Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 95, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Bistolfi, Alessandro ^a   Massazza, Giuseppe ^a   Lee, Gwo Chin ^b   Deledda, Davide ^a   Berchialla, Paola ^a   Crova, Maurizio ^a  

^a CTO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; BONE ATROPHY; BONE NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FIXED-BEARING IMPLANT; FLEXION CONTRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT SURVIVAL; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE BEARING IMPLANT; MOTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL; THROMBOSIS PREVENTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 84896377965     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00327     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(5):619-28.
2. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994 May 4;271(17):1349-57.
3. Tarkin IS, Bridgeman JT, Jardon OM, Garvin KL. Successful biologic fixation with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun;20(4):481-6.
4. Buechel FF Sr. Long-term follow up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;404:40-50.
5. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):980-6.
6. Dixon MC, Brown RR, Parsch D, Scott RD. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87(3): 598-603.
7. Dennis DA, Clayton ML, O'Donnell S, Mack RP, Stringer EA. Posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. Average 11-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Aug;(281):168-76.
8. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long term follow-up and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(4):575-82.
9. Parsch D, Krüger M, Moser MT, Geiger F. Follow-up of 11-16 years after modular fixed-bearing TKA. Int Orthop. 2009 Apr;33(2):431-5.
10. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Nov;77(11):1713-20.
11. Nakamura E, Banks SA, Tanaka A, Sei A, Mizuta H. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics during deep flexion kneeling in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1120-4.
12. Argenson JN, O'Connor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Mar;74(2):228-32.
13. Buechel FF. Low contact stress meniscal bearing knee replacement: design concepts, failure mechanisms and long-term survivorship. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, editors. Current concepts in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p 47-64.
14. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Sep;68(7):1041-51.
15. Tamaki M, Tomita T, Watanabe T, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6): 972-8.
16. Heim CS, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS. Classification of mobilebearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83 (Pt 1)(Suppl 2):32-7.
17. Kelly NH, Fu RH, Wright TM, Padgett DE. Wear damage in mobile-bearing TKA is as severe as that in fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1): 123-30.
18. Haider H, Garvin K. Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2677-85.
19. Kim YH, Kim DY, Kim JS. Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):904-10.
20. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, de Steiger R, Dodd CA, Gibbons M, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jan;85(1):62-7.
21. Huang CH, Liau JJ, Cheng CK. Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2007;2:1-8.
22. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Sep;58(6):754-65.
23. Aichroth P, Freeman MAR, Smillie IS, Souter WA; From the British Orthopaedic Association Research Sub-Committee. A knee function assessment chart. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Aug;60(3):308-9.
24. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;248(248):9-12.
25. Carothers JT, Kim RH, Dennis DA, Southworth C. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jun;26(4):537-42.
26. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(10):1317-23.
27. Garcia RM, Kraay MJ, Messerschmitt PJ, Goldberg VM, Rimnac CM. Analysis of retrieved ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial components from rotatingplatform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):131-8. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
28. Gioe TJ, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos ER, Singh J. Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2104-12.
29. Jacobs W, Anderson PG, Limbeek J, Wymenga AAB. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD003130, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003130. pub2.
30. Lädermann A, Lübbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D. Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee. 2008 Jun;15(3):206-10.
31. Matsuda S, Mizu-uchi H, Fukagawa S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Matsuda H, Iwamoto Y. Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results of total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Oct;18(10):1311-6.
32. Kalisvaart MM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):481-9.