Spatially-Resolved Proteomics: Rapid Quantitative Analysis of Laser Capture Microdissected Alveolar Tissue Samples

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Clair, Geremy ^a   Piehowski, Paul D ^a   Nicola, Teodora ^b   Kitzmiller, Joseph A ^c   Huang, Eric L ^a   Zink, Erika M ^a   Sontag, Ryan L ^a   Orton, Daniel J ^a   Moore, Ronald J ^a   Carson, James P ^d   Smith, Richard D ^a   Whitsett, Jeffrey A ^c   Corley, Richard A ^a   Ambalavanan, Namasivayam ^b   Ansong, Charles ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham and Children's Hospital   (United States)

^c CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ANIMAL; AUTOMATION; C57BL MOUSE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LASER CAPTURE MICRODISSECTION; LUNG; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NEWBORN; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; AUTOMATION; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; LASER CAPTURE MICRODISSECTION; LUNG; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 85006913826     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep39223     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Larance, M. & Lamond, A. I. Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 269-280 (2015)
2. Datta, S. et al. Laser capture microdissection: Big data from small samples. Histol. Histopathol. 30, 1255-69 (2015)
3. Longuesp R. et al. Tissue proteomics for the next decade? Towards a molecular dimension in histology. OMICS 18, 539-52 (2014)
4. Heeren, R. M. A., Smith, D. F., Stauber, J., Krer-Kaletas, B. & MacAleese, L. Imaging mass spectrometry: hype or hope? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1006-14 (2009)
5. Lanekoff, I., Stevens, S. L., Stenzel-Poore, M. P. & Laskin, J. Matrix effects in biological mass spectrometry imaging: identification and compensation. Analyst 139, 3528-32 (2014)
6. Scheltema, R. A. et al. The Q Exactive HF, a Benchtop mass spectrometer with a pre-filter, high-performance quadrupole and an ultra-high-field Orbitrap analyzer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 3698-708 (2014)
7. Eckhard, U., Marino, G., Butler, G. S. & Overall, C. M. Positional proteomics in the era of the human proteome project on the doorstep of precision medicine. Biochimie 122, 110-8 (2016)
8. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteomewide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367-72 (2008)
9. Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513-26 (2014)
10. Altelaar, A. F. M. & Heck, A. J. R. Trends in ultrasensitive proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 16, 206-13 (2012)
11. Kulak, N. A., Pichler, G., Paron, I., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copynumber estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods 11, 319-24 (2014)
12. Waanders, L. F. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of single pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 18902-7 (2009)
13. Liu, N. Q. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of microdissected breast cancer tissues: comparison of label-free and SILAC-based quantification with shotgun, directed, and targeted MS approaches. J. Proteome Res. 12, 4627-41 (2013)
14. Bark, S. J. & Hook, V. Differential recovery of peptides from sample tubes and the reproducibility of quantitative proteomic data. J. Proteome Res. 6, 4511-6 (2007)
15. Gutstein, H. B., Morris, J. S., Annangudi, S. P. & Sweedler, J. V. Microproteomics: analysis of protein diversity in small samples. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 27, 316-30 (2008)
16. Hughes, C. S. et al. Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 757 (2014)
17. Wiśniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359-62 (2009)
18. Nel, A. J. M., Garnett, S., Blackburn, J. M. & Soares, N. C. Comparative reevaluation of FASP and enhanced FASP methods by LCMS/ MS. J. Proteome Res. 14, 1637-42 (2015)
19. An, B., Zhang, M., Johnson, R. W. & Qu, J. Surfactant-aided precipitation/on-pellet-digestion (SOD) procedure provides robust and rapid sample preparation for reproducible, accurate and sensitive LC/MS quantification of therapeutic protein in plasma and tissues. Anal. Chem. 87, 4023-9 (2015)
20. Liebler, D. C. & Ham, A.-J. L. Spin filter-based sample preparation for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods 6, 785; author reply 785-6 (2009)
21. Girelli, A. M. & Mattei, E. Application of immobilized enzyme reactor in on-line high performance liquid chromatography: a review. J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 819, 3-16 (2005)
22. Yamaguchi, H. & Miyazaki, M. Enzyme-immobilized reactors for rapid and efficient sample preparation in MS-based proteomic studies. Proteomics 13, 457-66 (2013)
23. Hustoft, H. K. et al. Open tubular lab-on-column/mass spectrometry for targeted proteomics of nanogram sample amounts. PLoS One 9, e106881 (2014)
24. Sun, L., Zhu, G. & Dovichi, N. J. Integrated capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry system with an immobilized trypsin microreactor for online digestion and analysis of picogram amounts of RAW 264.7 cell lysate. Anal. Chem. 85, 4187-94 (2013)
25. Shen, Y. et al. High-efficiency nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled on-line with mass spectrometry using nanoelectrospray ionization for proteomics. Anal. Chem. 74, 4235-49 (2002)
26. Luo, Q. et al. More sensitive and quantitative proteomic measurements using very low flow rate porous silica monolithic LC columns with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 5, 1091-7 (2006)
27. Huang, E. L. et al. SNaPP: Simplified Nano-Proteomics Platform for reproducible global proteomic analysis of nanogram protein quantities. Endocrinology en20151821, doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1821 (2016)
28. Warburton, D. et al. Lung organogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 90, 73-158 (2010)
29. Chinoy, M. R. Lung growth and development. Front. Biosci. 8, d392-415 (2003)
30. Bhattacharya, S. & Mariani, T. J. Systems biology approaches to identify developmental bases for lung diseases. Pediatr. Res. 73, 514-22 (2013)
31. Xu, Y. et al. Transcriptional programs controlling perinatal lung maturation. PLoS One 7, e37046 (2012)
32. Cox, B. et al. Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of mouse lung development and Nmyc target genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 109 (2007)
33. Crosetto, N., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 57-66 (2014)
34. Piehowski, P. D. et al. Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2128-37 (2013)
35. Wiśniewski, J. R., Ostasiewicz, P. & Mann, M. High recovery FASP applied to the proteomic analysis of microdissected formalin fixed paraffin embedded cancer tissues retrieves known colon cancer markers. J. Proteome Res. 10, 3040-9 (2011)
36. Whitsett, J. A. The molecular era of surfactant biology. Neonatology 105, 337-43 (2014)
37. Mund, S. I., Stampanoni, M. & Schittny, J. C. Developmental alveolarization of the mouse lung. Dev. Dyn. 237, 2108-16 (2008)
38. Mariani, T. J., Reed, J. J. & Shapiro, S. D. Expression profiling of the developing mouse lung: insights into the establishment of the extracellular matrix. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 26, 541-8 (2002)
39. Kho, A. T. et al. Age, Sexual Dimorphism and Disease Associations in the Developing Human Fetal Lung Transcriptome. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0326OC (2015)
40. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009)
41. Liu, D. et al. Proteomic analysis of lung tissue in a rat acute lung injury model: identification of PRDX1 as a promoter of inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2014, 469358 (2014)
42. Barabutis, N., Siejka, A. & Schally, A. V. Effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone and its agonistic and antagonistic analogs in cancer and non-cancerous cell lines. Int. J. Oncol. 36, 1285-9 (2010)
43. Shu, W. et al. Foxp2 and Foxp1 cooperatively regulate lung and esophagus development. Development 134, 1991-2000 (2007)
44. Li, S., Weidenfeld, J. & Morrisey, E. E. Transcriptional and DNA binding activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 809-22 (2004)
45. Rock, J. R. et al. Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, E1475-83 (2011)
46. Beyea, J. A. et al. Growth hormone (GH) receptor knockout mice reveal actions of GH in lung development. Proteomics 6, 341-8 (2006)
47. Park, K.-S. & Gumbiner, B. M. Cadherin-6B stimulates an epithelial mesenchymal transition and the delamination of cells from the neural ectoderm via LIMK/cofilin mediated non-canonical BMP receptor signaling. Dev. Biol. 366, 232-43 (2012)
48. Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178-96 (2014)
49. Bartis, D., Mise, N., Mahida, R. Y., Eickelberg, O. & Thickett, D. R. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in lung development and disease: does it exist and is it important? Thorax 69, 760-5 (2014)
50. Smaczniak, C. et al. Proteomics-based identification of low-abundance signaling and regulatory protein complexes in native plant tissues. Nat. Protoc. 7, 2144-2158 (2012)
51. Maeda, Y., Dav V. & Whitsett, J. A. Transcriptional control of lung morphogenesis. Physiol. Rev. 87, 219-44 (2007)
52. Song, J. S. et al. Inhibitory effect of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) on the TGF-β -induced alveolar epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Exp. Mol. Med. 43, 517-24 (2011)
53. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371-375 (2014)
54. Brett, J. et al. Survey of the distribution of a newly characterized receptor for advanced glycation end products in tissues. Am. J. Pathol. 143, 1699-712 (1993)
55. Watanabe-Takano, H. et al. DA-Raf-dependent inhibition of the Ras-ERK signaling pathway in type 2 alveolar epithelial cells controls alveolar formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, E2291-300 (2014)
56. Alejandre-Alcar, M. A. et al. TGF-beta signaling is dynamically regulated during the alveolarization of rodent and human lungs. Dev. Dyn. 237, 259-69 (2008)
57. Jain, R. et al. Plasticity of Hopx(+ ) type I alveolar cells to regenerate type II cells in the lung. Nat. Commun. 6, 6727 (2015)
58. Bridges, J. P. et al. Orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR116 regulates pulmonary surfactant pool size. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 49, 348-57 (2013)
59. Fukuzawa, T. et al. Lung surfactant levels are regulated by Ig-Hepta/GPR116 by monitoring surfactant protein D. PLoS One 8, e69451 (2013)
60. Niaudet, C. et al. Gpr116 Receptor Regulates Distinctive Functions in Pneumocytes and Vascular Endothelium. PLoS One 10, e0137949 (2015)
61. Bling, F. et al. Gene targeting of the cysteine peptidase cathepsin H impairs lung surfactant in mice. PLoS One 6, e26247 (2011)
62. Woischnik, M. et al. Cathepsin H and napsin A are active in the alveoli and increased in alveolar proteinosis. Eur. Respir. J. 31, 1197-204 (2008)
63. Ruppert, C. et al. Liver carboxylesterase cleaves surfactant protein (SP-) B and promotes surfactant subtype conversion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348, 1449-54 (2006)
64. Khoor, A., Stahlman, M. T., Gray, M. E. & Whitsett, J. A. Temporal-spatial distribution of SP-B and SP-C proteins and mRNAs in developing respiratory epithelium of human lung. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 42, 1187-99 (1994)
65. Kishore, U. et al. Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors. Mol. Immunol. 43, 1293-315 (2006)
66. Dakhlallah, D. et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-17∼92 contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 187, 397-405 (2013)
67. Benlhabib, H. & Mendelson, C. R. Epigenetic regulation of surfactant protein A gene (SP-A) expression in fetal lung reveals a critical role for Suv39h methyltransferases during development and hypoxia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 1949-58 (2011)
68. Herriges, M. & Morrisey, E. E. Lung development: orchestrating the generation and regeneration of a complex organ. Development 141, 502-13 (2014)
69. Catez, F. et al. Network of dynamic interactions between histone H1 and high-mobility-group proteins in chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 4321-8 (2004)
70. Furlan-Margaril, M. & Recillas-Targa, F. In Topics in Animal and Plant Development: From Cell Differentiation to Morphogenesis (ed. Chimal-Monroy, J.) 221-247 at https://issuu.com/researchsignpost/docs/chimal-monroy-e--book (2011)
71. Maiolica, A., Borsotti, D. & Rappsilber, J. Self-made frits for nanoscale columns in proteomics. Proteomics 5, 3847-3850 (2005)
72. Kelly, R. T. et al. Chemically Etched Open Tubular and Monolithic Emitters for Nanoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 7796-7801 (2006)