A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: Two-year clinical results

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 96 B, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 907-913

  Dossett, H G ^a   Estrada, N A ^b   Swartz, G J ^c   LeFevre, G W ^c   Kwasman, B G ^c  

^a Phoenix Veterans' Affairs Health Care System   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; KINEMATICALLY ALIGNED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; KINEMATICS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICALLY ALIGNED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESIS; SKIN EXFOLIATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING DISTANCE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; LENGTH OF STAY; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT; KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE REPLACEMENT; TKA; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ALIGNMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ALIGNMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85047688101     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:57-63.
2. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:893- 900. (Pubitemid 47322786)
3. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;290:259-268.
4. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A (Suppl):71-80.
5. Howell SM, Hull ML. Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scott AE. Surgery of the knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2012:1255-68.
6. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1000-1007.
7. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 2008;31:857-863.
8. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 2009;33:1571-1575.
9. Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, Lefevre GW, Kwasman BG. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012;35:160-169.
10. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1010-1014.
11. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW. A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin Rheumatol 1986;5:231-241.
12. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14. (Pubitemid 20204775)
13. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:98-194.
14. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:45-53.
15. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977;59-A:77-79. (Pubitemid 8030304)
16. No authors listed. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical- Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System. (date last accessed May 16 2014).
17. Meding JB, Reddleman K, Keating ME, et al. Total knee replacement in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:208-216. (Pubitemid 37413641)
18. Zywiel MG, Stroh S, Lee SY, Bonutti PM, Mont MA. Chronic opioid use prior to total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:1988-1993.
19. Kassam AM, Dieppe P, Toms AD. An analysis of time and money spent on investigating painful total knee replacements. BJMP 2012;5:5261.
20. No authors listed. The New Zealand Joint Registry Thirteen Year Report. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/NJR/reports/A2D65CA3.pdf (date last accessed 28 October 2013).
21. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobb, A, Framptom CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:413-418.
22. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis: a ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:423-431.
23. Hsu HP, Garg A, Walker PS, Spector M, Ewald FC. Effect of knee component alignment on tibial load distribution with clinical correlation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:135-144. (Pubitemid 20204793)
24. Krishnan SP, Dawood A, Richards R, Henckel J, Hart AJ. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B:1457-1461.
25. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:354- 359.
26. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94(11SupplA):95- 99.
27. Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2271-2280.
28. Williams DP, Blakey CM, Hadfield SG, et al. Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:45-51.
29. Breeman S, Campbell MK, Dakin H, et al. Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:486-492.