A validation study of the New Zealand score for hip and knee surgery

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 464, Issue , 2007, Pages 190-195

  Toyé, Francine ^a   Barlow, Julie ^b   Wright, Chris ^c   Lamb, Sarah E ^d  

^a NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW ZEALAND SCORE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; COST OF ILLNESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HOSPITALIZATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; STANDARD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 35848965723     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815725d9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. BMJ. 1994;309:188.
2. th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2002.
3. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. User Guide IV; 2000. Available at: www.womac.org; http://www.womac.org/womac/womac_userguide.htm. Accessed August 1, 2007.
4. rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000.
5. British Medical Association. Waiting List Prioritisation Scoring Systems - A Discussion Paper. Health Policy and Economic Research Unit. Discussion Paper Number 6. London, UK: British Medical Association; 1998.
6. Coleman B, McChesney S, Twaddle B. Does the priority scoring system for joint replacement really identify those in most need? N Z Med J. 2005;118:U1463.
7. Coyte PC, Hawker G, Croxford R, Attard C, Wright JG. Variation in rheumatologists' and family physicians' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:730-738.
8. Dent THS, Cunningham SL, Hook WE, Morris RJ, Sylvester NC. The MODEL project: a scoring system to manage demand for cataract and joint replacement surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:917-919.
9. Derrett S, Paul C, Herbison P, Williams H. Evaluation of explicit prioritisation for elective surgery: a prospective study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(suppl 1):S14-S22.
10. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 26. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
11. Dieppe P, Basler HD, Chard J, Croft P, Dixon J, Hurley M, Lohmander S, Raspe H. Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis; effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:73-83.
12. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Aróstegui I, Askárate J, Güenaga JI, Arenaza JC, Garai I. Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:57-70.
13. Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:680-689.
14. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:i-iv, 1-74.
15. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. BMJ. 1997;314:131-134.
16. Harry LE, Nolan JF, Elender F, Lewis JC. Who gets priority? Waiting list assessment using a scoring system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(6 suppl):186-188.
17. Hefford B, Holmes AC. Booking systems for elective services: the New Zealand experience. Aust Health Rev. 1999;22:61-73.
18. Jüni P, Dieppe P, Donovan J, Peters T, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Frankel S. Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42:516-521.
19. Kelly KD, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Newman SC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Change in pain and function while waiting for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:351-359.
20. Kennedy LG, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Dieppe PA. When should we do knee replacements? Knee. 2003;10:161-166.
21. Kipping R, Robert G, McLeod H, Clark J. A Review of Priority Scoring and Slot Systems for Elective Surgery. Birmingham, UK: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; 2002.
22. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1856-1864.
23. Mancuso CA, Ranawat CS, Esdaile JM, Johanson NA, Charlson ME. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties: results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:34-46.
24. Mangione TW. Mail Surveys - Improving the Quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
25. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1987.
26. Naylor CD, Williams JI. Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:20-30.
27. nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995.
28. Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:9-18.
29. rd ed. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers; 1996.
30. Tennant A, Fear J, Pickering A, Hillman M, Cutts A, Chamberlain MA. Prevalence of knee problems in the population aged 55 years and over: identifying the need for knee arthroplasty. BMJ. 1995;310:1291-1293.
31. Thomas KS, Muir KR, Doherty M, Jones AC, O'Reilly SC, Bassey EJ. Home based exercise programme for knee pain and knee osteoarthritis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325:752-757.
32. Tierney WM, Fitzgerald JF, Heck DA, Kennedy JM, Katz BP, Melfi CA, Dittus RS, Allen DI, Freund DA. Tricompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of orthopaedic surgeons' self reported performance rates with surgical indications, contraindications, and expected outcomes. Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:209-217.
33. Tomlinson M, Cullen J. A clinical audit of patients on an orthopaedic waiting list for greater than two years. N Z Med J. 1992;105:266-268.
34. Wall PD. Pain - The Science of Suffering. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2000.
35. Williams JI, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Arshinoff R, Young N, Naylor CD. The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract. 1997;3:59-68.
36. Wright JG, Coyte P, Hawker G, Bombardier C, Cooke D, Heck D, Dittus R, Freund D. Variation in orthopedic surgeons perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement. CMAJ. 1995;152:687-697.