Forming shared values in conservation management: An interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 344-357

  Ranger, S ^a,b   Kenter, J O ^b   Bryce, R ^c   Cumming, G ^d   Dapling, T ^e   Lawes, E ^e   Richardson, P B ^a  

^a MARINE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS   (United Kingdom)

^d Working Landscapes Community Voice Consulting   (United States)

^e Sussex Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority Riverside Business Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Deliberative value formation; Marine protected areas; Post normal science; Transdisciplinarity; Values based approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006004059     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., Against mono-consequentialism: multiple outcomes and their drivers in social–ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 21 (2011), 1–3, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.007.
2. Association of IFCAs, 2014. A brief guide to The Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities (http://www.association-ifca.org.uk/Upload/IFCA%20Leaflet-February%202014%20FINAL.pdf).
3. Balmford, A., Cowling, R.M., Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology. Conserv. Biol., 20(3), 2006.
4. Beaumont, N., Townsend, M., Mangi, S., Austen, M.C., Marine Biodiversity - An Economic Valuation. 2008, Defra, London.
5. Blaustein, R.J., Protected areas and equity concerns. Bioscience 57:3 (2007), 216–221.
6. Bryce, R., Irvine, K., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015 This issue.
7. Burrows, M.T., Schoeman, D.S., Richardson, A.J., García Molinos, J., Hoffmann, A., Buckley, L.B., Moore, P., Brown, C., Bruno, J.F., Duarte, C.M., Halpern, B.S., Hoegh Guldberg, O., Kappel, C.V., Kiessling, W., O'Connor, M.I., Pandolfi, J.M., Parmesan, C., Sydeman, W.J., Ferrier, S., Williams, K.J., Poloczanska, E.S., Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity. Nature, 506, 2014, 7487.
8. Christie, P., Campbell, L.M., Armada, N., Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution. Garcia, Serge M., Rice, J., Charles, Anthony, (eds.) Stewardship in tropical small-scale fisheries: Community and national perspectives., first edition, 2014, John Wiley & Sons.
9. Cimon-Morin, J., Darveau, M., Poulin, M., Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biol. Conserv. 166 (2012), 144–154.
10. Cooper, K., Boyd, S., Aldridge, J., Rees, H., Cumulative impacts of aggregate extraction on seabed macro-invertebrate communities in an area off the east coast of the United Kingdom. J. Sea Res. 57:4 (2007), 288–302 (May 2007) (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385110106001468).
11. Cooper, N., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Steen, H., Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014 This issue.
12. Cumming, G., Norwood, C., The community voice method: using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105 (2012), 434–444.
13. Cumming, G., Holland, D., Growing local/buying local: challenging pessimism and social division through narratives of possibility. Progress. Plan. 195 (2013), 44–46.
14. Davies, A.L., Bryce, R., Redpath, S.M., Use of multicriteria decision analysis to address conservation conflicts. Conserv. Biol. 27 (2013), 936–944.
15. Defra, 2010. IFCA Byelaw Guidance: Guidance on the byelaw making powers and general offence under Part 6, Chapter 1, Sections 155 to 164 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act. (http://ww2.defra.gov.uk/environment/marine/wwo/ifca/).
16. Defra, JNCC, Natural England, 2013a. Beachy Head West MCZ Designation Order (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/marine-conservation-zone-2013-designation-beachy-head-west).
17. Defra, JNCC, Natural England (2013b). Kingmere MCZ Designation Order. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/marine-conservation-zone-2013-designation-kingmere.
18. Defra, MMO, Natural England, 2015. Policy Paper: 2010 to 2015 government policy: Marine environment. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-marine-environment/2010-to-2015-government-policy-marine-environment).
19. Edwards, D., Collins, T., Goto, R., An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
20. Everard, M., Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., The ripple effect: institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.001 This issue.
21. Fish, R., Church, A., Cheryl, W., Winter, M., Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
22. Fish, R., Church, A., Winter, M., 2016b. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. This issue.
23. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:7 (1993), 739–755.
24. Garmendia, E., Stagl, S., Public participation for sustainability and social learning: concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1712–1722.
25. Gray, N.J., Sea change: exploring the international effort to promote marine protected areas. Conserv. Soc. 8:4 (2010), 331–338.
26. Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I, 1984, Beacon, Boston.
27. Hall-Spencer, J.M., Moore, P.G., Scallop dredging has profound long-term impacts on maerl habitats. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57 (2000), 1407–1415 http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/5/1407.full.pdf.
28. Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M., Steneck, R., Watson, R., A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319 (2008), 948–952 (http://www.sciencemag.com).
29. Irvine, K., O'Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O., Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001 This issue.
30. Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., Kiel, F., Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol. Econ. 79 (2012), 1–10.
31. Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Kenter, J.O., Looking below the surface: the cultural ecosystem service values of UK marine protected areas (MPAs). Ecosyst. Serv. 10 (2014), 97–110, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.006.
32. Jobstvogt, N., Hanley, N., Hynes, S., Kenter, J., Witte, U., Twenty thousand sterling under the sea: estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity. Ecol. Econ. 97 (2014), 10–19, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.019.
33. Jones, P.J.S., Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11930 (2001), 89–101.
34. Kay, J.J., Regier, H., Uncertainty, complexity and ecological integrity: insights from an ecosystem approach. Crabbé, P., et al. (eds.) Implementing ecological integrity: Restoring regional and global environmental and human health, 2000, NATO science series, environmental security, Deventer: Kluwer, 121–156.
35. Kenter, J.O., Shared, plural and cultural values. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
36. Kenter, J.O., Integrating deliberative choice experiments, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010 This issue.
37. Kenter, J.O., Deliberative and non-monetary valuation. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London.
38. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Fazey, I., The deliberative value formation model. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
39. Kenter, J.O., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Irvine, K., Christie, M., Bryce, R., The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006 This issue.
40. Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Davies, A., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Ranger, S., Solandt, J.L., Duncan, C., Christie, M., Crump, H., Irvine, K.N., Pinard, M., Reed, M.S., The Value of Potential Marine Protected Areas in the UK to Divers and Sea Anglers. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Interim Report. 2013, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
41. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Cooper, N., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Raymond, C.M., Tett, P., Watson, V., Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
42. Kenter, J.O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99.
43. Lieberknecht, L.Mullier, T.Ardron, J., 2014. Assessment of the Ecological Coherence of the UK's Marine Protected Area Network A Report Prepared for the Joint Links (http://www.wcl.org.uk/docs/ECN_MPA_report_for_Joint_Links.pdf).
44. Lo, A.Y., Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecol. Econ. 87 (2013), 84–94.
45. Mascia, M.B., et al. Conservation and the Social Sciences. Conserv. Biol. 17:3 (2003), 649–650.
46. McVittie, A., Moran, D., Valuing the non-use benefits of marine conservation zones: an application to the UK Marine Bill. Ecol. Econ. 70 (2010), 413–424.
47. Moffatt, A., Natural England access to evidence information note EIN010 summary of evidence. Marine, 2015 (http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/5548623481798656).
48. MPA Atlas, 2015. Atlas of Marine Protected Areas [online]. (http://www.mpatlas.org), (accessed 20.12.2015.).
49. Natural England, 2012a. Annex I1 from Finding Sanctuary, Irish Seas Conservation Zones, Net Gain and Balanced Seas. 2012. Impact Assessment materials in support of the Regional Marine Conservation Zone Projects’ Recommendations. (http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/2002408).
50. Natural England, 2012b. Regional MCZ Project Final Report: Balanced Seas (MCZ002) (http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/1463173).
51. Natural England, 2015a. Conservation Advice for Marine Conservation Zone Kingmere (BS16).(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/conservation-advice-for-marine-conservation-zone-kingmere-bs16).
52. Natural England, 2015b, Conservation Advice for Marine Conservation Zone: Beach Head West (BS13.2).(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/conservation-advice-for-marine-conservation-zone-beachy-head-west-bs132).
53. Negi, C.S., Nautiyal, S., Indigenous peoples, biological diversity and protected area management - policy framework towards resolving conflicts. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 10:2 (2003), 169–179.
54. Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Church, A., Democratic deliberative monetary valuation to implement the ecosystems approach. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016 This issue.
55. Pomeroy, R., Douvere, F., The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar. Policy 32:5 (2008), 816–822.
56. Proctor, W., Dreschler, M., Deliberative mutlicriteria evaluation. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 24 (2006), 169–190.
57. Ranger, S., Lowe, R., Sanghera, A., Solandt, J.L., An assessment of non-use value and other benefits of rMCZs in England. Your Seas your Voice Balanced Seas Region, May 2009 – October 2011. Mar. Conserv. Soc., 2011, 2011.
58. Raymond, C., Kenter, J.O., Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018 This issue.
59. Read, D., West, R.J., Haste, M., Jordan, A., Optimizing vountary compliance in marine protected areas: a comparison of recreational fisher and enforcement officer perspectives using multi-criteria analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 92:2011 (2011), 2558–2567.
60. Reed, M.S., Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141 (2008), 2417–2431.
61. Ritchie, H., Ellis, G., A system that works for the sea? Exploring stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 53:6 (2010), 701–723.
62. Rodela, R., Advancing the deliberative turn in natural resource management: an analysis of discourses on the use of local resources. J. Environ. Manag. 96 (2012), 26–34, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.013.
63. Saarikoski, H.Barton, D.N.Mustajoki, J.Keune H.Gomez-Baggethun, E.LangemeyerJ., 2015. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in ecosystem service valuation. In: Potschin, M. and K. Jax (eds), OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. Available via: (www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book).
64. Solandt, J.-L., Jones, P., Duval-Diop, D., Kleiven, A.R., Frangoudes, K., Governance challenges in scaling up from individual MPAs to MPA networks. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24:Suppl. 2 (2014), 145–152.
65. Stagl, S., Valuation for sustainable development – the role of multicriteria evaluation. Vierteljahrsh. Zur. Wirtsch. 73 (2004), 53–62.
66. Sussex IFCA. (2015) Impact Assessment Sussex IFCA MPA Byelaw: Kingmere MCZ Regulatory Notice http://www.sussex-ifca.gov.uk/repository/SxIFCA%20Impact%20Assessment%20-%20MPA%20Byelaw%20&%20Kingmere%20Regulatory%20Notice.pdf.
67. Toropova, C.Meliane, I.Laffoley, D.Matthews, E.Spalding, M., 2010. Editors. Global Ocean Protection: Present Status and future possibilities. Brest, France: Agence des aires marine protégées, Gland Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA: IUCN WCPA Cambridge UK: UNEP-WC-MC, Arlington USA: TNC, Tokyo, Japan: UNU New York USA.
68. Turner, R.K., Lorenzoni, I., Beaumont, N., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., McDonald, A.L., Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio-economic changes on the UK coast. Geogr. J. 164:3 (1998), 269–281.
69. Voyer, M., Gladstone, W., Goodall, H., Methods of social assessment in Marine protected area planning: is public participation enough?. Mar. Policy 36 (2012), 432–439.
70. Zylstra, et al. Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice, 2, 2014, Springer Science Reviews, 119–143.