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.
57. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Cooper, N., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Raymond, C.M., Tett, P., Watson, V., Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 358–371, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006.
58. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Fazey, I., The Deliberative Value Formation model. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 194–207, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015.
59. Lienhoop, N., Bartkowski, B., Hansjürgens, B., Informing biodiversity policy: the role of economic valuation, deliberative institutions and deliberative monetary valuation. Environ. Sci. Policy 54 (2015), 522–532, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.007.
60. Lo, A.Y., Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. J. Econ. Surv. 27 (2012), 768–789, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00718.x.
61. López-Mosquera, N., Sánchez, M., Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J. Environ. Manag. 113 (2012), 251–262.
62. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., Montes, C., Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol. Indic. 37 (2013), 220–228, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
63. Max-Neef, M., Human scale development: an option for the future. Dev. Dialogue 1 (1989), 5–81.
64. McShane, K., Some challenges for narrative accounts of value. Ethics Environ. 17 (2012), 45–69.
65. Natural England, 2012. Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment: The National Survey on People and the Natural Environment. Technical Report (2011–12 survey). (http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/1712385).
66. Niemeyer, S., Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics. Environ. Politics 13 (2004), 347–372, 10.1080/0946601042000209612.
67. O'Neill, J., Markets, Deliberation and Environment, 2007, Routledge, London.
68. O'Neill, J., Cost-benefit analysis, rationality and the plurality of values. Ecologist 26 (1996), 98–103.
69. O'Neill, J., Holland, A., Light, A., Environmental Values, 2008, Routledge, London.
70. Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Church, A., Democratic deliberative monetary valuation to implement the ecosystems approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 308–318, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005.
71. Parks, S., Gowdy, J., What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst. Serv. 3 (2013), e1–e10, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.002.
72. Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N.J., Alexander, K.A., Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 145–156, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033.
73. Raymond, C., Kenter, J.O, Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 241–257, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018.
74. Reed, M.S., Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141 (2008), 2417–2431, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
75. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2001, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
76. Sagoff, M., Values and preferences. Ethics 96 (1986), 301–316.
77. Satterfield, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., Chan, K.M., Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 117 (2013), 103–114, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033.
78. Schlapfer, F., Contingent valuation: confusions, problems, and solutions. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 1569–1571, 10.1016/J.Ecolecon.2009.01.014.
79. Scholte, S.S.K., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol. Econ. 114 (2015), 67–78, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007.
80. Schwartz, S.H., Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. Issues 50 (1994), 19–45.
81. Schwartz, S.H., Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25 (1992), 1–65.
82. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W., Toward a universal psychological structure of human-values. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 1987, 550–562.
83. Scottish Government, 2009. Technical Report: Economic Impact of Recreational Sea Angling in Scotland. (http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/07/31154700/4).
84. Shnabel, N., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J.E., Garcia, J., Cohen, G.L., Demystifying values-affirmation interventions writing about social belonging is a key to buffering against identity threat. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39 (2013), 663–676, 10.1177/0146167213480816.
85. Snelgar, R.S., Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: measurement and structure. J. Environ. Psychol. 26 (2006), 87–99, 10.1016/J.Jenvp.2006.06.003.
86. Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Econ. 84 (2008), 469–488.
87. Spash, C.L., Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Econ. 82 (2006), 602–622, 10.3368/le.82.4.602.
88. Spash, C.L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., Hill, G., Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 955–964, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.013.
89. Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W., Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J. Environ. Psychol. 25 (2005), 415–425, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003.
90. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., The value basis of environmental concern. J. Soc. Issues 50 (1994), 65–84.
91. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Guagnano, G.A., P, A brief inventory of values. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 58, 1998, 984.
92. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 25 (1993), 322–348.
93. Szabó, Z., Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: improving the validity of biodiversity valuation. Ecol. Econ., 2011, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.025.
94. TEEB, 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the ecological and economic foundations. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: the Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, London.
95. Turner, R.K., The “Balance Sheet” approach within adaptive management for ecosystem services. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, Abingdon, 289–303.
96. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
97. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
98. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2207–2215.
99. Veisten, K., Hoen, H.F., Navrud, S., Strand, J., Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. J. Environ. Manag. 73 (2004), 317–331, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.008.
100. Velleman, J., Narrative explanation. Philos. Rev. 112 (2003), 1–25.
101. Wilson, C., Irvine, K., Bottom-up communication: identifying opportunities and limitations through an exploratory field-based evaluation. Energy Effic. 6 (2012), 91–104.
102. Zografos, C., Howarth, R.B., Deliberative ecological economics for sustainability governance. Sustainability 2010 (2010), 3399–3417.