The revised learning and study strategies inventory: An evaluation of competing models

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 448-458

  Prevatt, Frances ^a,b   Petscher, Yaacov ^a   Proctor, Briley E ^a   Hurst, Abigail ^a   Adams, Katharine ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

College students; Factor analysis; LASSI; Learning strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646531424     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: 15523888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282454     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117.
2. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 325-344.
3. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
4. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51 [Computer software]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International.
5. Ley, K. L., & Young, D. B. (1998). Motivation in developmental and regular admission college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 14, 29-38.
6. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Melancon, J. G. (2002). Reliability, structure, and correlates of learning and study strategies inventory scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 1020-1027.
8. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version with Singaporean females: Examining psychometric properties. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 493-511.
9. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Olaussen, B. S., & Braten, I. (1998). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory(LASSI) in Norwegian college students. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 82-96.
11. Olejnik, S., & Nist, S. L. (1992). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 151-159.
12. Olivarez, A., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1994). Psychometric properties of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 243-257.
13. Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Psychometric properties and item-keying direction effects for the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version with Norwegian students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 430-445.
14. Tate, R. (1998). An introduction to modeling outcomes in the behavioral and social sciences (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Burgess International Group.
15. Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): User's manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
16. Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A. C., & Palmer, D. P. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
17. Yip, M. C., & Chung, O. L. (2002). Relation of study strategies to the academic performance of Hong Kong University students. Psychological Reports, 90, 338-340.