The Deliberative Value Formation model

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 194-207

  Kenter, Jasper O ^a   Reed, Mark S ^b   Fazey, Ioan ^c  

^a SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deliberative monetary valuation; Deliberative non monetary valuation; Participatory methods; Shared values; Social learning; Transcendental values

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011410582     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., Gauvin, F.P., Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 57 (2003), 239–251.
2. Ajzen, I., From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., (eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, 1985, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 11–39, 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
3. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (1991), 179–211.
4. Bandura, A., Social learning of moral judgments. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 11 (1969), 275–279.
5. Bandura, A., Social Learning Theory. 1977, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Bardi, A., Goodwin, R., The dual route to value change: individual processes and cultural moderators. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 42 (2011), 271–287.
7. Barnes, B., The Nature of Power. 1988, Polity Press, Cambridge.
8. Baveye, P.C., Baveye, J., Gowdy, J., Monetary valuation of ecosystem services: it matters to get the timeline right. Ecol. Econ. 95 (2013), 231–235.
9. Bessette, J.M., Deliberation: political aspects. Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci., 2001, 3377–3380.
10. Betsch, C., Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making: lessons learned about intuition from an individual differences approach. Plessner, H., Betsch, T., Betsch, C., (eds.) Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making, 2011, Psychology Press, 231–248.
11. Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., Munton, R., 1998. Deliberative and inclusionary processes: their contributions to environmental governance. 1st ESRC ‘DIPs in Environmental Decision-making’ Seminar, 17th December 1998.
12. Bohmann, J., Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Brody, G.H., A social learning explanation of moral development. Contemporary Educational Psychology 3 (1978), 20–26.
14. Brouwer, R., Powe, N., Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Public attitudes to contingent valuation and public consultation. Environ. Values 8 (1999), 325–347.
15. Bryce, R., Irvine, K., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 258–269, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015.
16. Bull, R., Petts, J., Evans, J., Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (2008), 701–716.
17. Bunse, L., Rendon, O., Luque, S., What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 88–97.
18. Calhoun, C.J., Habermas and the Public Sphere. 1992, The MIT Press.
19. Chambers, R., Participatory Workshops. 2002, Earthscan, London.
20. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., Woodside, U., Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756.
21. Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., Kenter, J.O., An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecol. Econ. 83 (2012), 69–80.
22. Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T., Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol. Econ. 58 (2006), 304–317.
23. Clark, J., Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., I struggled with this money business: respondents’ perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecol. Econ. 33 (2000), 45–62.
24. Cook, D., Proctor, W., Assessing the threat of exotic plant pests. Ecol. Econ. 63 (2007), 594–604.
25. Cooke, B., Kothari, U., Participation: the New Tyranny?. 2001, Zed Books, New York.
26. Cooper, N., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Steen, H., Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 218–229, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014.
27. Cundill, G., Rodela, R., A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 113 (2012), 7–14.
28. Cuppen, E., Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods. Policy Sci. 45 (2012), 23–46.
29. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J. & der Dunk, von, A., 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. vol. 109, pp. 8812–8819.
30. Daniels, S.E., Walker, G.B., Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental impact assessment review 16 (1996), 71–102.
31. de Vente, J., Reed, M.S., Newig, J., Stringer, L.C., Valente, S., 2016. How do context and design of participatory decision-making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in dryland sites. J. Environ. Manag.
32. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., Shwom, R., Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30 (2005), 335–372.
33. Edwards, D., Collins, T., Goto, R., An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 319–328, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.018.
34. Elwyn, G., Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision- making. Health Expect. 13 (2010), 139–147.
35. Evely, A.C., Pinard, M., Reed, M.S., Fazey, I., High levels of participation in conservation projects enhance learning. Conserv. Lett. 4 (2011), 116–126.
36. Everard, M., Reed, M.S., Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., The ripple effect: institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 230–240, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.001.
37. Fazey, I., Evely, A.C., Reed, M.S., Stringer, L.C., Kruijsen, J.H.J., White, P.C.L., Newsham, A., Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., Phillipson, J., Blackstock, K.L., Entwistle, N., Sheate, W.R., Armstrong, F., Blackmore, C., Fazey, J.A., Ingram, J., Gregson, J., Lowe, P., Morton, S., Trevitt, C., Knowledge Exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environ. Conserv. 40 (2013), 19–36.
38. Fazey, I., Fazey, J.A., Fazey, D., Learning more effectively from experience. Ecol. Soc., 10, 2005.
39. Fazey, I., Kesby, M., Evely, A., Latham, I., Wagatora, D., Hagasua, J.-E., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., 2010. A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands 20, pp. 713–728, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011.
40. Fazey, I., Pettorelli, N., Kenter, J.O., Wagatora, D., Schuett, D., Maladaptive trajectories of change in Makira, Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 21 (2011), 1275–1289.
41. Fish, R., Burgess, J., Chilvers, J., Footitt, A., Haines-Young, R., Russel, D., Turner, K., Winter, D.M., 2011. Participatory and Deliberative Techniques to Embed an Ecosystems Approach into Decision Making: Full Technical Report. DEFRA, London.
42. Fish, R., Winter, M., Oliver, D., Chadwick, D., Hodgson, C., Heathwaite, A., Employing the citizens’ jury technique to elicit reasoned public judgments about environmental risk: insights from an inquiry into the governance of microbial water pollution. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 2013, 1–21.
43. Fish, R., Church, A., Winter, M., Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 208–217, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002.
44. Fish, R., Church, A., Willis, C., Winter, M., Tratalos, J.W., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK Nature Improvement Initiative. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 329–343, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.017.
45. Foster, J., Introduction: environmental value and the scope of economics. Foster, J., (eds.) Valuing nature? Ethics, Economics and the Environment, 1997, Routledge, London.
46. Foucault, M., Gordon, C., Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972/1977. 1980, Harvester Press.
47. Frey, R., Eye juggling: Seeing the world through a looking glass and a glass pane : a workbook for clarifying and interpreting values. 1994, University Press of America, Lanham.
48. Gastil, J., Black, L., Moscovitz, K., Ideology, attitude change, and deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Polit. Commun. 25 (2008), 23–46.
49. Grusec, J.E., Socialization processes in the family: social and emotional development. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2011, 243–269.
50. Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I. Boston: Beacon.
52. Halpern, D., Gibbs, J., Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 (2012), 1159–1168.
53. Holland, A., Are choices tradoffs?. Bromley, D.W., Paavola, J., (eds.) Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy Contested Choices, 2002, Blackwell, Oxford, Malden, MA, 17–34.
54. Howarth, B., Anderson, A.H., Introducing objects in spoken dialogue: the influence of conversational setting and cognitive load on the articulation and use of referring expressions. Lang. Cogn. Process. 82 (2007), 1–16.
55. Irvine, K., O'Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O., Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 184–193, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001.
56. Ison, R., Blackmore, C., Iaquinto, B.L., Towards systemic and adaptive governance: exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecol. Econ. 87 (2013), 34–42.
57. Ives, C.D., Kendal, D., The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 144 (2014), 67–72.
58. Johnson, K.A., Dana, G., Jordan, N.R., Draeger, K.J., Kapuscinski, A., Schmitt Olabisi, L.K., Reich, P.B., Using Participatory Scenarios to Stimulate Social Learning for Collaborative Sustainable Development. Ecology and Society, 17, 2012, 10.5751/ES-04780-170209 art9.
59. Kallis, G., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Zografos, C., To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol. Econ. 94 (2013), 97–105.
60. Karjalainen, T.P., Marttunen, M., Sarkki, S., Rytkönen, A.-M., Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: an analytic–deliberative approach. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 (2013), 54–64.
61. Keen, M., Mahanty, S., Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19:6 (2006), 497–513.
62. Kenter, J.O., Deliberative and non-monetary valuation. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, Abingdon.
63. Kenter, J.O., Integrating deliberative choice experiments, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21, 2016, 291–307, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010.
64. Kenter, J.O., Shared, plural and cultural values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 175–183, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.010.
65. Kenter, J.O., Deliberative monetary valuation. Spash, C.L., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society, 2017, Routledge, Abingdon.
66. Kenter, J.O., Hyde, T., Christie, M., Fazey, I., The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 21 (2011), 505–521, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001.
67. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Everard, M., Irvine, K.N., O'brien, E.A., Molloy, C., Bryce, R., Brady, E., Christie, M., Church, A., Collins, T., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Edwards, D., Evely, A., Fazey, I., Goto, R., Hockley, N., Jobstvogt, N., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M. & Watson, V., 2014a, Shared, Plural and Cultural Values: a Handbook for Decision-Makers. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4683.5281.
68. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, L., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., 2014b. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1275.6565.
69. Kenter, J.O., Fazey, I., 2015. Conservation, culture, kids and cash crops in the Solomon Islands. In: Redpath, S.M., Guitierrez, R.J., Wood, K.A., Young, J.C. (Eds.), Conflicts in Conservation Navigating Towards Solutions. Cambridge, pp. 76–79.
70. Kenter, J.O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.
71. Kenter, J.O., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Irvine, K., Christie, M., Bryce, R., The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 270–290, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006.
72. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Cooper, N., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Raymond, C.M., Tett, P., Watson, V., Shared values and deliberative valuation: key findings and future directions. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 358–371, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006.
73. Kumar, S., Methods for Community Participation. 2002, Practical Action Publishing, Rugby, Warwickshire.
74. Lawson, T., What is this “school” called neoclassical economics?. Camb. J. Econ. 37 (2013), 947–983.
75. Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., Demers-Payette, O., Boivin, A., Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics?. Soc. Sci. Med. 68 (2009), 2002–2009.
76. Liu, S., Proctor, W., Cook, D., Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management. Ecol. Econ. 69:12 (2010), 2374–2382.
77. Liu, S., Sheppard, A., Kriticos, D., Cook, D., Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach. Biol. Invasions 13:10 (2011), 2323–2337.
78. Lo, A.Y., Analysis and democracy: The antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation. Environ Plann C 29 (2011), 958–974.
79. Lo, A.Y., Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecol. Econ. 87 (2013), 84–94.
80. Lo, A.Y., Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. J. Econ. Surv. 27 (2012), 768–789.
81. López-Mosquera, N., Sánchez, M., Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J. Environ. Manag. 113 (2012), 251–262.
82. Maccallum, G.C., Negative and Positive Freedom. Philos. Rev., 76, 1967, 312, 10.2307/2183622.
83. Macmillan, D.C., Philip, L., Hanley, N., Alvarez Farizo, B., Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches. Ecol. Econ. 43 (2002), 49–59.
84. Maio, G.R., Olson, J.M., Values as truisms: evidence and implications. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74 (1998), 294–311, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.294.
85. Mason, K., Participatory action research: coproduction, governance and care. Geogr. Compass 9 (2015), 497–507, 10.1111/gec3.12227.
86. McCrum, G., Blackstock, K., Matthews, K., Rivington, M., Miller, D., Buchan, K., 2009. Adapting to climate change in land management: the role of deliberative workshops in enhancing social learning. In: Collins, K., Ison, R., (Eds.). Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, pp. 413–426.
87. Miller, D., Citizenship and National Identity, 2000, Blackwell Publishers Inc., New York.
88. Morse-Jones, S., Bateman, I.J., Kontoleon, A., Ferrini, S., Burgess, N.D., Turner, R.K., Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: charmisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects. Ninan, K.N., (eds.) Valuing Ecosystem Service: Methodological Issues and Case Studies, 2014, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 109–131.
89. Mummery, J., Rodan, D., The role of blogging in public deliberation and democracy. Discourse Context Media 2 (2013), 22–39.
90. Newig, J., Fritsch, O., 2009. More input – better output: does citizen involvement improve environmental governance? In: Blühdorn, I. (Editor), Search of Legitimacy. Policy Making in Europe and the Challenge of Complexity. Barbara Budrich, Opladen, Farmington Hills, pp. 205–224.
91. Niemeyer, S., Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics. Environmental Politics 13 (2004), 347–372, 10.1080/0964401042000209612.
92. Niemeyer, S., Spash, C.L., Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: a critical appraisal. Environ. Plan. C – Gov. Policy 19 (2001), 567–585.
93. O'Hara, S.U., Stagl, S., Endogenous preferences and sustainable development. J. Socio-Econ. 31, 2002, 511–527, 10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00134-8.
94. O'Neill, J., Markets, Deliberation and Environment. 2007, Routledge, London/New York.
95. O'Neill, J., Holland, A., Light, A., Environmental Values. 2008, Routledge, London.
96. Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Church, A., Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the ecosystems approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 308–318, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005.
97. Parks, S., Gowdy, J., What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst. Serv. 3 (2013), e1–e10.
98. Patel, M., Kok, K., Rothman, D.S., Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24 (2007), 546–561.
99. Pretty, J.N., Alternative systems of inquiry for sustainable agriculture. IDS Bull. 25 (1994), 37–48.
100. Proctor, W., Drechsler, M., 2003. Deliberative multi-criteria evaluation: a case study of recreation and tourism options in Victoria, Australia. In: Proceedings of the Frontiers 2 Conference European Society for Ecological Economics, pp. 11–15.
101. Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Cumming, G., Dapling, T., Lawes, E., Richardson, P., Forming shared values in conservation management: an interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 344–357, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.016.
102. Raymond, C., Kenter, J.O., Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21 (2016), 241–257, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018.
103. Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N.J., Alexander, K.A., Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 145–156.
104. Reed, M., Evely, A.C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I.R.A., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., What is social learning?. Ecol. Soc., 15, 2010 (online).
105. Reed, M.S., Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv 141 (2008), 2417–2431, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
106. Reed, M.S., Evely, A.C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., Stringer, L.C., What is social learning?. Ecol. Soc., 15, 2010, r1.
107. Reed, M.S., Kenter, J., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burt, T.P., Fazey, I.R., Fraser, E.D.G., Hubacek, K., Nainggolan, D., Quinn, C.H., Stringer, L.C., Ravera, F., Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J. Environ. Manag. 128 (2013), 345–362, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016.
108. Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., 2015. Valuing the Dark Peak: A Deliberative Approach to Payments for Peatland Ecosystem Services. Moors for the Future/Peak District National Park, Edale, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3399.1200/1.
109. Reed, M.S., Allen, K., Attlee, A., Dougill, A.J., Evans, K., Kenter, J.O., Hoy, J., McNab, D., Stead, S., Twyman, C., Scott, A., Smyth, M., Stringer, L.C., Whittingham, M., A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang., 2017 (In press).
110. Rist, S., Delgado Burgoa, F., Wiesmann, U., The role of social learning processes in the emergence and development of Aymara land use systems. Mt. Res. Dev. 23 (2003), 263–270.
111. Rodela, R., Advancing the deliberative turn in natural resource management: an analysis of discourses on the use of local resources. J. Environ. Manag. 96 (2012), 26–34.
112. Rokeach, M., The nature of human values. 1973, Free Press, New York.
113. Russel, D., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Bond, A., Sheate, W. & Adelle, C., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 9: Embedding an Ecosystem Services Framework in Appraisal: Key Barriers and Enablers. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
114. Sabari, J.S., Professional socialization: implications for occupational therapy education. Am. J. Occup. Ther.: Off. Publ. Am. Occup. Ther.Assoc. 39 (1985), 96–102.
115. Sagoff, M., Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecol. Econ. 24 (1998), 213–230.
116. Satterfield, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., Chan, K.M., Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 117 (2013), 103–114.
117. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W., Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human-Values., 53, 1987, 550–562, 10.1016/j.mpaic.2007.01.01.
118. Schwartz, S.H., Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25 (1992), 1–65.
119. Schwartz, S.H., A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Appl. Psychol. 48 (1999), 23–47.
120. Scott, B.E., Irvine, K., Byg, A., Gubbins, M., Kafas, A., Kenter, J., MacDonald, A., O'Hara Murray, R., Potts, T., Slater, AM., Tweddle, J., Wright, K., Davies, I., 2016. Cooperative Participatory Evaluation of Renewable Technologies on Ecosystem Services (Corporates). Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science 7 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.7489/1681-1.
121. Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M., Role of socialization in explaining social inequalities in health. Soc. Sci. Med. 60 (2005), 2129–2133.
122. Shriver, D., Randhir, T.O., Integrating stakeholder values with multiple attributes to quantify watershed performance. Water Resour. Res. 42 (2006), 1–15.
123. Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 63 (2007), 690–699.
124. Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Econ. 84 (2008), 469–488.
125. Spash, C.L., Aslaksen, I., Re-establishing an ecological discourse in the policy debate over how to value ecosystems and biodiversity. J. Environ. Manag. 159 (2015), 245–253.
126. Stern, P.C., New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56 (2000), 407–424.
127. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnanon, G.A., Kalof, L., A Social Psychological Theory of Support for Social Movements: the Case of Environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6 (1999), 81–97.
128. Steyaert, P., Barzman, M., Billaud, J.P., Brives, H., Hubert, B., Ollivier, G., Roche, B., The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environ. Sci. Policy 10 (2007), 537–550.
129. Turnpenny, J., Russel, D., Jordan, A., The challenge of embedding an ecosystem services approach: patterns of knowledge utilisation in public policy appraisal. Environ. Plan. C – Gov. Policy 32 (2014), 247–262.
130. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
131. Urama, K.C., Hodge, I., Participatory environmental education and willingness to pay for river basin management: empirical evidence from Nigeria. Land Econ. 82 (2006), 542–561.
132. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2207–2215.
133. Völker, M., Lienhoop, N., Exploring group dynamics in deliberative choice experiments. Ecol. Econ. 123 (2016), 57–67, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.006.
134. Wilson, M.A., Howarth, R.B., Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol. Econ. 41 (2002), 431–443.
135. Wright, G., Rowe, G., Group-based judgmental forecasting: an integration of extant knowledge and the development of priorities for a new research agenda. Int. J. Forecast. 27 (2011), 1–13.
136. Zografos, C., Howarth, R.B., Deliberative ecological economics for for sustainability governance. Sustainability 2010 (2010), 3399–3417.