Factors influencing patient satisfaction two to five years after primary total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1189-1191

  Jacobs, Cale A ^a   Christensen, Christian P ^a  

^a LEXINGTON CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Instability; Pain; Patient satisfaction; Stiffness; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; REOPERATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

INSTABILITY; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STIFFNESS; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84901028972     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Schroer W.C., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(8 Suppl):116.
2. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2003;20(1):1.
3. Scott C.E.H., Howie C.R., MacDonald D., et al. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement. A prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010, 92-B(9):1253.
4. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989, (248):13.
5. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System 2009.
6. Dalury D.F., Pomeroy D.L., Gorab R.S., et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(8 Suppl):120.
7. Dy C.J., Bozic K.J., Padgett D.E., et al. Risk factors for early revision of total knee arthroplasty. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Chicago, IL 2013, 428.
8. Thiele K., Perka C., Matziolis G., et al. Failure mechanism of knee arthroplasties: a retrospective analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Chicago, IL 2013, 652.
9. Judge A., Arden N.K., Price A., et al. Assessing patients for joint replacment. Can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection?. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93-B(12):1660.
10. Roth J.S., Buuehler K.C., Shen J., et al. Patient factors predict functional outcomes after cruciate retaining TKA. A 2-year follow-up analysis. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(8):1321.
11. Liebs T.R., Kloos S.-A., Herzberg W., et al. The significance of an asymmetric extension gap on routine radiographs after total knee replacement. A new sign and its clinical significance. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B(4):472.
12. Lingard E.A., Sledge C.B., Learmonth I.D. The Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88-A(6):1201.
13. Sj"ling M., Nordahl G., Olofsson N., et al. The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 51:169.
14. Clement N.D., Muzammil A., MacDonald D., et al. Socioeconomic status affects the early outcome of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93-B(4):464.