Outcome Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 653-665.e1

  Lange, Toni ^a   Rataj, Elisabeth ^a   Kopkow, Christian ^a   Lützner, Jörg ^a   Günther, Klaus Peter ^a   Schmitt, Jochen ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

core outcome set; knee; measurement instrument; OMERACT; osteoarthritis

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; KNEE REPLACEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85005949787     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.014     Document Type: Review

References (144)

1. 1 Moskowitz, R.W., The burden of osteoarthritis: clinical and quality-of-life issues. Am J Manag Care, 15(8 Suppl), 2009, S223.
2. 2 Cross, M., Smith, E., Hoy, D., et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis, 73(7), 2014, 1323.
3. 3 Dowsey, M.M., Spelman, T., Choong, P.F., Development of a prognostic nomogram for predicting the probability of nonresponse to total knee arthroplasty 1 year after surgery. J Arthroplasty, 31(8), 2016, 1654.
4. 4 Haase, E., Lange, T., Lützner, J., et al. Indikation zur endoprothetischen Versorgung des Kniegelenks–ein Evidence Mapping. Zeitschrift für Evidenz. Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 109(8), 2015, 605.
5. 5 Bellamy, N., Kirwan, J., Boers, M., et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol, 24(4), 1997, 799.
6. 6 Boers, M., Kirwan, J.R., Wells, G., et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol, 67(7), 2014, 745.
7. 7 Clarke, M., Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials, 8, 2007, 39.
8. 8 Deckert, S., Kaiser, U., Kopkow, C., et al. A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. Eur J Pain, 20(1), 2016, 51.
9. 9 Gargon, E., Gurung, B., Medley, N., et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One, 9(6), 2014, e99111.
10. 10 Gargon, E., Williamson, P.R., Altman, D.G., et al. The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014). Trials, 16, 2015, 515.
11. 11 Kirkham, J.J., Gorst, S., Altman, D.G., et al. COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol). Trials, 16, 2015, 373.
12. 12 Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Green, S.E., et al. Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol, 68(11), 2015, 1270.
13. 13 Tugwell, P., Boers, M., Brooks, P., et al. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials, 8, 2007, 38.
14. 14 Tugwell, P., Knottnerus, J.A., Whither core outcome sets?. J Clin Epidemiol, 67(7), 2014, 731.
15. 15 Williamson, P., Altman, D., Blazeby, J., et al. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes. J Health Serv Res Policy, 17(1), 2012, 1.
16. 16 Williamson, P.R., Altman, D.G., Blazeby, J.M., et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials, 13, 2012, 132.
17. 17 Schmitt, J., Apfelbacher, C., Spuls, P.I., et al. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol, 135(1), 2015, 24.
18. 18 Mokkink, L.B., Terwee, C.B., Patrick, D.L., et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 63(7), 2010, 737.
19. 19 Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med, 6(7), 2009, e1000100.
20. 20 Cohen, J.A., Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas, 20(1), 1960, 37.
21. 21 Byrt, T., Bishop, J., Carlin, J.B., Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol, 46(5), 1993, 423.
22. 22 de Vet, H.C., Mokkink, L.B., Terwee, C.B., et al. Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's kappa. BMJ, 346, 2013, f2125.
23. 23 Looney, S.W., Hagan, J.L., 4 statistical methods for assessing biomarkers and analyzing biomarker data. Rao, C.R., Miller, J., Rao, D.C., (eds.) Handbook of statistics, 2007, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 109.
24. 24 Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 1977, 159.
25. 25 Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration www.handbook.cochrane.org.
26. 26 Dechartres, A., Altman, D.G., Trinquart, L., et al. Association between analytic strategy and estimates of treatment outcomes in meta-analyses. JAMA, 312(6), 2014, 623.
27. 27 Singh, J.A., Lewallen, D.G., Patient-level improvements in pain and activities of daily living after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford), 53(2), 2014, 313.
28. 28 Adam, R., Orban, C., Orban, H., Comparative study of design and PCL-substituting systems of total knee prosthesis. Chirurgia (Bucur), 109(1), 2014, 99.
29. 29 Aggarwal, A.K., Agrawal, A., Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study. J Arthroplasty, 28(10), 2013, 1712.
30. 30 Alentorn-Geli, E., Leal-Blanquet, J., Guirro, P., et al. Comparison of quality of life between elderly patients undergoing TKA. Orthopedics, 36(4), 2013, e415.
31. 31 Anania, A., Abdel, M.P., Lee, Y.Y., et al. The natural history of a newly developed flexion contracture following primary total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 37(10), 2013, 1917.
32. 32 Ang, C.L., Fook, S., Chia, S.L., et al. Unconstrained arthroplasty in type II valgus knees: posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), 2014, 666.
33. 33 Apold, H., Meyer, H.E., Nordsletten, L., et al. Weight gain and the risk of knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis: a population based, prospective cohort study of 225,908 individuals. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 22(5), 2014, 652.
34. 34 Arsoy, D., Pagnano, M.W., Lewallen, D.G., et al. Aseptic tibial debonding as a cause of early failure in a modern total knee arthroplasty design. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 2013, 94.
35. 35 Aveline, C., Roux, A.L., Hetet, H.L., et al. Pain and recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a 12-month follow-up after a prospective randomized study evaluating Nefopam and Ketamine for early rehabilitation. Clin J Pain, 30(9), 2014, 749.
36. 36 Babazadeh, S., Dowsey, M.M., Stoney, J.D., et al. Gap balancing sacrifices joint-line maintenance to improve gap symmetry: a randomized controlled trial comparing gap balancing and measured resection. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 950.
37. 37 Baker, P.N., Petheram, T., Dowen, D., et al. Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty–functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing. J Arthroplasty, 29(2), 2014, 314.
38. 38 Berend, M.E., Ritter, M.A., Keating, E.M., et al. Use of screws and cement in primary TKA with up to 20 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 29(6), 2014, 1207.
39. 39 Bistolfi, A., Lee, G.C., Deledda, D., et al. NexGen(R) LPS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(8), 2014, 1786.
40. 40 Bistolfi, A., Massazza, G., Lee, G.C., et al. Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95(12), 2013, e83.
41. 41 Biswas, D., Van Thiel, G.S., Wetters, N.G., et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years old: minimum of two years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 29(1), 2014, 101.
42. 42 Blakeney, W.G., Khan, R.J., Palmer, J.L., Functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial comparing computer-assisted surgery with conventional techniques. Knee, 21(2), 2014, 364.
43. 43 Blum, M.A., Singh, J.A., Lee, G.C., et al. Patient race and surgical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of a large regional database. Arthritis Care Res, 65(3), 2013, 414.
44. 44 Bohm, E., Zhu, N., Gu, J., et al. Does adding antibiotics to cement reduce the need for early revision in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(1), 2014, 162.
45. 45 Bolognesi, M.P., Watters, T.S., Attarian, D.E., et al. Simultaneous vs staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty among Medicare beneficiaries, 2000-2009. J Arthroplasty, 28(8 Suppl), 2013, 87.
46. 46 Breeman, S., Campbell, M.K., Dakin, H., et al., KAT Trail Group. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 95-B(4), 2013, 486.
47. 47 Breugem, S.J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., et al. No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), 2014, 509.
48. 48 Callaghan, J.J., Beckert, M.W., Hennessy, D.W., et al. Durability of a cruciate-retaining TKA with modular tibial trays at 20 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 2013, 109.
49. 49 Campbell, A.L., Patrick, D.A. Jr., Liabaud, B., et al. Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 966.
50. 50 Chang, C.B., Park, K.W., Kang, Y.G., et al. Coexisting lumbar spondylosis in patients undergoing TKA: how common and how serious?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(2), 2014, 710.
51. 51 Chang, M.J., Kim, S.H., Kang, Y.G., et al. Activity levels and participation in physical activities by Korean patients following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15(1), 2014, 240.
52. 52 Chareancholvanich, K., Pornrattanamaneewong, C., Does the length of incision in the quadriceps affect the recovery of strength after total knee replacement? a prospective randomised clinical trial. Bone Joint J, 96 B(7), 2014, 902.
53. 53 Chen, J.Y., Lo, N.N., Jiang, L., et al. Simultaneous versus staged bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 95-B(6), 2013, 788.
54. 54 Clement, N.D., Jenkins, P.J., MacDonald, D., et al. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford Knee Score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 95-B(1), 2013, 52.
55. 55 Clement, N.D., Macdonald, D., Burnett, R., Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford Knee Score: where do we draw the line?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 133(5), 2013, 689.
56. 56 Clement, N.D., MacDonald, D., Burnett, R., Primary total knee replacement in patients with mental disability improves their mental health and knee function: a prospective study. Bone Joint J, 95-B(3), 2013, 360.
57. 57 Clement, N.D., MacDonald, D., Burnett, R., et al. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford Knee Score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction. Knee, 20(6), 2013, 437.
58. 58 Clement, N.D., MacDonald, D., Simpson, A.H., et al. Total knee replacement in patients with concomitant back pain results in a worse functional outcome and a lower rate of satisfaction. Bone Joint J, 95-B(12), 2013, 1632.
59. 59 Clement, N.D., MacDonald, D., Simpson, A.H., The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford Knee Score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(8), 2014, 1933.
60. 60 Colbert, C.J., Almagor, O., Chmiel, J.S., et al. Excess body weight and four-year function outcomes: comparison of African Americans and whites in a prospective study of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res, 65(1), 2013, 5.
61. 61 De Carvalho, B.R., Yassaie, O.S., Muir, D.C., Modular versus all-polyethylene tibial components: comparison of pre- and early post-operative patient scores in total knee replacement. ANZ J Surg, 83(10), 2013, 784.
62. 62 Dempsey, K.E., Collins, J.E., Ghazinouri, R., et al. Associations between preoperative functional status and functional outcomes of total joint replacement in the Dominican Republic. Rheumatology (Oxford), 52(10), 2013, 1802.
63. 63 Dennis, D.A., Heekin, R.D., Clark, C.R., et al. Effect of implant design on knee flexion. J Arthroplasty, 28(3), 2013, 429.
64. 64 Dixon, S., Blom, A.W., Whitehouse, M.R., et al. Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon((R)) and Kinemax Plus prostheses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 96(1), 2014, 61.
65. 65 Dossett, H.G., Estrada, N.A., Swartz, G.J., et al. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J, 96-B(7), 2014, 907.
66. 66 Dowsey, M.M., Nikpour, M., Choong, P.F., Outcomes following large joint arthroplasty: does socio-economic status matter?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15(1), 2014, 148.
67. 67 Duivenvoorden, T., Vissers, M.M., Verhaar, J.A., et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 21(12), 2013, 1834.
68. 68 Dy, C.J., Marx, R.G., Bozic, K.J., et al. Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(4), 2014, 1198.
69. 69 Ee, G., Pang, H.N., Chong, H.C., et al. Computer navigation is a useful intra-operative tool for joint line measurement in total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 20(4), 2013, 256.
70. 70 Ejaz, A., Laursen, A.C., Kappel, A., et al. Faster recovery without the use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 85(4), 2014, 422.
71. 71 Escobar, A., Garcia Perez, L., Herrera-Espineira, C., et al. Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 21(12), 2013, 2006.
72. 72 Ferguson, K.B., Bailey, O., Anthony, I., et al. A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design–outcomes at two year follow-up. Knee, 21(1), 2014, 151.
73. 73 Fernandez-Fairen, M., Hernandez-Vaquero, D., Murcia, A., et al. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(11), 2013, 3543.
74. 74 Fischer, M., von Eisenhart-Rothe, R., Simank, H.G., Comparable short-term results seen with standard and high-flexion knee arthroplasty designs in European patients. J Orthop, 10(3), 2013, 119.
75. 75 Geijsen, G.J., Heesterbeek, P.J., van Stralen, G., et al. Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), 2014, 550.
76. 76 Giesinger, K., Hamilton, D.F., Jost, B., et al. Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 22(2), 2014, 184.
77. 77 Gothesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L.I., et al. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-B(5), 2014, 609.
78. 78 Guild, G.N. 3rd, Labib, S.A., Clinical outcomes in high flexion total knee arthroplasty were not superior to standard posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty, 29(3), 2014, 530.
79. 79 Hakki, S., Saleh, K.J., Potty, A.G., et al. Columbus navigated TKA system: clinical and radiological results at a minimum of 5 years with survivorship analysis. Orthopedics, 36(3), 2013, e308.
80. 80 Hamilton, D.F., Simpson, A.H., Burnett, R., et al. Lengthening the moment arm of the patella confers enhanced extensor mechanism power following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res, 31(8), 2013, 1201.
81. 81 Hamilton, D.F., Lane, J.V., Gaston, P., et al. Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question: the net promoter score. Bone Joint J, 96-B(5), 2014, 622.
82. 82 Hanusch, B.C., O'Connor, D.B., Ions, P., et al. Effects of psychological distress and perceptions of illness on recovery from total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 96-B(2), 2014, 210.
83. 83 Harwin, S.F., Issa, K., Given, K., et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of primary TKA with a single-radius design. Orthopedics, 36(7), 2013, e877.
84. 84 Hawker, G.A., Badley, E.M., Borkhoff, C.M., et al. Which patients are most likely to benefit from total joint arthroplasty?. Arthritis Rheum, 65(5), 2013, 1243.
85. 85 Hinarejos, P., Guirro, P., Leal, J., et al. The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded cement in total knee arthroplasty does not reduce the incidence of infection: a prospective randomized study in 3000 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95(9), 2013, 769.
86. 86 Hirschmann, M.T., Testa, E., Amsler, F., et al. The unhappy total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patient: higher WOMAC and lower KSS in depressed patients prior and after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21(10), 2013, 2405.
87. 87 Holland, P., Santini, A.J., Davidson, J.S., et al. Five year survival analysis of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 20(6), 2013, 384.
88. 88 Hooper, G.J., Gilchrist, N., Maxwell, R., et al. The effect of the Oxford uncemented medial compartment arthroplasty on the bone mineral density and content of the proximal tibia. Bone Joint J, 95-B(11), 2013, 1480.
89. 89 Hossain, F.S., Patel, S., Fernandez, M.A., et al. A performance based patient outcome score for active patients following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 21(1), 2013, 51.
90. 90 Howell, S.M., Howell, S.J., Kuznik, K.T., et al. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(3), 2013, 1000.
91. 91 Jacobs, C.A., Christensen, C.P., Factors influencing patient satisfaction two to five years after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 29(6), 2014, 1189.
92. 92 Jain, S., Wasnik, S., Hegde, C., et al. High-flexion mobile-bearing knees: impact on patellofemoral outcomes in 159 patients. J Knee Surg, 27(2), 2014, 113.
93. 93 Jenkins, D., Rodriguez, J., Ranawat, A., et al. A randomized, controlled, prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96(10), 2014, 851.
94. 94 Keurentjes, J.C., Van Tol, F.R., Fiocco, M., et al. Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Bone Joint Res, 3(1), 2014, 7.
95. 95 Keurentjes, J.C., Fiocco, M., Nelissen, R.G., Willingness to undergo surgery again validated clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol, 67(1), 2014, 114.
96. 96 Kim, Y.H., Park, J.W., Lim, H.M., et al. Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?. Int Orthop, 38(2), 2014, 297.
97. 97 Klit, J., Jacobsen, S., Rosenlund, S., et al. Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 912.
98. 98 Kong, C.G., Kim, G.H., Kim, D.W., et al. The effect of topical scar treatment on postoperative scar pain and pruritus after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 134(4), 2014, 555.
99. 99 Kong, C.G., Park, S.W., Yang, H., et al. The effect of femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty: genesis II prosthesis versus Vanguard prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 134(4), 2014, 571.
100. 100 Li, J., Wu, T., Xu, Z., et al. A pilot study of post-total knee replacement gait rehabilitation using lower limbs robot-assisted training system. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 24(2), 2014, 203.
101. 101 Lizaur-Utrilla, A., Miralles-Munoz, F.A., Sanz-Reig, J., et al. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a prospective matched study with follow-up of 5-10 years. J Arthroplasty, 29(6), 2014, 1192.
102. 102 Lohmann-Jensen, R., Holsgaard-Larsen, A., Emmeluth, C., et al. The efficacy of tourniquet assisted total knee arthroplasty on patient-reported and performance-based physical function: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15(1), 2014, 110.
103. 103 Lutzner, J., Hartmann, A., Lutzner, C., et al. Is range of motion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty influenced by prosthesis design? a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 961.
104. 104 Matassi, F., Duerinckx, J., Vandenneucker, H., et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of a preoperative home exercise program. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), 2014, 703.
105. 105 McGonagle, L., Bethell, L., Byrne, N., et al. The Rotaglide+ total knee replacement: a comparison of mobile versus fixed bearings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(7), 2014, 1626.
106. 106 Metsna, V., Vorobjov, S., Lepik, K., et al. Anterior knee pain following total knee replacement correlates with the OARSI score of the cartilage of the patella. Acta Orthop, 85(4), 2014, 427.
107. 107 Morrison, T.A., Liabaud, B., Geller, J.A., Functional results of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using inside-out soft-tissue balancing in the valgus knee. Curr Orthop Pract, 24(5), 2013, 504.
108. 108 Mufty, S., Vandenneucker, H., Bellemans, J., The influence of leg length difference on clinical outcome after revision TKA. Knee, 21(2), 2014, 424.
109. 109 Nam, D., Cody, E.A., Nguyen, J.T., et al. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty, 29(2), 2014, 288.
110. 110 Nanjayan, S.K., Swamy, G.N., Yellu, S., et al. In-hospital complications following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients. J Orthop Traumatol, 15(1), 2014, 29.
111. 111 Nouta, K.A., Pijls, B.G., Fiocco, M., et al. How to deal with lost to follow-up in total knee arthroplasty: a new method based on the competing risks approach. Int Orthop, 38(5), 2014, 953.
112. 112 Park, D.H., Leong, J., Palmer, S.J., Total knee arthroplasty with an oxidised zirconium femoral component: a 5-year follow-up study. J Orthop Surg, 22(1), 2014, 75.
113. 113 Perez-Prieto, D., Gil-Gonzalez, S., Pelfort, X., et al. Influence of depression on total knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty, 29(1), 2014, 44.
114. 114 Pinsornsak, P., Naratrikun, K., Chumchuen, S., The effect of infrapatellar fat pad excision on complications after minimally invasive TKA: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(2), 2014, 695.
115. 115 Pulavarti, R.S., Raut, V.V., McLauchlan, G.J., Patella denervation in primary total knee arthroplasty—a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 977.
116. 116 Rampersaud, Y.R., Lewis, S.J., Davey, J.R., et al. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee–part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life. Spine J, 14(2), 2014, 234.
117. 117 Riddle, D.L., Jiranek, W.A., Hayes, C.W., Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol, 66(8), 2014, 2134.
118. 118 Schimmel, J.J., Defoort, K.C., Heesterbeek, P.J., et al. Bicruciate substituting design does not improve maximal flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96(10), 2014, e81.
119. 119 Schroer, W.C., Stormont, D.M., Pietrzak, W.S., Seven-year survivorship and functional outcomes of the high-flexion Vanguard complete knee system. J Arthroplasty, 29(1), 2014, 61.
120. 120 Scott, C.E., Murray, R.C., MacDonald, D.J., et al. Staged bilateral total knee replacement: changes in expectations and outcomes between the first and second operations. Bone Joint J, 96-B(6), 2014, 752.
121. 121 Singh, J.A., Lewallen, D.G., Depression in primary TKA and higher medical comorbidities in revision TKA are associated with suboptimal subjective improvement in knee function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, 2014, 127.
122. 122 Staibano, P., Winemaker, M., Petruccelli, D., et al. Total joint arthroplasty and preoperative low back pain. J Arthroplasty, 29(5), 2014, 867.
123. 123 Tasker, A., Hassaballa, M., Murray, J., et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up. Knee, 21(1), 2014, 189.
124. 124 Utrillas-Compaired, A., De la Torre-Escuredo, B.J., Tebar-Martinez, A.J., et al. Does preoperative psychologic distress influence pain, function, and quality of life after TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(8), 2014, 2457.
125. 125 van Jonbergen, H.P., Scholtes, V.A., Poolman, R.W., A randomised, controlled trial of circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing: a concise follow-up at a mean of 3.7 years. Bone Joint J, 96-B(4), 2014, 473.
126. 126 Weston-Simons, J.S., Pandit, H., Kendrick, B.J., et al. The mid-term outcomes of the Oxford Domed Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 96-B(1), 2014, 59.
127. 127 Kirkham, J.J., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., et al. Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials, 14, 2013, 324.
128. 128 Riddle, D.L., Stratford, P.W., Bowman, D.H., Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum, 59(6), 2008, 876.
129. 129 Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol, 63(8), 2010, 834.
130. 130 von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 2007, 806.
131. 131 Araujo, F., Cordeiro, I., Ramiro, S., et al. Outcomes assessed in trials of gout and accordance with OMERACT-proposed domains: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology, 54(6), 2015, 981.
132. 132 Schumacher, H.R., Taylor, W., Edwards, L., et al. Outcome domains for studies of acute and chronic gout. J Rheumatol, 36(10), 2009, 2342.
133. 133 Escobar, A., Quintana, J.M., Arostegui, I., et al. Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 19(1), 2003, 57.
134. 134 Naylor, C.D., Williams, J.I., Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. Qual Health Care, 5(1), 1996, 20.
135. 135 Toye, F., Barlow, J., Wright, C., et al. A validation study of the New Zealand score for hip and knee surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 464, 2007, 190.
136. 136 Lofvendahl, S., Bizjajeva, S., Ranstam, J., et al. Indications for hip and knee replacement in Sweden. J Eval Clin Pract, 17(2), 2011, 251.
137. 137 Lawson, E.H., Gibbons, M.M., Ko, C.Y., et al. The appropriateness method has acceptable reliability and validity for assessing overuse and underuse of surgical procedures. J Clin Epidemiol, 65(11), 2012, 1133.
138. 138 Mancuso, C.A., Sculco, T.P., Wickiewicz, T.L., et al. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A(7), 2001, 1005.
139. 139 Carr, A.J., Robertsson, O., Graves, S., et al. Knee replacement. Lancet, 379(9823), 2012, 1331.
140. 140 Van Manen, M.D., Nace, J., Mont, M.A., Management of primary knee osteoarthritis and indications for total knee arthroplasty for general practitioners. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 112(11), 2012, 709.
141. 141 Gossec, L., Paternotte, S., Bingham, C.O. 3rd, et al., OARSI-OMERACT Task Force Total Articular Replacement as Outcome Measure in OA. OARSI/OMERACT initiative to define states of severity and indication for joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis. An OMERACT 10 Special Interest Group. J Rheumatol, 38(8), 2011, 1765.
142. 142 Lawson, E.H., Gibbons, M.M., Ingraham, A.M., et al. Appropriateness criteria to assess variations in surgical procedure use in the United States. Arch Surg, 146(12), 2011, 1433.
143. 143 Ghomrawi, H.M., Alexiades, M., Pavlov, H., et al. Evaluation of two appropriateness criteria for total knee replacement. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 66(11), 2014, 1749.
144. 144 Wylde, V., Bruce, J., Beswick, A., et al. Assessment of chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 65(11), 2013, 1795.