Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods

Ecological Economics

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 67-78

  Scholte, Samantha S K ^a   van Teeffelen, Astrid J A ^a   Verburg, Peter H ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Ecosystem services; Landscape values; Social valuation; Socio cultural values; Valuation methods

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; VALUATION;

EID: 84925670785     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007     Document Type: Short Survey

References (148)

1. Abram N.K., Meijaard E., Ancrenaz M., Runting R.K., Wells J.A., Gaveau D., . . ., Mengersen K. Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 7:116-127. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.004.
2. Agbenyega O., Burgess P.J., Cook M., Morris J. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(3):551-557. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011.
3. Alessa L., Kliskey A., Williams P., Barton M. Perception of change in freshwater in remote resource-dependent Arctic communities. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18(1):153-164. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.007.
4. Allendorf T.D., Yang J. The role of ecosystem services in park-people relationships: the case of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve in southwest China. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167:187-193. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.013.
5. Alvesson M. Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2003, 28:13-33. 10.5465/AMR.2003.8925191.
6. Anderson N.M., Williams K.J.H., Ford R.M. Community perceptions of plantation forestry: the association between place meanings and social representations of a contentious rural land use. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 34:121-136. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.001.
7. Aretano R., Petrosillo I., Zaccarelli N., Semeraro T., Zurlini G. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: a combination of subjective and objective assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 112:63-73. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.010.
8. Arnberger A., Eder R. Exploring the heterogeneity of rural landscape preferences: an image-based latent class approach. Landsc. Res. 2011, 36:19-40. 10.1080/01426397.2010.536204.
9. Atkinson G., Bateman I., Mourato S. Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2012, 28:22-47. 10.1093/oxrep/grs007.
10. Badola R., Barthwal S., Hussain S.A. Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests: a case study from the east coast of India. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 96:188-196. 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.016.
11. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 51(2):269-290. 10.1111/1464-0597.00092.
12. Bateman I.J., Mawby J. First impressions count: interviewer appearance and information effects in stated preference studies. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 49(1):47-55. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.12.006.
13. Beck A.C., Campbell D., Shrives P.J. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. Br. Account. Rev. 2010, 42(3):207-222. 10.1016/j.bar.2010.05.002.
14. Bell S. Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process 2012, 348. Routledge.
15. Bingham G., Bishop R., Brody M., Bromley D., Clark E.(Toby), Cooper W., . . ., Suter G. Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 1995, 14(2):73-90. 10.1016/0921-8009(95)00021-Z.
16. Brown T.C. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 1984, 60(3):231-246. (Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3146184?uid=41302&uid=3738736&uid=2&uid=3&uid=67&uid=5911848&uid=41301&uid=62&sid=21105932585153).
17. Brown G. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5:58-68. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004.
18. Brown G., Brabyn L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107(3):317-331. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007.
19. Bryman A. Social Research Methods 2012, Oxford University Press, New York. 4th ed.
20. Buijs A.E., Elands B.H.M., Langers F. No wilderness for immigrants: cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91(3):113-123. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.003.
21. Calvet-Mir L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Reyes-García V. Beyond food production: ecosystem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:153-160. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.011.
22. Carvalho-Ribeiro S.M., Lovett A. Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13(1). 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.09.003.
23. Carvalho-Ribeiro S.M., Lovett A., O'Riordan T. Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal: moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development. Land Use Policy 2010, 27(4):1111-1122. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.008.
24. Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129C:33-43. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059.
25. Castro P. Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: contributions from the social representations approach. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 16(4):247-266. 10.1002/casp.864.
26. Castro a.J., Martín-López B., García-LLorente M., Aguilera P.a., López E., Cabello J. Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. J. Arid Environ. 2011, 75(11):1201-1208. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013.
27. Castro A.J., Verburg P.H., Martin-Lopez B., Garcia-Llorente M., Vaughn C.C., Cabello J. Ecosystem services trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 132:102-110.
28. Ceperley N., Montagnini F., Natta A. Significance of sacred sites for riparian forest conservation in Central Benin. Bois Et Forets Des Tropiques 2010, 303(1):5-23. (Retrieved from http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/150431?ln=en&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed).
29. Chan K.M.A., Guerry A.D., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T., Bostrom A., . . ., Woodside U. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 2012, 62(8):744-756. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
30. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
31. Chee Y.E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 120(4):549-565. 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028.
32. Christie M., Fazey I., Cooper R., Hyde T., Kenter J.O. An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 83:67-78. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012.
33. Common M. The dangers of extended, but incomplete, accounting for measures of economic performance in a world of imperfect knowledge. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.014.
34. Corraliza J.a, Berenguer J. Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: a situational approach. Environ. Behav. 2000, 32(6):832-848. 10.1177/00139160021972829.
35. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., . . ., van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387(6630):253-260. 10.1038/387253a0.
36. Cottet M., Piégay H., Bornette G. Does human perception of wetland aesthetics and healthiness relate to ecological functioning?. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128:1012-1022. (Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479713004659).
37. Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington DC.
38. Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54(1-4):267-281. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
39. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.a., von der Dunk A. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109(23):8812-8819. 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
40. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.a., Boumans R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):393-408. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
41. De Groot R., Fisher B., Christie M., Aronson J., Braat L., Gowdy J., . . ., Shmelev S. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan, London. P. Kumar (Ed.).
42. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30(1):335-372. 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.
43. Dobbie M., Green R. Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 110:143-154. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.003.
44. Dramstad W.E., Tveit M.S., Fjellstad W.J., Fry G.L.A. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 78(4):465-474. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006.
45. Edwards D., Jay M., Jensen F.S., Lucas B., Marzano M., Montagné C., . . ., Weiss G. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: towards a pan-European perspective. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 19:12-19. 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.006.
46. Everard M., Jones L., Watts B. Have we neglected the societal importance of sand dunes? An ecosystem services perspective. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 2010, 20(4):476-487. 10.1002/aqc.1114.
47. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments - mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:421-433. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004.
48. Farber S.C., Costanza R., Wilson M.a. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):375-392. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5.
49. Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.I., Daniel T.C., Fry G. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22(7):959-972. 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x.
50. Goma H., Rahim K., Nangendo G., Riley J., Stein a. Participatory studies for agro-ecosystem evaluation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 87(2):179-190. 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00277-8.
51. Halcomb E.J., Gholizadeh L., DiGiacomo M., Phillips J., Davidson P.M. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J. Clin. Nurs. 2007, 16(6):1000-1011. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
52. Hartter J. Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2010, 23(3):207-223. 10.1080/08941920903360372.
53. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Maes J., Wittmer H., Jax K. "Maps have an air of authority": potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:25-32. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003.
54. Hinds J., Sparks P. Engaging with the natural environment: the role of affective connection and identity. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28(2):109-120. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001.
55. Horne P., Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 207(1-2):189-199. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026.
56. Howley P. Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 72(0):161-169. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026.
57. Ives C.D., Kendal D. Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land. Land Use Policy 2013, 34(0). 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.003.
58. Jay M., Schraml U. Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants - uses, perception and integrative potential. Urban For. Urban Green. 2009, 8(4):283-294. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.07.003.
59. Jerneck A., Olsson L. More than trees! Understanding the agroforestry adoption gap in subsistence agriculture: insights from narrative walks in Kenya. J. Rural. Stud. 2013, 32(0):114-125. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.004.
60. Johnson, Cassandra Y., Bowker J.M., Bergstrom J.C., Cordell K.H. Wilderness values in America: does immigrant status or ethnicity matter?. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2004, 17(7):611-628. 10.1080/08941920490466585.
61. Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 59(1):1-11. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2.
62. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
63. Kelemen E., Nguyen G., Gomiero T., Kovács E., Choisis J.-P., Choisis N., . . ., Balázs K. Farmers' perceptions of biodiversity: lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study. Land Use Policy 2013, 35(0):318-328. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.005.
64. Kellert S.R., Wilson E.O. The Biophilia Hypothesis 1993, Island Press, Washington DC.
65. Kenter J.O., Hyde T., Christie M., Fazey I. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries-evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21(2):505-521. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001.
66. Kenyon W., Hanley N., Nevin C. Citizens' juries: an aid to environmental valuation?. Environ. Planning C: Govt. Pol. 2001, 19(4):557-566. 10.1068/c4s.
67. Kijazi M.H., Kant S. Forest stakeholders' value preferences in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12(5):357-369. 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.007.
68. Klain S.C., Chan K.M.A. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82:104-113. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008.
69. Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior? 2010, 37-41. (November 2013).
70. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1228-1236. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002.
71. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64(4):808-819. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008.
72. Lamarque P., Tappeiner U., Turner C., Steinbacher M., Bardgett R.D., Szukics U., . . ., Lavorel S. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2011, 11(4):791-804. 10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0.
73. Lamb R.J., Purcell A.T. Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1990, 19(4):333-352. 10.1016/0169-2046(90)90041-Y.
74. Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(5):467-482. 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002.
75. Le Lay Y.-F., Piégay H., Rivière-Honegger A. Perception of braided river landscapes: implications for public participation and sustainable management. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 119(0):1-12. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.006.
76. Limburg K.E., O'Neill R.V., Costanza R., Farber S. Complex systems and valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):409-420. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00090-3.
77. Lindemann-Matthies P., Junge X., Matthies D. The influence of plant diversity on people's perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143(1):195-202. 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003.
78. Liu S., Costanza R., Farber S., Troy A. Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1185:54-78. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x.
79. Lockwood M. Humans valuing nature: synthesising insights from philosophy, psychology and economics. Environ. Values 1999, 8:381-401. 10.3197/096327199129341888.
80. López-santiago C.A., Oteros-rozas E., Martín-lópez B., Plieninger T., Martín E.G., José A. Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19(2).
81. MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and human well-being - synthesis. World Health 2005, Vol. 5. Island Press, Washington DC, (Retrieved from http://www.who.int/entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf).
82. Maass J.M., Balvanera P., Castillo A., Daily G.C., Mooney H.A., Ehrlich P., . . ., Ayala R. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10(1).
83. MacMillan D.C., Marshall K. The Delphi process? An expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim. Conserv. 2006, 9(1):11-19. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00001.x.
84. Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., Del Amo D.G., . . ., Montes C. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One 2012, 7(6):e38970. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
85. Martín-López B., Gómez-Baggethun E., García-Llorente M., Montes C. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 37(0):220-228. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
86. McFarlane B.L., Boxall P.C. Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: the case of the Foothills Model. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2000, 13(7):37-41. 10.1080/08941920050121927.
87. McKeown B., Thomas D. Q Methodology 1988, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
88. Mehtälä J., Vuorisalo T. High aesthetic valuation of urban thrush nightingales in 19th century Helsinki. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 98(2):117-123. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.018.
89. Meyfroidt P. Environmental cognitions, land change and socio-ecological feedbacks: an overview. J. Land Use Sci. 2013, 8:341-367.
90. Milcu A.I., Hanspach J., Abson D., Fischer J. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(3). (art44). 10.5751/ES-05790-180344.
91. Morrison E.H.J., Upton C., Pacini N., Odhiambo-K'oyooh K., Harper D.M. Public perceptions of papyrus: community appraisal of wetland ecosystem services at Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2013, 13(2):135-147. 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.03.008.
92. Nassauer J. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc. Ecol. 1995, 10(4):229-237. 10.1007/BF00129257.
93. Nassauer J.I. Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 2004, 24(4):756-765. 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0756:MTSOMW]2.0.CO;2.
94. Norton B.G., Noonan D. Ecology and valuation: big changes needed. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63(4):664-675. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.013.
95. Ode A., Fry G., Tveit M.S., Messager P., Miller D. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(1):375-383. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013.
96. Ostwald M., Jonsson A., Wibeck V., Asplund T. Mapping energy crop cultivation and identifying motivational factors among Swedish farmers. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 50:25-34. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.058.
97. Oteros-Rozas E., Martín-López B., González J.a., Plieninger T., López C.A., Montes C. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2013, 10.1007/s10113-013-0571-y.
98. Peters K., Elands B., Buijs A. Social interactions in urban parks: stimulating social cohesion?. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9(2):93-100. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003.
99. Petrosillo I., Costanza R., Aretano R., Zaccarelli N., Zurlini G. The use of subjective indicators to assess how natural and social capital support residents' quality of life in a small volcanic island. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24:609-620. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.021.
100. Piwowarczyk J., Kronenberg J., Dereniowska M.A. Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109(1):85-93. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.009.
101. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.
102. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28(6):1053-1065. 10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x.
103. Pröpper M., Haupts F. The culturality of ecosystem services. Emphasizing process and transformation. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 108:28-35. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.023.
104. Rawlins A., Morris J. Social and economic aspects of peatland management in Northern Europe, with particular reference to the English case. Geoderma 2010, 154(3-4):242-251. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.022.
105. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., MacDonald D.H., Cast A., Strathearn S., Grandgirard A., Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(5):1301-1315. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006.
106. Rees S.E., Rodwell L.D., Attrill M.J., Austen M.C., Mangi S.C. The value of marine biodiversity to the leisure and recreation industry and its application to marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 2010, 34(5):868-875. 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.009.
107. Roca E., Villares M. Public perceptions of managed realignment strategies: the case study of the Ebro Delta in the Mediterranean basin. Ocean Coast. Manage. 2012, 60(0):38-47. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.01.002.
108. Rudzitis G. Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural west. Rural Dev. Perspect. 1999, 14(2):9-13. (Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/west/amenities.pdf).
109. Sagie H., Morris A., Rofè Y., Orenstein D.E., Groner E. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli-Jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley Desert. J. Arid Environ. 2013, 97(0):38-48. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.05.007.
110. Schraml U., Volz K.-R. Do species matter? Valuable broadleaves as an object of public perception and policy. Valuable Broadleaved Forests in Europe 2009, 213-236. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden. H. Spieker (Ed.).
111. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. Issues 1994, 50(4):19-45. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.
112. Seeland K., Dübendorfer S., Hansmann R. Making friends in Zurich's urban forests and parks: the role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11(1):10-17. 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005.
113. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48(3):630-636. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
114. Serna-Chavez H.M., Schulp C.J.E., van Bodegom P.M., Bouten W., Verburg P.H., Davidson M.D. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 39:24-33. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024.
115. Seymour E., Curtis A., Pannell D., Allan C., Roberts A. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17(3):142-153. 10.1080/14486563.2010.9725261.
116. Shackleton C.M., Blair A. Perceptions and use of public green space is influenced by its relative abundance in two small towns in South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 113(0):104-112. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.011.
117. Sherrouse B.C., Clement J.M., Semmens D.J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31(2):748-760. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
118. Shogren J.F., Taylor L.O. On behavioral-environmental economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2008, 2(1):26-44. 10.1093/reep/rem027.
119. Smith H.F., Sullivan C.A. Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes-farmers' perceptions. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 98:72-80. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.008.
120. Soini K., Vaarala H., Pouta E. Residents' sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural-urban interface. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 104(1):124-134. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002.
121. Soliva R., Rønningen K., Bella I., Bezak P., Cooper T., Flø B.E., . . ., Potter C. Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes. J. Rural. Stud. 2008, 24(1):56-71. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.04.001.
122. Spangenberg J.H., Settele J. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7(3):327-337. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007.
123. Spash C.L. Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: coral reef biodiversity. J. Econ. Psychol. 2002, 23(5):665-687. 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00123-X.
124. Spash C.L. Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63(4):690-699. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014.
125. Spash C.L., Vatn A. Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60(2):379-388. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.010.
126. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009, 29(3):309-317. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
127. Stern P.C., Dietz T. The value basis of environmental concern. J. Soc. Issues 1994, 50(3):65-84. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.
128. Straton A.T., Jackson S., Marinoni O., Proctor W., Woodward E. Exploring and evaluating scenarios for a river catchment in Northern Australia using scenario development, multi-criteria analysis and a deliberative process as a tool for water planning. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 25(1):141-164. 10.1007/s11269-010-9691-z.
129. Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:S62-S75. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025.
130. Swetnam R.D., Fisher B., Mbilinyi B.P., Munishi P.K.T., Willcock S., Ricketts T., . . ., Lewis S.L. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92(3):563-574. (Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20932636).
131. Tagliafierro C., Longo A., Van Eetvelde V., Antrop M., Hutchinson W.G. Landscape economic valuation by integrating landscape ecology into landscape economics. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2013, 32(0):26-36. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.001.
132. Tengberg A., Fredholm S., Eliasson I., Knez I., Saltzman K., Wetterberg O. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 2:14-26. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006.
133. Terkenli T.S. Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 57(3):197-208. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00204-3.
134. Tisdell C., Wilson C. Information, wildlife valuation, conservation: experiments and policy. Contemp. Econ. Policy 2006, 24(1):144-159. 10.1093/cep/byj014.
135. Tveit M., Ode Å., Fry G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31(3):229-255. 10.1080/01426390600783269.
136. Tzoulas K., James P. Peoples' use of, and concerns about, green space networks: a case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9(2):121-128. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.12.001.
137. Ulrich R.S. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1986, 13:29-44. 10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8.
138. Ulrich R.S. Biophylia, biophobia and natural landscapes. The Biophylia Hypothesis 1993, Island Press, Washington DC. S.R. Kellert, E.O. Wilson (Eds.).
139. Van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 37:163-174. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
140. Van Zanten B.T., Verburg P.H., Espinosa M., Gomez-y-Paloma S., Galimberti G., Kantelhardt J., . . ., Viaggi D. European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 34(2):309-325. 10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4.
141. Van Zanten B.T., Verburg P.H., Koetse M.J., van Beukering P.J.H. Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: a meta-analysis of case studies. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 132:89-101. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012.
142. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P., Williams D.R., Jonker S. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 14(9):761-776. 10.1080/089419201753210585.
143. Vatn A. Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55(2):203-217. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.001.
144. Vihervaara P., Marjokorpi a., Kumpula T., Walls M., Kamppinen M. Ecosystem services of fast-growing tree plantations: a case study on integrating social valuations with land-use changes in Uruguay. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 14(1):58-68. 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.008.
145. Voelklein C., Howarth C. A review of controversies about social representations theory: a British debate. Cult. Psychol. 2005, 11(4):431-454. 10.1177/1354067X05058586.
146. Wilson M.a., Howarth R.B. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):431-443. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7.
147. Yu K. Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1995, 32(2):107-126. 10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9.
148. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landsc. Plan. 1982, 9(1):1-33. 10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0.