The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of Reading Difficulties

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 34-48

  Chevalier, Thérèse M ^a   Parrila, Rauno ^b   Ritchie, Krista C ^c   Deacon, S Hélène ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c IWK HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

learning and study strategies; metacognitive reading strategies; reading difficulties

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METACOGNITION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; READING; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; METACOGNITION; READING; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85006014954     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219415588850     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allison D. B., Primavera B. S., Louis H., (1993). Some of the most common questions asked of statistical consultants: Our favorite responses and recommended readings. Journal of Group Psychotherapy Psychodrama & Sociometry, 46(3), 83–109.
2. Alster E. H., (1997). The effects of extended time on algebra test scores for college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 222–227. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000210
3. Borkowski J., Estrada M., Milstead M., Hale C., (1989). General problem-solving skills: Relations between metacognition and strategic processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(1), 57–70. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1510252
4. Butler D., (1995). Promoting strategic learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(3), 170–190. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/002221949502800306
5. Cano F., (2006). An in-depth analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 1023–1038. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406288167
6. Corkett J., Hein S., Parrila R., (2008). Compensating for reading difficulties: A qualitative investigation of university students’ experiences of influential personal characteristics. Exceptionality Education Canada, 18(2), 51–68. Retrieved from https://faculty.nipissingu.ca/juliec/sep/EDUC_4104_Webpage_2009/My_Research_files/personalcharacteristics.pdf
7. Corkett J., Parrila R., Hein S. F., (2006). Learning and study strategies of university students who report a significant history of reading difficulties. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 34(1/2), 57–80.
8. Cromley J. G., Azevedo R., (2007a). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 229–247. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5
9. Cromley J. G., Azevedo R., (2007b). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
10. Cromley J. G., Azevedo R., (2011). Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 155–177. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9070-z
11. Cromley J. G., Snyder-Hogan L. E., Luciw-Dubas U. A., (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
12. Deacon S., Cook K., Parrila R., (2012). Identifying high-functioning dyslexics: Is self-report of early reading problems enough? Annals of Dyslexia, 62(2), 120–134. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0068-2
13. Deacon S., Parrila R., Kirby J., (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 103–128. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0005-3
14. Evans C. J., Kirby J. R., Fabrigar L. R., (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 507–528. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322591217
15. Finucci J., Whitehouse C., Isaacs S., Childs B., (1984). Derivation and validation of a quantitative definition of specific reading disability for adults. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 26, 143–153. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04425.x/abstract
16. Flavell J. H., (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
17. Gallagher A., Laxon V., Armstrong E., Frith U., (1996). Phonological difficulties in high-functioning dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 8, 499–509. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00577025
18. Garcia T., Pintrich P. R., (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 477–486.
19. Harvey V., (1995). Teaching study skills. In Thomas A., Grimes J., (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 931–942). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
20. Heiman T., Precel K., (2003). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Academic strategies profile. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 248–258. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15515645
21. Henderson C., (1999). College freshman with disabilities, 1999: A biennial statistical profile. Statistical year 1998. Washington, DC: HEATH Resource Center, American Council on Education, One Dupont Circle.
22. Kemp N., Parrila R., Kirby J., (2009). Phonological and orthographic spelling in high-functioning adult dyslexics. Dyslexia, 128(2), 105–128. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1002/dys
23. Kern C. C. W., Fagley N. S. N., Miller P. P. M., (1998). Correlates of college retention and GPA: Learning and study strategies, testwiseness, attitudes, and ACT. Journal of College Counseling, 1, 26–34. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2161-1882.1998.tb00121.x/abstract
24. Kirby J. R., Silvestri R., Allingham B. H., Parrila R., La Fave C. B., (2008). Learning strategies and study approaches of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 85–96. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407311040
25. Kovach K., Wilgosh L., (1999). Learning and study strategies and performance anxiety in postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A preliminary study. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(1), 47–57.
26. Lawson L., (2009). The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory as a predictive measure of 1st semester academic performance of at-risk students. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations, Paper 3223. Retrieved from http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/3223/
27. Lefly D., Pennington B., (1991). Spelling errors and reading fluency in compensated adult dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 141–162. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02648083
28. Lefly D., Pennington B., (2000). Reliability and validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 286–296. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300306
29. Leutner D., Leopold C., den Elzen-Rump V., (2007). Self-regulated learning with a text-highlighting strategy. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(3), 174–182. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.174
30. Lewis L., Farris E., Greene B., (1999). An institutional perspective on students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
31. Marrs H., Sigler E., Hayes K., (2009). Study strategy predictors of performance in introductory psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(2), 125–133. Retrieved from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Journal-Instructional-Psychology/204682053.html
32. McKean E., (Ed.). (2005). New Oxford American dictionary (2nd ed., p. 2096). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Olaussen B., Bråten I., (1998). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) in Norwegian college students. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(1), 82–96. Retrieved from http://heldref-publications.metapress.com/index/088555184162t957.pdf
34. Olejnik S., Nist S., (1992). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Journal of Experimental Educational, 60(2), 151–159. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20152322
35. Olson J., Platt J., Dieker L., (2008). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
36. Parrila R., Georgiou G., Corkett J., (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated? Exceptionality Education Canada, 17(2), 195–220.
37. Pintrich P. R., Groot E. V.De. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
38. Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., MacCallum R. C., Nicewander W. A., (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178–192. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178
39. Pressley M., (2000). Comprehension instruction in elementary school: A quarter-century of research progress. In Taylor B., Graves M. F., van den Broek P., (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 32–51). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40. Pressley M., Brown R., El-Dinary P., Allferbach P., (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 41(4), 215–224.
41. Prevatt F., Petscher Y., Proctor B. E., Hurst A., Adams K., (2006). The revised Learning and Study Strategies Inventory: An evaluation of competing models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 448–458. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282454
42. Proctor B. E., Prevatt F. F., Adams K., Hurst A., Petscher Y., (2006). Study skills profiles of normal-achieving and academically-struggling college students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 37–51. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0011
43. Reis S. M., McGuire J. M., Neu T. W., (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(2), 123–134. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400205
44. Ruban L., McCoach D., McGuire M., Reis S., (2003). The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 270–286. Retrieved from http://ldx.sagepub.com/content/36/3/270.short
45. Sanford C., Newman L., Wagner M., Cameto R., Knokey A., Shaver D., (2011). The post–high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school. Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED524044
46. Sarver M., (2000). A study of the relationship between personal and environmental factors bearing on self-determination and the academic success of university students with learning disabilities. Gainesville: University of Florida.
47. Tabachnik B. G., Fidell L. S., (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
48. Taraban R., Kerr M., Rynearson K., (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–81. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435547
49. Taraban R., Rynearson K., Kerr M., (2000). College students’ academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 283–308. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/027027100750061930
50. Trainin G., Swanson H., (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(4), 261–272. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4126965
51. Vogel S. A., Adelman P. B., (1992). The success of college students with learning disabilities: Factors related to educational attainment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(7), 430–441. Retrieved from http://ldx.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/002221949202500703
52. Wade S., Trathen W., Schraw G., (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 147–166. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/747599
53. Weinstein C., (1987). LASSI user’s manual. Clearwater, FL: H & H.
54. Weinstein C., Hume L., (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55. Weinstein C., Palmer D., (2002). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): Users manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H.