Is range of motion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty influenced by prosthesis design? A prospective randomized trial

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 961-965

  Lützner, Jörg ^a   Hartmann, Albrecht ^a   Lützner, Cornelia ^a   Kirschner, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Design; Range of motion; Results; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRUCIATE RETAINING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; DEATH; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART FAILURE; HEMATOMA; HIGH FLEXION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG INSUFFICIENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION; RESULTS; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84899111785     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.046     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lützner J., Kasten P., Günther K.P., et al. Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2009, 5(6):309.
2. Mancuso C.A., Sculco T.P., Wickiewicz T.L., et al. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A(7):1005.
3. Devers B.N., Conditt M.A., Jamieson M.L., et al. Does greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(2):178.
4. Gandhi R., Tso P., Davey J.R., et al. High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee 2009, 16(1):14.
5. Hamilton W.G., Sritulanondha S., Engh C.A. Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review. Orthopedics 2011, 34(9):e500-e503.
6. Luo S.X., Su W., Zhao J.M., et al. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(6):847.
7. Sumino T., Gadikota H.R., Varadarajan K.M., et al. Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis. Int Orthop 2011, 35(9):1309.
8. Klein G.R., Restrepo C., Hozack W.J. The effect of knee component design changes on range of motion evaluation in vivo by a computerized navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(5):623.
9. Lee D.C., Kim D.H., Scott R.D., et al. Intraoperative flexion against gravity as an indication of ultimate range of motion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13(5):500.
10. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248(248):13.
11. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1995, 41(10):1359.
12. Song E.K., Park S.J., Yoon T.R., et al. Hi-flexion and gender-specific designs fail to provide significant increases in range of motion during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(6):1081.
13. Bin S.I., Nam T.S. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15(4):350.
14. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(5):674.
15. Laskin R.S. The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007, 30(8 Suppl):86.
16. Lionberger D.R., Eggers M.D., Brewer K.E., et al. Improved knee flexion following high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2012, 7:22.
17. Nutton R.W., Wade F.A., Coutts F.J., et al. Does a mobile-bearing, high-flexion design increase knee flexion after total knee replacement?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(8):1051.
18. Weeden S.H., Schmidt R. A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(3):349.
19. Choi W.C., Lee S., Seong S.C., et al. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(16):2634.
20. Endres S. High-flexion versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a 5-year study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011, 19(2):226.
21. Hamilton W.G., Sritulanondha S., Engh C.A. Prospective randomized comparison of high-flex and standard rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(6 Suppl):28.
22. Kim Y.H., Choi Y., Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(8):1874.
23. Lee S.M., Seong S.C., Lee S., et al. Outcomes of the different types of total knee arthroplasty with the identical femoral geometry. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012, 24(4):214.
24. Malik A., Salas A., Ben A.J., et al. Range of motion and function are similar in patients undergoing TKA with posterior stabilised and high-flexion inserts. Int Orthop 2010, 34(7):965.
25. McCalden R.W., MacDonald S.J., Bourne R.B., et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(6 Suppl):33.
26. Minoda Y., Aihara M., Sakawa A., et al. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion cruciate retaining total knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(5):674.
27. Ng F.Y., Wong H.L., Yau W.P., et al. Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2008, 32(6):795.
28. Nutton R.W., van der Linden M.L., Rowe P.J., et al. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(1):37.
29. Seon J.K., Park S.J., Lee K.B., et al. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(3):672.
30. Wajsfisz A., Biau D., Boisrenoult P., et al. Comparative study of intraoperative knee flexion with three different TKR designs. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010, 96(3):242.
31. Wohlrab D., Hube R., Zeh A., et al. Clinical and radiological results of high flex total knee arthroplasty: a 5year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009, 129(1):21.
32. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Scuderi G.R., et al. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:53.
33. Kurosaka M., Yoshiya S., Mizuno K., et al. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17(4 Suppl 1):59.